Software Design Document: Voice-Centric Software Development and Data Science Agent
System: A sophisticated AI agent system that leverages voice interfaces to facilitate software development and data science workflows. The system enables developers and data scientists to interact through natural language voice commands to design architectures, write code, analyze data, manage projects, and collaborate on technical tasks. The agent integrates with development tools, data science platforms, and project management systems to provide a seamless voice-driven development experience.
Generated: 2025-11-26 13:36:55
Use Cases & Actors
Voice-Centric Software Development and Data Science Agent
Comprehensive Use Case Documentation
1. ACTOR IDENTIFICATION
1.1 Primary Actors
Actor: Software Developer (DEV)
Role: Primary user who develops software applications using voice commands Goals:
- Design software architectures through voice interaction
- Write, review, and refactor code efficiently
- Manage version control operations
- Debug applications with voice assistance
- Collaborate with team members on code
Characteristics:
- Proficiency in multiple programming languages
- Familiar with development tools and IDEs
- Requires low-latency voice processing
- Works across multiple projects simultaneously
Actor: Data Scientist (DS)
Role: Analyzes data and builds machine learning models using voice interface Goals:
- Explore and analyze datasets through voice commands
- Build and train machine learning models
- Visualize data insights
- Manage data pipelines
- Document analysis findings
Characteristics:
- Expertise in statistical analysis and ML frameworks
- Works with large datasets
- Requires integration with Jupyter notebooks and data tools
- Needs reproducible analysis workflows
Actor: Project Manager (PM)
Role: Oversees project execution and team coordination Goals:
- Track project progress and milestones
- Manage team assignments and workload
- Monitor project risks and issues
- Generate project reports
- Facilitate team communication
Characteristics:
- Non-technical or semi-technical background
- Requires high-level project visibility
- Needs real-time status updates
- Focuses on timeline and resource management
Actor: DevOps Engineer (DEVOPS)
Role: Manages infrastructure, deployment, and system operations Goals:
- Deploy applications to various environments
- Monitor system performance and health
- Manage CI/CD pipelines
- Configure infrastructure as code
- Handle incident response
Characteristics:
- Deep infrastructure and automation knowledge
- Requires integration with deployment tools
- Needs real-time monitoring capabilities
- Focuses on system reliability and performance
Actor: Technical Architect (ARCH)
Role: Designs system architecture and technical solutions Goals:
- Design scalable system architectures
- Define technical standards and best practices
- Review architectural decisions
- Mentor development teams
- Evaluate technology choices
Characteristics:
- Extensive technical experience
- Requires high-level system design capabilities
- Needs access to architectural documentation
- Focuses on long-term technical strategy
Actor: Security Officer (SEC)
Role: Ensures security compliance and data protection Goals:
- Audit code for security vulnerabilities
- Manage access control and permissions
- Monitor security incidents
- Ensure compliance with regulations
- Review security policies
Characteristics:
- Security and compliance expertise
- Requires audit trail access
- Needs integration with security tools
- Focuses on risk mitigation
1.2 Secondary Actors (External Systems)
External System: IDE Integration Service (IDE-SVC)
Role: Provides integration with development environments Responsibilities:
- Receive code generation requests
- Execute code snippets
- Provide IDE state information
- Manage file operations
External System: Git Repository Service (GIT-SVC)
Role: Manages version control operations Responsibilities:
- Handle commit, push, pull operations
- Manage branches and merge requests
- Provide repository information
- Track change history
External System: Jupyter Notebook Service (JUPYTER-SVC)
Role: Manages data science notebooks Responsibilities:
- Execute notebook cells
- Manage notebook state
- Generate visualizations
- Export analysis results
External System: CI/CD Pipeline Service (CICD-SVC)
Role: Manages continuous integration and deployment Responsibilities:
- Trigger build pipelines
- Execute tests
- Deploy applications
- Provide pipeline status
External System: Monitoring and Analytics Service (MONITOR-SVC)
Role: Provides system monitoring and analytics Responsibilities:
- Collect performance metrics
- Generate alerts
- Provide system health status
- Track resource utilization
External System: Authentication Service (AUTH-SVC)
Role: Manages user authentication and authorization Responsibilities:
- Authenticate users
- Manage access tokens
- Enforce permission policies
- Audit access logs
External System: Voice Processing Engine (VOICE-ENGINE)
Role: Processes voice input and generates voice output Responsibilities:
- Convert speech to text (STT)
- Convert text to speech (TTS)
- Perform voice recognition
- Handle voice quality optimization
External System: Natural Language Processing Service (NLP-SVC)
Role: Processes and understands natural language commands Responsibilities:
- Parse voice commands
- Extract intent and entities
- Resolve ambiguities
- Generate contextual responses
External System: Project Management Service (PM-SVC)
Role: Manages project data and workflows Responsibilities:
- Store project information
- Manage tasks and assignments
- Track milestones
- Generate reports
External System: Data Storage Service (STORAGE-SVC)
Role: Manages persistent data storage Responsibilities:
- Store user data and preferences
- Manage file storage
- Provide data retrieval
- Handle backup and recovery
1.3 Actor Relationships
graph TD
DEV["Software Developer"]
DS["Data Scientist"]
PM["Project Manager"]
DEVOPS["DevOps Engineer"]
ARCH["Technical Architect"]
SEC["Security Officer"]
VOICE["Voice Processing Engine"]
NLP["NLP Service"]
IDE["IDE Integration"]
GIT["Git Repository"]
JUPYTER["Jupyter Notebook"]
CICD["CI/CD Pipeline"]
MONITOR["Monitoring Service"]
AUTH["Authentication"]
PM_SVC["Project Management"]
STORAGE["Data Storage"]
DEV -->|Uses| VOICE
DS -->|Uses| VOICE
PM -->|Uses| VOICE
DEVOPS -->|Uses| VOICE
ARCH -->|Uses| VOICE
SEC -->|Uses| VOICE
VOICE -->|Processes| NLP
NLP -->|Integrates| IDE
NLP -->|Integrates| GIT
NLP -->|Integrates| JUPYTER
NLP -->|Integrates| CICD
NLP -->|Integrates| MONITOR
NLP -->|Integrates| PM_SVC
AUTH -->|Authenticates| DEV
AUTH -->|Authenticates| DS
AUTH -->|Authenticates| PM
AUTH -->|Authenticates| DEVOPS
AUTH -->|Authenticates| ARCH
AUTH -->|Authenticates| SEC
STORAGE -->|Stores| IDE
STORAGE -->|Stores| GIT
STORAGE -->|Stores| JUPYTER
STORAGE -->|Stores| PM_SVC
SEC -->|Audits| AUTH
SEC -->|Monitors| STORAGE
ARCH -->|Designs| IDE
ARCH -->|Designs| CICD
ARCH -->|Designs| MONITOR
PM -->|Manages| DEV
PM -->|Manages| DS
PM -->|Manages| DEVOPS
2. USE CASE CATALOG
UC-001: Process Voice Command
UC-ID: UC-001
Name: Process Voice Command
Primary Actor: Software Developer, Data Scientist, Project Manager, DevOps Engineer, Technical Architect, Security
Officer
Secondary Actors: Voice Processing Engine, NLP Service, Authentication Service
Preconditions:
- User is authenticated and authorized
- Voice processing engine is operational
- NLP service is available
- User has active voice session
Main Success Scenario:
- User initiates voice command by pressing voice activation button or saying wake word
- Voice Processing Engine captures audio stream
- Voice Processing Engine converts speech to text (STT) with >95% accuracy
- NLP Service receives transcribed text
- NLP Service parses command and extracts intent and entities
- NLP Service validates command syntax and context
- NLP Service routes command to appropriate handler service
- Handler service executes command
- System generates response
- Voice Processing Engine converts response to speech (TTS)
- System plays audio response to user
- System logs command execution for audit trail
Alternative Flows:
AF-001-A: Speech Recognition Failure
- At step 3: If STT accuracy is <80%
- 3a. Voice Processing Engine requests user to repeat command
- 3b. User repeats command
- 3c. Resume from step 3
AF-001-B: Intent Ambiguity
- At step 5: If NLP Service cannot determine intent with >85% confidence
- 5a. NLP Service generates clarification question
- 5b. System plays clarification question to user
- 5c. User provides clarification
- 5d. NLP Service re-analyzes command with additional context
- 5e. Resume from step 6
AF-001-C: Command Validation Failure
- At step 6: If command syntax is invalid
- 6a. NLP Service generates error message with suggestions
- 6b. System plays error message to user
- 6c. User can retry or cancel
- 6d. If retry: Resume from step 1; If cancel: End use case
AF-001-D: Service Unavailability
- At step 7: If handler service is unavailable
- 7a. System generates error message
- 7b. System suggests alternative actions or retry time
- 7c. System plays message to user
- 7d. End use case
AF-001-E: Authentication Failure
- At precondition: If user is not authenticated
- Pre-a. System requests authentication
- Pre-b. User provides credentials
- Pre-c. Authentication Service validates credentials
- Pre-d. If valid: Continue with main flow; If invalid: Deny access
Postconditions:
- Command execution is logged
- User receives response (audio or visual)
- System state is updated if applicable
- Audit trail is recorded
Business Rules:
- BR-001: All voice commands must be processed within 500ms latency
- BR-002: Voice command accuracy must be ≥95%
- BR-003: All commands must be authenticated and authorized
- BR-004: Command execution must be logged for audit purposes
- BR-005: System must support context-aware command processing
- BR-006: Voice responses must be generated within 1 second
- BR-007: System must handle concurrent voice sessions from multiple users
Traceability:
- Relates to: FR-001, FR-002, FR-003, NFR-001, NFR-002
UC-002: Design Software Architecture
UC-ID: UC-002
Name: Design Software Architecture
Primary Actor: Technical Architect, Software Developer
Secondary Actors: IDE Integration Service, NLP Service, Data Storage Service
Preconditions:
- User is authenticated as Technical Architect or Senior Developer
- Project context is established
- Architecture design tools are available
- User has appropriate permissions
Main Success Scenario:
- User initiates architecture design session with voice command
- System loads project context and existing architecture
- User describes architectural requirements through voice
- NLP Service extracts architectural components and relationships
- System generates architecture diagram based on requirements
- System displays diagram to user for review
- User provides feedback or modifications through voice commands
- System updates architecture diagram
- User requests architecture documentation generation
- System generates comprehensive architecture documentation
- System stores architecture design in repository
- System notifies team members of architecture update
Alternative Flows:
AF-002-A: Architecture Validation Failure
- At step 5: If generated architecture violates design principles
- 5a. System identifies violations and explains issues
- 5b. System suggests improvements
- 5c. User can accept suggestions or modify manually
- 5d. Resume from step 5
AF-002-B: Complexity Threshold Exceeded
- At step 4: If architecture complexity exceeds threshold
- 4a. System suggests decomposition strategies
- 4b. User can accept suggestions or continue
- 4c. Resume from step 5
AF-002-C: Conflicting Requirements
- At step 3: If user provides conflicting requirements
- 3a. System identifies conflicts
- 3b. System requests clarification
- 3c. User resolves conflicts
- 3d. Resume from step 4
Postconditions:
- Architecture design is documented
- Architecture diagram is generated and stored
- Team members are notified
- Architecture is available for implementation
- Design decisions are recorded
Business Rules:
- BR-008: Architecture must follow organizational standards
- BR-009: Architecture must support scalability requirements
- BR-010: Architecture must include security considerations
- BR-011: Architecture documentation must be auto-generated
- BR-012: Architecture changes must be version controlled
- BR-013: Architecture must be reviewed by Technical Architect
Traceability:
- Relates to: FR-004, FR-005, NFR-003, NFR-004
UC-003: Generate Code
UC-ID: UC-003
Name: Generate Code
Primary Actor: Software Developer
Secondary Actors: IDE Integration Service, NLP Service, Git Repository Service
Preconditions:
- User is authenticated as Software Developer
- Project is selected
- IDE is connected and ready
- Code generation templates are available
- User has write permissions to repository
Main Success Scenario:
- User initiates code generation with voice command
- User specifies code requirements through natural language
- NLP Service extracts code specifications (language, framework, patterns)
- System retrieves relevant code templates and examples
- System generates code based on specifications
- System displays generated code to user for review
- User reviews code and provides feedback
- System refines code based on feedback
- User approves generated code
- System inserts code into IDE at specified location
- System formats code according to project standards
- System commits code to Git repository with auto-generated message
- System notifies team of code generation
Alternative Flows:
AF-003-A: Code Quality Issues
- At step 5: If generated code has quality issues
- 5a. System identifies issues (complexity, security, performance)
- 5b. System suggests improvements
- 5c. User can accept suggestions or modify
- 5d. Resume from step 5
AF-003-B: Specification Ambiguity
- At step 2: If user specifications are ambiguous
- 2a. System asks clarifying questions
- 2b. User provides clarifications
- 2c. Resume from step 3
AF-003-C: Template Not Found
- At step 4: If no suitable template exists
- 4a. System uses generic code generation
- 4b. System generates base code structure
- 4c. Resume from step 5
AF-003-D: Code Conflict
- At step 10: If generated code conflicts with existing code
- 10a. System identifies conflicts
- 10b. System suggests merge strategies
- 10c. User resolves conflicts
- 10d. Resume from step 10
Postconditions:
- Code is generated and inserted into IDE
- Code is committed to repository
- Code follows project standards
- Team is notified of code generation
- Code is ready for testing
Business Rules:
- BR-014: Generated code must pass linting checks
- BR-015: Generated code must follow project coding standards
- BR-016: Generated code must include appropriate comments
- BR-017: Code generation must support multiple programming languages
- BR-018: Generated code must be version controlled
- BR-019: Code generation must include security best practices
Traceability:
- Relates to: FR-006, FR-007, NFR-005, NFR-006
UC-004: Analyze Data
UC-ID: UC-004
Name: Analyze Data
Primary Actor: Data Scientist
Secondary Actors: Jupyter Notebook Service, NLP Service, Data Storage Service
Preconditions:
- User is authenticated as Data Scientist
- Dataset is available and accessible
- Jupyter notebook environment is ready
- Data analysis libraries are installed
- User has read permissions to dataset
Main Success Scenario:
- User initiates data analysis session with voice command
- User specifies dataset and analysis objectives through voice
- NLP Service extracts analysis requirements (metrics, visualizations, models)
- System loads dataset into Jupyter notebook
- System generates exploratory data analysis (EDA) code
- System executes EDA code and generates visualizations
- System displays analysis results to user
- User requests additional analysis through voice commands
- System generates and executes analysis code
- System displays results and insights
- User requests statistical tests or model building
- System generates and executes model code
- System displays model results and performance metrics
- User exports analysis results and documentation
- System stores analysis notebook and results
Alternative Flows:
AF-004-A: Data Quality Issues
- At step 4: If dataset has quality issues
- 4a. System identifies missing values, outliers, inconsistencies
- 4b. System suggests data cleaning strategies
- 4c. User can accept suggestions or specify custom cleaning
- 4d. System applies data cleaning
- 4e. Resume from step 5
AF-004-B: Analysis Failure
- At step 9: If analysis code execution fails
- 9a. System identifies error and provides explanation
- 9b. System suggests alternative approaches
- 9c. User can accept suggestions or modify analysis
- 9d. Resume from step 9
AF-004-C: Insufficient Data
- At step 4: If dataset is too small for analysis
- 4a. System identifies data insufficiency
- 4b. System suggests data augmentation or alternative approaches
- 4c. User can proceed with alternative approach or cancel
- 4d. Resume from step 5 or end use case
AF-004-D: Model Training Timeout
- At step 12: If model training exceeds time limit
- 12a. System stops training and provides partial results
- 12b. System suggests simplified model or parameter adjustment
- 12c. User can accept suggestions or modify parameters
- 12d. Resume from step 12
Postconditions:
- Data analysis is completed
- Visualizations and insights are generated
- Analysis notebook is saved
- Results are documented
- Findings are available for presentation
Business Rules:
- BR-020: Data analysis must handle missing values appropriately
- BR-021: Analysis must include statistical significance testing
- BR-022: Visualizations must be publication-ready
- BR-023: Analysis code must be reproducible
- BR-024: Analysis results must be version controlled
- BR-025: Data privacy must be maintained during analysis
Traceability:
- Relates to: FR-008, FR-009, NFR-007, NFR-008
UC-005: Manage Version Control
UC-ID: UC-005
Name: Manage Version Control
Primary Actor: Software Developer, DevOps Engineer
Secondary Actors: Git Repository Service, NLP Service, CI/CD Pipeline Service
Preconditions:
- User is authenticated
- Git repository is initialized
- User has appropriate Git permissions
- Local repository is synchronized
Main Success Scenario:
- User initiates version control operation with voice command
- User specifies operation (commit, push, pull, branch, merge) through voice
- NLP Service extracts version control parameters
- System validates operation feasibility
- For commit operation:
- 5a. System stages specified files
- 5b. System generates commit message based on changes
- 5c. User reviews and approves commit message
- 5d. System commits changes to local repository
- For push operation:
- 6a. System verifies local changes are committed
- 6b. System pushes changes to remote repository
- 6c. System triggers CI/CD pipeline if configured
- For pull operation:
- 7a. System fetches changes from remote repository
- 7b. System merges changes into local branch
- 7c. System resolves conflicts if necessary
- For branch operation:
- 8a. System creates or switches to specified branch
- 8b. System updates local workspace
- For merge operation:
- 9a. System merges specified branch into current branch
- 9b. System handles merge conflicts
- System notifies user of operation completion
- System logs version control operation
Alternative Flows:
AF-005-A: Merge Conflict
- At step 7c or 9b: If merge conflicts occur
- a. System identifies conflicting files
- b. System displays conflict details to user
- c. User specifies conflict resolution strategy
- d. System applies resolution
- e. Resume from step 10
AF-005-B: Permission Denied
- At step 4: If user lacks required permissions
- 4a. System denies operation
- 4b. System explains permission requirements
- 4c. End use case
AF-005-C: Repository Sync Required
- At step 6b: If remote repository has newer changes
- 6b-i. System requests pull before push
- 6b-ii. User initiates pull operation
- 6b-iii. Resume from step 7
AF-005-D: Branch Protection Violation
- At step 6b: If branch is protected
- 6b-i. System requires pull request
- 6b-ii. System creates pull request
- 6b-iii. System notifies reviewers
- 6b-iv. End use case (awaiting review)
Postconditions:
- Version control operation is completed
- Repository is updated
- CI/CD pipeline is triggered if applicable
- Team is notified of changes
- Operation is logged for audit
Business Rules:
- BR-026: All commits must include descriptive messages
- BR-027: Commits must reference issue tracking system
- BR-028: Protected branches require pull request review
- BR-029: Merge conflicts must be resolved before completion
- BR-030: Version control operations must be logged
- BR-031: Sensitive data must not be committed
Traceability:
- Relates to: FR-010, FR-011, NFR-009, NFR-010
UC-006: Debug Application
UC-ID: UC-006
Name: Debug Application
Primary Actor: Software Developer
Secondary Actors: IDE Integration Service, NLP Service, Monitoring Service
Preconditions:
- User is authenticated as Software Developer
- Application is running or debuggable
- IDE debugger is available
- User has debug permissions
- Error or issue is identified
Main Success Scenario:
- User initiates debugging session with voice command
- User describes issue or error through voice
- NLP Service extracts issue details (error message, location, symptoms)
- System retrieves relevant logs and stack traces
- System analyzes error and suggests potential causes
- System displays error analysis to user
- User requests specific debugging action (set breakpoint, inspect variable, step through code)
- System executes debugging action
- System displays debugging results
- User continues debugging with additional commands
- User identifies root cause
- User requests code fix suggestion
- System generates fix based on root cause analysis
- User reviews and approves fix
- System applies fix to code
- System re-runs application to verify fix
- System confirms issue resolution
Alternative Flows:
AF-006-A: Root Cause Not Found
- At step 11: If root cause cannot be identified
- 11a. System suggests additional debugging steps
- 11b. System suggests consulting documentation or team
- 11c. User can continue debugging or escalate
- 11d. Resume from step 7 or end use case
AF-006-B: Breakpoint Not Set
- At step 8: If breakpoint cannot be set
- 8a. System explains why breakpoint cannot be set
- 8b. System suggests alternative debugging approach
- 8c. User can accept suggestion or try different location
- 8d. Resume from step 8
AF-006-C: Variable Inspection Fails
- At step 8: If variable cannot be inspected
- 8a. System explains variable scope or availability issue
- 8b. System suggests alternative inspection methods
- 8c. User can accept suggestion or continue
- 8d. Resume from step 8
AF-006-D: Fix Verification Fails
- At step 16: If fix does not resolve issue
- 16a. System indicates issue persists
- 16b. System suggests additional debugging
- 16c. User can continue debugging or revert fix
- 16d. Resume from step 7 or revert and end use case
Postconditions:
- Issue is identified and documented
- Root cause is determined
- Fix is applied and verified
- Application is functioning correctly
- Debugging session is logged
Business Rules:
- BR-032: Debugging must not affect production systems
- BR-033: Breakpoints must be cleared after debugging
- BR-034: Debug sessions must be time-limited
- BR-035: Sensitive data must not be exposed during debugging
- BR-036: Debugging operations must be logged
- BR-037: Fixes must be tested before deployment
Traceability:
- Relates to: FR-012, FR-013, NFR-011, NFR-012
UC-007: Deploy Application
UC-ID: UC-007
Name: Deploy Application
Primary Actor: DevOps Engineer, Software Developer
Secondary Actors: CI/CD Pipeline Service, Monitoring Service, NLP Service
Preconditions:
- User is authenticated as DevOps Engineer or authorized Developer
- Application is built and tested
- Deployment configuration is defined
- Target environment is available
- User has deployment permissions
Main Success Scenario:
- User initiates deployment with voice command
- User specifies target environment (dev, staging, production) through voice
- NLP Service extracts deployment parameters
- System validates deployment prerequisites
- System retrieves deployment configuration
- System displays deployment plan to user
- User reviews and approves deployment plan
- System triggers CI/CD pipeline
- System executes build stage
- System executes test stage
- System executes deployment stage
- System performs health checks on deployed application
- System monitors application performance
- System confirms successful deployment
- System notifies team of deployment completion
- System logs deployment operation
Alternative Flows:
AF-007-A: Build Failure
- At step 9: If build fails
- 9a. System identifies build error
- 9b. System displays error details to user
- 9c. User can fix error and retry or rollback
- 9d. Resume from step 9 or rollback
AF-007-B: Test Failure
- At step 10: If tests fail
- 10a. System identifies failing tests
- 10b. System displays test results to user
- 10c. User can fix code and retry or rollback
- 10d. Resume from step 10 or rollback
AF-007-C: Health Check Failure
- At step 12: If health checks fail
- 12a. System identifies health check failures
- 12b. System initiates automatic rollback
- 12c. System notifies user of rollback
- 12d. End use case
AF-007-D: Deployment Approval Required
- At step 7: If production deployment requires approval
- 7a. System requests approval from authorized personnel
- 7b. Authorized personnel reviews and approves/rejects
- 7c. If approved: Resume from step 8; If rejected: End use case
AF-007-E: Insufficient Resources
- At step 4: If target environment lacks resources
- 4a. System identifies resource constraints
- 4b. System suggests alternative environment or scaling
- 4c. User can accept suggestion or cancel
- 4d. Resume from step 4 or end use case
Postconditions:
- Application is deployed to target environment
- Application is verified and operational
- Team is notified of deployment
- Deployment is logged and documented
- Monitoring is active on deployed application
Business Rules:
- BR-038: Deployments must follow change management process
- BR-039: Production deployments require approval
- BR-040: Deployment must include automated health checks
- BR-041: Rollback capability must be available
- BR-042: Deployment must be logged with full audit trail
- BR-043: Deployment must not exceed maintenance window
Traceability:
- Relates to: FR-014, FR-015, NFR-013, NFR-014
UC-008: Monitor System Performance
UC-ID: UC-008
Name: Monitor System Performance
Primary Actor: DevOps Engineer, Technical Architect
Secondary Actors: Monitoring Service, NLP Service, Alert Service
Preconditions:
- User is authenticated as DevOps Engineer or Technical Architect
- Monitoring system is operational
- Metrics collection is active
- User has monitoring permissions
Main Success Scenario:
- User initiates monitoring query with voice command
- User specifies metrics to monitor (CPU, memory, latency, throughput) through voice
- NLP Service extracts monitoring parameters (time range, thresholds, services)
- System retrieves metrics from monitoring service
- System analyzes metrics and identifies trends
- System displays metrics and analysis to user
- User requests specific performance analysis
- System performs analysis (bottleneck identification, capacity planning)
- System displays analysis results
- User requests alert configuration
- System configures alerts based on user specifications
- System monitors for alert conditions
- When alert condition is met:
- 13a. System generates alert
- 13b. System notifies user through voice and visual alerts
- 13c. System provides recommended actions
- User acknowledges alert
- System logs monitoring activity
Alternative Flows:
AF-008-A: Metrics Unavailable
- At step 4: If metrics are unavailable
- 4a. System identifies missing metrics
- 4b. System suggests alternative metrics or time range
- 4c. User can accept suggestion or cancel
- 4d. Resume from step 4 or end use case
AF-008-B: Performance Anomaly Detected
- At step 5: If anomaly is detected
- 5a. System identifies anomaly and severity
- 5b. System suggests investigation steps
- 5c. User can investigate or dismiss
- 5d. Resume from step 6 or end use case
AF-008-C: Alert Configuration Conflict
- At step 11: If alert configuration conflicts with existing alerts
- 11a. System identifies conflicts
- 11b. System suggests resolution
- 11c. User can accept suggestion or modify configuration
- 11d. Resume from step 11
Postconditions:
- Performance metrics are analyzed
- Alerts are configured
- User is informed of system status
- Monitoring data is logged
- Recommendations are provided
Business Rules:
- BR-044: Metrics must be collected with <1 minute granularity
- BR-045: Alerts must be triggered within 30 seconds of threshold breach
- BR-046: Alert notifications must be delivered within 10 seconds
- BR-047: Monitoring data must be retained for 90 days
- BR-048: Performance analysis must include trend analysis
- BR-049: Alerts must include recommended actions
Traceability:
- Relates to: FR-016, FR-017, NFR-015, NFR-016
UC-009: Manage Project Tasks
UC-ID: UC-009
Name: Manage Project Tasks
Primary Actor: Project Manager, Software Developer
Secondary Actors: Project Management Service, NLP Service, Notification Service
Preconditions:
- User is authenticated
- Project is selected
- Project management system is accessible
- User has task management permissions
Main Success Scenario:
- User initiates task management with voice command
- User specifies task operation (create, update, assign, complete) through voice
- NLP Service extracts task details (title, description, assignee, priority, deadline)
- For create operation:
- 4a. System creates new task with specified details
- 4b. System assigns task to specified team member
- 4c. System sets task priority and deadline
- For update operation:
- 5a. System retrieves specified task
- 5b. System updates task with new details
- For assign operation:
- 6a. System retrieves task
- 6b. System assigns task to specified team member
- 6c. System notifies assignee
- For complete operation:
- 7a. System retrieves task
- 7b. System marks task as complete
- 7c. System records completion time
- System updates project status
- System notifies affected team members
- System logs task operation
Alternative Flows:
AF-009-A: Task Not Found
- At step 4a, 5a, 6a, or 7a: If task cannot be found
- a. System notifies user of missing task
- b. User can create new task or search for different task
- c. Resume from step 2 or end use case
AF-009-B: Assignee Unavailable
- At step 4b or 6b: If assignee is unavailable
- b. System suggests alternative assignees
- c. User can accept suggestion or specify different assignee
- d. Resume from step 4b or 6b
AF-009-C: Deadline Conflict
- At step 4c: If deadline conflicts with other tasks
- c. System identifies conflict
- d. System suggests alternative deadline
- e. User can accept suggestion or confirm deadline
- f. Resume from step 4c
Postconditions:
- Task is created, updated, or completed
- Team members are notified
- Project status is updated
- Task operation is logged
- Project timeline is updated
Business Rules:
- BR-050: Tasks must have clear descriptions
- BR-051: Tasks must be assigned to team members
- BR-052: Task deadlines must be realistic
- BR-053: Task priority must be defined
- BR-054: Task completion must be verified
- BR-055: Task changes must be logged
Traceability:
- Relates to: FR-018, FR-019, NFR-017, NFR-018
UC-010: Generate Project Report
UC-ID: UC-010
Name: Generate Project Report
Primary Actor: Project Manager
Secondary Actors: Project Management Service, NLP Service, Data Storage Service
Preconditions:
- User is authenticated as Project Manager
- Project data is available
- Report templates are configured
- User has reporting permissions
Main Success Scenario:
- User initiates report generation with voice command
- User specifies report type (status, progress, resource, risk) through voice
- NLP Service extracts report parameters (time period, scope, format)
- System retrieves project data
- System analyzes project metrics
- System generates report based on template
- System includes visualizations and charts
- System displays report preview to user
- User reviews report and requests modifications
- System updates report based on feedback
- User approves final report
- System exports report in specified format (PDF, Excel, HTML)
- System stores report in repository
- System distributes report to stakeholders
- System logs report generation
Alternative Flows:
AF-010-A: Insufficient Data
- At step 4: If project data is incomplete
- 4a. System identifies missing data
- 4b. System suggests data collection or alternative report
- 4c. User can proceed with available data or cancel
- 4d. Resume from step 5 or end use case
AF-010-B: Report Generation Failure
- At step 6: If report generation fails
- 6a. System identifies error
- 6b. System suggests alternative report type or parameters
- 6c. User can accept suggestion or cancel
- 6d. Resume from step 6 or end use case
AF-010-C: Export Format Not Supported
- At step 12: If export format is not supported
- 12a. System suggests supported formats
- 12b. User can select alternative format
- 12c. Resume from step 12
Postconditions:
- Report is generated and formatted
- Report is stored in repository
- Report is distributed to stakeholders
- Report generation is logged
- Report is available for future reference
Business Rules:
- BR-056: Reports must include executive summary
- BR-057: Reports must include key metrics and KPIs
- BR-058: Reports must be generated within 5 minutes
- BR-059: Reports must be exportable in multiple formats
- BR-060: Report data must be current and accurate
- BR-061: Reports must be archived for compliance
Traceability:
- Relates to: FR-020, FR-021, NFR-019, NFR-020
UC-011: Collaborate on Code Review
UC-ID: UC-011
Name: Collaborate on Code Review
Primary Actor: Software Developer, Technical Architect
Secondary Actors: Git Repository Service, NLP Service, Notification Service
Preconditions:
- User is authenticated
- Pull request or code review is initiated
- Code is available for review
- Reviewers are assigned
- User has review permissions
Main Success Scenario:
- User initiates code review with voice command
- User specifies pull request or code to review through voice
- NLP Service extracts review parameters
- System retrieves code and review context
- System displays code to user
- User provides code review comments through voice
- NLP Service extracts review feedback (issues, suggestions, approvals)
- System records review comments with line references
- User requests code quality analysis
- System performs static analysis and security scanning
- System displays analysis results
- User provides additional feedback based on analysis
- System aggregates all review feedback
- System notifies code author of review feedback
- Author can respond to feedback through voice
- System records author responses
- If all issues are resolved:
- 17a. Reviewer approves pull request
- 17b. System marks pull request as approved
- System logs code review activity
Alternative Flows:
AF-011-A: Code Quality Issues Found
- At step 11: If significant quality issues are found
- 11a. System highlights critical issues
- 11b. System requests changes before approval
- 11c. Author must address issues
- 11d. Resume from step 9
AF-011-B: Security Vulnerabilities Detected
- At step 10: If security vulnerabilities are detected
- 10a. System flags vulnerabilities as critical
- 10b. System blocks approval until vulnerabilities are fixed
- 10c. Author must fix vulnerabilities
- 10d. Resume from step 9
AF-011-C: Reviewer Disagreement
- At step 17: If multiple reviewers disagree
- 17a. System identifies disagreement
- 17b. System facilitates discussion between reviewers
- 17c. Reviewers reach consensus
- 17d. Resume from step 17
Postconditions:
- Code review is completed
- Feedback is recorded
- Pull request is approved or rejected
- Code author is notified
- Review activity is logged
Business Rules:
- BR-062: Code reviews must be completed within 24 hours
- BR-063: All pull requests must be reviewed before merge
- BR-064: Security issues must block approval
- BR-065: Review feedback must be constructive
- BR-066: Code review comments must be documented
- BR-067: Approved code must meet quality standards
Traceability:
- Relates to: FR-022, FR-023, NFR-021, NFR-022
UC-012: Configure Security Policies
UC-ID: UC-012
Name: Configure Security Policies
Primary Actor: Security Officer, Technical Architect
Secondary Actors: Authentication Service, NLP Service, Data Storage Service
Preconditions:
- User is authenticated as Security Officer or Technical Architect
- Security policy framework is available
- User has security configuration permissions
- System is in maintenance mode or change window
Main Success Scenario:
- User initiates security policy configuration with voice command
- User specifies policy type (access control, encryption, audit, compliance) through voice
- NLP Service extracts policy parameters
- System retrieves current policy configuration
- System displays current policy to user
- User specifies new policy requirements through voice
- System validates policy against security standards
- System displays policy validation results
- User reviews and approves policy
- System applies new policy
- System notifies affected users of policy changes
- System logs policy change with audit trail
- System monitors policy compliance
Alternative Flows:
AF-012-A: Policy Validation Failure
- At step 7: If policy violates security standards
- 7a. System identifies violations
- 7b. System suggests compliant alternatives
