Causal Set Theory for Agent-Based Multiverse Knowledge Graph Generation
Abstract
We present a framework for dynamically generating interactive narrative multiverses using Causal Set Theory (CST) as the underlying mathematical structure. Documents become discrete spacetime events, reader choices determine causal relationships, and the emergent large-scale structure forms a coherent narrative universe with genuine relativistic properties.
1. Theoretical Foundation
1.1 Physical-Narrative Correspondence
Core Mapping:
- Documents ↔ Spacetime Events (discrete points in narrative spacetime)
- Reader Choices ↔ Causal Links (directed edges creating partial ordering)
- Narrative Coherence ↔ Lattice Optimization Pressure (structural consistency)
- Thematic Coherence ↔ Field Configuration Energy (content consistency)
1.2 Causal Structure
Partial Ordering Relation: For documents D₁, D₂ in the narrative multiverse, D₁ ≺ D₂ iff:
- D₁ causally precedes D₂ (information/events in D₁ influence D₂)
- There exists a directed path of reader choices connecting D₁ → D₂
- The causal relationship preserves narrative consistency
Causal Diamonds: Regions of story-space where certain document sequences are mandatory:
1
2
3
4
5
D_future
/ \
D_past ≺ D_present ≺ D_consequence
\ /
D_branch
2. Dynamic Graph Generation
2.1 Birth Process Dynamics
Document Generation Probability:
1
P(new_doc | causal_context) = f(ρ_local, θ_coherence, E_thematic)
Where:
ρ_local
: Local density of existing causal relationshipsθ_coherence
: Narrative coherence tensor at that graph locationE_thematic
: Thematic field energy requiring resolution
Accretion Rules:
- Causal Completeness: If reader choice creates causal necessity, corresponding document must be generated
- Coherence Preservation: New documents minimize narrative stress tensor
- Thematic Consistency: Generated content preserves field configuration energy
- Temporal Ordering: New documents respect established causal precedence
2.2 Causal Link Formation
Reader Choice Mapping:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
def process_reader_choice(character_state, dialogue_input, context):
# Extract causal parameters from roleplay interaction
causal_vector = extract_causality(character_state, dialogue_input)
# Determine which future documents become accessible
accessible_futures = causal_cone(current_position, causal_vector)
# Generate new documents if causal necessity requires
if causal_gap_detected(accessible_futures):
new_docs = generate_causal_completion(gap_region)
return next_document_set
3. Emergent Spacetime Geometry
3.1 Narrative Manifold Structure
Discrete to Continuous Limit: As document density increases, the causal set approximates a smooth narrative manifold with:
- Metric Signature: (-, +, +, +) where timelike dimension represents narrative causality
- Curvature: Induced by thematic “mass-energy” that bends story trajectories
- Geodesics: Optimal reader paths through the narrative spacetime
Causal Horizons: Documents beyond the reader’s causal reach:
1
Horizon(reader_position) = {D : no causal path from reader choices to D}
3.2 Lorentz Invariance
Path Independence: The essential narrative structure remains invariant under reader path transformations:
- Different readers can traverse same causal events in different orders
- Core story relationships preserved across all valid trajectories
- Proper time: Each reader experiences their own narrative timeline
4. Multi-Scale Coherence Dynamics
4.1 Coupled Field Equations
Narrative Lattice Evolution:
1
∂²g_μν/∂τ² = -Γ(∇coherence) - κT_narrative
Thematic Field Dynamics:
1
□φ_theme + V'(φ_theme) = J_reader_choices
Where:
g_μν
: Narrative spacetime metric (graph connectivity)T_narrative
: Stress-energy tensor from plot inconsistenciesφ_theme
: Thematic field configurationJ_reader_choices
: Source term from reader interactions
4.2 Cross-Scale Coupling
Microscale → Macroscale:
- Individual reader choices create local causal perturbations
- Accumulation leads to large-scale narrative structure evolution
- Renormalization: Short-distance story details average out at large scales
Macroscale → Microscale:
- Global thematic coherence constrains local document generation
- Effective theory: Local story dynamics influenced by global narrative curvature
5. Implementation Architecture
5.1 Agent-Based Generation Engine
Core Components:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
class NarrativeCST:
def __init__(self):
self.causal_graph = CausalSet()
self.coherence_field = NarrativeCoherence()
self.thematic_field = ThematicField()
self.generation_agent = DocumentAgent()
def process_reader_interaction(self, roleplay_input):
# Update causal structure
new_links = self.extract_causal_relationships(roleplay_input)