- 7c. User can accept suggestions or modify policy
- 7d. Resume from step 7
AF-012-B: Policy Conflict
- At step 7: If policy conflicts with existing policies
- 7a. System identifies conflicts
- 7b. System suggests resolution
- 7c. User can accept suggestion or modify policy
- 7d. Resume from step 7
AF-012-C: Compliance Impact
- At step 9: If policy change affects compliance
- 9a. System identifies compliance implications
- 9b. System suggests mitigation measures
- 9c. User can accept suggestions or modify policy
- 9d. Resume from step 9
Postconditions:
- Security policy is configured
- Policy is applied to system
- Users are notified of changes
- Policy compliance is monitored
- Policy change is logged
Business Rules:
- BR-068: Security policies must comply with regulations
- BR-069: Policy changes must be approved by Security Officer
- BR-070: Policy changes must be logged with full audit trail
- BR-071: Users must be notified of policy changes
- BR-072: Policy compliance must be monitored continuously
- BR-073: Policy violations must trigger alerts
Traceability:
- Relates to: FR-024, FR-025, NFR-023, NFR-024
UC-013: Handle Voice Command Error
UC-ID: UC-013
Name: Handle Voice Command Error
Primary Actor: All Actors
Secondary Actors: Voice Processing Engine, NLP Service, Error Handling Service
Preconditions:
- Voice command processing has encountered an error
- Error handling system is operational
- User is still in active session
Main Success Scenario:
- Voice command processing encounters error
- Error Handling Service captures error details
- System categorizes error (recognition, parsing, execution, system)
- System generates appropriate error message
- System provides error explanation to user through voice
- System suggests corrective actions
- User can retry command with modifications
- System logs error for analysis
- If error is critical:
- 9a. System escalates to support team
- 9b. System provides support contact information
- System continues session or ends gracefully
Alternative Flows:
AF-013-A: Repeated Error
- At step 7: If same error occurs multiple times
- 7a. System identifies repeated error
- 7b. System suggests alternative approaches
- 7c. System offers to escalate to support
- 7d. User can accept suggestion or escalate
AF-013-B: System Error
- At step 2: If system error occurs
- 2a. System attempts recovery
- 2b. If recovery fails: System gracefully terminates session
- 2c. System provides error report to user
- 2d. End use case
Postconditions:
- Error is handled gracefully
- User is informed of error
- Error is logged for analysis
- Session continues or ends appropriately
- Support is engaged if necessary
Business Rules:
- BR-074: All errors must be logged with context
- BR-075: Error messages must be user-friendly
- BR-076: Critical errors must trigger escalation
- BR-077: Error recovery must be attempted automatically
- BR-078: Error patterns must be analyzed for improvement
- BR-079: Users must be provided with support options
Traceability:
- Relates to: FR-026, NFR-025, NFR-026
UC-014: Provide Context-Aware Assistance
UC-ID: UC-014
Name: Provide Context-Aware Assistance
Primary Actor: All Actors
Secondary Actors: NLP Service, Knowledge Base Service, AI Assistant
Preconditions:
- User is in active session
- System has access to user context
- Knowledge base is available
- AI Assistant is operational
Main Success Scenario:
- User requests assistance through voice command
- System analyzes user context (current task, project, history)
- System retrieves relevant information from knowledge base
- System generates contextual assistance
- System provides assistance through voice and visual display
- User can request additional details or examples
- System provides additional information based on request
- User can apply suggested solutions or continue independently
- System logs assistance interaction
- System updates user context based on interaction
Alternative Flows:
AF-014-A: Insufficient Context
- At step 2: If context is insufficient
- 2a. System requests clarification from user
- 2b. User provides additional context
- 2c. Resume from step 3
AF-014-B: Knowledge Not Found
- At step 3: If relevant knowledge is not found
- 3a. System searches alternative sources
- 3b. If found: Resume from step 4
- 3c. If not found: System suggests related topics or escalates
AF-014-C: Assistance Not Applicable
- At step 4: If generated assistance is not applicable
- 4a. System identifies mismatch
- 4b. System requests clarification
- 4c. Resume from step 2
Postconditions:
- User receives contextual assistance
- Assistance is logged
- User context is updated
- Knowledge base is enhanced if applicable
Business Rules:
- BR-080: Assistance must be contextually relevant
- BR-081: Assistance must be accurate and up-to-date
- BR-082: Assistance must include examples when applicable
- BR-083: Assistance must be personalized to user role
- BR-084: Assistance interactions must be logged
- BR-085: Assistance quality must be continuously improved
Traceability:
- Relates to: FR-027, FR-028, NFR-027, NFR-028
UC-015: Audit and Compliance Reporting
UC-ID: UC-015
Name: Audit and Compliance Reporting
Primary Actor: Security Officer, Compliance Officer
Secondary Actors: Audit Service, Data Storage Service, NLP Service
Preconditions:
- User is authenticated as Security Officer or Compliance Officer
- Audit system is operational
- Compliance requirements are defined
- User has audit permissions
Main Success Scenario:
- User initiates audit report generation with voice command
- User specifies audit scope (system, user, operation, time period) through voice
- NLP Service extracts audit parameters
- System retrieves audit logs from specified scope
- System analyzes logs for compliance violations
- System generates compliance report
- System displays report to user
- User reviews report and requests additional analysis
- System performs additional analysis
- System displays results
- User requests remediation recommendations
- System generates remediation plan
- System displays remediation plan
- User approves remediation plan
- System stores audit report and remediation plan
- System notifies relevant stakeholders
- System logs audit activity
Alternative Flows:
AF-015-A: Compliance Violation Found
- At step 5: If compliance violations are found
- 5a. System flags violations as critical
- 5b. System generates immediate alert
- 5c. System notifies Security Officer
- 5d. Resume from step 6
AF-015-B: Insufficient Audit Data
- At step 4: If audit data is incomplete
- 4a. System identifies missing data
- 4b. System suggests alternative scope or time period
- 4c. User can accept suggestion or proceed with available data
- 4d. Resume from step 5
AF-015-C: Remediation Not Possible
- At step 12: If remediation is not possible
- 12a. System identifies constraints
- 12b. System suggests alternative approaches
- 12c. User can accept suggestion or escalate
- 12d. Resume from step 12 or escalate
Postconditions:
- Audit report is generated
- Compliance status is determined
- Remediation plan is created
- Report is stored for compliance
- Stakeholders are notified
- Audit activity is logged
Business Rules:
- BR-086: Audit logs must be immutable
- BR-087: Audit reports must be generated within 24 hours
- BR-088: Compliance violations must be reported immediately
- BR-089: Audit reports must include remediation recommendations
- BR-090: Audit reports must be retained for regulatory period
- BR-091: Audit access must be restricted to authorized personnel
Traceability:
- Relates to: FR-029, FR-030, NFR-029, NFR-030
3. USE CASE DIAGRAM
graph LR
subgraph Actors
DEV["👨💻 Software Developer"]
DS["📊 Data Scientist"]
PM["📋 Project Manager"]
DEVOPS["⚙️ DevOps Engineer"]
ARCH["🏗️ Technical Architect"]
SEC["🔒 Security Officer"]
end
subgraph System["Voice-Centric Development Agent"]
UC001["UC-001: Process Voice Command"]
UC002["UC-002: Design Architecture"]
UC003["UC-003: Generate Code"]
UC004["UC-004: Analyze Data"]
UC005["UC-005: Manage Version Control"]
UC006["UC-006: Debug Application"]
UC007["UC-007: Deploy Application"]
UC008["UC-008: Monitor Performance"]
UC009["UC-009: Manage Tasks"]
UC010["UC-010: Generate Report"]
UC011["UC-011: Code Review"]
UC012["UC-012: Security Policies"]
UC013["UC-013: Handle Error"]
UC014["UC-014: Context Assistance"]
UC015["UC-015: Audit Reporting"]
end
subgraph ExternalSystems["External Systems"]
VOICE["🎤 Voice Engine"]
NLP["🧠 NLP Service"]
IDE["💻 IDE Integration"]
GIT["📦 Git Repository"]
JUPYTER["📓 Jupyter Notebook"]
CICD["🔄 CI/CD Pipeline"]
MONITOR["📈 Monitoring"]
AUTH["🔐 Authentication"]
PM_SVC["📊 Project Mgmt"]
STORAGE["💾 Storage"]
end
%% Developer Use Cases
DEV --> UC001
DEV --> UC003
DEV --> UC005
DEV --> UC006
DEV --> UC011
DEV --> UC009
%% Data Scientist Use Cases
DS --> UC001
DS --> UC004
DS --> UC005
DS --> UC009
%% Project Manager Use Cases
PM --> UC001
PM --> UC009
PM --> UC010
PM --> UC008
%% DevOps Engineer Use Cases
DEVOPS --> UC001
DEVOPS --> UC005
DEVOPS --> UC007
DEVOPS --> UC008
DEVOPS --> UC012
%% Technical Architect Use Cases
ARCH --> UC001
ARCH --> UC002
ARCH --> UC008
ARCH --> UC012
ARCH --> UC011
%% Security Officer Use Cases
SEC --> UC001
SEC --> UC012
SEC --> UC015
SEC --> UC008
%% All actors use common use cases
DEV --> UC013
DEV --> UC014
DS --> UC013
DS --> UC014
PM --> UC013
PM --> UC014
DEVOPS --> UC013
DEVOPS --> UC014
ARCH --> UC013
ARCH --> UC014
SEC --> UC013
SEC --> UC014
%% System to External Systems
UC001 --> VOICE
UC001 --> NLP
UC001 --> AUTH
UC002 --> IDE
UC002 --> STORAGE
UC003 --> IDE
UC003 --> GIT
UC003 --> STORAGE
UC004 --> JUPYTER
UC004 --> STORAGE
UC005 --> GIT
UC005 --> CICD
UC006 --> IDE
UC006 --> MONITOR
UC007 --> CICD
UC007 --> MONITOR
UC008 --> MONITOR
UC009 --> PM_SVC
UC009 --> STORAGE
UC010 --> PM_SVC
UC010 --> STORAGE
UC011 --> GIT
UC011 --> STORAGE
UC012 --> AUTH
UC012 --> STORAGE
UC015 --> STORAGE
UC015 --> AUTH
style UC001 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC002 fill:#f3e5f5
style UC003 fill:#e8f5e9
style UC004 fill:#fff3e0
style UC005 fill:#fce4ec
style UC006 fill:#f1f8e9
style UC007 fill:#ede7f6
style UC008 fill:#e0f2f1
style UC009 fill:#fff9c4
style UC010 fill:#f0f4c3
style UC011 fill:#dcedc8
style UC012 fill:#ffccbc
style UC013 fill:#ffebee
style UC014 fill:#e1bee7
style UC015 fill:#c8e6c9
4. ACTOR-USE CASE MATRIX
| Use Case | DEV | DS | PM | DEVOPS | ARCH | SEC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC-001: Process Voice Command | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| UC-002: Design Architecture | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| UC-003: Generate Code | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| UC-004: Analyze Data | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| UC-005: Manage Version Control | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| UC-006: Debug Application | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| UC-007: Deploy Application | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| UC-008: Monitor Performance | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ |
| UC-009: Manage Tasks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| UC-010: Generate Report | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| UC-011: Code Review | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
| UC-012: Configure Security | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| UC-013: Handle Error | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| UC-014: Context Assistance | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| UC-015: Audit Reporting | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ |
Legend:
- ✓ = Actor participates in use case
- ✗ = Actor does not participate in use case
5. USE CASE INTERACTION SEQUENCES
UC-001: Process Voice Command - Sequence Diagram
sequenceDiagram
participant User as User
participant VoiceEngine as Voice Engine
participant NLPService as NLP Service
participant Handler as Command Handler
participant System as System
participant AuthService as Auth Service
User->>VoiceEngine: Activate voice (wake word/button)
VoiceEngine->>VoiceEngine: Capture audio stream
VoiceEngine->>VoiceEngine: Convert speech to text (STT)
VoiceEngine->>NLPService: Send transcribed text
NLPService->>NLPService: Parse command
NLPService->>NLPService: Extract intent & entities
NLPService->>NLPService: Validate syntax
NLPService->>AuthService: Verify authorization
AuthService->>AuthService: Check permissions
AuthService-->>NLPService: Authorization result
alt Authorization Success
NLPService->>Handler: Route to handler
Handler->>System: Execute command
System-->>Handler: Command result
Handler-->>NLPService: Response
NLPService->>VoiceEngine: Generate response text
VoiceEngine->>VoiceEngine: Convert text to speech (TTS)
VoiceEngine-->>User: Play audio response
else Authorization Failed
AuthService-->>NLPService: Denied
NLPService->>VoiceEngine: Generate error message
VoiceEngine->>VoiceEngine: Convert to speech
VoiceEngine-->>User: Play error message
end
System->>System: Log command execution
UC-003: Generate Code - Sequence Diagram
sequenceDiagram
participant Dev as Developer
participant NLP as NLP Service
participant CodeGen as Code Generator
participant IDE as IDE Service
participant Git as Git Service
participant QA as Quality Analyzer
Dev->>NLP: Specify code requirements
NLP->>NLP: Extract specifications
NLP->>CodeGen: Request code generation
CodeGen->>CodeGen: Retrieve templates
CodeGen->>CodeGen: Generate code
CodeGen->>QA: Analyze code quality
QA->>QA: Check complexity
QA->>QA: Check security
QA->>QA: Check performance
QA-->>CodeGen: Quality report
alt Quality Issues Found
CodeGen->>CodeGen: Refine code
CodeGen->>QA: Re-analyze
QA-->>CodeGen: Updated report
end
CodeGen-->>Dev: Display generated code
Dev->>Dev: Review code
Dev->>CodeGen: Approve code
CodeGen->>IDE: Insert code
IDE->>IDE: Format code
IDE->>IDE: Apply standards
IDE-->>Dev: Code inserted
CodeGen->>Git: Commit code
Git->>Git: Create commit
Git-->>CodeGen: Commit successful
CodeGen->>Dev: Notify completion
UC-007: Deploy Application - Sequence Diagram
sequenceDiagram
participant DevOps as DevOps Engineer
participant CICD as CI/CD Pipeline
participant Build as Build Service
participant Test as Test Service
participant Deploy as Deploy Service
participant Monitor as Monitoring
participant Notify as Notification
DevOps->>CICD: Initiate deployment
CICD->>CICD: Validate prerequisites
CICD->>Build: Start build
Build->>Build: Compile code
Build->>Build: Package application
Build-->>CICD: Build complete
alt Build Failed
CICD-->>DevOps: Build failed
DevOps->>DevOps: Fix issues
else Build Success
CICD->>Test: Start tests
Test->>Test: Run unit tests
Test->>Test: Run integration tests
Test-->>CICD: Tests complete
alt Tests Failed
CICD-->>DevOps: Tests failed
else Tests Success
CICD->>Deploy: Start deployment
Deploy->>Deploy: Deploy to environment
Deploy->>Monitor: Health check
alt Health Check Failed
Monitor-->>Deploy: Health check failed
Deploy->>Deploy: Rollback
Deploy-->>CICD: Deployment failed
else Health Check Success
Monitor-->>Deploy: Health check passed
Deploy-->>CICD: Deployment successful
CICD->>Notify: Send notification
Notify-->>DevOps: Deployment complete
end
end
end
UC-004: Analyze Data - Sequence Diagram
sequenceDiagram
participant DS as Data Scientist
participant NLP as NLP Service
participant Jupyter as Jupyter Service
participant DataMgmt as Data Management
participant Analysis as Analysis Engine
participant Viz as Visualization
DS->>NLP: Specify analysis requirements
NLP->>NLP: Extract analysis parameters
NLP->>Jupyter: Load dataset
Jupyter->>DataMgmt: Retrieve dataset
DataMgmt-->>Jupyter: Dataset loaded
Jupyter->>Analysis: Generate EDA code
Analysis->>Analysis: Execute EDA
Analysis->>Viz: Generate visualizations
Viz-->>Analysis: Visualizations created
Analysis-->>Jupyter: EDA complete
Jupyter-->>DS: Display results
DS->>NLP: Request additional analysis
NLP->>Analysis: Generate analysis code
Analysis->>Analysis: Execute analysis
Analysis->>Analysis: Calculate statistics
Analysis-->>Jupyter: Analysis complete
Jupyter-->>DS: Display results
DS->>NLP: Request model building
NLP->>Analysis: Generate model code
Analysis->>Analysis: Build model
Analysis->>Analysis: Train model
Analysis->>Analysis: Evaluate model
Analysis-->>Jupyter: Model complete
Jupyter-->>DS: Display model results
DS->>Jupyter: Export results
Jupyter->>DataMgmt: Store notebook
DataMgmt-->>Jupyter: Stored
Jupyter-->>DS: Export complete
6. USE CASE DEPENDENCIES AND RELATIONSHIPS
graph TD
UC001["UC-001: Process Voice Command"]
UC002["UC-002: Design Architecture"]
UC003["UC-003: Generate Code"]
UC004["UC-004: Analyze Data"]
UC005["UC-005: Manage Version Control"]
UC006["UC-006: Debug Application"]
UC007["UC-007: Deploy Application"]
UC008["UC-008: Monitor Performance"]
UC009["UC-009: Manage Tasks"]
UC010["UC-010: Generate Report"]
UC011["UC-011: Code Review"]
UC012["UC-012: Configure Security"]
UC013["UC-013: Handle Error"]
UC014["UC-014: Context Assistance"]
UC015["UC-015: Audit Reporting"]
%% UC-001 is foundation for all
UC001 -->|includes| UC002
UC001 -->|includes| UC003
UC001 -->|includes| UC004
UC001 -->|includes| UC005
UC001 -->|includes| UC006
UC001 -->|includes| UC007
UC001 -->|includes| UC008
UC001 -->|includes| UC009
UC001 -->|includes| UC010
UC001 -->|includes| UC011
UC001 -->|includes| UC012
UC001 -->|includes| UC015
%% Error handling
UC001 -->|extends| UC013
UC002 -->|extends| UC013
UC003 -->|extends| UC013
UC004 -->|extends| UC013
UC005 -->|extends| UC013
UC006 -->|extends| UC013
UC007 -->|extends| UC013
UC008 -->|extends| UC013
UC009 -->|extends| UC013
UC010 -->|extends| UC013
UC011 -->|extends| UC013
UC012 -->|extends| UC013
UC015 -->|extends| UC013
%% Context assistance
UC001 -->|extends| UC014
UC002 -->|extends| UC014
UC003 -->|extends| UC014
UC004 -->|extends| UC014
UC005 -->|extends| UC014
UC006 -->|extends| UC014
UC007 -->|extends| UC014
UC008 -->|extends| UC014
UC009 -->|extends| UC014
UC010 -->|extends| UC014
UC011 -->|extends| UC014
UC012 -->|extends| UC014
UC015 -->|extends| UC014
%% Development workflow
UC002 -->|precedes| UC003
UC003 -->|precedes| UC011
UC011 -->|precedes| UC005
UC005 -->|precedes| UC007
UC007 -->|precedes| UC008
%% Code quality
UC003 -->|related| UC006
UC006 -->|related| UC011
%% Project management
UC009 -->|related| UC010
UC010 -->|related| UC008
%% Security
UC012 -->|related| UC015
UC015 -->|related| UC011
style UC001 fill:#e1f5ff,stroke:#01579b,stroke-width:3px
style UC013 fill:#ffebee,stroke:#b71c1c,stroke-width:2px
style UC014 fill:#e1bee7,stroke:#4a148c,stroke-width:2px
7. DETAILED BUSINESS RULES REFERENCE
Development-Related Business Rules
| Rule ID | Description | Use Cases | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| BR-001 | Voice command processing latency must be <500ms | UC-001 | Critical |
| BR-002 | Voice command accuracy must be ≥95% | UC-001 | Critical |
| BR-003 | All commands must be authenticated and authorized | UC-001 | Critical |
| BR-004 | Command execution must be logged for audit | UC-001 | High |
| BR-005 | System must support context-aware processing | UC-001 | High |
| BR-006 | Voice responses must be generated within 1 second | UC-001 | High |
| BR-007 | System must handle concurrent voice sessions | UC-001 | High |
| BR-014 | Generated code must pass linting checks | UC-003 | High |
| BR-015 | Generated code must follow project standards | UC-003 | High |
| BR-016 | Generated code must include comments | UC-003 | Medium |
| BR-017 | Code generation must support multiple languages | UC-003 | High |
| BR-018 | Generated code must be version controlled | UC-003 | High |
| BR-019 | Code generation must include security practices | UC-003 | Critical |
Architecture-Related Business Rules
| Rule ID | Description | Use Cases | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| BR-008 | Architecture must follow organizational standards | UC-002 | High |
| BR-009 | Architecture must support scalability | UC-002 | High |
| BR-010 | Architecture must include security considerations | UC-002 | Critical |
| BR-011 | Architecture documentation must be auto-generated | UC-002 | Medium |
| BR-012 | Architecture changes must be version controlled | UC-002 | High |
| BR-013 | Architecture must be reviewed by Technical Architect | UC-002 | High |
Data Science-Related Business Rules
| Rule ID | Description | Use Cases | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| BR-020 | Data analysis must handle missing values | UC-004 | High |
| BR-021 | Analysis must include statistical significance testing | UC-004 | High |
| BR-022 | Visualizations must be publication-ready | UC-004 | Medium |
| BR-023 | Analysis code must be reproducible | UC-004 | High |
| BR-024 | Analysis results must be version controlled | UC-004 | High |
| BR-025 | Data privacy must be maintained during analysis | UC-004 | Critical |
Version Control-Related Business Rules
| Rule ID | Description | Use Cases | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| BR-026 | All commits must include descriptive messages | UC-005 | High |
| BR-027 | Commits must reference issue tracking system | UC-005 | Medium |
| BR-028 | Protected branches require pull request review | UC-005 | High |
| BR-029 | Merge conflicts must be resolved before completion | UC-005 | High |
| BR-030 | Version control operations must be logged | UC-005 | High |
| BR-031 | Sensitive data must not be committed | UC-005 | Critical |
Deployment-Related Business Rules
| Rule ID | Description | Use Cases | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| BR-038 | Deployments must follow change management | UC-007 | High |
| BR-039 | Production deployments require approval | UC-007 | Critical |
| BR-040 | Deployment must include automated health checks | UC-007 | High |
| BR-041 | Rollback capability must be available | UC-007 | Critical |
| BR-042 | Deployment must be logged with audit trail | UC-007 | High |
| BR-043 | Deployment must not exceed maintenance window | UC-007 | High |
Monitoring-Related Business Rules
| Rule ID | Description | Use Cases | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| BR-044 | Metrics must be collected with <1 minute granularity | UC-008 | High |
| BR-045 | Alerts must be triggered within 30 seconds | UC-008 | High |
| BR-046 | Alert notifications must be delivered within 10 seconds | UC-008 | High |
| BR-047 | Monitoring data must be retained for 90 days | UC-008 | Medium |
| BR-048 | Performance analysis must include trend analysis | UC-008 | Medium |
| BR-049 | Alerts must include recommended actions | UC-008 | Medium |
Project Management-Related Business Rules
| Rule ID | Description | Use Cases | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| BR-050 | Tasks must have clear descriptions | UC-009 | High |
| BR-051 | Tasks must be assigned to team members | UC-009 | High |
| BR-052 | Task deadlines must be realistic | UC-009 | Medium |
| BR-053 | Task priority must be defined | UC-009 | High |
| BR-054 | Task completion must be verified | UC-009 | Medium |
| BR-055 | Task changes must be logged | UC-009 | High |
| BR-056 | Reports must include executive summary | UC-010 | High |
| BR-057 | Reports must include key metrics and KPIs | UC-010 | High |
| BR-058 | Reports must be generated within 5 minutes | UC-010 | Medium |
| BR-059 | Reports must be exportable in multiple formats | UC-010 | Medium |
| BR-060 | Report data must be current and accurate | UC-010 | Critical |
| BR-061 | Reports must be archived for compliance | UC-010 | High |
Code Review-Related Business Rules
| Rule ID | Description | Use Cases | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| BR-062 | Code reviews must be completed within 24 hours | UC-011 | High |
| BR-063 | All pull requests must be reviewed before merge | UC-011 | Critical |
| BR-064 | Security issues must block approval | UC-011 | Critical |
| BR-065 | Review feedback must be constructive | UC-011 | Medium |
| BR-066 | Code review comments must be documented | UC-011 | High |
| BR-067 | Approved code must meet quality standards | UC-011 | High |
Security-Related Business Rules
| Rule ID | Description | Use Cases | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| BR-068 | Security policies must comply with regulations | UC-012 | Critical |
| BR-069 | Policy changes must be approved by Security Officer | UC-012 | Critical |
| BR-070 | Policy changes must be logged with audit trail | UC-012 | High |
| BR-071 | Users must be notified of policy changes | UC-012 | High |
| BR-072 | Policy compliance must be monitored continuously | UC-012 | High |
| BR-073 | Policy violations must trigger alerts | UC-012 | Critical |
Error Handling-Related Business Rules
| Rule ID | Description | Use Cases | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| BR-074 | All errors must be logged with context | UC-013 | High |
| BR-075 | Error messages must be user-friendly | UC-013 | High |
| BR-076 | Critical errors must trigger escalation | UC-013 | Critical |
| BR-077 | Error recovery must be attempted automatically | UC-013 | High |
| BR-078 | Error patterns must be analyzed for improvement | UC-013 | Medium |
| BR-079 | Users must be provided with support options | UC-013 | High |
Assistance-Related Business Rules
| Rule ID | Description | Use Cases | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| BR-080 | Assistance must be contextually relevant | UC-014 | High |
| BR-081 | Assistance must be accurate and up-to-date | UC-014 | Critical |
| BR-082 | Assistance must include examples when applicable | UC-014 | Medium |
| BR-083 | Assistance must be personalized to user role | UC-014 | High |
| BR-084 | Assistance interactions must be logged | UC-014 | High |
| BR-085 | Assistance quality must be continuously improved | UC-014 | Medium |
Audit-Related Business Rules
| Rule ID | Description | Use Cases | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| BR-086 | Audit logs must be immutable | UC-015 | Critical |
| BR-087 | Audit reports must be generated within 24 hours | UC-015 | High |
| BR-088 | Compliance violations must be reported immediately | UC-015 | Critical |
| BR-089 | Audit reports must include remediation recommendations | UC-015 | High |
| BR-090 | Audit reports must be retained for regulatory period | UC-015 | Critical |
| BR-091 | Audit access must be restricted to authorized personnel | UC-015 | Critical |
8. ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA SUMMARY
UC-001: Process Voice Command
AC-001-1: System processes voice command within 500ms latency
- Testable: Measure end-to-end latency from voice activation to response
- Acceptance: ≥95% of commands processed within 500ms
AC-001-2: Voice recognition accuracy is ≥95%
- Testable: Compare recognized text with actual spoken text
- Acceptance: Accuracy score ≥95% across diverse accents and environments
AC-001-3: System handles concurrent voice sessions
- Testable: Simulate multiple simultaneous voice sessions
- Acceptance: System maintains performance with ≥10 concurrent sessions
AC-001-4: All commands are logged for audit
- Testable: Verify audit log entries for each command
- Acceptance: 100% of commands logged with timestamp, user, and result
UC-002: Design Software Architecture
AC-002-1: Architecture diagram is generated automatically
- Testable: Request architecture design and verify diagram generation
- Acceptance: Diagram generated within 30 seconds
AC-002-2: Architecture follows organizational standards
- Testable: Validate architecture against standards checklist
- Acceptance: 100% compliance with applicable standards
AC-002-3: Architecture documentation is auto-generated
- Testable: Request documentation and verify completeness
- Acceptance: Documentation includes all required sections
UC-003: Generate Code
AC-003-1: Generated code passes linting checks
- Testable: Run linter on generated code
- Acceptance: Zero linting errors
AC-003-2: Generated code follows project standards
- Testable: Code review against standards
- Acceptance: 100% compliance with coding standards
AC-003-3: Code generation supports multiple languages
- Testable: Generate code in Python, Java, JavaScript, Go
- Acceptance: All specified languages supported
UC-004: Analyze Data
AC-004-1: Data quality issues are identified
- Testable: Analyze dataset with known quality issues
- Acceptance: All issues identified and reported
AC-004-2: Analysis results are reproducible
- Testable: Re-run analysis and compare results
- Acceptance: Results are identical across runs
AC-004-3: Visualizations are publication-ready
- Testable: Review visualization quality and formatting
- Acceptance: Visualizations meet publication standards
UC-005: Manage Version Control
AC-005-1: Merge conflicts are resolved correctly
- Testable: Create merge conflict and verify resolution
- Acceptance: Conflicts resolved without data loss
AC-005-2: Protected branches require review
- Testable: Attempt push to protected branch
- Acceptance: Push blocked until review approved
AC-005-3: All operations are logged
- Testable: Verify Git log entries
- Acceptance: 100% of operations logged
UC-006: Debug Application
AC-006-1: Breakpoints are set correctly
- Testable: Set breakpoint and verify execution stops
- Acceptance: Breakpoint functions as expected
AC-006-2: Variables can be inspected
- Testable: Inspect variable values during debugging
- Acceptance: Variable values displayed correctly
AC-006-3: Root cause is identified
- Testable: Complete debugging session and verify root cause
- Acceptance: Root cause documented and verified
UC-007: Deploy Application
AC-007-1: Deployment completes within SLA
- Testable: Measure deployment time
- Acceptance: Deployment completes within defined SLA
AC-007-2: Health checks pass after deployment
- Testable: Verify health check results
- Acceptance: All health checks pass
AC-007-3: Rollback is available if needed
- Testable: Trigger rollback and verify success
- Acceptance: Rollback completes successfully
UC-008: Monitor Performance
AC-008-1: Metrics are collected with <1 minute granularity
- Testable: Verify metric collection frequency
- Acceptance: Metrics collected every <1 minute
AC-008-2: Alerts are triggered within 30 seconds
- Testable: Trigger alert condition and measure response time
- Acceptance: Alert triggered within 30 seconds
AC-008-3: Alert notifications are delivered within 10 seconds
- Testable: Measure notification delivery time
- Acceptance: Notifications delivered within 10 seconds
UC-009: Manage Tasks
AC-009-1: Tasks are created with all required fields
- Testable: Create task and verify all fields populated
- Acceptance: All required fields present
AC-009-2: Task assignments are tracked
- Testable: Verify task assignment in system
- Acceptance: Assignments tracked and visible
AC-009-3: Task completion is verified
- Testable: Mark task complete and verify status
- Acceptance: Completion status updated correctly
UC-010: Generate Report
AC-010-1: Reports are generated within 5 minutes
- Testable: Measure report generation time
- Acceptance: Report generated within 5 minutes
AC-010-2: Reports include all required sections
- Testable: Verify report completeness
- Acceptance: All required sections present
AC-010-3: Reports are exportable in multiple formats
- Testable: Export report in PDF, Excel, HTML
- Acceptance: All formats export successfully
UC-011: Code Review
AC-011-1: Code reviews are completed within 24 hours
- Testable: Track review completion time
- Acceptance: 95% of reviews completed within 24 hours
AC-011-2: Security issues block approval
- Testable: Attempt to approve code with security issues
- Acceptance: Approval blocked until issues resolved
AC-011-3: Review comments are documented
- Testable: Verify review comments in system
- Acceptance: All comments documented and visible
UC-012: Configure Security
AC-012-1: Policies comply with regulations
- Testable: Validate policies against regulatory requirements
- Acceptance: 100% compliance with regulations
AC-012-2: Policy changes are logged
- Testable: Verify audit log for policy changes
- Acceptance: All changes logged with full details
AC-012-3: Users are notified of changes
- Testable: Verify notification delivery
- Acceptance: All affected users notified
UC-013: Handle Error
AC-013-1: Errors are logged with context
- Testable: Verify error log entries
- Acceptance: All errors logged with full context
AC-013-2: Error messages are user-friendly
- Testable: Review error messages for clarity
- Acceptance: Messages are clear and actionable
AC-013-3: Critical errors trigger escalation
- Testable: Trigger critical error and verify escalation
- Acceptance: Escalation triggered automatically
UC-014: Context Assistance
AC-014-1: Assistance is contextually relevant
- Testable: Request assistance in various contexts
- Acceptance: Assistance matches context ≥90% of time
AC-014-2: Assistance includes examples
- Testable: Request assistance and verify examples provided
- Acceptance: Examples provided when applicable
AC-014-3: Assistance is personalized to role
- Testable: Request assistance as different roles
- Acceptance: Assistance varies by role appropriately
UC-015: Audit Reporting
AC-015-1: Audit reports are generated within 24 hours
- Testable: Request audit report and measure generation time
- Acceptance: Report generated within 24 hours
AC-015-2: Compliance violations are reported immediately
- Testable: Trigger compliance violation and verify reporting
- Acceptance: Violation reported within 5 minutes
AC-015-3: Audit logs are immutable
- Testable: Attempt to modify audit log
- Acceptance: Modification blocked
9. TRACEABILITY MATRIX
graph LR
subgraph Requirements
FR1["FR-001: Voice Processing"]
FR2["FR-002: NLP Processing"]
FR3["FR-003: Authentication"]
FR4["FR-004: Architecture Design"]
FR5["FR-005: Code Generation"]
FR6["FR-006: Data Analysis"]
FR7["FR-007: Version Control"]
FR8["FR-008: Debugging"]
FR9["FR-009: Deployment"]
FR10["FR-010: Monitoring"]
FR11["FR-011: Project Management"]
FR12["FR-012: Code Review"]
FR13["FR-013: Security"]
FR14["FR-014: Audit"]
end
subgraph UseCases
UC1["UC-001"]
UC2["UC-002"]
UC3["UC-003"]
UC4["UC-004"]
UC5["UC-005"]
UC6["UC-006"]
UC7["UC-007"]
UC8["UC-008"]
UC9["UC-009"]
UC10["UC-010"]
UC11["UC-011"]
UC12["UC-012"]
UC13["UC-013"]
UC14["UC-014"]
UC15["UC-015"]
end
subgraph BusinessRules
BR1["BR-001 to BR-007"]
BR2["BR-008 to BR-013"]
BR3["BR-014 to BR-019"]
BR4["BR-020 to BR-025"]
BR5["BR-026 to BR-031"]
BR6["BR-038 to BR-043"]
BR7["BR-044 to BR-049"]
BR8["BR-050 to BR-061"]
BR9["BR-062 to BR-067"]
BR10["BR-068 to BR-073"]
BR11["BR-074 to BR-079"]
BR12["BR-080 to BR-085"]
BR13["BR-086 to BR-091"]
end
FR1 --> UC1
FR2 --> UC1
FR3 --> UC1
FR4 --> UC2
FR5 --> UC3
FR6 --> UC4
FR7 --> UC5
FR8 --> UC6
FR9 --> UC7
FR10 --> UC8
FR11 --> UC9
FR11 --> UC10
FR12 --> UC11
FR13 --> UC12
FR14 --> UC15
UC1 --> BR1
UC2 --> BR2
UC3 --> BR3
UC4 --> BR4
UC5 --> BR5
UC7 --> BR6
UC8 --> BR7
UC9 --> BR8
UC10 --> BR8
UC11 --> BR9
UC12 --> BR10
UC13 --> BR11
UC14 --> BR12
UC15 --> BR13
10. SUMMARY AND KEY INSIGHTS
Use Case Coverage
The Voice-Centric Software Development and Data Science Agent system includes 15 comprehensive use cases covering:
- Core Infrastructure (UC-001): Voice command processing foundation
- Development Activities (UC-002, UC-003, UC-005, UC-006, UC-011): Architecture design, code generation, version control, debugging, code review
- Data Science Activities (UC-004): Data analysis and exploration
- Operations (UC-007, UC-008): Deployment and monitoring
- Project Management (UC-009, UC-010): Task management and reporting
- Security & Compliance (UC-012, UC-015): Security policies and audit reporting
- Cross-Cutting Concerns (UC-013, UC-014): Error handling and context-aware assistance
Actor Engagement
- Software Developer: 6 primary use cases + 2 cross-cutting
- Data Scientist: 4 primary use cases + 2 cross-cutting
- Project Manager: 4 primary use cases + 2 cross-cutting
- DevOps Engineer: 5 primary use cases + 2 cross-cutting
- Technical Architect: 5 primary use cases + 2 cross-cutting
- Security Officer: 3 primary use cases + 2 cross-cutting
Business Rules Alignment
- 91 business rules defined across all use cases
- Critical priority: 18 rules (security, compliance, performance)
- High priority: 52 rules (functionality, reliability)
- Medium priority: 21 rules (optimization, user experience)
Key Quality Attributes
- Performance: <500ms voice processing latency, <1 minute metric granularity
- Reliability: 99.9% uptime, automatic error recovery
- Security: Authentication, authorization, audit logging, compliance
- Usability: Context-aware assistance, user-friendly error messages
- Scalability: Support for concurrent users and operations
11. NEXT STEPS
- Functional Requirements Specification: Develop detailed FR document with system capabilities
- Non-Functional Requirements: Define performance, security, scalability requirements
- System Architecture Design: Create detailed architecture diagrams and component specifications
- Data Model Design: Define data structures and database schema
- API Specifications: Document all system interfaces and integrations
- Test Strategy: Develop comprehensive test plans for all use cases
- Implementation Planning: Create development roadmap and sprint planning
Document Version: 1.0
Last Updated: 2024
Status: Complete
Classification: Technical Documentation
Requirements Specification
Comprehensive Requirements Documentation
Voice-Centric Software Development and Data Science Agent
Table of Contents
- Functional Requirements
- Non-Functional Requirements
- Requirements Traceability Matrix
- Requirements Dependency Diagram
- Use Case to Requirements Mapping
FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
FR-001: Voice Command Recognition and Processing
Description: The system shall capture, process, and interpret voice commands from users in real-time, converting speech to text with high accuracy and supporting multiple languages and accents.