self.causal_graph.add_edges(new_links)
# Check for causal completeness
gaps = self.find_causal_gaps()
# Generate necessary documents
new_documents = []
for gap in gaps:
doc = self.generation_agent.create_document(
causal_context=gap,
coherence_constraints=self.coherence_field.local_state(gap),
thematic_requirements=self.thematic_field.local_state(gap)
)
new_documents.append(doc)
# Update fields
self.coherence_field.propagate_changes(new_documents)
self.thematic_field.evolve(new_documents)
return self.get_accessible_documents(roleplay_input.reader_position)
5.2 Document Type Manifold
Coordinate Charts: Different document types occupy different regions of narrative spacetime:
- Scientific Papers: High technical coherence, low emotional content
- Personal Narratives: High emotional coherence, variable technical content
- Historical Records: Fixed causal precedence, medium coherence requirements
- Philosophical Essays: High thematic coherence, flexible causal positioning
Transition Functions: Smooth transformations between document types based on reader trajectory:
1
2
3
4
5
6
def document_transition(current_type, reader_vector, causal_context):
# Calculate optimal document type for new causal position
coherence_requirements = analyze_narrative_stress(causal_context)
thematic_needs = analyze_field_configuration(causal_context)
return optimize_document_type(coherence_requirements, thematic_needs)
6. Validation and Consistency
6.1 Causal Consistency Checks
Acyclicity Enforcement:
1
2
3
4
5
def validate_causal_structure(new_links):
for link in new_links:
if creates_causal_loop(link):
return resolve_paradox(link)
return True
Temporal Ordering: Ensure all generated documents respect established narrative chronology while allowing for multiple consistent interpretations.
6.2 Coherence Metrics
Narrative Stress Tensor:
1
S_μν = ∂²E_narrative/∂g_μν∂g_ρσ
Measures structural inconsistencies in the causal graph.
Thematic Field Energy:
1
E_theme = ∫(½(∇φ)² + V(φ) + φJ_reader)d⁴x
Quantifies philosophical consistency across the multiverse.
7. Emergent Properties
7.1 Narrative Thermodynamics
Entropy Growth:
- Story complexity increases as causal graph grows
- Arrow of narrative time: Irreversible accumulation of plot elements
- Heat death: Eventual saturation where no new meaningful documents can be generated
Information Geometry:
- Reader choices follow geodesics in information space
- Surprise: Curvature in narrative probability manifold
- Learning: Gradient descent on story understanding landscape
7.2 Phase Transitions
Genre Shifts: Critical points where narrative structure undergoes discontinuous change:
- Science → Horror (when cosmic doom becomes apparent)
- Individual → Collective (scale transitions in story focus)
- Human → Post-Human (evolutionary phase transitions)
8. Applications and Extensions
8.1 Interactive Storytelling
Personalized Multiverse Generation: Each reader creates their own branch of the causal set, with shared backbone structure but unique experiential paths.
Collaborative World-Building: Multiple readers contribute to same causal structure, creating emergent narrative complexity beyond any individual contribution.
8.2 Educational Applications
Science Communication: Complex scientific concepts naturally emerge through roleplay interactions, with technical documents generated on-demand based on reader curiosity.
Historical Simulation: Causal set structure can model historical events with multiple perspectives and counterfactual branches.
9. Future Directions
9.1 Quantum Extensions
Narrative Superposition: Multiple potential documents exist in superposition until reader choice collapses them into definite states.
Entanglement: Distant parts of the narrative multiverse exhibit quantum correlations through shared thematic coherence.
9.2 Machine Learning Integration
Causal Discovery: Use ML to automatically infer optimal causal structures from reader interaction patterns.
Predictive Generation: Train models to anticipate reader preferences and pre-generate likely narrative branches.
Conclusion
By treating interactive narratives as discrete spacetime manifolds governed by causal set theory, we create genuinely physics-based storytelling systems. The resulting multiverses exhibit emergent complexity, maintain consistency across scales, and provide rich, personalized experiences that evolve through reader interaction.
This framework bridges computational creativity, fundamental physics, and human narrative understanding, suggesting new approaches to both storytelling technology and our understanding of information, causality, and meaning in complex systems.
The story becomes a living universe that readers help optimize through their choices, creating unique contributions to an ever-evolving narrative cosmos.