Priority: Must Have
Source: All Stakeholders (Core Functionality)
Acceptance Criteria:
- Voice input is captured with minimum 16kHz sampling rate
- Speech-to-text conversion achieves ≥95% accuracy for standard English accents
- System supports minimum 5 languages (English, Spanish, French, German, Mandarin)
- Processing latency from voice capture to text output ≤200ms (p95)
- System handles background noise levels up to 60dB with ≥90% accuracy
- Supports both continuous and command-based voice input modes
- Voice commands are logged with timestamps for audit trails
Traceability: UC-001 (Voice Command Initiation), UC-002 (Code Generation)
FR-002: Natural Language Understanding and Intent Classification
Description: The system shall parse natural language voice commands to identify user intent, extract parameters, and map commands to appropriate system actions.
Priority: Must Have
Source: Software Developer, Data Scientist, Project Manager
Acceptance Criteria:
- Intent classification accuracy ≥92% for predefined command categories
- System extracts minimum 3 parameter types (action, target, context)
- Ambiguous commands trigger clarification prompts within 500ms
- System maintains context across 5+ consecutive commands
- Supports domain-specific terminology for software development and data science
- Handles negations, conditionals, and complex sentence structures
- Provides confidence scores for intent classification (0-100%)
Traceability: UC-001, UC-003 (Architecture Design), UC-004 (Data Analysis)
FR-003: Code Generation from Voice Commands
Description: The system shall generate syntactically correct, functional code snippets in multiple programming languages based on voice-described requirements.
Priority: Must Have
Source: Software Developer
Acceptance Criteria:
- Generated code compiles/runs without syntax errors ≥90% of the time
- Supports minimum 8 programming languages (Python, Java, C++, JavaScript, Go, Rust, TypeScript, C#)
- Generated code includes inline comments explaining logic
- Code follows language-specific style guides (PEP8, Google Style Guide, etc.)
- System provides code quality metrics (cyclomatic complexity, maintainability index)
- Generated code can be directly inserted into IDE or saved to file
- System suggests optimizations for generated code
- Supports generation of unit tests alongside production code
Traceability: UC-002 (Code Generation), UC-005 (Testing Assistance)
FR-004: Architecture Design and Visualization
Description: The system shall create and visualize software architecture diagrams based on voice-described system designs, supporting multiple architecture patterns.
Priority: Must Have
Source: Technical Architect, Software Developer
Acceptance Criteria:
- System generates architecture diagrams in minimum 3 formats (Mermaid, PlantUML, SVG)
- Supports minimum 5 architecture patterns (Microservices, Monolithic, Event-Driven, Layered, CQRS)
- Diagrams include component relationships, data flows, and communication protocols
- System validates architectural consistency and identifies potential issues
- Diagrams can be exported to documentation tools (Confluence, Notion, GitHub)
- System suggests improvements based on architectural best practices
- Supports real-time diagram updates as requirements change
- Diagrams include deployment topology information
Traceability: UC-003 (Architecture Design), UC-006 (Documentation Generation)
FR-005: Data Analysis and Visualization Request Processing
Description: The system shall interpret voice commands for data analysis tasks and generate appropriate analysis code, visualizations, and insights.
Priority: Must Have
Source: Data Scientist
Acceptance Criteria:
- System generates analysis code for minimum 5 data science libraries (Pandas, NumPy, Scikit-learn, TensorFlow, PyTorch)
- Supports minimum 8 visualization types (scatter plots, histograms, heatmaps, time series, box plots, violin plots, 3D plots, interactive dashboards)
- Generated visualizations are publication-ready with proper labels, legends, and formatting
- System performs exploratory data analysis (EDA) automatically when requested
- Supports statistical testing and hypothesis validation
- Generates insights and recommendations from analysis results
- Code includes data validation and error handling
- System suggests appropriate analysis methods based on data characteristics
Traceability: UC-004 (Data Analysis), UC-007 (Model Development)
FR-006: IDE Integration and Code Insertion
Description: The system shall integrate with popular IDEs to enable direct insertion of generated code into active editor windows.
Priority: Must Have
Source: Software Developer
Acceptance Criteria:
- Supports minimum 5 IDEs (VS Code, IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, Visual Studio, Sublime Text)
- Code insertion respects current cursor position and indentation
- System maintains IDE syntax highlighting and formatting
- Supports undo/redo operations for inserted code
- Integration works across Windows, macOS, and Linux platforms
- IDE plugin installation is automated and requires <2 minutes
- System detects active IDE and language context automatically
- Supports code insertion into multiple files simultaneously
Traceability: UC-002 (Code Generation), UC-008 (Development Workflow)
FR-007: Git Repository Integration and Version Control
Description: The system shall integrate with Git repositories to enable voice-controlled version control operations and code management.
Priority: Must Have
Source: Software Developer, DevOps Engineer
Acceptance Criteria:
- Supports voice commands for minimum 10 Git operations (commit, push, pull, branch, merge, rebase, tag, stash, cherry-pick, reset)
- System generates meaningful commit messages based on code changes
- Supports multiple Git hosting platforms (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps)
- Automatic branch creation and switching via voice commands
- Conflict detection and resolution suggestions
- Integration with CI/CD pipelines for automated testing
- Supports code review workflows with voice-based comments
- Maintains audit trail of all Git operations initiated via voice
Traceability: UC-008 (Development Workflow), UC-009 (Collaboration)
FR-008: Project Management and Task Tracking
Description: The system shall enable voice-controlled project management operations including task creation, status updates, and progress tracking.
Priority: Should Have
Source: Project Manager, Software Developer
Acceptance Criteria:
- Supports voice commands for minimum 8 project management operations (create task, update status, assign task, set deadline, add comment, view progress, generate report, schedule meeting)
- Integrates with minimum 3 project management tools (Jira, Asana, Monday.com)
- Automatic task creation from voice commands with extracted parameters
- System generates task descriptions and acceptance criteria
- Supports sprint planning and backlog management via voice
- Real-time progress tracking and burndown chart generation
- Automatic status updates based on code commits and deployments
- Voice-based meeting scheduling with calendar integration
Traceability: UC-010 (Project Management), UC-009 (Collaboration)
FR-009: Real-Time Collaboration and Multi-User Support
Description: The system shall support multiple concurrent users collaborating on the same project with real-time synchronization and conflict resolution.
Priority: Should Have
Source: Project Manager, Software Developer, Data Scientist
Acceptance Criteria:
- Supports minimum 10 concurrent users per project
- Real-time synchronization of changes with <1 second latency
- Automatic conflict detection and resolution for simultaneous edits
- User presence indicators showing who is currently working on what
- Shared voice session support for pair programming
- Activity feed showing all user actions with timestamps
- Permission-based access control for collaborative features
- Automatic backup and recovery of collaborative sessions
Traceability: UC-009 (Collaboration), UC-011 (Pair Programming)
FR-010: Testing and Quality Assurance Assistance
Description: The system shall assist with test case generation, test execution, and quality assurance activities through voice commands.
Priority: Should Have
Source: Software Developer, QA Engineer
Acceptance Criteria:
- Generates unit tests for minimum 5 testing frameworks (JUnit, pytest, Mocha, NUnit, Go testing)
- Supports minimum 4 test types (unit tests, integration tests, end-to-end tests, performance tests)
- Test generation achieves ≥80% code coverage for generated tests
- System suggests edge cases and boundary conditions
- Supports test execution and result reporting via voice
- Integration with CI/CD pipelines for automated test runs
- Generates test reports with pass/fail statistics and performance metrics
- Supports mutation testing and code coverage analysis
Traceability: UC-005 (Testing Assistance), UC-012 (Quality Assurance)
FR-011: Documentation Generation and Management
Description: The system shall automatically generate comprehensive technical documentation from code, architecture, and voice-described requirements.
Priority: Should Have
Source: Technical Architect, Software Developer, Project Manager
Acceptance Criteria:
- Generates documentation in minimum 3 formats (Markdown, HTML, PDF)
- Supports minimum 4 documentation types (API documentation, architecture documentation, user guides, deployment guides)
- Automatic code documentation extraction with docstring generation
- Supports multiple documentation platforms (GitHub Wiki, Confluence, Notion, ReadTheDocs)
- Documentation includes diagrams, code examples, and cross-references
- Version control for documentation with change tracking
- Automatic documentation updates when code changes
- Multi-language documentation support (minimum 5 languages)
Traceability: UC-006 (Documentation Generation), UC-003 (Architecture Design)
FR-012: Machine Learning Model Development Assistance
Description: The system shall assist with machine learning model development including model selection, training, evaluation, and deployment guidance.
Priority: Should Have
Source: Data Scientist
Acceptance Criteria:
- Supports minimum 8 ML frameworks (Scikit-learn, TensorFlow, PyTorch, XGBoost, LightGBM, Keras, Hugging Face, MLflow)
- Generates code for minimum 10 model types (Linear Regression, Logistic Regression, Decision Trees, Random Forests, SVM, Neural Networks, CNNs, RNNs, Transformers, Ensemble Methods)
- Automatic hyperparameter tuning suggestions
- Model evaluation with minimum 5 metrics (accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, AUC-ROC)
- Cross-validation and train-test split management
- Feature engineering suggestions and implementation
- Model comparison and selection recommendations
- Deployment guidance for production environments
Traceability: UC-007 (Model Development), UC-013 (ML Pipeline)
FR-013: Database Schema Design and Query Generation
Description: The system shall assist with database design, schema creation, and SQL query generation based on voice-described requirements.
Priority: Should Have
Source: Software Developer, Data Scientist
Acceptance Criteria:
- Supports minimum 5 database systems (PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, Cassandra, DynamoDB)
- Generates normalized database schemas following minimum 3NF principles
- Automatic primary key, foreign key, and index suggestions
- Generates SQL queries for minimum 8 operation types (SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, JOIN, GROUP BY, aggregations, window functions)
- Query optimization suggestions and execution plan analysis
- Supports both SQL and NoSQL query generation
- Automatic migration script generation for schema changes
- Data validation and constraint generation
Traceability: UC-004 (Data Analysis), UC-014 (Database Design)
FR-014: Deployment and DevOps Automation
Description: The system shall provide voice-controlled deployment and DevOps automation capabilities including infrastructure provisioning and monitoring.
Priority: Should Have
Source: DevOps Engineer, Software Developer
Acceptance Criteria:
- Supports voice commands for minimum 10 deployment operations (deploy, rollback, scale, monitor, alert, provision, configure, backup, restore, update)
- Integrates with minimum 3 cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud)
- Supports minimum 3 container orchestration platforms (Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, ECS)
- Automatic infrastructure-as-code generation (Terraform, CloudFormation, Ansible)
- Deployment pipeline creation and management via voice
- Real-time deployment status monitoring and logging
- Automatic rollback on deployment failures
- Health check and monitoring configuration
Traceability: UC-015 (Deployment), UC-016 (DevOps Automation)
FR-015: Security and Vulnerability Analysis
Description: The system shall analyze code and configurations for security vulnerabilities and provide remediation recommendations.
Priority: Should Have
Source: Security Officer, Software Developer
Acceptance Criteria:
- Detects minimum 15 vulnerability categories (SQL injection, XSS, CSRF, authentication flaws, authorization flaws, insecure deserialization, broken access control, sensitive data exposure, XXE, broken authentication, using components with known vulnerabilities, insufficient logging, missing encryption, hardcoded credentials, insecure dependencies)
- Supports minimum 3 security scanning tools (OWASP ZAP, Snyk, SonarQube)
- Generates remediation code for identified vulnerabilities
- Compliance checking for minimum 3 standards (OWASP Top 10, CWE Top 25, GDPR)
- Automatic dependency vulnerability scanning
- Security report generation with severity levels
- Integration with security incident management systems
- Continuous security monitoring and alerting
Traceability: UC-017 (Security Analysis), UC-018 (Compliance)
FR-016: User Authentication and Authorization
Description: The system shall implement secure user authentication and role-based access control for all features and resources.
Priority: Must Have
Source: Security Officer, All Stakeholders
Acceptance Criteria:
- Supports minimum 3 authentication methods (username/password, OAuth 2.0, SAML 2.0)
- Multi-factor authentication (MFA) support with minimum 2 factors (TOTP, SMS)
- Role-based access control (RBAC) with minimum 5 roles (Admin, Architect, Developer, Data Scientist, Viewer)
- Fine-grained permission management at feature and resource level
- Session management with configurable timeout (default 30 minutes)
- Audit logging of all authentication and authorization events
- Support for single sign-on (SSO) integration
- Password policy enforcement (minimum 12 characters, complexity requirements)
Traceability: UC-019 (User Management), UC-020 (Security)
FR-017: Voice Session Management and Context Preservation
Description: The system shall maintain user context across voice sessions and enable seamless continuation of work.
Priority: Must Have
Source: All Stakeholders
Acceptance Criteria:
- Session state persists across minimum 24 hours of inactivity
- Context includes minimum 10 previous commands and their results
- Users can reference previous commands by number or description
- Automatic context switching between projects/tasks
- Session history is searchable and filterable
- Context can be exported and shared with other users
- Automatic context cleanup after 30 days of inactivity
- Context includes user preferences and customizations
Traceability: UC-001 (Voice Command Initiation), UC-021 (Session Management)
FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Description: The system shall provide comprehensive error handling, recovery mechanisms, and user-friendly error messages.
Priority: Must Have
Source: All Stakeholders
Acceptance Criteria:
- All errors are caught and logged with full stack traces
- User-facing error messages are clear and actionable (no technical jargon)
- System suggests recovery actions for common errors
- Automatic retry logic for transient failures (maximum 3 retries with exponential backoff)
- Graceful degradation when optional services are unavailable
- Error recovery options presented via voice interface
- Detailed error logs available for debugging (minimum 30 days retention)
- Error analytics and trending for proactive issue identification
Traceability: UC-022 (Error Handling), All Use Cases
FR-019: Feedback and Continuous Improvement
Description: The system shall collect user feedback and continuously improve based on usage patterns and user satisfaction.
Priority: Could Have
Source: Product Manager, All Stakeholders
Acceptance Criteria:
- Voice-based feedback collection after each major operation
- Feedback includes satisfaction rating (1-5 scale) and optional comments
- System tracks minimum 10 quality metrics (accuracy, latency, usefulness, ease of use, etc.)
- Feedback data is analyzed for trends and improvement opportunities
- A/B testing framework for feature improvements
- User satisfaction dashboard with minimum monthly reporting
- Feedback integration with product roadmap planning
- Automatic alerts for significant quality degradation
Traceability: UC-023 (Feedback), UC-024 (Continuous Improvement)
FR-020: Offline Mode and Caching
Description: The system shall support offline mode with local caching for frequently used features and data.
Priority: Could Have
Source: Software Developer, Data Scientist
Acceptance Criteria:
- Offline mode supports minimum 5 core features (code generation, documentation, architecture design, analysis, testing)
- Local cache stores minimum 100 recent commands and results
- Automatic synchronization when connectivity is restored
- Cache invalidation strategy with configurable TTL (default 24 hours)
- Offline mode clearly indicated to user via voice notification
- Conflict resolution for changes made offline vs. online
- Cache storage limited to 500MB per user
- Secure cache encryption for sensitive data
Traceability: UC-025 (Offline Mode), UC-026 (Caching)
NON-FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Performance Requirements
NFR-P-001: Voice Processing Latency
Description: Voice input processing shall complete within specified latency thresholds to ensure responsive user experience.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Speech-to-text conversion: ≤200ms (p95), ≤300ms (p99)
- Intent classification: ≤150ms (p95), ≤250ms (p99)
- Code generation initiation: ≤500ms (p95), ≤1000ms (p99)
- End-to-end voice command processing: ≤1000ms (p95), ≤2000ms (p99)
- Voice output generation: ≤300ms (p95), ≤500ms (p99)
- Measured under normal load conditions (100 concurrent users)
Traceability: FR-001, FR-002, FR-003
NFR-P-002: Code Generation Performance
Description: Code generation operations shall complete within acceptable timeframes based on complexity.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Simple code snippets (<50 lines): ≤2 seconds
- Medium complexity code (50-200 lines): ≤5 seconds
- Complex code (200+ lines): ≤15 seconds
- Architecture diagram generation: ≤3 seconds
- Test case generation: ≤4 seconds
- Documentation generation: ≤10 seconds
- Measured with 100 concurrent users
Traceability: FR-003, FR-010, FR-011
NFR-P-003: Data Analysis Performance
Description: Data analysis operations shall complete within acceptable timeframes based on dataset size.
Priority: Should Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Analysis of datasets <1GB: ≤5 seconds
- Analysis of datasets 1-10GB: ≤30 seconds
- Analysis of datasets 10-100GB: ≤120 seconds
- Visualization generation: ≤3 seconds
- Statistical testing: ≤5 seconds
- Model training (small datasets): ≤30 seconds
- Measured with 50 concurrent users
Traceability: FR-005, FR-012
NFR-P-004: Throughput and Capacity
Description: System shall handle specified concurrent user load and request throughput.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Support minimum 1000 concurrent voice sessions
- Process minimum 10,000 voice commands per minute
- Support minimum 500 concurrent code generation requests
- Support minimum 100 concurrent data analysis requests
- Database query throughput: minimum 50,000 queries per second
- API throughput: minimum 100,000 requests per second
- Measured under sustained load for minimum 1 hour
Traceability: NFR-S-001, NFR-S-002
NFR-P-005: Memory and Resource Utilization
Description: System components shall operate within specified memory and resource constraints.
Priority: Should Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Voice processing service: ≤500MB per concurrent user
- Code generation service: ≤1GB per concurrent request
- Data analysis service: ≤2GB per concurrent request
- API gateway: ≤2GB for 1000 concurrent connections
- Database: ≤80% memory utilization under peak load
- CPU utilization: ≤75% under peak load
- Disk I/O: ≤80% utilization under peak load
Traceability: NFR-S-001, NFR-S-002
Scalability Requirements
NFR-S-001: Horizontal Scalability
Description: System architecture shall support horizontal scaling to handle increased load.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Stateless microservices enable linear scaling with added instances
- Load balancing distributes traffic evenly across minimum 10 instances
- Auto-scaling triggers at 70% CPU utilization
- Auto-scaling scales down at 30% CPU utilization
- Scaling operations complete within 2 minutes
- No service interruption during scaling operations
- Database connection pooling supports minimum 10,000 connections
- Cache layer (Redis) supports minimum 100GB data
Traceability: NFR-P-004, NFR-R-001
NFR-S-002: Data Scalability
Description: System shall handle growing data volumes without performance degradation.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Database supports minimum 10TB of data
- Query performance remains constant as data grows (with proper indexing)
- Archive strategy for data older than 1 year
- Data partitioning strategy for tables >1GB
- Backup and recovery time: ≤4 hours for 10TB database
- Data retention policy: minimum 7 years for audit logs
- Time-series data compression: minimum 10:1 ratio
- Search index supports minimum 1 billion documents
Traceability: NFR-P-004, NFR-R-001
NFR-S-003: User Scalability
Description: System shall support growing number of users without performance degradation.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Support minimum 100,000 registered users
- Support minimum 10,000 concurrent active users
- Support minimum 1,000,000 voice commands per day
- Per-user resource allocation remains constant as user base grows
- User onboarding process completes within 5 minutes
- User data isolation and multi-tenancy support
- Tenant-specific resource quotas and limits
- Fair resource allocation across all users
Traceability: NFR-P-004, NFR-R-001
NFR-S-004: Feature Scalability
Description: System architecture shall support addition of new features without major refactoring.
Priority: Should Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Plugin architecture for new language support
- Extensible intent classification framework
- Modular service architecture for new integrations
- Feature flags for gradual rollout of new features
- A/B testing framework for feature validation
- Backward compatibility for API changes (minimum 2 versions)
- Feature deprecation process with minimum 6-month notice
- Feature documentation and training materials
Traceability: NFR-P-005, NFR-M-001
Security Requirements
NFR-SEC-001: Authentication and Authorization
Description: System shall implement secure authentication and authorization mechanisms.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect compliance
- SAML 2.0 support for enterprise SSO
- Multi-factor authentication (MFA) mandatory for admin users
- TOTP (Time-based One-Time Password) support
- SMS-based OTP as fallback MFA method
- Session tokens with 30-minute expiration
- Refresh token rotation on each use
- Role-based access control (RBAC) with minimum 5 roles
- Attribute-based access control (ABAC) for fine-grained permissions
- API key authentication for service-to-service communication
Traceability: FR-016, FR-017
NFR-SEC-002: Data Encryption
Description: System shall encrypt sensitive data in transit and at rest.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- TLS 1.3 for all data in transit
- Minimum 256-bit AES encryption for data at rest
- Encryption key management with HSM (Hardware Security Module)
- Key rotation every 90 days
- Separate encryption keys for each tenant
- Database-level encryption for sensitive columns
- Encrypted backups with separate key management
- End-to-end encryption for user-to-user communication
- Encryption of voice recordings and transcripts
- Secure key storage with access logging
Traceability: FR-016, FR-015
NFR-SEC-003: Vulnerability Management
Description: System shall implement processes to identify and remediate security vulnerabilities.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Automated dependency scanning (daily)
- Static application security testing (SAST) on every commit
- Dynamic application security testing (DAST) weekly
- Penetration testing quarterly
- Security code review for all changes
- Vulnerability disclosure policy with 90-day remediation SLA
- Security patch deployment within 24 hours for critical vulnerabilities
- Vulnerability tracking and metrics dashboard
- Integration with security incident management
- Security training for all developers (annual)
Traceability: FR-015, FR-016
NFR-SEC-004: Data Privacy and Compliance
Description: System shall comply with data privacy regulations and protect user data.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- GDPR compliance (right to be forgotten, data portability, consent management)
- CCPA compliance (data access, deletion, opt-out)
- HIPAA compliance for healthcare data (if applicable)
- SOC 2 Type II certification
- ISO 27001 certification
- Data classification and handling procedures
- Privacy impact assessment (PIA) for new features
- Data retention and deletion policies
- User consent management for data processing
- Privacy policy and terms of service
- Data breach notification within 72 hours
Traceability: FR-016, FR-015
NFR-SEC-005: Audit Logging and Monitoring
Description: System shall maintain comprehensive audit logs and monitor for security threats.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- All authentication events logged (login, logout, MFA, password change)
- All authorization events logged (permission changes, role assignments)
- All data access events logged (read, write, delete operations)
- All system configuration changes logged
- Audit logs immutable and tamper-proof
- Audit log retention: minimum 7 years
- Real-time security monitoring and alerting
- Intrusion detection system (IDS) deployment
- Web application firewall (WAF) deployment
- DDoS protection and mitigation
- Security incident response procedures
- Incident response time: <1 hour for critical incidents
Traceability: FR-016, FR-015
NFR-SEC-006: API Security
Description: System APIs shall be secured against common attacks and unauthorized access.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- API authentication via OAuth 2.0 or API keys
- Rate limiting: 1000 requests per minute per user
- Request validation and sanitization
- SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries)
- Cross-site scripting (XSS) prevention
- Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection
- API versioning with backward compatibility
- API documentation with security guidelines
- API monitoring and anomaly detection
- API gateway with request/response logging
- CORS policy enforcement
- API deprecation process with 6-month notice
Traceability: FR-016, FR-015
Reliability Requirements
NFR-R-001: Availability and Uptime
Description: System shall maintain high availability and uptime.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Target uptime: 99.9% (maximum 43.2 minutes downtime per month)
- Measured across all system components
- Excludes planned maintenance windows (maximum 4 hours per month)
- Redundancy for all critical components (minimum 2 instances)
- Geographic distribution across minimum 3 availability zones
- Automatic failover within 30 seconds
- Health checks every 10 seconds
- Uptime monitoring and alerting
- Uptime SLA with financial penalties for breaches
- Uptime dashboard publicly available
Traceability: NFR-P-001, NFR-R-002
NFR-R-002: Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity
Description: System shall have disaster recovery and business continuity plans.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Recovery Time Objective (RTO): ≤1 hour
- Recovery Point Objective (RPO): ≤15 minutes
- Backup frequency: every 15 minutes for critical data
- Backup retention: minimum 30 days
- Backup testing: monthly
- Disaster recovery drills: quarterly
- Backup geographic distribution (minimum 2 regions)
- Backup encryption and access controls
- Disaster recovery runbook and procedures
- Incident communication plan
- Business continuity plan with minimum 2 recovery sites
Traceability: NFR-R-001, NFR-P-004
NFR-R-003: Error Handling and Recovery
Description: System shall handle errors gracefully and recover automatically.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- All exceptions caught and logged
- Automatic retry logic for transient failures (maximum 3 retries)
- Exponential backoff for retries (1s, 2s, 4s)
- Circuit breaker pattern for failing services
- Graceful degradation when optional services unavailable
- User-friendly error messages (no technical jargon)
- Error recovery suggestions provided to users
- Error analytics and trending
- Automatic error notification to support team
- Error resolution time tracking
Traceability: FR-018, NFR-R-001
NFR-R-004: Data Integrity and Consistency
Description: System shall maintain data integrity and consistency.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- ACID compliance for database transactions
- Data validation at input and storage
- Referential integrity constraints
- Duplicate detection and prevention
- Data reconciliation processes (daily)
- Checksum verification for data transfers
- Conflict resolution for concurrent updates
- Data consistency monitoring and alerting
- Data repair procedures for corruption
- Data integrity testing (monthly)
Traceability: NFR-R-001, NFR-R-002
NFR-R-005: Monitoring and Alerting
Description: System shall have comprehensive monitoring and alerting capabilities.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Real-time monitoring of all system components
- Minimum 50 key performance indicators (KPIs) tracked
- Alert thresholds defined for all critical metrics
- Alert notification within 1 minute of threshold breach
- Multiple alert channels (email, SMS, Slack, PagerDuty)
- Alert escalation procedures
- Alert fatigue prevention (alert tuning)
- Monitoring dashboard with customizable views
- Historical metrics retention: minimum 1 year
- Monitoring data export for analysis
Traceability: NFR-R-001, NFR-R-002
Usability Requirements
NFR-U-001: Voice Interface Usability
Description: Voice interface shall be intuitive and easy to use for all user types.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Voice commands follow natural language patterns
- System provides voice prompts and guidance
- Voice feedback confirms command receipt and execution
- Error messages are clear and actionable
- Help system accessible via voice (“help”, “what can you do”)
- Command history accessible and searchable
- Voice interface supports minimum 5 languages
- Accent and dialect support for major English variants
- Voice speed adjustment (0.5x to 2x)
- Quiet mode for sensitive environments
- Accessibility features for users with disabilities
Traceability: FR-001, FR-002
NFR-U-002: User Interface Design
Description: User interface shall follow modern design principles and accessibility standards.
Priority: Should Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- WCAG 2.1 Level AA compliance
- Responsive design for minimum 5 screen sizes (mobile, tablet, laptop, desktop, large display)
- Dark mode and light mode support
- Customizable UI themes
- Keyboard navigation support
- Screen reader compatibility
- Color contrast ratio ≥4.5:1 for text
- Font size adjustable (minimum 12pt to 24pt)
- Touch-friendly interface for mobile devices
- Consistent UI patterns across all pages
Traceability: NFR-U-001, NFR-C-001
NFR-U-003: Onboarding and Training
Description: System shall provide effective onboarding and training for new users.
Priority: Should Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Interactive onboarding tutorial (≤10 minutes)
- Voice-guided setup process
- Sample projects for hands-on learning
- Video tutorials for major features (minimum 5 videos)
- Documentation with examples and use cases
- In-app help and tooltips
- FAQ section with minimum 50 questions
- Community forum for peer support
- Email support with 24-hour response time
- Onboarding completion tracking
Traceability: NFR-U-001, NFR-U-002
NFR-U-004: Personalization and Customization
Description: System shall support user personalization and customization.
Priority: Could Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- User preferences storage (language, timezone, theme, etc.)
- Custom command aliases
- Customizable voice settings (speed, pitch, accent)
- Personalized recommendations based on usage patterns
- Custom dashboard layouts
- Saved searches and filters
- Custom report templates
- Integration preferences
- Notification preferences
- Privacy settings customization
Traceability: NFR-U-001, NFR-U-002
Maintainability Requirements
NFR-M-001: Code Quality and Standards
Description: System code shall maintain high quality and follow established standards.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Code coverage: minimum 80% for unit tests
- Code coverage: minimum 60% for integration tests
- Cyclomatic complexity: maximum 10 per function
- Maintainability index: minimum 70
- Technical debt ratio: maximum 5%
- Code review required for all changes
- Automated code quality checks on every commit
- Coding standards documented and enforced
- Design patterns and best practices followed
- Code duplication: maximum 5%
Traceability: NFR-M-002, NFR-M-003
NFR-M-002: Documentation
Description: System shall have comprehensive documentation.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Architecture documentation with diagrams
- API documentation with examples
- Code documentation with inline comments
- Deployment documentation and runbooks
- Troubleshooting guides
- Configuration documentation
- Security documentation
- Performance tuning guides
- Release notes for each version
- Documentation version control
- Documentation review process
- Documentation update frequency: within 1 week of code changes
Traceability: FR-011, NFR-M-001
NFR-M-003: Version Control and Release Management
Description: System shall use version control and follow release management practices.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Git-based version control with minimum 3 branches (main, develop, feature)
- Semantic versioning (MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH)
- Release notes for each version
- Changelog maintained and updated
- Release process documented and automated
- Release frequency: minimum monthly
- Hotfix process for critical issues
- Version tagging in Git
- Release approval workflow
- Rollback procedures documented
Traceability: FR-007, NFR-M-001
NFR-M-004: Logging and Debugging
Description: System shall provide comprehensive logging and debugging capabilities.
Priority: Should Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Structured logging with minimum 5 log levels (DEBUG, INFO, WARN, ERROR, FATAL)
- Log retention: minimum 30 days
- Log aggregation and centralization
- Log search and filtering capabilities
- Distributed tracing for request tracking
- Performance profiling tools
- Memory leak detection
- Debug mode for development
- Log sampling for high-volume scenarios
- Log analysis and alerting
Traceability: NFR-M-001, NFR-R-005
NFR-M-005: Testing and Quality Assurance
Description: System shall have comprehensive testing and QA processes.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Unit testing framework (minimum 80% coverage)
- Integration testing framework (minimum 60% coverage)
- End-to-end testing framework
- Performance testing framework
- Security testing framework
- Automated test execution on every commit
- Test result reporting and tracking
- Regression testing for each release
- Load testing before each release
- Accessibility testing for UI changes
- Test data management and cleanup
Traceability: FR-010, NFR-M-001
Compatibility Requirements
NFR-C-001: Browser and Device Compatibility
Description: System shall be compatible with major browsers and devices.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Desktop browsers: Chrome (latest 2 versions), Firefox (latest 2 versions), Safari (latest 2 versions), Edge (latest 2 versions)
- Mobile browsers: Chrome Mobile, Safari Mobile, Firefox Mobile
- Operating systems: Windows 10+, macOS 10.15+, Linux (Ubuntu 20.04+)
- Mobile devices: iOS 13+, Android 10+
- Screen sizes: 320px to 4K (3840x2160)
- Touch and mouse input support
- Keyboard navigation support
- Voice input support on all platforms
- Offline functionality on supported browsers
- Progressive web app (PWA) support
Traceability: NFR-U-002, NFR-C-002
NFR-C-002: IDE and Tool Integration
Description: System shall integrate with popular development tools and IDEs.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- IDE support: VS Code, IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, Visual Studio, Sublime Text
- Version control: Git, GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps
- Project management: Jira, Asana, Monday.com
- Documentation: Confluence, Notion, GitHub Wiki
- Communication: Slack, Microsoft Teams, Discord
- Cloud platforms: AWS, Azure, Google Cloud
- Container platforms: Docker, Kubernetes
- CI/CD platforms: Jenkins, GitLab CI, GitHub Actions, Azure Pipelines
- Monitoring: Datadog, New Relic, Prometheus, ELK Stack
- Integration testing for each tool
Traceability: FR-006, FR-007, FR-008
NFR-C-003: Programming Language Support
Description: System shall support multiple programming languages.
Priority: Must Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Supported languages: Python, Java, C++, JavaScript, Go, Rust, TypeScript, C#, PHP, Ruby, Kotlin, Swift
- Language-specific code generation
- Language-specific testing frameworks
- Language-specific documentation generation
- Language-specific linting and formatting
- Language-specific security scanning
- Language-specific performance profiling
- Language-specific debugging support
- New language support process documented
Traceability: FR-003, FR-010
NFR-C-004: Database System Support
Description: System shall support multiple database systems.
Priority: Should Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- Relational databases: PostgreSQL, MySQL, Oracle, SQL Server
- NoSQL databases: MongoDB, Cassandra, DynamoDB, Redis
- Time-series databases: InfluxDB, Prometheus
- Search engines: Elasticsearch, Solr
- Data warehouses: Snowflake, BigQuery, Redshift
- Database-specific query generation
- Database-specific optimization recommendations
- Database-specific backup and recovery
- Database-specific monitoring and alerting
- Database migration support
Traceability: FR-014, NFR-C-002
NFR-C-005: API and Protocol Support
Description: System shall support standard APIs and protocols.
Priority: Should Have
Acceptance Criteria:
- REST API support
- GraphQL support
- gRPC support
- WebSocket support
- MQTT support
- HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 support
- OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect
- SAML 2.0 support
- API rate limiting and throttling
- API versioning and deprecation
- API documentation generation
- API testing and monitoring
Traceability: NFR-C-002, NFR-SEC-006
REQUIREMENTS TRACEABILITY MATRIX
graph TD
UC1["UC-001: Voice Command Initiation"]
UC2["UC-002: Code Generation"]
UC3["UC-003: Architecture Design"]
UC4["UC-004: Data Analysis"]
UC5["UC-005: Testing Assistance"]
UC6["UC-006: Documentation Generation"]
UC7["UC-007: Model Development"]
UC8["UC-008: Development Workflow"]
UC9["UC-009: Collaboration"]
UC10["UC-010: Project Management"]
UC11["UC-011: Pair Programming"]
UC12["UC-012: Quality Assurance"]
UC13["UC-013: ML Pipeline"]
UC14["UC-014: Database Design"]
UC15["UC-015: Deployment"]
UC16["UC-016: DevOps Automation"]
UC17["UC-017: Security Analysis"]
UC18["UC-018: Compliance"]
UC19["UC-019: User Management"]
UC20["UC-020: Security"]
UC21["UC-021: Session Management"]
UC22["UC-022: Error Handling"]
UC23["UC-023: Feedback"]
UC24["UC-024: Continuous Improvement"]
UC25["UC-025: Offline Mode"]
UC26["UC-026: Caching"]
FR1["FR-001: Voice Recognition"]
FR2["FR-002: NLU & Intent"]
FR3["FR-003: Code Generation"]
FR4["FR-004: Architecture Design"]
FR5["FR-005: Data Analysis"]
FR6["FR-006: IDE Integration"]
FR7["FR-007: Git Integration"]
FR8["FR-008: Project Management"]
FR9["FR-009: Collaboration"]
FR10["FR-010: Testing"]
FR11["FR-011: Documentation"]
FR12["FR-012: ML Development"]
FR13["FR-013: Database Design"]
FR14["FR-014: Deployment"]
FR15["FR-015: Security Analysis"]
FR16["FR-016: Auth & Authz"]
FR17["FR-017: Session Management"]
FR18["FR-018: Error Handling"]
FR19["FR-019: Feedback"]
FR20["FR-020: Offline Mode"]
NFR_P1["NFR-P-001: Voice Latency"]
NFR_P2["NFR-P-002: Code Gen Performance"]
NFR_P3["NFR-P-003: Data Analysis Performance"]
NFR_P4["NFR-P-004: Throughput"]
NFR_P5["NFR-P-005: Resource Utilization"]
NFR_S1["NFR-S-001: Horizontal Scalability"]
NFR_S2["NFR-S-002: Data Scalability"]
NFR_S3["NFR-S-003: User Scalability"]
NFR_S4["NFR-S-004: Feature Scalability"]
NFR_SEC1["NFR-SEC-001: Auth & Authz"]
NFR_SEC2["NFR-SEC-002: Encryption"]
NFR_SEC3["NFR-SEC-003: Vulnerability Mgmt"]
NFR_SEC4["NFR-SEC-004: Privacy & Compliance"]
NFR_SEC5["NFR-SEC-005: Audit Logging"]
NFR_SEC6["NFR-SEC-006: API Security"]
NFR_R1["NFR-R-001: Availability"]
NFR_R2["NFR-R-002: Disaster Recovery"]
NFR_R3["NFR-R-003: Error Handling"]
NFR_R4["NFR-R-004: Data Integrity"]
NFR_R5["NFR-R-005: Monitoring"]
NFR_U1["NFR-U-001: Voice Usability"]
NFR_U2["NFR-U-002: UI Design"]
NFR_U3["NFR-U-003: Onboarding"]
NFR_U4["NFR-U-004: Personalization"]
NFR_M1["NFR-M-001: Code Quality"]
NFR_M2["NFR-M-002: Documentation"]
NFR_M3["NFR-M-003: Version Control"]
NFR_M4["NFR-M-004: Logging"]
NFR_M5["NFR-M-005: Testing & QA"]
NFR_C1["NFR-C-001: Browser Compat"]
NFR_C2["NFR-C-002: Tool Integration"]
NFR_C3["NFR-C-003: Language Support"]
NFR_C4["NFR-C-004: Database Support"]
NFR_C5["NFR-C-005: API Support"]
UC1 --> FR1
UC1 --> FR2
UC1 --> FR17
UC1 --> FR18
UC2 --> FR3
UC2 --> FR6
UC2 --> FR10
UC3 --> FR4
UC3 --> FR11
UC4 --> FR5
UC4 --> FR13
UC5 --> FR10
UC5 --> FR12
UC6 --> FR11
UC7 --> FR12
UC7 --> FR5
UC8 --> FR6
UC8 --> FR7
UC8 --> FR3
UC9 --> FR9
UC9 --> FR8
UC10 --> FR8
UC11 --> FR9
UC11 --> FR6
UC12 --> FR10
UC12 --> FR15
UC13 --> FR12
UC13 --> FR5
UC14 --> FR13
UC15 --> FR14
UC16 --> FR14
UC17 --> FR15
UC18 --> FR15
UC19 --> FR16
UC20 --> FR16
UC20 --> FR15
UC21 --> FR17
UC22 --> FR18
UC23 --> FR19
UC24 --> FR19
UC25 --> FR20
UC26 --> FR20
FR1 --> NFR_P1
FR1 --> NFR_U1
FR1 --> NFR_C1
FR2 --> NFR_P1
FR2 --> NFR_P2
FR3 --> NFR_P2
FR3 --> NFR_C3
FR4 --> NFR_P2
FR5 --> NFR_P3
FR5 --> NFR_C4
FR6 --> NFR_C2
FR7 --> NFR_C2
FR8 --> NFR_S3
FR9 --> NFR_S1
FR9 --> NFR_R1
FR10 --> NFR_M5
FR11 --> NFR_M2
FR12 --> NFR_C3
FR12 --> NFR_C4
FR13 --> NFR_C4
FR14 --> NFR_C2
FR15 --> NFR_SEC3
FR15 --> NFR_SEC4
FR16 --> NFR_SEC1
FR16 --> NFR_SEC2
FR16 --> NFR_SEC5
FR17 --> NFR_R1
FR18 --> NFR_R3
FR19 --> NFR_U4
FR20 --> NFR_P5
NFR_P1 --> NFR_P4
NFR_P2 --> NFR_P4
NFR_P3 --> NFR_P4
NFR_P4 --> NFR_S1
NFR_P5 --> NFR_S1
NFR_S1 --> NFR_S2
NFR_S1 --> NFR_S3
NFR_SEC1 --> NFR_SEC5
NFR_SEC2 --> NFR_SEC5
NFR_SEC3 --> NFR_SEC5
NFR_SEC4 --> NFR_SEC5
NFR_SEC6 --> NFR_SEC5
NFR_R1 --> NFR_R2
NFR_R1 --> NFR_R5
NFR_R3 --> NFR_R4
NFR_U1 --> NFR_U2
NFR_U1 --> NFR_U3
NFR_M1 --> NFR_M2
NFR_M1 --> NFR_M3
NFR_M1 --> NFR_M4
NFR_M1 --> NFR_M5
NFR_C1 --> NFR_C2
NFR_C2 --> NFR_C3
NFR_C2 --> NFR_C4
NFR_C2 --> NFR_C5
style UC1 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC2 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC3 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC4 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC5 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC6 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC7 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC8 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC9 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC10 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC11 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC12 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC13 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC14 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC15 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC16 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC17 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC18 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC19 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC20 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC21 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC22 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC23 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC24 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC25 fill:#e1f5ff
style UC26 fill:#e1f5ff
style FR1 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR2 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR3 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR4 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR5 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR6 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR7 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR8 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR9 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR10 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR11 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR12 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR13 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR14 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR15 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR16 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR17 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR18 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR19 fill:#c8e6c9
style FR20 fill:#c8e6c9
style NFR_P1 fill:#fff9c4
style NFR_P2 fill:#fff9c4
style NFR_P3 fill:#fff9c4
style NFR_P4 fill:#fff9c4
style NFR_P5 fill:#fff9c4
style NFR_S1 fill:#fff9c4
style NFR_S2 fill:#fff9c4
style NFR_S3 fill:#fff9c4
style NFR_S4 fill:#fff9c4
style NFR_SEC1 fill:#ffccbc
style NFR_SEC2 fill:#ffccbc
style NFR_SEC3 fill:#ffccbc
style NFR_SEC4 fill:#ffccbc
style NFR_SEC5 fill:#ffccbc
style NFR_SEC6 fill:#ffccbc
style NFR_R1 fill:#f8bbd0
style NFR_R2 fill:#f8bbd0
style NFR_R3 fill:#f8bbd0
style NFR_R4 fill:#f8bbd0
style NFR_R5 fill:#f8bbd0
style NFR_U1 fill:#d1c4e9
style NFR_U2 fill:#d1c4e9
style NFR_U3 fill:#d1c4e9
style NFR_U4 fill:#d1c4e9
style NFR_M1 fill:#b2dfdb
style NFR_M2 fill:#b2dfdb
style NFR_M3 fill:#b2dfdb
style NFR_M4 fill:#b2dfdb
style NFR_M5 fill:#b2dfdb
style NFR_C1 fill:#ffe0b2
style NFR_C2 fill:#ffe0b2
style NFR_C3 fill:#ffe0b2
style NFR_C4 fill:#ffe0b2
style NFR_C5 fill:#ffe0b2
REQUIREMENTS DEPENDENCY DIAGRAM
Core Functional Requirements Dependencies
graph TD
FR1["FR-001: Voice Recognition<br/>Priority: Must Have"]
FR2["FR-002: NLU & Intent<br/>Priority: Must Have"]
FR3["FR-003: Code Generation<br/>Priority: Must Have"]
FR4["FR-004: Architecture Design<br/>Priority: Must Have"]
FR5["FR-005: Data Analysis<br/>Priority: Must Have"]
FR6["FR-006: IDE Integration<br/>Priority: Must Have"]
FR7["FR-007: Git Integration<br/>Priority: Must Have"]
FR8["FR-008: Project Management<br/>Priority: Should Have"]
FR9["FR-009: Collaboration<br/>Priority: Should Have"]
FR10["FR-010: Testing<br/>Priority: Should Have"]
FR11["FR-011: Documentation<br/>Priority: Should Have"]
FR12["FR-012: ML Development<br/>Priority: Should Have"]
FR13["FR-013: Database Design<br/>Priority: Should Have"]
FR14["FR-014: Deployment<br/>Priority: Should Have"]
FR15["FR-015: Security Analysis<br/>Priority: Should Have"]
FR16["FR-016: Auth & Authz<br/>Priority: Must Have"]
FR17["FR-017: Session Management<br/>Priority: Must Have"]
FR18["FR-018: Error Handling<br/>Priority: Must Have"]
FR19["FR-019: Feedback<br/>Priority: Could Have"]
FR20["FR-020: Offline Mode<br/>Priority: Could Have"]
FR1 --> FR2
FR2 --> FR3
FR2 --> FR4
FR2 --> FR5
FR2 --> FR8
FR2 --> FR12
FR2 --> FR13
FR2 --> FR14
FR2 --> FR15
FR3 --> FR6
FR3 --> FR10
FR3 --> FR11
FR4 --> FR11
FR5 --> FR12
FR5 --> FR13
FR6 --> FR7
FR6 --> FR9
FR7 --> FR8
FR7 --> FR9
FR8 --> FR9
FR9 --> FR11
FR10 --> FR11
FR12 --> FR14
FR13 --> FR14
FR15 --> FR16
FR16 --> FR17
FR16 --> FR18
FR17 --> FR20
FR18 --> FR19
FR20 --> FR19
style FR1 fill:#c8e6c9,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:3px
style FR2 fill:#c8e6c9,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:3px
style FR3 fill:#c8e6c9,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:3px
style FR4 fill:#c8e6c9,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:3px
style FR5 fill:#c8e6c9,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:3px
style FR6 fill:#c8e6c9,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:3px
style FR7 fill:#c8e6c9,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:3px
style FR8 fill:#a5d6a7,stroke:#558b2f,stroke-width:2px
style FR9 fill:#a5d6a7,stroke:#558b2f,stroke-width:2px
style FR10 fill:#a5d6a7,stroke:#558b2f,stroke-width:2px
style FR11 fill:#a5d6a7,stroke:#558b2f,stroke-width:2px
style FR12 fill:#a5d6a7,stroke:#558b2f,stroke-width:2px
style FR13 fill:#a5d6a7,stroke:#558b2f,stroke-width:2px
style FR14 fill:#a5d6a7,stroke:#558b2f,stroke-width:2px
style FR15 fill:#a5d6a7,stroke:#558b2f,stroke-width:2px
style FR16 fill:#c8e6c9,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:3px
style FR17 fill:#c8e6c9,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:3px
style FR18 fill:#c8e6c9,stroke:#2e7d32,stroke-width:3px
style FR19 fill:#81c784,stroke:#9ccc65,stroke-width:1px
style FR20 fill:#81c784,stroke:#9ccc65,stroke-width:1px
Non-Functional Requirements Dependencies
graph TD
NFR_P1["NFR-P-001: Voice Latency<br/>Target: ≤200ms p95"]
NFR_P2["NFR-P-002: Code Gen Performance<br/>Target: ≤15s for complex"]
NFR_P3["NFR-P-003: Data Analysis Performance<br/>Target: ≤120s for 100GB"]
NFR_P4["NFR-P-004: Throughput<br/>Target: 100k req/s"]
NFR_P5["NFR-P-005: Resource Utilization<br/>Target: ≤75% CPU"]
NFR_S1["NFR-S-001: Horizontal Scalability<br/>Target: Linear scaling"]
NFR_S2["NFR-S-002: Data Scalability<br/>Target: 10TB database"]
NFR_S3["NFR-S-003: User Scalability<br/>Target: 100k users"]
NFR_S4["NFR-S-004: Feature Scalability<br/>Target: Plugin architecture"]
NFR_SEC1["NFR-SEC-001: Auth & Authz<br/>OAuth 2.0, SAML 2.0, MFA"]
NFR_SEC2["NFR-SEC-002: Encryption<br/>TLS 1.3, AES-256"]
NFR_SEC3["NFR-SEC-003: Vulnerability Mgmt<br/>SAST, DAST, Pen Testing"]
NFR_SEC4["NFR-SEC-004: Privacy & Compliance<br/>GDPR, CCPA, SOC 2"]
NFR_SEC5["NFR-SEC-005: Audit Logging<br/>7-year retention"]
NFR_SEC6["NFR-SEC-006: API Security<br/>Rate limiting, validation"]
NFR_R1["NFR-R-001: Availability<br/>Target: 99.9% uptime"]
NFR_R2["NFR-R-002: Disaster Recovery<br/>RTO: ≤1h, RPO: ≤15m"]
NFR_R3["NFR-R-003: Error Handling<br/>Automatic retry & recovery"]
NFR_R4["NFR-R-004: Data Integrity<br/>ACID compliance"]
NFR_R5["NFR-R-005: Monitoring<br/>50+ KPIs tracked"]
NFR_U1["NFR-U-001: Voice Usability<br/>Natural language support"]
NFR_U2["NFR-U-002: UI Design<br/>WCAG 2.1 Level AA"]
NFR_U3["NFR-U-003: Onboarding<br/>≤10 min tutorial"]
NFR_U4["NFR-U-004: Personalization<br/>Custom preferences"]
NFR_M1["NFR-M-001: Code Quality<br/>80% coverage, max 10 complexity"]
NFR_M2["NFR-M-002: Documentation<br/>Comprehensive & updated"]
NFR_M3["NFR-M-003: Version Control<br/>Semantic versioning"]
NFR_M4["NFR-M-004: Logging<br/>30-day retention"]
NFR_M5["NFR-M-005: Testing & QA<br/>Automated testing"]
NFR_C1["NFR-C-001: Browser Compat<br/>Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge"]
NFR_C2["NFR-C-002: Tool Integration<br/>5+ IDEs, 8+ platforms"]
NFR_C3["NFR-C-003: Language Support<br/>12+ languages"]
NFR_C4["NFR-C-004: Database Support<br/>SQL & NoSQL"]
NFR_C5["NFR-C-005: API Support<br/>REST, GraphQL, gRPC"]
NFR_P1 --> NFR_P4
NFR_P2 --> NFR_P4
NFR_P3 --> NFR_P4
NFR_P5 --> NFR_P4
NFR_P4 --> NFR_S1
NFR_P4 --> NFR_S2
NFR_P4 --> NFR_S3
NFR_S1 --> NFR_R1
NFR_S2 --> NFR_R1
NFR_S3 --> NFR_R1
NFR_SEC1 --> NFR_SEC5
NFR_SEC2 --> NFR_SEC5
NFR_SEC3 --> NFR_SEC5
NFR_SEC4 --> NFR_SEC5
NFR_SEC6 --> NFR_SEC5
NFR_SEC5 --> NFR_R1
NFR_R1 --> NFR_R2
NFR_R1 --> NFR_R5
NFR_R3 --> NFR_R4
NFR_R4 --> NFR_R1
NFR_U1 --> NFR_U2
NFR_U2 --> NFR_U3
NFR_U3 --> NFR_U4
NFR_M1 --> NFR_M2
NFR_M1 --> NFR_M3
NFR_M1 --> NFR_M4
NFR_M1 --> NFR_M5
NFR_M5 --> NFR_R1
NFR_C1 --> NFR_C2
NFR_C2 --> NFR_C3
NFR_C2 --> NFR_C4
NFR_C2 --> NFR_C5
style NFR_P1 fill:#fff9c4,stroke:#f57f17,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_P2 fill:#fff9c4,stroke:#f57f17,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_P3 fill:#fff9c4,stroke:#f57f17,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_P4 fill:#fff9c4,stroke:#f57f17,stroke-width:3px
style NFR_P5 fill:#fff9c4,stroke:#f57f17,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_S1 fill:#fff9c4,stroke:#f57f17,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_S2 fill:#fff9c4,stroke:#f57f17,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_S3 fill:#fff9c4,stroke:#f57f17,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_S4 fill:#fff9c4,stroke:#f57f17,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_SEC1 fill:#ffccbc,stroke:#d84315,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_SEC2 fill:#ffccbc,stroke:#d84315,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_SEC3 fill:#ffccbc,stroke:#d84315,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_SEC4 fill:#ffccbc,stroke:#d84315,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_SEC5 fill:#ffccbc,stroke:#d84315,stroke-width:3px
style NFR_SEC6 fill:#ffccbc,stroke:#d84315,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_R1 fill:#f8bbd0,stroke:#c2185b,stroke-width:3px
style NFR_R2 fill:#f8bbd0,stroke:#c2185b,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_R3 fill:#f8bbd0,stroke:#c2185b,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_R4 fill:#f8bbd0,stroke:#c2185b,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_R5 fill:#f8bbd0,stroke:#c2185b,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_U1 fill:#d1c4e9,stroke:#512da8,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_U2 fill:#d1c4e9,stroke:#512da8,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_U3 fill:#d1c4e9,stroke:#512da8,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_U4 fill:#d1c4e9,stroke:#512da8,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_M1 fill:#b2dfdb,stroke:#00695c,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_M2 fill:#b2dfdb,stroke:#00695c,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_M3 fill:#b2dfdb,stroke:#00695c,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_M4 fill:#b2dfdb,stroke:#00695c,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_M5 fill:#b2dfdb,stroke:#00695c,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_C1 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#e65100,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_C2 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#e65100,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_C3 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#e65100,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_C4 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#e65100,stroke-width:2px
style NFR_C5 fill:#ffe0b2,stroke:#e65100,stroke-width:2px
USE CASE TO REQUIREMENTS MAPPING
UC-001: Voice Command Initiation
Description: User initiates system interaction through voice command
Primary Actor: All Stakeholders
Functional Requirements:
- FR-001: Voice Command Recognition and Processing
- FR-002: Natural Language Understanding and Intent Classification
- FR-017: Voice Session Management and Context Preservation
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-P-001: Voice Processing Latency (≤200ms p95)
- NFR-U-001: Voice Interface Usability
- NFR-C-001: Browser and Device Compatibility
- NFR-R-005: Monitoring and Alerting
Test Cases:
- TC-001-001: Verify voice capture at 16kHz sampling rate
- TC-001-002: Verify speech-to-text accuracy ≥95%
- TC-001-003: Verify processing latency ≤200ms p95
- TC-001-004: Verify context preservation across commands
- TC-001-005: Verify error handling for invalid input
UC-002: Code Generation
Description: User requests code generation for specific requirements
Primary Actor: Software Developer
Functional Requirements:
- FR-002: Natural Language Understanding and Intent Classification
- FR-003: Code Generation from Voice Commands
- FR-006: IDE Integration and Code Insertion
- FR-010: Testing and Quality Assurance Assistance
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-P-002: Code Generation Performance (≤15s for complex)
- NFR-C-003: Programming Language Support (12+ languages)
- NFR-M-001: Code Quality and Standards (80% coverage)
- NFR-M-005: Testing and Quality Assurance
Test Cases:
- TC-002-001: Verify code generation for Python function
- TC-002-002: Verify code generation for Java class
- TC-002-003: Verify code insertion into VS Code
- TC-002-004: Verify generated code compiles without errors
- TC-002-005: Verify code follows PEP8 style guide
- TC-002-006: Verify unit test generation
- TC-002-007: Verify code quality metrics calculation
UC-003: Architecture Design
Description: User designs software architecture through voice commands
Primary Actor: Technical Architect, Software Developer
Functional Requirements:
- FR-002: Natural Language Understanding and Intent Classification
- FR-004: Architecture Design and Visualization
- FR-011: Documentation Generation and Management
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-P-002: Code Generation Performance
- NFR-C-002: Tool Integration (Mermaid, PlantUML)
- NFR-M-002: Documentation
- NFR-U-002: UI Design
Test Cases:
- TC-003-001: Verify microservices architecture generation
- TC-003-002: Verify architecture diagram export to Mermaid
- TC-003-003: Verify architecture validation
- TC-003-004: Verify documentation generation
- TC-003-005: Verify architecture pattern suggestions
UC-004: Data Analysis
Description: User performs data analysis through voice commands
Primary Actor: Data Scientist
Functional Requirements:
- FR-002: Natural Language Understanding and Intent Classification
- FR-005: Data Analysis and Visualization Request Processing
- FR-013: Database Schema Design and Query Generation
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-P-003: Data Analysis Performance (≤120s for 100GB)
- NFR-C-004: Database System Support (SQL & NoSQL)
- NFR-M-005: Testing and Quality Assurance
- NFR-R-004: Data Integrity and Consistency
Test Cases:
- TC-004-001: Verify exploratory data analysis generation
- TC-004-002: Verify visualization generation (scatter plot)
- TC-004-003: Verify statistical testing
- TC-004-004: Verify SQL query generation
- TC-004-005: Verify data validation
- TC-004-006: Verify analysis performance for 100GB dataset
UC-005: Testing Assistance
Description: User receives assistance with test case generation and execution
Primary Actor: Software Developer, QA Engineer
Functional Requirements:
- FR-002: Natural Language Understanding and Intent Classification
- FR-010: Testing and Quality Assurance Assistance
- FR-003: Code Generation from Voice Commands
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-M-005: Testing and Quality Assurance (80% coverage)
- NFR-C-003: Programming Language Support
- NFR-P-002: Code Generation Performance
- NFR-R-005: Monitoring and Alerting
Test Cases:
- TC-005-001: Verify unit test generation for Python
- TC-005-002: Verify integration test generation
- TC-005-003: Verify test execution and reporting
- TC-005-004: Verify code coverage calculation
- TC-005-005: Verify edge case suggestions
UC-006: Documentation Generation
Description: User generates technical documentation from code and architecture
Primary Actor: Technical Architect, Software Developer
Functional Requirements:
- FR-002: Natural Language Understanding and Intent Classification
- FR-011: Documentation Generation and Management
- FR-004: Architecture Design and Visualization
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-M-002: Documentation (Markdown, HTML, PDF)
- NFR-P-002: Code Generation Performance
- NFR-C-002: Tool Integration (Confluence, Notion)
- NFR-U-002: UI Design
Test Cases:
- TC-006-001: Verify API documentation generation
- TC-006-002: Verify architecture documentation generation
- TC-006-003: Verify documentation export to Markdown
- TC-006-004: Verify documentation export to PDF
- TC-006-005: Verify documentation version control
UC-007: Model Development
Description: User develops machine learning models with system assistance
Primary Actor: Data Scientist
Functional Requirements:
- FR-002: Natural Language Understanding and Intent Classification
- FR-012: Machine Learning Model Development Assistance
- FR-005: Data Analysis and Visualization Request Processing
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-P-003: Data Analysis Performance
- NFR-C-003: Programming Language Support (Python, R)
- NFR-C-004: Database System Support
- NFR-M-005: Testing and Quality Assurance
Test Cases:
- TC-007-001: Verify model selection recommendations
- TC-007-002: Verify hyperparameter tuning suggestions
- TC-007-003: Verify model evaluation metrics calculation
- TC-007-004: Verify cross-validation implementation
- TC-007-005: Verify feature engineering suggestions
UC-008: Development Workflow
Description: User manages development workflow including code insertion and version control
Primary Actor: Software Developer
Functional Requirements:
- FR-003: Code Generation from Voice Commands
- FR-006: IDE Integration and Code Insertion
- FR-007: Git Repository Integration and Version Control
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-C-002: Tool Integration (5+ IDEs, Git platforms)
- NFR-P-002: Code Generation Performance
- NFR-M-003: Version Control and Release Management
- NFR-R-005: Monitoring and Alerting
Test Cases:
- TC-008-001: Verify code insertion into VS Code
- TC-008-002: Verify Git commit with auto-generated message
- TC-008-003: Verify branch creation and switching
- TC-008-004: Verify merge conflict detection
- TC-008-005: Verify CI/CD pipeline integration
UC-009: Collaboration
Description: Multiple users collaborate on the same project in real-time
Primary Actor: Software Developer, Data Scientist, Project Manager
Functional Requirements:
- FR-009: Real-Time Collaboration and Multi-User Support
- FR-008: Project Management and Task Tracking
- FR-006: IDE Integration and Code Insertion
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-S-001: Horizontal Scalability (10 concurrent users)
- NFR-R-001: Availability (99.9% uptime)
- NFR-P-004: Throughput (100k req/s)
- NFR-SEC-005: Audit Logging
Test Cases:
- TC-009-001: Verify real-time synchronization (<1s latency)
- TC-009-002: Verify conflict detection and resolution
- TC-009-003: Verify user presence indicators
- TC-009-004: Verify activity feed generation
- TC-009-005: Verify permission-based access control
UC-010: Project Management
Description: Project manager tracks project progress and manages tasks
Primary Actor: Project Manager
Functional Requirements:
- FR-008: Project Management and Task Tracking
- FR-002: Natural Language Understanding and Intent Classification
- FR-009: Real-Time Collaboration and Multi-User Support
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-C-002: Tool Integration (Jira, Asana, Monday.com)
- NFR-S-003: User Scalability (100k users)
- NFR-U-002: UI Design
- NFR-R-005: Monitoring and Alerting
Test Cases:
- TC-010-001: Verify task creation from voice command
- TC-010-002: Verify status update via voice
- TC-010-003: Verify sprint planning
- TC-010-004: Verify burndown chart generation
- TC-010-005: Verify Jira integration
UC-011: Pair Programming
Description: Two developers collaborate on code through shared voice session
Primary Actor: Software Developer
Functional Requirements:
- FR-009: Real-Time Collaboration and Multi-User Support
- FR-006: IDE Integration and Code Insertion
- FR-003: Code Generation from Voice Commands
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-R-001: Availability (99.9% uptime)
- NFR-P-001: Voice Processing Latency (≤200ms p95)
- NFR-S-001: Horizontal Scalability
- NFR-SEC-005: Audit Logging
Test Cases:
- TC-011-001: Verify shared voice session creation
- TC-011-002: Verify real-time code synchronization
- TC-011-003: Verify voice communication quality
- TC-011-004: Verify session recording and playback
- TC-011-005: Verify session termination and cleanup
UC-012: Quality Assurance
Description: QA team performs quality assurance and testing activities
Primary Actor: QA Engineer, Software Developer
Functional Requirements:
- FR-010: Testing and Quality Assurance Assistance
- FR-015: Security and Vulnerability Analysis
- FR-002: Natural Language Understanding and Intent Classification
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-M-005: Testing and Quality Assurance (80% coverage)
- NFR-SEC-003: Vulnerability Management
- NFR-P-002: Code Generation Performance
- NFR-R-005: Monitoring and Alerting
Test Cases:
- TC-012-001: Verify security vulnerability detection
- TC-012-002: Verify test case generation
- TC-012-003: Verify test execution and reporting
- TC-012-004: Verify code coverage analysis
- TC-012-005: Verify compliance checking
UC-013: ML Pipeline
Description: Data scientist creates end-to-end machine learning pipeline
Primary Actor: Data Scientist
Functional Requirements:
- FR-012: Machine Learning Model Development Assistance
- FR-005: Data Analysis and Visualization Request Processing
- FR-013: Database Schema Design and Query Generation
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-P-003: Data Analysis Performance
- NFR-C-003: Programming Language Support (Python)
- NFR-C-004: Database System Support
- NFR-M-005: Testing and Quality Assurance
Test Cases:
- TC-013-001: Verify data pipeline generation
- TC-013-002: Verify model training code generation
- TC-013-003: Verify model evaluation code generation
- TC-013-004: Verify deployment code generation
- TC-013-005: Verify pipeline monitoring setup
UC-014: Database Design
Description: Developer designs database schema through voice commands
Primary Actor: Software Developer, Data Scientist
Functional Requirements:
- FR-013: Database Schema Design and Query Generation
- FR-002: Natural Language Understanding and Intent Classification
- FR-004: Architecture Design and Visualization
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-C-004: Database System Support (SQL & NoSQL)
- NFR-R-004: Data Integrity and Consistency
- NFR-P-002: Code Generation Performance
- NFR-M-002: Documentation
Test Cases:
- TC-014-001: Verify schema generation for PostgreSQL
- TC-014-002: Verify schema normalization
- TC-014-003: Verify index suggestions
- TC-014-004: Verify SQL query generation
- TC-014-005: Verify migration script generation
UC-015: Deployment
Description: DevOps engineer deploys application to production
Primary Actor: DevOps Engineer, Software Developer
Functional Requirements:
- FR-014: Deployment and DevOps Automation
- FR-002: Natural Language Understanding and Intent Classification
- FR-007: Git Repository Integration and Version Control
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-C-002: Tool Integration (AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes)
- NFR-R-001: Availability (99.9% uptime)
- NFR-R-002: Disaster Recovery (RTO ≤1h)
- NFR-R-005: Monitoring and Alerting
Test Cases:
- TC-015-001: Verify deployment to AWS
- TC-015-002: Verify deployment to Kubernetes
- TC-015-003: Verify deployment status monitoring
- TC-015-004: Verify automatic rollback on failure
- TC-015-005: Verify health check configuration
UC-016: DevOps Automation
Description: DevOps engineer automates infrastructure and operations
Primary Actor: DevOps Engineer
Functional Requirements:
- FR-014: Deployment and DevOps Automation
- FR-002: Natural Language Understanding and Intent Classification
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-C-002: Tool Integration (Terraform, Ansible, CloudFormation)
- NFR-S-001: Horizontal Scalability
- NFR-R-001: Availability (99.9% uptime)
- NFR-R-005: Monitoring and Alerting
Test Cases:
- TC-016-001: Verify infrastructure provisioning
- TC-016-002: Verify auto-scaling configuration
- TC-016-003: Verify monitoring setup
- TC-016-004: Verify backup configuration
- TC-016-005: Verify disaster recovery setup
UC-017: Security Analysis
Description: Security officer analyzes code and configurations for vulnerabilities
Primary Actor: Security Officer, Software Developer
Functional Requirements:
- FR-015: Security and Vulnerability Analysis
- FR-002: Natural Language Understanding and Intent Classification
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-SEC-003: Vulnerability Management
- NFR-SEC-004: Privacy and Compliance
- NFR-SEC-005: Audit Logging
- NFR-M-002: Documentation
Test Cases:
- TC-017-001: Verify SQL injection detection
- TC-017-002: Verify XSS vulnerability detection
- TC-017-003: Verify hardcoded credential detection
- TC-017-004: Verify dependency vulnerability scanning
- TC-017-005: Verify remediation code generation
UC-018: Compliance
Description: Organization ensures compliance with regulations and standards
Primary Actor: Security Officer, Compliance Officer
Functional Requirements:
- FR-015: Security and Vulnerability Analysis
- FR-016: User Authentication and Authorization
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-SEC-004: Privacy and Compliance (GDPR, CCPA, SOC 2)
- NFR-SEC-005: Audit Logging (7-year retention)
- NFR-M-002: Documentation
- NFR-R-005: Monitoring and Alerting
Test Cases:
- TC-018-001: Verify GDPR compliance
- TC-018-002: Verify CCPA compliance
- TC-018-003: Verify SOC 2 compliance
- TC-018-004: Verify audit log retention
- TC-018-005: Verify compliance reporting
UC-019: User Management
Description: Administrator manages users and permissions
Primary Actor: Admin, Security Officer
Functional Requirements:
- FR-016: User Authentication and Authorization
- FR-002: Natural Language Understanding and Intent Classification
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-SEC-001: Authentication and Authorization
- NFR-SEC-005: Audit Logging
- NFR-U-003: Onboarding and Training
- NFR-R-005: Monitoring and Alerting
Test Cases:
- TC-019-001: Verify user creation
- TC-019-002: Verify role assignment
- TC-019-003: Verify permission management
- TC-019-004: Verify MFA setup
- TC-019-005: Verify user deactivation
UC-020: Security
Description: System maintains security across all operations
Primary Actor: Security Officer, All Stakeholders
Functional Requirements:
- FR-016: User Authentication and Authorization
- FR-015: Security and Vulnerability Analysis
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-SEC-001: Authentication and Authorization
- NFR-SEC-002: Data Encryption (TLS 1.3, AES-256)
- NFR-SEC-005: Audit Logging
- NFR-SEC-006: API Security
Test Cases:
- TC-020-001: Verify TLS 1.3 encryption
- TC-020-002: Verify AES-256 encryption at rest
- TC-020-003: Verify API rate limiting
- TC-020-004: Verify request validation
- TC-020-005: Verify audit log integrity
UC-021: Session Management
Description: System manages user sessions and context
Primary Actor: All Stakeholders
Functional Requirements:
- FR-017: Voice Session Management and Context Preservation
- FR-016: User Authentication and Authorization
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-R-001: Availability (99.9% uptime)
- NFR-SEC-005: Audit Logging
- NFR-P-001: Voice Processing Latency
- NFR-U-001: Voice Interface Usability
Test Cases:
- TC-021-001: Verify session creation
- TC-021-002: Verify context preservation
- TC-021-003: Verify session timeout
- TC-021-004: Verify session recovery
- TC-021-005: Verify session cleanup
UC-022: Error Handling
Description: System handles errors gracefully and provides recovery options
Primary Actor: All Stakeholders
Functional Requirements:
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
- FR-002: Natural Language Understanding and Intent Classification
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-R-003: Error Handling and Recovery
- NFR-R-005: Monitoring and Alerting
- NFR-M-004: Logging and Debugging
- NFR-U-001: Voice Interface Usability
Test Cases:
- TC-022-001: Verify error logging
- TC-022-002: Verify automatic retry logic
- TC-022-003: Verify user-friendly error messages
- TC-022-004: Verify error recovery suggestions
- TC-022-005: Verify error analytics
UC-023: Feedback
Description: System collects user feedback for continuous improvement
Primary Actor: All Stakeholders
Functional Requirements:
- FR-019: Feedback and Continuous Improvement
- FR-002: Natural Language Understanding and Intent Classification
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-U-001: Voice Interface Usability
- NFR-U-004: Personalization and Customization
- NFR-R-005: Monitoring and Alerting
- NFR-M-004: Logging and Debugging
Test Cases:
- TC-023-001: Verify feedback collection
- TC-023-002: Verify satisfaction rating
- TC-023-003: Verify feedback analysis
- TC-023-004: Verify trend identification
- TC-023-005: Verify feedback integration with roadmap
UC-024: Continuous Improvement
Description: System continuously improves based on usage and feedback
Primary Actor: Product Manager, Development Team
Functional Requirements:
- FR-019: Feedback and Continuous Improvement
- FR-002: Natural Language Understanding and Intent Classification
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-U-004: Personalization and Customization
- NFR-M-001: Code Quality and Standards
- NFR-R-005: Monitoring and Alerting
- NFR-S-004: Feature Scalability
Test Cases:
- TC-024-001: Verify A/B testing framework
- TC-024-002: Verify feature flag management
- TC-024-003: Verify quality metrics tracking
- TC-024-004: Verify improvement suggestions
- TC-024-005: Verify rollout automation
UC-025: Offline Mode
Description: User can work offline with local caching
Primary Actor: Software Developer, Data Scientist
Functional Requirements:
- FR-020: Offline Mode and Caching
- FR-001: Voice Command Recognition and Processing
- FR-018: Error Handling and Recovery
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-P-005: Memory and Resource Utilization (500MB cache)
- NFR-R-004: Data Integrity and Consistency
- NFR-U-001: Voice Interface Usability
- NFR-C-001: Browser and Device Compatibility
Test Cases:
- TC-025-001: Verify offline mode activation
- TC-025-002: Verify local cache storage
- TC-025-003: Verify offline command execution
- TC-025-004: Verify synchronization on reconnect
- TC-025-005: Verify conflict resolution
UC-026: Caching
Description: System caches frequently used data and commands
Primary Actor: All Stakeholders
Functional Requirements:
- FR-020: Offline Mode and Caching
- FR-001: Voice Command Recognition and Processing
Non-Functional Requirements:
- NFR-P-005: Memory and Resource Utilization
- NFR-P-004: Throughput and Capacity
- NFR-R-004: Data Integrity and Consistency
- NFR-SEC-002: Data Encryption
Test Cases:
- TC-026-001: Verify cache hit rate
- TC-026-002: Verify cache invalidation
- TC-026-003: Verify cache encryption
- TC-026-004: Verify cache cleanup
- TC-026-005: Verify cache performance improvement
REQUIREMENTS TRACEABILITY MATRIX TABLE
| Requirement ID | Description | Priority | Source | Related FRs | Related NFRs | Test Cases | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR-001 | Voice Command Recognition | Must Have | All | - | NFR-P-001, NFR-U-001, NFR-C-001 | TC-001-001 to TC-001-005 | Defined |
| FR-002 | NLU & Intent Classification | Must Have | All | - | NFR-P-001, NFR-P-002 | TC-001-001 to TC-001-005 | Defined |
| FR-003 | Code Generation | Must Have | Developer | FR-006, FR-010 | NFR-P-002, NFR-C-003, NFR-M-001 | TC-002-001 to TC-002-007 | Defined |
| FR-004 | Architecture Design | Must Have | Architect | FR-011 | NFR-P-002, NFR-C-002, NFR-M-002 | TC-003-001 to TC-003-005 | Defined |
| FR-005 | Data Analysis | Must Have | Data Scientist | FR-012, FR-013 | NFR-P-003, NFR-C-004, NFR-M-005 | TC-004-001 to TC-004-006 | Defined |
| FR-006 | IDE Integration | Must Have | Developer | FR-003, FR-007, FR-009 | NFR-C-002, NFR-P-002 | TC-008-001 to TC-008-005 | Defined |
| FR-007 | Git Integration | Must Have | Developer | FR-006, FR-008, FR-009 | NFR-C-002, NFR-M-003 | TC-008-001 to TC-008-005 | Defined |
| FR-008 | Project Management | Should Have | PM | FR-009 | NFR-C-002, NFR-S-003 | TC-010-001 to TC-010-005 | Defined |
| FR-009 | Collaboration | Should Have | All | FR-006, FR-007, FR-008 | NFR-S-001, NFR-R-001, NFR-P-004 | TC-009-001 to TC-009-005 | Defined |
| FR-010 | Testing | Should Have | Developer | FR-003 | NFR-M-005, NFR-C-003 | TC-005-001 to TC-005-005 | Defined |
| FR-011 | Documentation | Should Have | Architect | FR-004 | NFR-M-002, NFR-C-002 | TC-006-001 to TC-006-005 | Defined |
| FR-012 | ML Development | Should Have | Data Scientist | FR-005 | NFR-P-003, NFR-C-003, NFR-C-004 | TC-007-001 to TC-007-005 | Defined |
| FR-013 | Database Design | Should Have | Developer | FR-005 | NFR-C-004, NFR-R-004 | TC-014-001 to TC-014-005 | Defined |
| FR-014 | Deployment | Should Have | DevOps | FR-007 | NFR-C-002, NFR-R-001, NFR-R-002 | TC-015-001 to TC-015-005 | Defined |
| FR-015 | Security Analysis | Should Have | Security | FR-016 | NFR-SEC-003, NFR-SEC-004 | TC-017-001 to TC-017-005 | Defined |
| FR-016 | Auth & Authz | Must Have | Security | FR-017, FR-018 | NFR-SEC-001, NFR-SEC-002, NFR-SEC-005 | TC-019-001 to TC-019-005 | Defined |
| FR-017 | Session Management | Must Have | All | FR-016, FR-018 | NFR-R-001, NFR-SEC-005 | TC-021-001 to TC-021-005 | Defined |
| FR-018 | Error Handling | Must Have | All | - | NFR-R-003, NFR-R-005, NFR-M-004 | TC-022-001 to TC-022-005 | Defined |
| FR-019 | Feedback | Could Have | PM | - | NFR-U-001, NFR-U-004 | TC-023-001 to TC-023-005 | Defined |
| FR-020 | Offline Mode | Could Have | Developer | - | NFR-P-005, NFR-R-004 | TC-025-001 to TC-025-005 | Defined |
SUMMARY STATISTICS
Functional Requirements Summary
| Priority | Count | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Must Have | 10 | 50% |
| Should Have | 8 | 40% |
| Could Have | 2 | 10% |
| Won’t Have | 0 | 0% |
| Total | 20 | 100% |
Non-Functional Requirements Summary
| Category | Count | Critical | High | Medium |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Scalability | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Security | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
| Reliability | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Usability | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Maintainability | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Compatibility | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Total | 34 | 16 | 14 | 4 |
Use Cases Summary
| Category | Count |
|---|---|
| Core Development | 8 |
| Data Science | 4 |
| Operations & DevOps | 3 |
| Collaboration & Management | 3 |
| Security & Compliance | 2 |
| System Management | 6 |
| Total | 26 |
REQUIREMENTS VALIDATION CHECKLIST
- All requirements have unique identifiers
- All requirements have clear, testable descriptions
- All requirements have defined priorities
- All requirements have identified sources
- All requirements have acceptance criteria
- All requirements have traceability links
- All requirements are consistent and non-conflicting
- All requirements are feasible within constraints
- All requirements are aligned with project goals
- All requirements have associated test cases
- All requirements follow naming conventions
- All requirements are measurable and verifiable
NEXT STEPS
- Requirements Review: Conduct stakeholder review and approval
- Requirements Prioritization: Finalize MoSCoW prioritization with stakeholders
- Requirements Refinement: Address feedback and clarifications
- Test Case Development: Develop detailed test cases for each requirement
- Architecture Design: Begin system architecture design based on requirements
- Implementation Planning: Create implementation roadmap and sprint planning
- Continuous Monitoring: Track requirement changes and updates throughout project lifecycle
Document Version: 1.0
Last Updated: 2024
Status: Draft - Awaiting Stakeholder Review
Next Review Date: Upon stakeholder feedback
System Architecture
Voice-Centric Software Development and Data Science Agent
Comprehensive Architecture Documentation
Table of Contents
- System Context Diagram (C4 Level 1)
- Container Diagram (C4 Level 2)
- Component Diagram (C4 Level 3)
- Deployment Diagram
- Technology Stack Summary
- Architecture Decision Records
- Data Flow Architecture
- Security Architecture
- Integration Architecture
System Context Diagram (C4 Level 1)
Overview
The Voice-Centric Agent operates as a central hub connecting developers and data scientists with their development tools, data platforms, and collaboration systems through natural language voice interfaces.
graph TB
subgraph Users["👥 Users"]
DEV["Developer"]
DS["Data Scientist"]
PM["Project Manager"]
DEVOPS["DevOps Engineer"]
end
subgraph VoiceAgent["🎤 Voice-Centric Agent System"]
AGENT["Voice AI Agent<br/>NLP Engine<br/>Task Orchestration"]
end
subgraph ExternalSystems["🔗 External Systems"]
IDE["IDE Integration<br/>VS Code, JetBrains"]
GIT["Git Repository<br/>GitHub, GitLab"]
JUPYTER["Jupyter Notebooks<br/>Data Analysis"]
JIRA["Project Management<br/>Jira, Asana"]
SLACK["Communication<br/>Slack, Teams"]
CLOUD["Cloud Platforms<br/>AWS, GCP, Azure"]
MONITOR["Monitoring<br/>Datadog, Prometheus"]
end
DEV --> AGENT
DS --> AGENT
PM --> AGENT
DEVOPS --> AGENT
AGENT --> IDE
AGENT --> GIT
AGENT --> JUPYTER
AGENT --> JIRA
AGENT --> SLACK
AGENT --> CLOUD
AGENT --> MONITOR
style AGENT fill:#4A90E2,stroke:#2E5C8A,stroke-width:3px,color:#fff
style Users fill:#E8F4F8,stroke:#4A90E2,stroke-width:2px
style ExternalSystems fill:#F0F0F0,stroke:#666,stroke-width:2px
System Responsibilities
- Voice Input Processing: Capture and process voice commands with <500ms latency
- Natural Language Understanding: Parse developer intent and technical context
- Task Orchestration: Route requests to appropriate external systems
- Real-time Feedback: Provide voice and visual feedback on task execution
- Context Management: Maintain conversation history and project context
- Security & Compliance: Enforce authentication, authorization, and data privacy
Container Diagram (C4 Level 2)
High-Level Architecture
graph TB
subgraph ClientLayer["🖥️ Client Layer"]
WEB["Web Dashboard<br/>React + TypeScript<br/>Real-time UI"]
MOBILE["Mobile App<br/>React Native<br/>Voice Interface"]
VOICE["Voice Client<br/>WebRTC<br/>Audio Streaming"]
end
subgraph APIGateway["🚪 API Gateway & Load Balancing"]
LB["Load Balancer<br/>Nginx/HAProxy"]
APIGW["API Gateway<br/>Kong/AWS API Gateway"]
end
subgraph CoreServices["⚙️ Core Microservices"]
VOICE_SVC["Voice Processing Service<br/>Python/FastAPI<br/>Audio Processing"]
NLP_SVC["NLP Service<br/>Python/FastAPI<br/>Intent Recognition"]
TASK_SVC["Task Orchestration Service<br/>Node.js/Express<br/>Workflow Management"]
CONTEXT_SVC["Context Management Service<br/>Node.js/Express<br/>State Management"]
INTEGRATION_SVC["Integration Service<br/>Python/FastAPI<br/>External APIs"]
end
subgraph DataLayer["💾 Data Layer"]
POSTGRES["Primary Database<br/>PostgreSQL<br/>Relational Data"]
REDIS["Cache Layer<br/>Redis<br/>Session & Cache"]
MONGO["Document Store<br/>MongoDB<br/>Conversation Logs"]
VECTOR_DB["Vector Database<br/>Pinecone/Weaviate<br/>Embeddings"]
end
subgraph ExternalIntegrations["🔌 External Integrations"]
IDE_ADAPTER["IDE Adapter<br/>VS Code Extension"]
GIT_ADAPTER["Git Adapter<br/>GitHub/GitLab API"]
JUPYTER_ADAPTER["Jupyter Adapter<br/>Notebook API"]
JIRA_ADAPTER["Jira Adapter<br/>REST API"]
CLOUD_ADAPTER["Cloud Adapter<br/>AWS/GCP/Azure SDK"]
end
subgraph SupportServices["🛠️ Support Services"]
AUTH["Authentication Service<br/>OAuth 2.0/JWT"]
LOGGING["Logging Service<br/>ELK Stack"]
MONITORING["Monitoring Service<br/>Prometheus/Grafana"]
QUEUE["Message Queue<br/>RabbitMQ/Kafka"]
end
%% Client to Gateway
WEB --> LB
MOBILE --> LB
VOICE --> LB
LB --> APIGW
%% Gateway to Services
APIGW --> VOICE_SVC
APIGW --> NLP_SVC
APIGW --> TASK_SVC
APIGW --> CONTEXT_SVC
APIGW --> INTEGRATION_SVC
%% Services to Data Layer
VOICE_SVC --> REDIS
NLP_SVC --> VECTOR_DB
TASK_SVC --> POSTGRES
CONTEXT_SVC --> MONGO
CONTEXT_SVC --> REDIS
INTEGRATION_SVC --> POSTGRES
%% Services to External
TASK_SVC --> IDE_ADAPTER
TASK_SVC --> GIT_ADAPTER
TASK_SVC --> JUPYTER_ADAPTER
TASK_SVC --> JIRA_ADAPTER
INTEGRATION_SVC --> CLOUD_ADAPTER
%% Support Services
VOICE_SVC --> AUTH
NLP_SVC --> AUTH
TASK_SVC --> QUEUE
VOICE_SVC --> LOGGING
NLP_SVC --> LOGGING
TASK_SVC --> MONITORING
style ClientLayer fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1976D2,stroke-width:2px
style APIGateway fill:#F3E5F5,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:2px
style CoreServices fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px
style DataLayer fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#F57C00,stroke-width:2px
style ExternalIntegrations fill:#FCE4EC,stroke:#C2185B,stroke-width:2px
style SupportServices fill:#F1F8E9,stroke:#689F38,stroke-width:2px
Container Descriptions
| Container | Technology | Responsibility | Scalability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Web Dashboard | React + TypeScript | Real-time UI, voice control visualization | Horizontal (CDN) |
| Mobile App | React Native | Cross-platform voice interface | Horizontal (CDN) |
| Voice Client | WebRTC + Web Audio API | Audio capture and streaming | Horizontal (Edge) |
| Voice Processing Service | Python/FastAPI | Audio codec handling, noise reduction | Horizontal (Kubernetes) |
| NLP Service | Python/FastAPI + Transformers | Intent recognition, entity extraction | Horizontal (GPU nodes) |
| Task Orchestration Service | Node.js/Express | Workflow execution, state management | Horizontal (Kubernetes) |
| Context Management Service | Node.js/Express | Conversation history, project context | Horizontal (Kubernetes) |
| Integration Service | Python/FastAPI | External API orchestration | Horizontal (Kubernetes) |
| PostgreSQL | PostgreSQL 14+ | Relational data, transactions | Vertical + Read Replicas |
| Redis | Redis Cluster | Session cache, real-time data | Horizontal (Cluster) |
| MongoDB | MongoDB Atlas | Conversation logs, unstructured data | Horizontal (Sharding) |
| Vector Database | Pinecone/Weaviate | Semantic search, embeddings | Horizontal (Managed) |
Component Diagram (C4 Level 3)
Voice Processing Service Components
graph TB
subgraph VPS["Voice Processing Service"]
AUDIO_IN["Audio Input Handler<br/>WebRTC Stream"]
CODEC["Codec Manager<br/>Opus/AAC/PCM"]
DENOISE["Noise Reduction<br/>Spectral Subtraction"]
VAD["Voice Activity Detection<br/>WebRTC VAD"]
BUFFER["Audio Buffer<br/>Ring Buffer"]
QUALITY["Quality Analyzer<br/>SNR/PESQ"]
AUDIO_OUT["Audio Output Handler<br/>Response Generation"]
end
AUDIO_IN --> CODEC
CODEC --> DENOISE
DENOISE --> VAD
VAD --> BUFFER
BUFFER --> QUALITY
QUALITY --> AUDIO_OUT
style VPS fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px
NLP Service Components
graph TB
subgraph NLP["NLP Service"]
TOKENIZER["Tokenizer<br/>BERT Tokenization"]
ENCODER["Encoder<br/>Transformer Model"]
INTENT["Intent Classifier<br/>Multi-class Classification"]
ENTITY["Entity Extractor<br/>Named Entity Recognition"]
CONTEXT["Context Resolver<br/>Coreference Resolution"]
SEMANTIC["Semantic Analyzer<br/>Dependency Parsing"]
CONFIDENCE["Confidence Scorer<br/>Uncertainty Quantification"]
end
TOKENIZER --> ENCODER
ENCODER --> INTENT
ENCODER --> ENTITY
ENCODER --> SEMANTIC
INTENT --> CONFIDENCE
ENTITY --> CONTEXT
SEMANTIC --> CONTEXT
CONTEXT --> CONFIDENCE
style NLP fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px
Task Orchestration Service Components
graph TB
subgraph TOS["Task Orchestration Service"]
PARSER["Command Parser<br/>AST Generation"]
VALIDATOR["Validator<br/>Syntax & Semantic Check"]
PLANNER["Task Planner<br/>Execution Plan"]
EXECUTOR["Executor<br/>Task Execution Engine"]
STATE["State Manager<br/>Workflow State"]
RETRY["Retry Manager<br/>Error Handling"]
FEEDBACK["Feedback Generator<br/>Response Formatting"]
end
PARSER --> VALIDATOR
VALIDATOR --> PLANNER
PLANNER --> EXECUTOR
EXECUTOR --> STATE
STATE --> RETRY
RETRY --> FEEDBACK
style TOS fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px
Integration Service Components
graph TB
subgraph IS["Integration Service"]
ADAPTER_MGR["Adapter Manager<br/>Plugin Registry"]
IDE_COMP["IDE Component<br/>Code Generation"]
GIT_COMP["Git Component<br/>Repository Ops"]
JUPYTER_COMP["Jupyter Component<br/>Notebook Ops"]
JIRA_COMP["Jira Component<br/>Issue Management"]
CLOUD_COMP["Cloud Component<br/>Infrastructure Ops"]
CACHE_LAYER["Cache Layer<br/>API Response Cache"]
end
ADAPTER_MGR --> IDE_COMP
ADAPTER_MGR --> GIT_COMP
ADAPTER_MGR --> JUPYTER_COMP
ADAPTER_MGR --> JIRA_COMP
ADAPTER_MGR --> CLOUD_COMP
IDE_COMP --> CACHE_LAYER
GIT_COMP --> CACHE_LAYER
JUPYTER_COMP --> CACHE_LAYER
JIRA_COMP --> CACHE_LAYER
CLOUD_COMP --> CACHE_LAYER
style IS fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px
Context Management Service Components
graph TB
subgraph CMS["Context Management Service"]
SESSION["Session Manager<br/>User Sessions"]
HISTORY["History Manager<br/>Conversation History"]
PROJECT["Project Context<br/>Active Projects"]
MEMORY["Memory Manager<br/>Short-term Memory"]
PERSISTENCE["Persistence Layer<br/>State Persistence"]
CLEANUP["Cleanup Manager<br/>TTL Management"]
end
SESSION --> HISTORY
SESSION --> PROJECT
SESSION --> MEMORY
HISTORY --> PERSISTENCE
PROJECT --> PERSISTENCE
MEMORY --> PERSISTENCE
PERSISTENCE --> CLEANUP
style CMS fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px
Deployment Diagram
Production Infrastructure
graph TB
subgraph CDN["🌐 CDN Layer"]
CLOUDFLARE["Cloudflare CDN<br/>Global Distribution"]
end
subgraph LB_ZONE["Load Balancing Zone"]
ALB["Application Load Balancer<br/>AWS ALB/GCP LB"]
WAF["Web Application Firewall<br/>DDoS Protection"]
end
subgraph K8S["☸️ Kubernetes Cluster<br/>Multi-AZ Deployment"]
subgraph NS_API["API Namespace"]
APIGW_POD["API Gateway Pod<br/>Replicas: 3"]
VOICE_POD["Voice Service Pod<br/>Replicas: 5"]
NLP_POD["NLP Service Pod<br/>Replicas: 4<br/>GPU Nodes"]
TASK_POD["Task Service Pod<br/>Replicas: 3"]
CONTEXT_POD["Context Service Pod<br/>Replicas: 3"]
INTEG_POD["Integration Service Pod<br/>Replicas: 3"]
end
subgraph NS_DATA["Data Namespace"]
POSTGRES_POD["PostgreSQL StatefulSet<br/>Primary + 2 Replicas"]
REDIS_POD["Redis Cluster<br/>6 Nodes"]
MONGO_POD["MongoDB ReplicaSet<br/>3 Nodes"]
end
subgraph NS_SUPPORT["Support Namespace"]
QUEUE_POD["Message Queue<br/>RabbitMQ Cluster"]
LOGGING_POD["Logging Stack<br/>ELK"]
MONITOR_POD["Monitoring Stack<br/>Prometheus/Grafana"]
end
subgraph NS_INGRESS["Ingress"]
INGRESS["Ingress Controller<br/>Nginx Ingress"]
end
end
subgraph STORAGE["💾 Storage Layer"]
EBS["EBS Volumes<br/>Database Storage"]
S3["S3/GCS Buckets<br/>Logs & Backups"]
VECTOR_MANAGED["Managed Vector DB<br/>Pinecone/Weaviate"]
end
subgraph BACKUP["🔄 Backup & DR"]
BACKUP_VAULT["Backup Vault<br/>Cross-region"]
DR_CLUSTER["DR Cluster<br/>Standby"]
end
subgraph MONITORING["📊 Monitoring & Logging"]
DATADOG["Datadog<br/>APM & Monitoring"]
SPLUNK["Splunk<br/>Log Analysis"]
PAGERDUTY["PagerDuty<br/>Incident Management"]
end
%% Traffic Flow
CLOUDFLARE --> WAF
WAF --> ALB
ALB --> INGRESS
%% Ingress to Services
INGRESS --> APIGW_POD
APIGW_POD --> VOICE_POD
APIGW_POD --> NLP_POD
APIGW_POD --> TASK_POD
APIGW_POD --> CONTEXT_POD
APIGW_POD --> INTEG_POD
%% Services to Data
VOICE_POD --> REDIS_POD
NLP_POD --> VECTOR_MANAGED
TASK_POD --> POSTGRES_POD
CONTEXT_POD --> MONGO_POD
CONTEXT_POD --> REDIS_POD
INTEG_POD --> POSTGRES_POD
%% Services to Queue
TASK_POD --> QUEUE_POD
INTEG_POD --> QUEUE_POD
%% Data to Storage
POSTGRES_POD --> EBS
REDIS_POD --> EBS
MONGO_POD --> EBS
%% Logging & Monitoring
VOICE_POD --> LOGGING_POD
NLP_POD --> LOGGING_POD
TASK_POD --> LOGGING_POD
LOGGING_POD --> SPLUNK
LOGGING_POD --> S3
APIGW_POD --> MONITOR_POD
VOICE_POD --> MONITOR_POD
MONITOR_POD --> DATADOG
DATADOG --> PAGERDUTY
%% Backup
POSTGRES_POD --> BACKUP_VAULT
MONGO_POD --> BACKUP_VAULT
BACKUP_VAULT --> DR_CLUSTER
style CDN fill:#FFE0B2,stroke:#E65100,stroke-width:2px
style LB_ZONE fill:#F3E5F5,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:2px
style K8S fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px
style NS_API fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1976D2,stroke-width:1px
style NS_DATA fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#F57C00,stroke-width:1px
style NS_SUPPORT fill:#F1F8E9,stroke:#689F38,stroke-width:1px
style STORAGE fill:#FCE4EC,stroke:#C2185B,stroke-width:2px
style BACKUP fill:#E0F2F1,stroke:#00796B,stroke-width:2px
style MONITORING fill:#F1F8E9,stroke:#689F38,stroke-width:2px
Deployment Specifications
graph LR
subgraph REGIONS["Multi-Region Strategy"]
PRIMARY["Primary Region<br/>us-east-1<br/>Active-Active"]
SECONDARY["Secondary Region<br/>eu-west-1<br/>Active-Active"]
TERTIARY["Tertiary Region<br/>ap-southeast-1<br/>Read-Only"]
end
subgraph HA["High Availability"]
AZ1["Availability Zone 1"]
AZ2["Availability Zone 2"]
AZ3["Availability Zone 3"]
end
PRIMARY --> AZ1
PRIMARY --> AZ2
PRIMARY --> AZ3
SECONDARY --> AZ1
SECONDARY --> AZ2
style REGIONS fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1976D2,stroke-width:2px
style HA fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px
Technology Stack Summary
Frontend Technologies
| Layer | Technology | Purpose | Version |
|---|---|---|---|
| Web Framework | React | UI framework | 18.x |
| Language | TypeScript | Type safety | 5.x |
| State Management | Redux Toolkit | Global state | 1.9.x |
| Real-time Communication | Socket.io | WebSocket events | 4.x |
| Voice Interface | Web Audio API | Audio processing | Native |
| Voice Capture | WebRTC | Audio streaming | Native |
| UI Components | Material-UI | Component library | 5.x |
| Visualization | D3.js + Recharts | Data visualization | Latest |
| Build Tool | Vite | Build optimization | 4.x |
| Testing | Jest + React Testing Library | Unit & integration tests | Latest |
Backend Technologies
| Layer | Technology | Purpose | Version |
|---|---|---|---|
| API Gateway | Kong | API management | 3.x |
| Voice Service | FastAPI + Python | Audio processing | 3.10+ |
| NLP Service | FastAPI + Transformers | Intent recognition | 4.x |
| Task Service | Express.js + Node.js | Orchestration | 18.x LTS |
| Context Service | Express.js + Node.js | State management | 18.x LTS |
| Integration Service | FastAPI + Python | External APIs | 3.10+ |
| Authentication | Auth0/Keycloak | Identity management | Latest |
| Message Queue | RabbitMQ | Async processing | 3.12.x |
| Task Scheduler | Celery + Redis | Background jobs | 5.x |
Data Storage Technologies
| Layer | Technology | Purpose | Version |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relational DB | PostgreSQL | Transactional data | 14+ |
| Cache Layer | Redis | Session & cache | 7.x |
| Document Store | MongoDB | Conversation logs | 6.x |
| Vector Database | Pinecone/Weaviate | Embeddings & search | Latest |
| Time-Series DB | InfluxDB | Metrics & telemetry | 2.x |
| Search Engine | Elasticsearch | Full-text search | 8.x |
Infrastructure & DevOps
| Layer | Technology | Purpose | Version |
|---|---|---|---|
| Container Orchestration | Kubernetes | Container management | 1.27+ |
| Container Runtime | Docker | Containerization | 24.x |
| Infrastructure as Code | Terraform | Infrastructure provisioning | 1.5+ |
| Configuration Management | Helm | K8s package management | 3.x |
| CI/CD Pipeline | GitHub Actions/GitLab CI | Automation | Latest |
| Container Registry | Docker Hub/ECR | Image storage | Latest |
| Service Mesh | Istio | Service communication | 1.17+ |
| Ingress Controller | Nginx Ingress | Traffic routing | Latest |
| Load Balancer | AWS ALB/GCP LB | Traffic distribution | Latest |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Global distribution | Latest |
Monitoring & Observability
| Layer | Technology | Purpose | Version |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metrics | Prometheus | Metrics collection | 2.x |
| Visualization | Grafana | Dashboards | 10.x |
| APM | Datadog | Application monitoring | Latest |
| Logging | ELK Stack | Log aggregation | 8.x |
| Tracing | Jaeger | Distributed tracing | 1.x |
| Incident Management | PagerDuty | On-call management | Latest |
| Error Tracking | Sentry | Error monitoring | Latest |
AI/ML Technologies
| Layer | Technology | Purpose | Version |
|---|---|---|---|
| NLP Framework | Hugging Face Transformers | Pre-trained models | 4.x |
| Speech Recognition | Whisper/DeepSpeech | Audio-to-text | Latest |
| Text-to-Speech | Google Cloud TTS/Azure TTS | Text-to-audio | Latest |
| ML Framework | PyTorch | Deep learning | 2.x |
| Model Serving | TensorFlow Serving/Triton | Model inference | Latest |
| Vector Embeddings | Sentence Transformers | Text embeddings | Latest |
Architecture Decision Records
ADR-001: Microservices Architecture
ID: ADR-001
Status: Accepted
Date: 2024-01-15
Context
The system needs to handle multiple concurrent voice processing requests, NLP analysis, and external integrations with varying latency requirements. A monolithic architecture would create bottlenecks and limit independent scaling.
Decision
Adopt a microservices architecture with the following services:
- Voice Processing Service (Python/FastAPI)
- NLP Service (Python/FastAPI with GPU support)
- Task Orchestration Service (Node.js/Express)
- Context Management Service (Node.js/Express)
- Integration Service (Python/FastAPI)
Consequences
Positive:
- Independent scaling of compute-intensive services (NLP)
- Technology diversity (Python for ML, Node.js for orchestration)
- Fault isolation and resilience
- Faster deployment cycles
- Team autonomy
Negative:
- Increased operational complexity
- Network latency between services
- Distributed transaction management
- Debugging complexity
Mitigation:
- Implement service mesh (Istio) for observability
- Use correlation IDs for request tracing
- Implement circuit breakers and retry logic
- Comprehensive monitoring and logging
ADR-002: Kubernetes for Container Orchestration
ID: ADR-002
Status: Accepted
Date: 2024-01-15
Context
The system requires:
- Auto-scaling based on voice processing load
- Self-healing capabilities
- Rolling deployments with zero downtime
- Multi-region deployment support
- 99.9% uptime SLA
Decision
Deploy all microservices on Kubernetes (EKS/GKE/AKS) with:
- Multi-AZ deployment for high availability
- Horizontal Pod Autoscaling (HPA) based on CPU/memory
- StatefulSets for databases
- Helm charts for package management
Consequences
Positive:
- Native auto-scaling and self-healing
- Declarative infrastructure
- Multi-cloud portability
- Mature ecosystem and tooling
- Community support
Negative:
- Steep learning curve
- Operational overhead
- Resource overhead (etcd, control plane)
- Complexity in debugging
Mitigation:
- Use managed Kubernetes services (EKS/GKE)
- Implement comprehensive monitoring
- Automate deployment with GitOps (ArgoCD)
- Regular training for operations team
ADR-003: PostgreSQL + MongoDB Polyglot Persistence
ID: ADR-003
Status: Accepted
Date: 2024-01-16
Context
Different data types have different requirements:
- Structured, transactional data (tasks, users, projects)
- Unstructured conversation logs with flexible schema
- Time-series metrics data
- Vector embeddings for semantic search
Decision
Implement polyglot persistence:
- PostgreSQL: Transactional data, ACID compliance
- MongoDB: Conversation logs, flexible schema
- Redis: Caching, sessions, real-time data
- Pinecone/Weaviate: Vector embeddings
Consequences
Positive:
- Optimal data model for each use case
- Better performance for specific queries
- Flexibility in schema evolution
- Reduced data transformation overhead
Negative:
- Operational complexity
- Multiple backup/recovery procedures
- Data consistency challenges
- Increased infrastructure costs
Mitigation:
- Implement event sourcing for consistency
- Use distributed transactions where needed
- Comprehensive backup strategy
- Clear data ownership boundaries
ADR-004: Real-time Voice Processing with <500ms Latency
ID: ADR-004
Status: Accepted
Date: 2024-01-16
Context
User experience requires voice response within 500ms. This includes:
- Audio capture and transmission
- Voice processing
- NLP analysis
- Task execution
- Response generation
Decision
Implement multi-level optimization:
- Client-side: WebRTC for low-latency audio streaming
- Network: Edge computing for voice processing
- Processing: Streaming NLP with incremental results
- Caching: Aggressive caching of common intents
Consequences
Positive:
- Acceptable user experience
- Reduced server load
- Better resource utilization
- Improved responsiveness
Negative:
- Complex distributed processing
- Increased client-side complexity
- Cache invalidation challenges
- Requires edge infrastructure
Mitigation:
- Implement SLA monitoring
- Use CDN for edge processing
- Implement request prioritization
- Regular performance testing
ADR-005: Event-Driven Architecture with Message Queue
ID: ADR-005
Status: Accepted
Date: 2024-01-17
Context
Services need to communicate asynchronously for:
- Long-running tasks (code generation, data analysis)
- Decoupling services
- Handling traffic spikes
- Ensuring reliability
Decision
Implement event-driven architecture using RabbitMQ:
- Task events published to message queue
- Services subscribe to relevant events
- Dead-letter queues for failed messages
- Event sourcing for audit trail
Consequences
Positive:
- Loose coupling between services
- Better scalability
- Improved reliability
- Audit trail of all events
Negative:
- Eventual consistency challenges
- Debugging complexity
- Message ordering issues
- Operational overhead
Mitigation:
- Implement idempotent message handlers
- Use correlation IDs for tracing
- Implement monitoring for queue depth
- Regular testing of failure scenarios
ADR-006: OAuth 2.0 + JWT for Authentication
ID: ADR-006
Status: Accepted
Date: 2024-01-17
Context
System needs to support:
- Multiple user types (developers, data scientists, managers)
- Integration with enterprise identity providers
- Stateless authentication
- Fine-grained authorization
Decision
Implement OAuth 2.0 with JWT tokens:
- Auth0/Keycloak as identity provider
- JWT tokens for stateless authentication
- Role-Based Access Control (RBAC)
- Refresh token rotation
Consequences
Positive:
- Industry standard authentication
- Stateless and scalable
- Enterprise integration support
- Fine-grained access control
Negative:
- Token management complexity
- Revocation challenges
- Increased token size in requests
- Requires secure token storage
Mitigation:
- Implement token refresh strategy
- Use short-lived access tokens
- Implement token revocation list
- Secure token storage in client
ADR-007: GPU-Accelerated NLP Processing
ID: ADR-007
Status: Accepted
Date: 2024-01-18
Context
NLP models (BERT, GPT) require significant compute resources. CPU-only processing would exceed latency requirements and increase costs.
Decision
Deploy NLP service on GPU nodes:
- NVIDIA GPUs (A100/H100) for inference
- TensorFlow Serving or Triton for model serving
- Batch processing for non-real-time tasks
- Model quantization for reduced memory
Consequences
Positive:
- 10-100x performance improvement
- Reduced latency for NLP tasks
- Support for larger models
- Better resource utilization
Negative:
- Significantly higher infrastructure costs
- GPU availability constraints
- Increased operational complexity
- Power consumption concerns
Mitigation:
- Use spot instances for non-critical workloads
- Implement model caching
- Use model quantization
- Regular cost optimization
ADR-008: Multi-Region Active-Active Deployment
ID: ADR-008
Status: Accepted
Date: 2024-01-18
Context
99.9% uptime requirement and global user base require:
- Disaster recovery capability
- Low-latency access from multiple regions
- Automatic failover
Decision
Deploy active-active in multiple regions:
- Primary: us-east-1 (North America)
- Secondary: eu-west-1 (Europe)
- Tertiary: ap-southeast-1 (Asia-Pacific)
- Global load balancing with health checks
- Cross-region replication for data
Consequences
Positive:
- Reduced latency for global users
- Automatic failover capability
- Improved disaster recovery
- Better compliance with data residency
Negative:
- 3x infrastructure costs
- Data consistency challenges
- Operational complexity
- Network bandwidth costs
Mitigation:
- Use managed services for replication
- Implement eventual consistency patterns
- Comprehensive monitoring across regions
- Regular DR testing
ADR-009: Service Mesh (Istio) for Observability
ID: ADR-009
Status: Accepted
Date: 2024-01-19
Context
Microservices architecture requires:
- Distributed tracing
- Service-to-service communication management
- Traffic management and routing
- Security policies
Decision
Implement Istio service mesh:
- Automatic sidecar injection
- Distributed tracing with Jaeger
- Traffic management with VirtualServices
- mTLS for service-to-service communication
Consequences
Positive:
- Transparent observability
- Automatic mTLS
- Advanced traffic management
- Reduced application code complexity
Negative:
- Additional resource overhead (sidecars)
- Increased latency (minimal)
- Operational complexity
- Debugging challenges
Mitigation:
- Use managed Istio (AWS App Mesh, GCP Anthos)
- Implement comprehensive monitoring
- Regular training for operations team
- Gradual rollout
ADR-010: Infrastructure as Code with Terraform
ID: ADR-010
Status: Accepted
Date: 2024-01-19
Context
Multi-region, multi-cloud deployment requires:
- Reproducible infrastructure
- Version control for infrastructure
- Automated provisioning
- Disaster recovery capability
Decision
Use Terraform for infrastructure provisioning:
- Modular Terraform configurations
- State management with remote backend (S3/GCS)
- Automated testing with Terratest
- GitOps workflow for changes
Consequences
Positive:
- Infrastructure as code benefits
- Version control and audit trail
- Reproducible deployments
- Multi-cloud portability
Negative:
- Learning curve for team
- State management complexity
- Terraform limitations for some resources
- Requires discipline in code organization
Mitigation:
- Implement code review process
- Use Terraform modules for reusability
- Implement state locking
- Regular training and documentation
Data Flow Architecture
Voice Command Processing Flow
sequenceDiagram
participant User as 👤 User
participant Client as 🖥️ Web Client
participant VoiceAPI as 🎤 Voice API
participant VoiceSvc as Voice Service
participant NLPSvc as NLP Service
participant TaskSvc as Task Service
participant IntegSvc as Integration Service
participant ExtSys as 🔌 External System
User->>Client: Speaks voice command
Client->>VoiceAPI: WebRTC audio stream
VoiceAPI->>VoiceSvc: Audio chunks
par Voice Processing
VoiceSvc->>VoiceSvc: Noise reduction
VoiceSvc->>VoiceSvc: Voice activity detection
VoiceSvc->>VoiceSvc: Audio codec handling
end
VoiceSvc->>NLPSvc: Transcribed text
par NLP Analysis
NLPSvc->>NLPSvc: Tokenization
NLPSvc->>NLPSvc: Intent classification
NLPSvc->>NLPSvc: Entity extraction
end
NLPSvc->>TaskSvc: Parsed intent + entities
TaskSvc->>TaskSvc: Validate command
TaskSvc->>TaskSvc: Generate execution plan
alt External Integration Required
TaskSvc->>IntegSvc: Execute integration task
IntegSvc->>ExtSys: API call
ExtSys-->>IntegSvc: Response
IntegSvc-->>TaskSvc: Result
end
TaskSvc->>TaskSvc: Generate response
TaskSvc->>VoiceAPI: Response text
VoiceAPI->>VoiceAPI: Text-to-speech synthesis
VoiceAPI->>Client: Audio response
Client->>User: Play audio response
Data Persistence Flow
sequenceDiagram
participant Service as Microservice
participant Cache as Redis Cache
participant Queue as Message Queue
participant PrimaryDB as PostgreSQL
participant ReplicaDB as PostgreSQL Replica
participant DocStore as MongoDB
participant VectorDB as Vector Database
Service->>Cache: Check cache
alt Cache Hit
Cache-->>Service: Return cached data
else Cache Miss
Service->>PrimaryDB: Query data
PrimaryDB-->>Service: Return data
Service->>Cache: Store in cache
end
Service->>Queue: Publish event
Queue->>DocStore: Store event log
Queue->>VectorDB: Update embeddings
PrimaryDB->>ReplicaDB: Replication stream
Service->>PrimaryDB: Write transaction
PrimaryDB->>PrimaryDB: Commit
PrimaryDB->>ReplicaDB: Async replication
Integration Workflow
graph TD
A["Voice Command<br/>Generate Code"] --> B["Parse Intent"]
B --> C["Validate Syntax"]
C --> D["Check Permissions"]
D --> E{Integration Type?}
E -->|IDE| F["IDE Adapter"]
E -->|Git| G["Git Adapter"]
E -->|Jupyter| H["Jupyter Adapter"]
E -->|Jira| I["Jira Adapter"]
E -->|Cloud| J["Cloud Adapter"]
F --> K["Execute Integration"]
G --> K
H --> K
I --> K
J --> K
K --> L["Cache Result"]
L --> M["Generate Response"]
M --> N["Text-to-Speech"]
N --> O["Return to User"]
style A fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1976D2
style K fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C
style O fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#F57C00
Security Architecture
Authentication & Authorization Flow
graph TB
subgraph AuthFlow["Authentication Flow"]
A["User Login"]
B["OAuth 2.0 Provider<br/>Auth0/Keycloak"]
C["JWT Token Generation"]
D["Refresh Token Storage"]
end
subgraph AuthzFlow["Authorization Flow"]
E["API Request + JWT"]
F["Token Validation"]
G["RBAC Check"]
H["Resource Access"]
end
subgraph MFA["Multi-Factor Authentication"]
I["TOTP/SMS"]
J["Biometric"]
K["Hardware Key"]
end
A --> B
B --> C
C --> D
E --> F
F --> G
G --> H
B --> I
B --> J
B --> K
style AuthFlow fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1976D2,stroke-width:2px
style AuthzFlow fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px
style MFA fill:#FCE4EC,stroke:#C2185B,stroke-width:2px
Data Security Architecture
graph TB
subgraph Encryption["🔐 Encryption"]
TLS["TLS 1.3<br/>In-Transit"]
AES["AES-256<br/>At-Rest"]
FIELD["Field-Level<br/>Encryption"]
end
subgraph Access["🔑 Access Control"]
RBAC["Role-Based<br/>Access Control"]
ABAC["Attribute-Based<br/>Access Control"]
AUDIT["Audit Logging"]
end
subgraph Privacy["🛡️ Privacy"]
PII["PII Masking"]
GDPR["GDPR Compliance"]
RETENTION["Data Retention"]
end
subgraph Secrets["🔓 Secrets Management"]
VAULT["HashiCorp Vault"]
ROTATION["Key Rotation"]
MONITORING["Access Monitoring"]
end
style Encryption fill:#FFEBEE,stroke:#C62828,stroke-width:2px
style Access fill:#F3E5F5,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:2px
style Privacy fill:#E0F2F1,stroke:#00796B,stroke-width:2px
style Secrets fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#F57C00,stroke-width:2px
Network Security
graph TB
subgraph Internet["Internet"]
USER["Users"]
end
subgraph DMZ["DMZ"]
WAF["Web Application<br/>Firewall"]
DDOS["DDoS Protection<br/>Cloudflare"]
end
subgraph Network["Network Layer"]
VPC["VPC<br/>Private Network"]
NSG["Network Security<br/>Groups"]
NACL["Network ACLs"]
end
subgraph ServiceMesh["Service Mesh"]
MTLS["mTLS<br/>Service-to-Service"]
POLICIES["Network Policies"]
end
subgraph Database["Database Layer"]
ENCRYPTION["Encryption at Rest"]
BACKUP["Encrypted Backups"]
end
USER --> DDOS
DDOS --> WAF
WAF --> VPC
VPC --> NSG
NSG --> NACL
NACL --> MTLS
MTLS --> POLICIES
POLICIES --> ENCRYPTION
ENCRYPTION --> BACKUP
style Internet fill:#FFEBEE,stroke:#C62828,stroke-width:2px
style DMZ fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#F57C00,stroke-width:2px
style Network fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1976D2,stroke-width:2px
style ServiceMesh fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px
style Database fill:#F3E5F5,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:2px
Integration Architecture
External System Integration Points
graph TB
subgraph VoiceAgent["Voice Agent Core"]
INTEG["Integration Service"]
end
subgraph IDEIntegration["IDE Integration"]
VSC["VS Code Extension<br/>Language Server Protocol"]
JB["JetBrains Plugin<br/>IDE Plugin API"]
SUBLIME["Sublime Text Plugin<br/>Plugin API"]
end
subgraph GitIntegration["Git Integration"]
GITHUB["GitHub API<br/>REST + GraphQL"]
GITLAB["GitLab API<br/>REST + GraphQL"]
BITBUCKET["Bitbucket API<br/>REST"]
end
subgraph DataIntegration["Data Science Integration"]
JUPYTER["Jupyter API<br/>Notebook Protocol"]
COLAB["Google Colab<br/>REST API"]
KAGGLE["Kaggle API<br/>REST"]
end
subgraph ProjectIntegration["Project Management"]
JIRA["Jira API<br/>REST"]
ASANA["Asana API<br/>REST"]
MONDAY["Monday.com API<br/>GraphQL"]
end
subgraph CloudIntegration["Cloud Platforms"]
AWS["AWS SDK<br/>Boto3"]
GCP["Google Cloud SDK<br/>Python"]
AZURE["Azure SDK<br/>Python"]
end
subgraph CommIntegration["Communication"]
SLACK["Slack API<br/>WebSocket"]
TEAMS["Teams API<br/>REST"]
DISCORD["Discord API<br/>WebSocket"]
end
INTEG --> VSC
INTEG --> JB
INTEG --> SUBLIME
INTEG --> GITHUB
INTEG --> GITLAB
INTEG --> BITBUCKET
INTEG --> JUPYTER
INTEG --> COLAB
INTEG --> KAGGLE
INTEG --> JIRA
INTEG --> ASANA
INTEG --> MONDAY
INTEG --> AWS
INTEG --> GCP
INTEG --> AZURE
INTEG --> SLACK
INTEG --> TEAMS
INTEG --> DISCORD
style VoiceAgent fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1976D2,stroke-width:2px
style IDEIntegration fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px
style GitIntegration fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#F57C00,stroke-width:2px
style DataIntegration fill:#FCE4EC,stroke:#C2185B,stroke-width:2px
style ProjectIntegration fill:#F3E5F5,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:2px
style CloudIntegration fill:#E0F2F1,stroke:#00796B,stroke-width:2px
style CommIntegration fill:#F1F8E9,stroke:#689F38,stroke-width:2px
API Integration Patterns
graph TB
subgraph Patterns["Integration Patterns"]
REST["REST API<br/>Synchronous<br/>Request-Response"]
GRAPHQL["GraphQL API<br/>Query Language<br/>Flexible Queries"]
WEBHOOK["Webhooks<br/>Event-Driven<br/>Async Notifications"]
GRPC["gRPC<br/>High Performance<br/>Binary Protocol"]
WEBSOCKET["WebSocket<br/>Real-time<br/>Bidirectional"]
end
subgraph Adapters["Adapter Layer"]
ADAPTER1["REST Adapter"]
ADAPTER2["GraphQL Adapter"]
ADAPTER3["Webhook Adapter"]
ADAPTER4["gRPC Adapter"]
ADAPTER5["WebSocket Adapter"]
end
subgraph Cache["Caching Strategy"]
REDIS_CACHE["Redis Cache<br/>API Responses"]
INVALIDATION["Cache Invalidation<br/>TTL + Events"]
end
REST --> ADAPTER1
GRAPHQL --> ADAPTER2
WEBHOOK --> ADAPTER3
GRPC --> ADAPTER4
WEBSOCKET --> ADAPTER5
ADAPTER1 --> REDIS_CACHE
ADAPTER2 --> REDIS_CACHE
ADAPTER3 --> REDIS_CACHE
ADAPTER4 --> REDIS_CACHE
ADAPTER5 --> REDIS_CACHE
REDIS_CACHE --> INVALIDATION
style Patterns fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1976D2,stroke-width:2px
style Adapters fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px
style Cache fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#F57C00,stroke-width:2px
Functional Requirements
FR-001: Voice Command Processing
ID: FR-001
Priority: P0 (Critical)
Status: Active
Description: System shall capture, process, and interpret voice commands from users with <500ms latency.
Acceptance Criteria:
- Voice input captured via WebRTC with sample rate ≥16kHz
- Audio processed with noise reduction achieving SNR >20dB
- Voice activity detection with >95% accuracy
- End-to-end latency <500ms (p95)
- Support for multiple languages (English, Spanish, French, German, Chinese)
- Offline fallback for critical commands
Traceability: UC-001, TC-001
FR-002: Natural Language Understanding
ID: FR-002
Priority: P0 (Critical)
Status: Active
Description: System shall understand developer intent from natural language commands and extract relevant entities.
Acceptance Criteria:
- Intent classification accuracy >95%
- Entity extraction F1-score >0.90
- Support for 50+ intent types
- Context-aware understanding (project, file, language)
- Ambiguity resolution with clarification prompts
- Support for complex multi-step commands
Traceability: UC-002, TC-002
FR-003: Code Generation
ID: FR-003
Priority: P0 (Critical)
Status: Active
Description: System shall generate code based on voice commands and insert into IDE.
Acceptance Criteria:
- Generate syntactically correct code for 90% of commands
- Support for Python, JavaScript, Java, Go, Rust
- Code follows project style guide
- Generated code includes comments and docstrings
- Integration with VS Code, JetBrains IDEs
- Undo/redo support for generated code
Traceability: UC-003, TC-003
FR-004: Data Analysis Assistance
ID: FR-004
Priority: P0 (Critical)
Status: Active
Description: System shall assist data scientists with analysis tasks through voice commands.
Acceptance Criteria:
- Generate Jupyter notebooks from voice commands
- Execute data analysis workflows
- Visualize results with appropriate charts
- Suggest analysis techniques based on data
- Support for pandas, scikit-learn, TensorFlow
- Export results in multiple formats (CSV, JSON, Parquet)
Traceability: UC-004, TC-004
FR-005: Project Management Integration
ID: FR-005
Priority: P1 (High)
Status: Active
Description: System shall integrate with project management tools for task tracking.
Acceptance Criteria:
- Create/update Jira issues via voice
- Track time spent on tasks
- Generate status reports
- Link code commits to issues
- Support for Jira, Asana, Monday.com
- Bi-directional synchronization
Traceability: UC-005, TC-005
FR-006: Real-time Collaboration
ID: FR-006
Priority: P1 (High)
Status: Active
Description: System shall support real-time collaboration between multiple users.
Acceptance Criteria:
- Multiple users can work on same project simultaneously
- Real-time synchronization of changes
- Conflict resolution for concurrent edits
- Presence awareness (who is online)
- Shared voice chat for team communication
- Activity history and audit trail
Traceability: UC-006, TC-006
FR-007: Security & Access Control
ID: FR-007
Priority: P0 (Critical)
Status: Active
Description: System shall enforce security policies and access control.
Acceptance Criteria:
- OAuth 2.0 authentication with MFA support
- Role-based access control (RBAC)
- Encryption of data in transit (TLS 1.3)
- Encryption of data at rest (AES-256)
- Audit logging of all actions
- Compliance with GDPR, SOC 2, ISO 27001
Traceability: UC-007, TC-007
FR-008: Error Handling & Recovery
ID: FR-008
Priority: P1 (High)
Status: Active
Description: System shall handle errors gracefully and provide recovery options.
Acceptance Criteria:
- Graceful degradation on service failures
- Automatic retry with exponential backoff
- Circuit breaker pattern for external APIs
- User-friendly error messages
- Automatic recovery from transient failures
- Manual recovery options for persistent failures
Traceability: UC-008, TC-008
Use Cases
UC-001: Developer Generates Code via Voice
ID: UC-001
Actor: Software Developer
Priority: P0
Preconditions:
- User is authenticated and authorized
- IDE is open and connected to voice agent
- Project context is loaded
Main Flow:
- Developer speaks: “Generate a REST API endpoint for user authentication”
- System captures and processes voice command
- NLP service identifies intent: “code_generation”
- System extracts entities: language=Python, type=REST_API, feature=authentication
- System generates code using LLM
- Code is inserted into IDE at cursor position
- System provides voice confirmation: “Generated authentication endpoint”
Alternative Flows:
- A1: User requests modification: “Add error handling”
- System modifies generated code
- Provides updated code to IDE
- A2: User rejects code: “Undo”
- System removes generated code
- Reverts to previous state
Postconditions:
- Code is inserted into IDE
- User can review and modify code
- Action is logged for audit trail
Acceptance Criteria:
- Code is syntactically correct
- Code follows project conventions
- Latency <2 seconds
- User satisfaction >4/5
UC-002: Data Scientist Analyzes Dataset
ID: UC-002
Actor: Data Scientist
Priority: P0
Preconditions:
- User is authenticated
- Dataset is accessible
- Jupyter environment is available
Main Flow:
- Data scientist speaks: “Analyze the sales dataset for trends”
- System captures voice command
- NLP service identifies intent: “data_analysis”
- System extracts entities: dataset=sales, analysis_type=trend_analysis
- System generates Jupyter notebook with analysis code
- Notebook is executed automatically
- Results are visualized with appropriate charts
- System provides voice summary: “Found 15% growth trend in Q4”
Alternative Flows:
- A1: User requests different visualization
- System regenerates charts with new parameters
- A2: User wants to export results
- System exports to CSV/JSON/Parquet
Postconditions:
- Analysis results are available in Jupyter
- Visualizations are generated
- Results can be shared with team
Acceptance Criteria:
- Analysis completes within 30 seconds
- Visualizations are accurate
- Results are exportable
- User satisfaction >4/5
UC-003: Project Manager Tracks Progress
ID: UC-003
Actor: Project Manager
Priority: P1
Preconditions:
- User is authenticated
- Project is configured in system
- Team members have logged time
Main Flow:
- PM speaks: “Show me project status for Q1”
- System captures voice command
- NLP service identifies intent: “status_report”
- System extracts entities: project=Q1, report_type=status
- System aggregates data from Jira, Git, time tracking
- System generates comprehensive status report
- Report is displayed with visualizations
- System provides voice summary with key metrics
Alternative Flows:
- A1: User requests specific team member status
- System filters data for that team member
- A2: User wants to export report
- System exports to PDF/Excel
Postconditions:
- Status report is generated
- Metrics are visualized
- Report can be shared with stakeholders
Acceptance Criteria:
- Report generation <5 seconds
- Data accuracy >99%
- Visualizations are clear
- User satisfaction >4/5
UC-004: DevOps Engineer Deploys Application
ID: UC-004
Actor: DevOps Engineer
Priority: P1
Preconditions:
- User is authenticated with elevated privileges
- Application is built and tested
- Deployment configuration is available
Main Flow:
- DevOps engineer speaks: “Deploy version 2.1.0 to production”
- System captures voice command
- NLP service identifies intent: “deploy”
- System extracts entities: version=2.1.0, environment=production
- System validates deployment prerequisites
- System initiates deployment pipeline
- System monitors deployment progress
- System provides voice updates: “Deployment 45% complete”
- Deployment completes successfully
- System confirms: “Version 2.1.0 deployed to production”
Alternative Flows:
- A1: Deployment fails
- System provides error details
- Offers rollback option
- A2: User requests deployment status
- System provides real-time status update
Postconditions:
- Application is deployed
- Deployment is logged
- Team is notified
Acceptance Criteria:
- Deployment completes successfully
- Zero-downtime deployment
- Rollback available if needed
- Deployment time <10 minutes
Test Cases
TC-001: Voice Command Processing Latency
ID: TC-001
Related FR: FR-001
Type: Performance Test
Test Steps:
- Capture voice command: “Generate a function”
- Measure time from voice input to system response
- Repeat 100 times with different commands
- Calculate p50, p95, p99 latencies
Expected Results:
- p50 latency: <300ms
- p95 latency: <500ms
- p99 latency: <1000ms
Pass Criteria: p95 latency <500ms
TC-002: Intent Classification Accuracy
ID: TC-002
Related FR: FR-002
Type: Functional Test
Test Data: 1000 voice commands across 50 intent types
Test Steps:
- Process each voice command
- Compare predicted intent with ground truth
- Calculate accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score
Expected Results:
- Accuracy: >95%
- Precision: >0.94
- Recall: >0.94
- F1-score: >0.94
Pass Criteria: Accuracy >95%
TC-003: Code Generation Correctness
ID: TC-003
Related FR: FR-003
Type: Functional Test
Test Data: 500 code generation requests across 5 languages
Test Steps:
- Generate code for each request
- Validate syntax using language-specific linter
- Execute code to verify functionality
- Check code style compliance
Expected Results:
- Syntax correctness: >95%
- Functionality correctness: >90%
- Style compliance: >85%
Pass Criteria: Syntax correctness >95%
TC-004: Data Analysis Accuracy
ID: TC-004
Related FR: FR-004
Type: Functional Test
Test Data: 100 datasets with known analysis results
Test Steps:
- Request analysis for each dataset
- Compare generated results with expected results
- Validate visualizations
- Check statistical accuracy
Expected Results:
- Result accuracy: >98%
- Visualization correctness: >95%
- Statistical validity: >99%
Pass Criteria: Result accuracy >98%
TC-005: Security Access Control
ID: TC-005
Related FR: FR-007
Type: Security Test
Test Steps:
- Attempt to access resource without authentication
- Attempt to access resource with invalid token
- Attempt to access resource with insufficient permissions
- Attempt to access resource with valid permissions
Expected Results:
- Unauthorized access denied: 100%
- Invalid token rejected: 100%
- Insufficient permissions denied: 100%
- Valid access granted: 100%
Pass Criteria: All unauthorized access denied
TC-006: System Availability
ID: TC-006
Related FR: FR-001
Type: Reliability Test
Test Duration: 30 days continuous operation
Test Steps:
- Monitor system uptime continuously
- Simulate failures and recovery
- Track response times
- Monitor error rates
Expected Results:
- Uptime: >99.9%
- Error rate: <0.1%
- Recovery time: <5 minutes
Pass Criteria: Uptime >99.9%
TC-007: Concurrent User Load
ID: TC-007
Related FR: FR-001
Type: Load Test
Test Scenario: 1000 concurrent users
Test Steps:
- Ramp up to 1000 concurrent users
- Maintain load for 30 minutes
- Monitor response times, error rates, resource usage
- Ramp down gradually
Expected Results:
- Response time p95: <1000ms
- Error rate: <0.1%
- CPU utilization: <80%
- Memory utilization: <85%
Pass Criteria: Response time p95 <1000ms, Error rate <0.1%
TC-008: Data Consistency
ID: TC-008
Related FR: FR-006
Type: Functional Test
Test Scenario: Concurrent writes from multiple users
Test Steps:
- Create 10 concurrent users
- Each user performs 100 write operations
- Verify data consistency across all replicas
- Check for data loss or corruption
Expected Results:
- Data consistency: 100%
- No data loss: 0 records lost
- No corruption: 0 corrupted records
Pass Criteria: Data consistency 100%, No data loss
Monitoring & Observability
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
graph TB
subgraph Latency["⏱️ Latency Metrics"]
L1["Voice Processing Latency<br/>Target: <500ms p95"]
L2["NLP Processing Latency<br/>Target: <300ms p95"]
L3["Task Execution Latency<br/>Target: <1000ms p95"]
L4["End-to-End Latency<br/>Target: <2000ms p95"]
end
subgraph Availability["✅ Availability Metrics"]
A1["System Uptime<br/>Target: 99.9%"]
A2["Service Availability<br/>Target: 99.95%"]
A3["Database Availability<br/>Target: 99.99%"]
A4["Error Rate<br/>Target: <0.1%"]
end
subgraph Quality["⭐ Quality Metrics"]
Q1["Intent Classification Accuracy<br/>Target: >95%"]
Q2["Code Generation Correctness<br/>Target: >95%"]
Q3["User Satisfaction<br/>Target: >4.5/5"]
Q4["Feature Adoption<br/>Target: >80%"]
end
subgraph Resource["📊 Resource Metrics"]
R1["CPU Utilization<br/>Target: <70%"]
R2["Memory Utilization<br/>Target: <75%"]
R3["Network Bandwidth<br/>Target: <80%"]
R4["Storage Utilization<br/>Target: <85%"]
end
subgraph Security["🔒 Security Metrics"]
S1["Authentication Success Rate<br/>Target: >99.9%"]
S2["Authorization Accuracy<br/>Target: 100%"]
S3["Encryption Coverage<br/>Target: 100%"]
S4["Audit Log Completeness<br/>Target: 100%"]
end
style Latency fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1976D2,stroke-width:2px
style Availability fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px
style Quality fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#F57C00,stroke-width:2px
style Resource fill:#FCE4EC,stroke:#C2185B,stroke-width:2px
style Security fill:#F3E5F5,stroke:#7B1FA2,stroke-width:2px
Monitoring Dashboard
graph TB
subgraph Dashboard["📈 Monitoring Dashboard"]
REAL_TIME["Real-time Metrics<br/>Updated every 10s"]
ALERTS["Alert Management<br/>Critical/Warning/Info"]
TRENDS["Trend Analysis<br/>24h/7d/30d"]
REPORTS["Automated Reports<br/>Daily/Weekly/Monthly"]
end
subgraph DataSources["Data Sources"]
PROMETHEUS["Prometheus<br/>Metrics Collection"]
JAEGER["Jaeger<br/>Distributed Tracing"]
ELK["ELK Stack<br/>Log Aggregation"]
DATADOG["Datadog<br/>APM"]
end
subgraph Visualization["Visualization"]
GRAFANA["Grafana<br/>Dashboards"]
KIBANA["Kibana<br/>Log Visualization"]
CUSTOM["Custom Dashboards<br/>React"]
end
PROMETHEUS --> GRAFANA
JAEGER --> GRAFANA
ELK --> KIBANA
DATADOG --> GRAFANA
GRAFANA --> REAL_TIME
KIBANA --> REAL_TIME
REAL_TIME --> ALERTS
REAL_TIME --> TRENDS
TRENDS --> REPORTS
style Dashboard fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1976D2,stroke-width:2px
style DataSources fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px
style Visualization fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#F57C00,stroke-width:2px
Scalability Strategy
Horizontal Scaling
graph TB
subgraph Current["Current State<br/>100 Users"]
API1["API Gateway<br/>1 instance"]
VOICE1["Voice Service<br/>2 instances"]
NLP1["NLP Service<br/>2 instances"]
TASK1["Task Service<br/>2 instances"]
end
subgraph Scaled["Scaled State<br/>10,000 Users"]
API2["API Gateway<br/>10 instances"]
VOICE2["Voice Service<br/>50 instances"]
NLP2["NLP Service<br/>40 instances<br/>GPU Nodes"]
TASK2["Task Service<br/>30 instances"]
end
subgraph Metrics["Scaling Triggers"]
CPU["CPU >70%"]
MEMORY["Memory >75%"]
LATENCY["Latency >1000ms"]
QUEUE["Queue Depth >1000"]
end
Current --> Metrics
Metrics --> Scaled
style Current fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1976D2,stroke-width:2px
style Scaled fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px
style Metrics fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#F57C00,stroke-width:2px
Database Scaling
graph TB
subgraph ReadScaling["Read Scaling"]
PRIMARY["Primary DB<br/>Write Operations"]
REPLICA1["Read Replica 1<br/>us-east-1"]
REPLICA2["Read Replica 2<br/>eu-west-1"]
REPLICA3["Read Replica 3<br/>ap-southeast-1"]
end
subgraph WriteScaling["Write Scaling"]
SHARDING["Database Sharding<br/>by User ID"]
SHARD1["Shard 1<br/>Users 0-25%"]
SHARD2["Shard 2<br/>Users 25-50%"]
SHARD3["Shard 3<br/>Users 50-75%"]
SHARD4["Shard 4<br/>Users 75-100%"]
end
PRIMARY --> REPLICA1
PRIMARY --> REPLICA2
PRIMARY --> REPLICA3
SHARDING --> SHARD1
SHARDING --> SHARD2
SHARDING --> SHARD3
SHARDING --> SHARD4
style ReadScaling fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1976D2,stroke-width:2px
style WriteScaling fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px
Disaster Recovery & Business Continuity
Backup Strategy
graph TB
subgraph BackupFrequency["Backup Frequency"]
HOURLY["Hourly Backups<br/>Last 24 hours"]
DAILY["Daily Backups<br/>Last 30 days"]
WEEKLY["Weekly Backups<br/>Last 90 days"]
MONTHLY["Monthly Backups<br/>Last 1 year"]
end
subgraph BackupLocation["Backup Location"]
PRIMARY_REGION["Primary Region<br/>us-east-1"]
SECONDARY_REGION["Secondary Region<br/>eu-west-1"]
TERTIARY_REGION["Tertiary Region<br/>ap-southeast-1"]
COLD_STORAGE["Cold Storage<br/>Glacier"]
end
subgraph Recovery["Recovery Options"]
RTO["RTO: 15 minutes<br/>Recovery Time Objective"]
RPO["RPO: 1 hour<br/>Recovery Point Objective"]
FAILOVER["Automatic Failover<br/>on Primary Failure"]
end
HOURLY --> PRIMARY_REGION
DAILY --> SECONDARY_REGION
WEEKLY --> TERTIARY_REGION
MONTHLY --> COLD_STORAGE
PRIMARY_REGION --> RTO
SECONDARY_REGION --> RPO
TERTIARY_REGION --> FAILOVER
style BackupFrequency fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1976D2,stroke-width:2px
style BackupLocation fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px
style Recovery fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#F57C00,stroke-width:2px
Disaster Recovery Plan
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> Normal: System Operating
Normal --> Degraded: Partial Failure
Normal --> Failed: Complete Failure
Degraded --> Normal: Auto-Recovery
Degraded --> Failed: Cascading Failure
Failed --> Recovery: Initiate DR
Recovery --> Failover: Activate Standby
Failover --> Restored: Services Restored
Restored --> Validation: Validate Data
Validation --> Normal: Resume Operations
note right of Normal
99.9% Uptime
All Services Active
end note
note right of Degraded
Reduced Capacity
Some Services Down
Auto-scaling Active
end note
note right of Failed
Complete Outage
DR Activated
RTO: 15 minutes
end note
note right of Recovery
Failover in Progress
Data Sync Active
Monitoring Alerts
end note
note right of Restored
Services Online
Data Validated
Performance Monitored
end note
Cost Optimization
Resource Optimization
graph TB
subgraph Optimization["Cost Optimization Strategies"]
SPOT["Spot Instances<br/>60% cost savings<br/>Non-critical workloads"]
RESERVED["Reserved Instances<br/>40% cost savings<br/>Baseline capacity"]
AUTOSCALE["Auto-scaling<br/>Pay for actual usage<br/>Peak demand handling"]
CACHE["Caching Strategy<br/>Reduce API calls<br/>Lower bandwidth"]
end
subgraph Monitoring["Cost Monitoring"]
BUDGET["Budget Alerts<br/>Monthly limits"]
ANOMALY["Anomaly Detection<br/>Unusual spending"]
OPTIMIZATION["Optimization Recommendations<br/>ML-based"]
end
subgraph Savings["Estimated Savings"]
COMPUTE["Compute: 45%"]
STORAGE["Storage: 30%"]
NETWORK["Network: 25%"]
TOTAL["Total: 35%"]
end
SPOT --> MONITORING
RESERVED --> MONITORING
AUTOSCALE --> MONITORING
CACHE --> MONITORING
MONITORING --> SAVINGS
style Optimization fill:#E3F2FD,stroke:#1976D2,stroke-width:2px
style Monitoring fill:#E8F5E9,stroke:#388E3C,stroke-width:2px
style Savings fill:#FFF3E0,stroke:#F57C00,stroke-width:2px
Roadmap & Future Enhancements
Phase 1: MVP (Q1 2024)
- ✅ Voice command processing
- ✅ Basic NLP intent recognition
- ✅ Code generation for Python/JavaScript
- ✅ IDE integration (VS Code)
- ✅ Basic authentication
Phase 2: Enhanced Features (Q2 2024)
- 🔄 Multi-language support (5+ languages)
- 🔄 Advanced NLP with context awareness
- 🔄 Data science integration (Jupyter)
- 🔄 Project management integration (Jira)
- 🔄 Real-time collaboration
Phase 3: Enterprise Features (Q3 2024)
- 📋 Advanced security (MFA, SSO)
- 📋 Compliance certifications (SOC 2, GDPR)
- 📋 Multi-region deployment
- 📋 Advanced analytics and reporting
- 📋 Custom integrations framework
Phase 4: AI Enhancements (Q4 2024)
- 🚀 GPT-4 integration
- 🚀 Custom model fine-tuning
- 🚀 Predictive code suggestions
- 🚀 Automated testing generation
- 🚀 Performance optimization recommendations
Conclusion
This comprehensive architecture documentation provides a complete blueprint for the Voice-Centric Software Development and Data Science Agent system. The design emphasizes:
- Scalability: Microservices architecture with horizontal scaling capabilities
- Performance: <500ms latency for voice processing with edge computing
- Reliability: 99.9% uptime with multi-region active-active deployment
- Security: End-to-end encryption, OAuth 2.0, RBAC, and comprehensive audit logging
- Maintainability: Clear separation of concerns, comprehensive monitoring, and documentation
- Extensibility: Plugin-based integration framework for external systems
The system is designed to support thousands of concurrent users while maintaining high performance and reliability standards. All architectural decisions are documented with clear rationale and consequences, enabling informed future modifications and enhancements.
Document Control
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 2024-01-20 | Architecture Team | Initial comprehensive documentation |
| 1.1 | 2024-01-21 | Architecture Team | Added security architecture details |
| 1.2 | 2024-01-22 | Architecture Team | Added monitoring and observability |
Document Classification: Internal - Technical
Last Updated: 2024-01-22
Next Review: 2024-04-22
Data Model & ERD
Comprehensive Data Model Documentation
Voice-Centric Software Development and Data Science Agent
1. Entity-Relationship Diagram
erDiagram
USER ||--o{ PROJECT : creates
USER ||--o{ VOICE_SESSION : initiates
USER ||--o{ COLLABORATION : participates
USER ||--o{ NOTIFICATION : receives
USER ||--o{ API_KEY : owns
PROJECT ||--o{ TASK : contains
PROJECT ||--o{ CODE_ARTIFACT : produces
PROJECT ||--o{ DATA_ANALYSIS : contains
PROJECT ||--o{ COLLABORATION : involves
PROJECT ||--o{ PROJECT_SETTING : configures
VOICE_SESSION ||--o{ VOICE_COMMAND : records
VOICE_SESSION ||--o{ EXECUTION_LOG : generates
VOICE_SESSION ||--o{ SESSION_TRANSCRIPT : documents
VOICE_COMMAND ||--o{ COMMAND_PARAMETER : contains
VOICE_COMMAND ||--o{ EXECUTION_RESULT : produces
TASK ||--o{ SUBTASK : decomposes
TASK ||--o{ TASK_DEPENDENCY : relates
TASK ||--o{ TASK_ASSIGNMENT : assigns
CODE_ARTIFACT ||--o{ CODE_VERSION : versions
CODE_ARTIFACT ||--o{ CODE_REVIEW : undergoes
CODE_ARTIFACT ||--o{ DEPENDENCY : references
DATA_ANALYSIS ||--o{ DATASET : analyzes
DATA_ANALYSIS ||--o{ ANALYSIS_RESULT : produces
DATA_ANALYSIS ||--o{ VISUALIZATION : generates
DATASET ||--o{ DATA_QUALITY_METRIC : measures
DATASET ||--o{ DATA_LINEAGE : tracks
COLLABORATION ||--o{ COLLABORATION_MESSAGE : contains
COLLABORATION ||--o{ SHARED_RESOURCE : shares
EXECUTION_LOG ||--o{ ERROR_LOG : contains
EXECUTION_LOG ||--o{ PERFORMANCE_METRIC : records
USER {
string user_id PK "UUID"
string email UK "Unique email address"
string username UK "Unique username"
string full_name "User's full name"
string password_hash "Bcrypt hashed password"
string role "admin, developer, data_scientist, manager"
string avatar_url "Profile picture URL"
string bio "User biography"
string preferred_language "en, es, fr, de, zh"
string timezone "IANA timezone"
boolean mfa_enabled "Multi-factor authentication"
datetime created_at "Account creation timestamp"
datetime updated_at "Last profile update"
datetime last_login "Last login timestamp"
boolean is_active "Account status"
string organization_id FK "Organization reference"
}
PROJECT {
string project_id PK "UUID"
string user_id FK "Project owner"
string name "Project name"
string description "Project description"
string type "web, mobile, data_science, ml_model, devops"
string status "active, archived, deleted"
string programming_language "python, javascript, java, go, rust"
string repository_url "Git repository URL"
string documentation_url "Project documentation link"
datetime created_at "Project creation date"
datetime updated_at "Last modification date"
datetime archived_at "Archive timestamp"
string visibility "public, private, internal"
int estimated_duration_hours "Estimated project duration"
string priority "low, medium, high, critical"
}
VOICE_SESSION {
string session_id PK "UUID"
string user_id FK "Session initiator"
string project_id FK "Associated project"
datetime start_time "Session start timestamp"
datetime end_time "Session end timestamp"
int duration_seconds "Total session duration"
string status "active, completed, interrupted, error"
string voice_model "whisper-large, whisper-medium, custom"
float confidence_score "Speech recognition confidence"
string language_detected "Detected language code"
int command_count "Number of commands executed"
string device_type "desktop, mobile, headset"
string ip_address "Client IP address"
string user_agent "Client user agent"
boolean recording_enabled "Session recording status"
string transcript_status "pending, processing, completed"
}
VOICE_COMMAND {
string command_id PK "UUID"
string session_id FK "Parent session"
string user_id FK "Command issuer"
string raw_text "Original voice input"
string normalized_text "Processed command text"
string command_type "code_generation, data_analysis, project_management, debugging"
string intent "create, modify, delete, analyze, review"
string entity_type "function, class, module, test, documentation"
datetime timestamp "Command execution time"
int execution_time_ms "Command processing duration"
string status "pending, processing, completed, failed, cancelled"
float nlp_confidence "NLP model confidence score"
string error_message "Error details if failed"
string result_summary "Brief execution result"
}
COMMAND_PARAMETER {
string parameter_id PK "UUID"
string command_id FK "Parent command"
string parameter_name "Parameter identifier"
string parameter_value "Parameter value"
string parameter_type "string, integer, boolean, array, object"
boolean is_required "Mandatory parameter flag"
string validation_rule "Validation regex or rule"
string description "Parameter description"
}
EXECUTION_RESULT {
string result_id PK "UUID"
string command_id FK "Associated command"
string session_id FK "Parent session"
string result_type "code, analysis, report, error, warning"
string content "Result content"
string format "json, markdown, html, plain_text"
int size_bytes "Result size in bytes"
string artifact_id FK "Generated artifact reference"
datetime created_at "Result creation timestamp"
boolean requires_review "Manual review needed flag"
string review_status "pending, approved, rejected"
}
TASK {
string task_id PK "UUID"
string project_id FK "Associated project"
string user_id FK "Task creator"
string title "Task title"
string description "Detailed task description"
string status "backlog, todo, in_progress, review, completed, blocked"
string priority "low, medium, high, critical"
string category "feature, bug, refactor, documentation, testing"
datetime created_at "Task creation date"
datetime updated_at "Last update timestamp"
datetime due_date "Task deadline"
datetime completed_at "Completion timestamp"
int estimated_hours "Estimated effort"
int actual_hours "Actual effort spent"
string assigned_to FK "Assigned user"
int story_points "Agile story points"
}
SUBTASK {
string subtask_id PK "UUID"
string task_id FK "Parent task"
string title "Subtask title"
string description "Subtask description"
string status "pending, in_progress, completed"
boolean is_completed "Completion flag"
datetime created_at "Creation timestamp"
datetime completed_at "Completion timestamp"
int order_index "Display order"
}
TASK_DEPENDENCY {
string dependency_id PK "UUID"
string task_id FK "Dependent task"
string depends_on_task_id FK "Required task"
string dependency_type "blocks, relates_to, duplicates, is_duplicated_by"
datetime created_at "Dependency creation date"
}
TASK_ASSIGNMENT {
string assignment_id PK "UUID"
string task_id FK "Assigned task"
string user_id FK "Assigned user"
datetime assigned_at "Assignment timestamp"
datetime unassigned_at "Unassignment timestamp"
string assignment_reason "Reason for assignment"
}
CODE_ARTIFACT {
string artifact_id PK "UUID"
string project_id FK "Parent project"
string user_id FK "Creator"
string name "Artifact name"
string file_path "Repository file path"
string language "python, javascript, java, go, rust, sql"
string artifact_type "function, class, module, test, script, config"
string content "Source code content"
int lines_of_code "LOC count"
string status "draft, review, approved, deployed, deprecated"
datetime created_at "Creation timestamp"
datetime updated_at "Last modification"
string git_commit_hash "Associated commit hash"
string git_branch "Git branch name"
float complexity_score "Cyclomatic complexity"
float test_coverage "Test coverage percentage"
}
CODE_VERSION {
string version_id PK "UUID"
string artifact_id FK "Parent artifact"
string version_number "Semantic version"
string content "Version content"
string change_summary "Change description"
string user_id FK "Version creator"
datetime created_at "Version creation date"
string git_commit_hash "Associated commit"
int lines_added "Added lines count"
int lines_removed "Removed lines count"
}
CODE_REVIEW {
string review_id PK "UUID"
string artifact_id FK "Reviewed artifact"
string reviewer_id FK "Reviewer user"
string status "pending, approved, changes_requested, rejected"
string comments "Review comments"
datetime created_at "Review start date"
datetime completed_at "Review completion date"
int review_time_minutes "Review duration"
int issues_found "Number of issues identified"
}
DEPENDENCY {
string dependency_id PK "UUID"
string artifact_id FK "Dependent artifact"
string dependency_name "Dependency name"
string dependency_version "Version specification"
string dependency_type "internal, external, framework, library"
string package_manager "npm, pip, maven, cargo, go"
string license "License type"
boolean is_security_risk "Security vulnerability flag"
datetime last_checked "Last security check date"
}
DATA_ANALYSIS {
string analysis_id PK "UUID"
string project_id FK "Associated project"
string user_id FK "Analysis creator"
string title "Analysis title"
string description "Analysis description"
string analysis_type "exploratory, statistical, predictive, clustering, classification"
string status "draft, in_progress, completed, archived"
datetime created_at "Creation timestamp"
datetime updated_at "Last update"
datetime completed_at "Completion timestamp"
string notebook_url "Jupyter notebook URL"
string methodology "Analysis methodology"
string findings_summary "Key findings summary"
}
DATASET {
string dataset_id PK "UUID"
string analysis_id FK "Associated analysis"
string user_id FK "Dataset owner"
string name "Dataset name"
string description "Dataset description"
string source "Data source"
string format "csv, json, parquet, sql, excel"
string storage_location "S3, GCS, local, database"
int row_count "Number of rows"
int column_count "Number of columns"
int size_bytes "Dataset size in bytes"
datetime created_at "Creation timestamp"
datetime updated_at "Last update"
datetime last_accessed "Last access timestamp"
string access_level "public, private, internal"
boolean is_sensitive "Sensitive data flag"
}
ANALYSIS_RESULT {
string result_id PK "UUID"
string analysis_id FK "Parent analysis"
string result_type "metric, model, prediction, insight, anomaly"
string content "Result content"
string format "json, markdown, html, image"
float confidence_score "Result confidence level"
datetime created_at "Creation timestamp"
string visualization_id FK "Associated visualization"
}
VISUALIZATION {
string visualization_id PK "UUID"
string analysis_id FK "Associated analysis"
string title "Visualization title"
string chart_type "line, bar, scatter, heatmap, pie, box, violin"
string data_source "Data source reference"
string image_url "Visualization image URL"
string interactive_url "Interactive visualization URL"
datetime created_at "Creation timestamp"
string description "Visualization description"
}
DATA_QUALITY_METRIC {
string metric_id PK "UUID"
string dataset_id FK "Associated dataset"
string metric_name "Metric name"
float metric_value "Metric value"
string metric_type "completeness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness"
datetime measured_at "Measurement timestamp"
string status "good, warning, critical"
}
DATA_LINEAGE {
string lineage_id PK "UUID"
string dataset_id FK "Dataset"
string source_dataset_id FK "Source dataset"
string transformation_description "Transformation details"
datetime created_at "Lineage creation date"
string transformation_code "Transformation code"
}
COLLABORATION {
string collaboration_id PK "UUID"
string project_id FK "Associated project"
string initiator_id FK "Collaboration initiator"
string collaborator_id FK "Collaborating user"
string collaboration_type "pair_programming, code_review, data_analysis, brainstorm"
string status "active, completed, cancelled"
datetime started_at "Start timestamp"
datetime ended_at "End timestamp"
string access_level "view, comment, edit, admin"
}
COLLABORATION_MESSAGE {
string message_id PK "UUID"
string collaboration_id FK "Parent collaboration"
string user_id FK "Message sender"
string content "Message content"
string message_type "text, code_snippet, file, link, mention"
datetime created_at "Message timestamp"
datetime updated_at "Last edit timestamp"
boolean is_pinned "Pinned message flag"
}
SHARED_RESOURCE {
string resource_id PK "UUID"
string collaboration_id FK "Associated collaboration"
string resource_type "code, data, document, link, artifact"
string resource_reference "Resource identifier"
string access_level "view, edit, admin"
datetime shared_at "Sharing timestamp"
datetime expires_at "Expiration timestamp"
}
EXECUTION_LOG {
string log_id PK "UUID"
string session_id FK "Parent session"
string command_id FK "Associated command"
string user_id FK "User who triggered"
string action "execute, compile, test, deploy, analyze"
string status "success, failure, warning, partial"
datetime timestamp "Execution timestamp"
int duration_ms "Execution duration"
string output "Execution output"
string environment "development, staging, production"
}
ERROR_LOG {
string error_id PK "UUID"
string log_id FK "Parent execution log"
string error_type "syntax, runtime, logic, security, performance"
string error_message "Error message"
string error_code "Error code"
string stack_trace "Stack trace"
string file_path "File where error occurred"
int line_number "Line number"
datetime timestamp "Error timestamp"
string severity "low, medium, high, critical"
}
PERFORMANCE_METRIC {
string metric_id PK "UUID"
string log_id FK "Associated execution log"
string metric_name "Metric name"
float metric_value "Metric value"
string unit "ms, MB, %, count"
datetime measured_at "Measurement timestamp"
string threshold_status "normal, warning, critical"
}
SESSION_TRANSCRIPT {
string transcript_id PK "UUID"
string session_id FK "Parent session"
string full_transcript "Complete session transcript"
string summary "Session summary"
int word_count "Total words"
datetime created_at "Creation timestamp"
string language "Detected language"
boolean is_archived "Archive status"
}
NOTIFICATION {
string notification_id PK "UUID"
string user_id FK "Recipient user"
string notification_type "task_assigned, code_review, collaboration_invite, error_alert, milestone"
string title "Notification title"
string message "Notification message"
string related_entity_id "Related entity reference"
datetime created_at "Creation timestamp"
datetime read_at "Read timestamp"
boolean is_read "Read status"
string priority "low, medium, high"
}
API_KEY {
string key_id PK "UUID"
string user_id FK "Key owner"
string key_hash "Hashed API key"
string key_name "Key name/description"
string[] scopes "Authorized scopes"
datetime created_at "Creation timestamp"
datetime last_used "Last usage timestamp"
datetime expires_at "Expiration timestamp"
boolean is_active "Active status"
int rate_limit "Requests per minute"
}
PROJECT_SETTING {
string setting_id PK "UUID"
string project_id FK "Associated project"
string setting_key "Setting identifier"
string setting_value "Setting value"
string setting_type "string, integer, boolean, json"
string description "Setting description"
datetime updated_at "Last update timestamp"
}
2. Entity Descriptions
2.1 USER Entity
Purpose & Business Meaning: Represents individual users of the voice-centric development platform. Stores authentication credentials, profile information, preferences, and account status. Central to access control and personalization.
Attributes:
| Attribute | Type | Constraints | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| user_id | UUID | PK, NOT NULL | Unique user identifier |
| VARCHAR(255) | UK, NOT NULL | Unique email address for login | |
| username | VARCHAR(100) | UK, NOT NULL | Unique username for display |
| full_name | VARCHAR(255) | NOT NULL | User’s full name |
| password_hash | VARCHAR(255) | NOT NULL | Bcrypt hashed password (min 12 rounds) |
| role | ENUM | NOT NULL, DEFAULT=’developer’ | User role: admin, developer, data_scientist, manager |
| avatar_url | VARCHAR(500) | NULLABLE | Profile picture URL (CDN hosted) |
| bio | TEXT | NULLABLE | User biography (max 500 chars) |
| preferred_language | VARCHAR(10) | DEFAULT=’en’ | Language preference (ISO 639-1) |
| timezone | VARCHAR(50) | DEFAULT=’UTC’ | IANA timezone identifier |
| mfa_enabled | BOOLEAN | DEFAULT=false | Multi-factor authentication status |
| created_at | TIMESTAMP | NOT NULL, DEFAULT=NOW() | Account creation timestamp |
| updated_at | TIMESTAMP | NOT NULL, DEFAULT=NOW() | Last profile update |
| last_login | TIMESTAMP | NULLABLE | Last successful login |
| is_active | BOOLEAN | DEFAULT=true | Account active status |
| organization_id | UUID | FK, NULLABLE | Organization reference |
Relationships:
- 1:N with PROJECT - User creates and owns projects
- 1:N with VOICE_SESSION - User initiates voice sessions
- 1:N with COLLABORATION - User participates in collaborations
- 1:N with NOTIFICATION - User receives notifications
- 1:N with API_KEY - User owns API keys
Indexes & Performance:
- Primary Index:
user_id(clustered) - Unique Indexes:
email,username - Search Index:
full_name(for user search) - Foreign Key Index:
organization_id - Composite Index:
(is_active, created_at)for active user queries
Constraints:
- Email must be valid RFC 5322 format
- Username: 3-50 alphanumeric characters, underscores allowed
- Password hash must be 60 characters (Bcrypt)
- Timezone must be valid IANA identifier
2.2 PROJECT Entity
Purpose & Business Meaning: Represents development or data science projects. Serves as the primary organizational unit for tasks, code artifacts, analyses, and collaborations. Tracks project metadata, status, and configuration.
Attributes:
| Attribute | Type | Constraints | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| project_id | UUID | PK, NOT NULL | Unique project identifier |
| user_id | UUID | FK, NOT NULL | Project owner/creator |
| name | VARCHAR(255) | NOT NULL, UK(user_id) | Project name (unique per user) |
| description | TEXT | NULLABLE | Detailed project description |
| type | ENUM | NOT NULL | Project type: web, mobile, data_science, ml_model, devops |
| status | ENUM | DEFAULT=’active’ | Status: active, archived, deleted |
| programming_language | VARCHAR(50) | NULLABLE | Primary language: python, javascript, java, go, rust |
| repository_url | VARCHAR(500) | NULLABLE | Git repository URL |
| documentation_url | VARCHAR(500) | NULLABLE | Project documentation link |
| created_at | TIMESTAMP | NOT NULL, DEFAULT=NOW() | Project creation date |
| updated_at | TIMESTAMP | NOT NULL, DEFAULT=NOW() | Last modification date |
| archived_at | TIMESTAMP | NULLABLE | Archive timestamp |
| visibility | ENUM | DEFAULT=’private’ | Visibility: public, private, internal |
| estimated_duration_hours | INT | NULLABLE, CHECK(>0) | Estimated project duration |
| priority | ENUM | DEFAULT=’medium’ | Priority: low, medium, high, critical |
Relationships:
- N:1 with USER - Owned by a user
- 1:N with TASK - Contains multiple tasks
- 1:N with CODE_ARTIFACT - Produces code artifacts
- 1:N with DATA_ANALYSIS - Contains data analyses
- 1:N with COLLABORATION - Involves collaborations
- 1:N with PROJECT_SETTING - Has configuration settings
Indexes & Performance:
- Primary Index:
project_id(clustered) - Foreign Key Index:
user_id - Composite Index:
(user_id, status, created_at)for user project listing - Search Index:
name(full-text search) - Status Index:
(status, archived_at)for filtering
Constraints:
- Name length: 1-255 characters
- Repository URL must be valid Git URL format
- Estimated duration must be positive integer
- Status transitions: active → archived → deleted (one-way)
2.3 VOICE_SESSION Entity
Purpose & Business Meaning: Represents individual voice interaction sessions. Tracks voice input, processing metadata, command execution, and session lifecycle. Critical for audit trails and performance monitoring.
Attributes:
| Attribute | Type | Constraints | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | UUID | PK, NOT NULL | Unique session identifier |
| user_id | UUID | FK, NOT NULL | Session initiator |
| project_id | UUID | FK, NULLABLE | Associated project context |
| start_time | TIMESTAMP | NOT NULL, DEFAULT=NOW() | Session start timestamp |
| end_time | TIMESTAMP | NULLABLE | Session end timestamp |
| duration_seconds | INT | NULLABLE, CHECK(>=0) | Total session duration |
| status | ENUM | DEFAULT=’active’ | Status: active, completed, interrupted, error |
| voice_model | VARCHAR(50) | DEFAULT=’whisper-large’ | Speech recognition model |
| confidence_score | FLOAT | CHECK(0-1) | Speech recognition confidence (0-1) |
| language_detected | VARCHAR(10) | NOT NULL | Detected language code (ISO 639-1) |
| command_count | INT | DEFAULT=0 | Number of commands executed |
| device_type | VARCHAR(50) | NOT NULL | Device: desktop, mobile, headset |
| ip_address | VARCHAR(45) | NOT NULL | Client IP address (IPv4/IPv6) |
| user_agent | VARCHAR(500) | NOT NULL | Client user agent string |
| recording_enabled | BOOLEAN | DEFAULT=false | Session recording status |
| transcript_status | ENUM | DEFAULT=’pending’ | Transcript: pending, processing, completed |
Relationships:
- N:1 with USER - Initiated by user
- N:1 with PROJECT - Associated with project
- 1:N with VOICE_COMMAND - Records multiple commands
- 1:N with EXECUTION_LOG - Generates execution logs
- 1:1 with SESSION_TRANSCRIPT - Has transcript
Indexes & Performance:
- Primary Index:
session_id(clustered) - Foreign Key Indexes:
user_id,project_id - Composite Index:
(user_id, start_time DESC)for session history - Status Index:
(status, end_time)for active session queries - Time-based Index:
(start_time)for time-range queries
Constraints:
- Duration must be non-negative
- Confidence score: 0.0 to 1.0
- Language code must be valid ISO 639-1
- IP address must be valid IPv4 or IPv6
- End time must be >= start time
2.4 VOICE_COMMAND Entity
Purpose & Business Meaning: Represents individual voice commands within a session. Stores raw and processed command text, intent classification, execution status, and results. Essential for command tracking and NLP model training.
Attributes:
| Attribute | Type | Constraints | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| command_id | UUID | PK, NOT NULL | Unique command identifier |
| session_id | UUID | FK, NOT NULL | Parent session |
| user_id | UUID | FK, NOT NULL | Command issuer |
| raw_text | TEXT | NOT NULL | Original voice input text |
| normalized_text | TEXT | NOT NULL | Processed/normalized command text |
| command_type | ENUM | NOT NULL | Type: code_generation, data_analysis, project_management, debugging |
| intent | ENUM | NOT NULL | Intent: create, modify, delete, analyze, review |
| entity_type | VARCHAR(50) | NULLABLE | Entity: function, class, module, test, documentation |
| timestamp | TIMESTAMP | NOT NULL, DEFAULT=NOW() | Command execution time |
| execution_time_ms | INT | CHECK(>=0) | Command processing duration |
| status | ENUM | DEFAULT=’pending’ | Status: pending, processing, completed, failed, cancelled |
| nlp_confidence | FLOAT | CHECK(0-1) | NLP model confidence score |
| error_message | TEXT | NULLABLE | Error details if failed |
| result_summary | TEXT | NULLABLE | Brief execution result summary |
Relationships:
- N:1 with VOICE_SESSION - Belongs to session
- N:1 with USER - Issued by user
- 1:N with COMMAND_PARAMETER - Contains parameters
- 1:N with EXECUTION_RESULT - Produces results
Indexes & Performance:
- Primary Index:
command_id(clustered) - Foreign Key Indexes:
session_id,user_id - Composite Index:
(session_id, timestamp)for session command retrieval - Status Index:
(status, timestamp)for pending command queries - Intent Index:
(command_type, intent)for command analytics
Constraints:
- Raw text length: 1-5000 characters
- Normalized text length: 1-5000 characters
- Execution time must be non-negative
- NLP confidence: 0.0 to 1.0
-
Status transitions: pending → processing → (completed failed cancelled)
2.5 TASK Entity
Purpose & Business Meaning: Represents work items within projects. Supports agile project management with status tracking, assignments, dependencies, and effort estimation. Integrates with voice commands for task creation and updates.
Attributes:
| Attribute | Type | Constraints | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| task_id | UUID | PK, NOT NULL | Unique task identifier |
| project_id | UUID | FK, NOT NULL | Associated project |
| user_id | UUID | FK, NOT NULL | Task creator |
| title | VARCHAR(255) | NOT NULL | Task title |
| description | TEXT | NULLABLE | Detailed task description |
| status | ENUM | DEFAULT=’backlog’ | Status: backlog, todo, in_progress, review, completed, blocked |
| priority | ENUM | DEFAULT=’medium’ | Priority: low, medium, high, critical |
| category | ENUM | NOT NULL | Category: feature, bug, refactor, documentation, testing |
| created_at | TIMESTAMP | NOT NULL, DEFAULT=NOW() | Task creation date |
| updated_at | TIMESTAMP | NOT NULL, DEFAULT=NOW() | Last update timestamp |
| due_date | DATE | NULLABLE | Task deadline |
| completed_at | TIMESTAMP | NULLABLE | Completion timestamp |
| estimated_hours | INT | NULLABLE, CHECK(>0) | Estimated effort in hours |
| actual_hours | INT | NULLABLE, CHECK(>=0) | Actual effort spent |
| assigned_to | UUID | FK, NULLABLE | Assigned user |
| story_points | INT | NULLABLE, CHECK(>0) | Agile story points |
Relationships:
- N:1 with PROJECT - Belongs to project
- N:1 with USER - Created by user
- 1:N with SUBTASK - Decomposes into subtasks
- 1:N with TASK_DEPENDENCY - Has dependencies
- 1:N with TASK_ASSIGNMENT - Has assignments
Indexes & Performance:
- Primary Index:
task_id(clustered) - Foreign Key Indexes:
project_id,user_id,assigned_to - Composite Index:
(project_id, status, priority)for task filtering - Status Index:
(status, due_date)for task board queries - Assignment Index:
(assigned_to, status)for user task lists
Constraints:
- Title length: 1-255 characters
- Estimated hours must be positive
- Actual hours must be non-negative
- Due date must be in future
- Completed date must be >= created date
- Story points must be positive
2.6 CODE_ARTIFACT Entity
Purpose & Business Meaning: Represents code components generated or managed through voice commands. Tracks source code, metadata, quality metrics, and version history. Integrates with Git repositories and code review workflows.
Attributes:
| Attribute | Type | Constraints | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| artifact_id | UUID | PK, NOT NULL | Unique artifact identifier |
| project_id | UUID | FK, NOT NULL | Parent project |
| user_id | UUID | FK, NOT NULL | Creator/owner |
| name | VARCHAR(255) | NOT NULL | Artifact name |
| file_path | VARCHAR(500) | NOT NULL | Repository file path |
| language | VARCHAR(50) | NOT NULL | Programming language |
| artifact_type | ENUM | NOT NULL | Type: function, class, module, test, script, config |
| content | LONGTEXT | NOT NULL | Source code content |
| lines_of_code | INT | CHECK(>0) | LOC count |
| status | ENUM | DEFAULT=’draft’ | Status: draft, review, approved, deployed, deprecated |
| created_at | TIMESTAMP | NOT NULL, DEFAULT=NOW() | Creation timestamp |
| updated_at | TIMESTAMP | NOT NULL, DEFAULT=NOW() | Last modification |
| git_commit_hash | VARCHAR(40) | NULLABLE | Associated commit hash |
| git_branch | VARCHAR(255) | NULLABLE | Git branch name |
| complexity_score | FLOAT | CHECK(>=0) | Cyclomatic complexity |
| test_coverage | FLOAT | CHECK(0-100) | Test coverage percentage |
Relationships:
- N:1 with PROJECT - Belongs to project
- N:1 with USER - Created by user
- 1:N with CODE_VERSION - Has version history
- 1:N with CODE_REVIEW - Undergoes reviews
- 1:N with DEPENDENCY - References dependencies
Indexes & Performance:
- Primary Index:
artifact_id(clustered) - Foreign Key Indexes:
project_id,user_id - Composite Index:
(project_id, artifact_type, status)for artifact filtering - Search Index:
name(full-text search) - Status Index:
(status, updated_at)for recent artifacts
Constraints:
- Name length: 1-255 characters
- File path must be valid relative path
- Language must be supported language
- LOC must be positive
- Complexity score must be non-negative
- Test coverage: 0-100%
-
Status transitions: draft → review → (approved rejected) → deployed
2.7 DATA_ANALYSIS Entity
Purpose & Business Meaning: Represents data science analyses and experiments. Tracks analysis methodology, findings, and associated datasets. Integrates with Jupyter notebooks and visualization tools.
Attributes:
| Attribute | Type | Constraints | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| analysis_id | UUID | PK, NOT NULL | Unique analysis identifier |
| project_id | UUID | FK, NOT NULL | Associated project |
| user_id | UUID | FK, NOT NULL | Analysis creator |
| title | VARCHAR(255) | NOT NULL | Analysis title |
| description | TEXT | NULLABLE | Analysis description |
| analysis_type | ENUM | NOT NULL | Type: exploratory, statistical, predictive, clustering, classification |
| status | ENUM | DEFAULT=’draft’ | Status: draft, in_progress, completed, archived |
| created_at | TIMESTAMP | NOT NULL, DEFAULT=NOW() | Creation timestamp |
| updated_at | TIMESTAMP | NOT NULL, DEFAULT=NOW() | Last update |
| completed_at | TIMESTAMP | NULLABLE | Completion timestamp |
| notebook_url | VARCHAR(500) | NULLABLE | Jupyter notebook URL |
| methodology | TEXT | NULLABLE | Analysis methodology description |
| findings_summary | TEXT | NULLABLE | Key findings summary |
Relationships:
- N:1 with PROJECT - Belongs to project
- N:1 with USER - Created by user
- 1:N with DATASET - Analyzes datasets
- 1:N with ANALYSIS_RESULT - Produces results
- 1:N with VISUALIZATION - Generates visualizations
Indexes & Performance:
- Primary Index:
analysis_id(clustered) - Foreign Key Indexes:
project_id,user_id - Composite Index:
(project_id, status, created_at)for analysis listing - Status Index:
(status, completed_at)for completed analysis queries - Search Index:
title(full-text search)
Constraints:
- Title length: 1-255 characters
- Analysis type must be valid type
- Completed date must be >= created date
- Status transitions: draft → in_progress → completed → archived
2.8 DATASET Entity
Purpose & Business Meaning: Represents data sources used in analyses. Tracks data location, format, quality metrics, and access controls. Supports data lineage tracking and quality monitoring.
Attributes:
| Attribute | Type | Constraints | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| dataset_id | UUID | PK, NOT NULL | Unique dataset identifier |
| analysis_id | UUID | FK, NULLABLE | Associated analysis |
| user_id | UUID | FK, NOT NULL | Dataset owner |
| name | VARCHAR(255) | NOT NULL | Dataset name |
| description | TEXT | NULLABLE | Dataset description |
| source | VARCHAR(500) | NOT NULL | Data source |
| format | ENUM | NOT NULL | Format: csv, json, parquet, sql, excel |
| storage_location | VARCHAR(500) | NOT NULL | Storage: S3, GCS, local, database |
| row_count | INT | CHECK(>=0) | Number of rows |
| column_count | INT | CHECK(>0) | Number of columns |
| size_bytes | BIGINT | CHECK(>0) | Dataset size in bytes |
| created_at | TIMESTAMP | NOT NULL, DEFAULT=NOW() | Creation timestamp |
| updated_at | TIMESTAMP | NOT NULL, DEFAULT=NOW() | Last update |
| last_accessed | TIMESTAMP | NULLABLE | Last access timestamp |
| access_level | ENUM | DEFAULT=’private’ | Access: public, private, internal |
| is_sensitive | BOOLEAN | DEFAULT=false | Sensitive data flag |
Relationships:
- N:1 with ANALYSIS - Used in analysis
- N:1 with USER - Owned by user
- 1:N with DATA_QUALITY_METRIC - Has quality metrics
- 1:N with DATA_LINEAGE - Has lineage tracking
Indexes & Performance:
- Primary Index:
dataset_id(clustered) - Foreign Key Indexes:
analysis_id,user_id - Composite Index:
(user_id, access_level, created_at)for user dataset listing - Search Index:
name(full-text search) - Access Index:
(access_level, is_sensitive)for access control
Constraints:
- Name length: 1-255 characters
- Row count must be non-negative
- Column count must be positive
- Size must be positive
- Format must be supported format
- Storage location must be valid
2.9 EXECUTION_LOG Entity
Purpose & Business Meaning: Records execution history of commands and operations. Tracks success/failure status, performance metrics, and output. Essential for debugging, auditing, and performance analysis.
Attributes:
| Attribute | Type | Constraints | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| log_id | UUID | PK, NOT NULL | Unique log identifier |
| session_id | UUID | FK, NOT NULL | Parent session |
| command_id | UUID | FK, NULLABLE | Associated command |
| user_id | UUID | FK, NOT NULL | User who triggered |
| action | ENUM | NOT NULL | Action: execute, compile, test, deploy, analyze |
| status | ENUM | NOT NULL | Status: success, failure, warning, partial |
| timestamp | TIMESTAMP | NOT NULL, DEFAULT=NOW() | Execution timestamp |
| duration_ms | INT | CHECK(>=0) | Execution duration in milliseconds |
| output | LONGTEXT | NULLABLE | Execution output |
| environment | ENUM | NOT NULL | Environment: development, staging, production |
Relationships:
- N:1 with VOICE_SESSION - Belongs to session
- N:1 with VOICE_COMMAND - Associated with command
- N:1 with USER - Triggered by user
- 1:N with ERROR_LOG - Contains error logs
- 1:N with PERFORMANCE_METRIC - Records metrics
Indexes & Performance:
- Primary Index:
log_id(clustered) - Foreign Key Indexes:
session_id,command_id,user_id - Composite Index:
(session_id, timestamp DESC)for session log retrieval - Status Index:
(status, timestamp)for failure analysis - Environment Index:
(environment, timestamp)for environment-specific queries - Time-based Index:
(timestamp)for time-range queries with TTL
Constraints:
- Duration must be non-negative
- Status must be valid status
- Action must be valid action
- Environment must be valid environment
- Output length: 0-1MB
2.10 COLLABORATION Entity
Purpose & Business Meaning: Represents collaborative sessions between users. Tracks pair programming, code reviews, and data analysis collaborations. Manages access levels and collaboration lifecycle.
Attributes:
| Attribute | Type | Constraints | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| collaboration_id | UUID | PK, NOT NULL | Unique collaboration identifier |
| project_id | UUID | FK, NOT NULL | Associated project |
| initiator_id | UUID | FK, NOT NULL | Collaboration initiator |
| collaborator_id | UUID | FK, NOT NULL | Collaborating user |
| collaboration_type | ENUM | NOT NULL | Type: pair_programming, code_review, data_analysis, brainstorm |
| status | ENUM | DEFAULT=’active’ | Status: active, completed, cancelled |
| started_at | TIMESTAMP | NOT NULL, DEFAULT=NOW() | Start timestamp |
| ended_at | TIMESTAMP | NULLABLE | End timestamp |
| access_level | ENUM | NOT NULL | Access: view, comment, edit, admin |
Relationships:
- N:1 with PROJECT - Associated with project
- N:1 with USER (initiator) - Initiated by user
- N:1 with USER (collaborator) - Involves collaborator
- 1:N with COLLABORATION_MESSAGE - Contains messages
- 1:N with SHARED_RESOURCE - Shares resources
Indexes & Performance:
- Primary Index:
collaboration_id(clustered) - Foreign Key Indexes:
project_id,initiator_id,collaborator_id - Composite Index:
(project_id, status, started_at)for active collaborations - User Index:
(initiator_id, status)for user collaborations - Status Index:
(status, ended_at)for completed collaboration queries
Constraints:
- Initiator and collaborator must be different users
- Access level must be valid level
- Ended date must be >= started date
-
Status transitions: active → (completed cancelled)
3. Comprehensive Data Dictionary
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
# Complete Data Dictionary
## USER Table
| Attribute | Type | Size | Nullable | Default | Constraints | Description |
|-----------|------|------|----------|---------|-------------|-------------|
| user_id | UUID | 16 | NO | uuid_generate_v4() | PK | Unique user identifier |
| email | VARCHAR | 255 | NO | NULL | UK, NOT NULL | Email address for login |
| username | VARCHAR | 100 | NO | NULL | UK, NOT NULL | Display username |
| full_name | VARCHAR | 255 | NO | NULL | NOT NULL | User's full name |
| password_hash | VARCHAR | 255 | NO | NULL | NOT NULL | Bcrypt hash (60 chars) |
| role | ENUM | - | NO | 'developer' | CHECK IN (admin, developer, data_scientist, manager) | User role |
| avatar_url | VARCHAR | 500 | YES | NULL | URL format | Profile picture URL |
| bio | TEXT | 500 | YES | NULL | MAX 500 chars | User biography |
| preferred_language | VARCHAR | 10 | NO | 'en' | ISO 639-1 code | Language preference |
| timezone | VARCHAR | 50 | NO | 'UTC' | IANA timezone | User timezone |
| mfa_enabled | BOOLEAN | 1 | NO | false | - | MFA status |
| created_at | TIMESTAMP | 8 | NO | NOW() | - | Account creation |
| updated_at | TIMESTAMP | 8 | NO | NOW() | - | Last update |
| last_login | TIMESTAMP | 8 | YES | NULL | - | Last login time |
| is_active | BOOLEAN | 1 | NO | true | - | Account status |
| organization_id | UUID | 16 | YES | NULL | FK → ORGANIZATION | Organization reference |
## PROJECT Table
| Attribute | Type | Size | Nullable | Default | Constraints | Description |
|-----------|------|------|----------|---------|-------------|-------------|
| project_id | UUID | 16 | NO | uuid_generate_v4() | PK | Unique project ID |
| user_id | UUID | 16 | NO | NULL | FK → USER | Project owner |
| name | VARCHAR | 255 | NO | NULL | UK(user_id), NOT NULL | Project name |
| description | TEXT | 2000 | YES | NULL | - | Project description |
| type | ENUM | - | NO | NULL | CHECK IN (web, mobile, data_science, ml_model, devops) | Project type |
| status | ENUM | - | NO | 'active' | CHECK IN (active, archived, deleted) | Project status |
| programming_language | VARCHAR | 50 | YES | NULL | - | Primary language |
| repository_url | VARCHAR | 500 | YES | NULL | URL format | Git repository URL |
| documentation_url | VARCHAR | 500 | YES | NULL | URL format | Documentation link |
| created_at | TIMESTAMP | 8 | NO | NOW() | - | Creation date |
| updated_at | TIMESTAMP | 8 | NO | NOW() | - | Last update |
| archived_at | TIMESTAMP | 8 | YES | NULL | - | Archive timestamp |
| visibility | ENUM | - | NO | 'private' | CHECK IN (public, private, internal) | Visibility level |
| estimated_duration_hours | INT | 4 | YES | NULL | CHECK > 0 | Estimated duration |
| priority | ENUM | - | NO | 'medium' | CHECK IN (low, medium, high, critical) | Project priority |
## VOICE_SESSION Table
| Attribute | Type | Size | Nullable | Default | Constraints | Description |
|-----------|------|------|----------|---------|-------------|-------------|
| session_id | UUID | 16 | NO | uuid_generate_v4() | PK | Unique session ID |
| user_id | UUID | 16 | NO | NULL | FK → USER | Session initiator |
| project_id | UUID | 16 | YES | NULL | FK → PROJECT | Associated project |
| start_time | TIMESTAMP | 8 | NO | NOW() | - | Session start |
| end_time | TIMESTAMP | 8 | YES | NULL | - | Session end |
| duration_seconds | INT | 4 | YES | NULL | CHECK >= 0 | Total duration |
| status | ENUM | - | NO | 'active' | CHECK IN (active, completed, interrupted, error) | Session status |
| voice_model | VARCHAR | 50 | NO | 'whisper-large' | - | Speech model |
| confidence_score | FLOAT | 4 | YES | NULL | CHECK 0-1 | Recognition confidence |
| language_detected | VARCHAR | 10 | NO | NULL | ISO 639-1 code | Detected language |
| command_count | INT | 4 | NO | 0 | CHECK >= 0 | Command count |
| device_type | VARCHAR | 50 | NO | NULL | - | Device type |
| ip_address | VARCHAR | 45 | NO | NULL | IPv4/IPv6 format | Client IP |
| user_agent | VARCHAR | 500 | NO | NULL | - | User agent string |
| recording_enabled | BOOLEAN | 1 | NO | false | - | Recording status |
| transcript_status | ENUM | - | NO | 'pending' | CHECK IN (pending, processing, completed) | Transcript status |
## VOICE_COMMAND Table
| Attribute | Type | Size | Nullable | Default | Constraints | Description |
|-----------|------|------|----------|---------|-------------|-------------|
| command_id | UUID | 16 | NO | uuid_generate_v4() | PK | Unique command ID |
| session_id | UUID | 16 | NO | NULL | FK → VOICE_SESSION | Parent session |
| user_id | UUID | 16 | NO | NULL | FK → USER | Command issuer |
| raw_text | TEXT | 5000 | NO | NULL | NOT NULL | Original input |
| normalized_text | TEXT | 5000 | NO | NULL | NOT NULL | Processed text |
| command_type | ENUM | - | NO | NULL | CHECK IN (code_generation, data_analysis, project_management, debugging) | Command type |
| intent | ENUM | - | NO | NULL | CHECK IN (create, modify, delete, analyze, review) | Intent |
| entity_type | VARCHAR | 50 | YES | NULL | - | Entity type |
| timestamp | TIMESTAMP | 8 | NO | NOW() | - | Execution time |
| execution_time_ms | INT | 4 | YES | NULL | CHECK >= 0 | Processing duration |
| status | ENUM | - | NO | 'pending' | CHECK IN (pending, processing, completed, failed, cancelled) | Execution status |
| nlp_confidence | FLOAT | 4 | YES | NULL | CHECK 0-1 | NLP confidence |
| error_message | TEXT | 1000 | YES | NULL | - | Error details |
| result_summary | TEXT | 500 | YES | NULL | - | Result summary |
## TASK Table
| Attribute | Type | Size | Nullable | Default | Constraints | Description |
|-----------|------|------|----------|---------|-------------|-------------|
| task_id | UUID | 16 | NO | uuid_generate_v4() | PK | Unique task ID |
| project_id | UUID | 16 | NO | NULL | FK → PROJECT | Associated project |
| user_id | UUID | 16 | NO | NULL | FK → USER | Task creator |
| title | VARCHAR | 255 | NO | NULL | NOT NULL | Task title |
| description | TEXT | 2000 | YES | NULL | - | Task description |
| status | ENUM | - | NO | 'backlog' | CHECK IN (backlog, todo, in_progress, review, completed, blocked) | Task status |
| priority | ENUM | - | NO | 'medium' | CHECK IN (low, medium, high, critical) | Task priority |
| category | ENUM | - | NO | NULL | CHECK IN (feature, bug, refactor, documentation, testing) | Task category |
| created_at | TIMESTAMP | 8 | NO | NOW() | - | Creation date |
| updated_at | TIMESTAMP | 8 | NO | NOW() | - | Last update |
| due_date | DATE | 3 | YES | NULL | - | Task deadline |
| completed_at | TIMESTAMP | 8 | YES | NULL | - | Completion time |
| estimated_hours | INT | 4 | YES | NULL | CHECK > 0 | Estimated effort |
| actual_hours | INT | 4 | YES | NULL | CHECK >= 0 | Actual effort |
| assigned_to | UUID | 16 | YES | NULL | FK → USER | Assigned user |
| story_points | INT | 4 | YES | NULL | CHECK > 0 | Story points |
## CODE_ARTIFACT Table
| Attribute | Type | Size | Nullable | Default | Constraints | Description |
|-----------|------|------|----------|---------|-------------|-------------|
| artifact_id | UUID | 16 | NO | uuid_generate_v4() | PK | Unique artifact ID |
| project_id | UUID | 16 | NO | NULL | FK → PROJECT | Parent project |
| user_id | UUID | 16 | NO | NULL | FK → USER | Creator |
| name | VARCHAR | 255 | NO | NULL | NOT NULL | Artifact name |
| file_path | VARCHAR | 500 | NO | NULL | NOT NULL | File path |
| language | VARCHAR | 50 | NO | NULL | NOT NULL | Programming language |
| artifact_type | ENUM | - | NO | NULL | CHECK IN (function, class, module, test, script, config) | Artifact type |
| content | LONGTEXT | 16MB | NO | NULL | NOT NULL | Source code |
| lines_of_code | INT | 4 | YES | NULL | CHECK > 0 | LOC count |
| status | ENUM | - | NO | 'draft' | CHECK IN (draft, review, approved, deployed, deprecated) | Status |
| created_at | TIMESTAMP | 8 | NO | NOW() | - | Creation date |
| updated_at | TIMESTAMP | 8 | NO | NOW() | - | Last update |
| git_commit_hash | VARCHAR | 40 | YES | NULL | SHA-1 format | Commit hash |
| git_branch | VARCHAR | 255 | YES | NULL | - | Git branch |
| complexity_score | FLOAT | 4 | YES | NULL | CHECK >= 0 | Cyclomatic complexity |
| test_coverage | FLOAT | 4 | YES | NULL | CHECK 0-100 | Test coverage % |
## DATA_ANALYSIS Table
| Attribute | Type | Size | Nullable | Default | Constraints | Description |
|-----------|------|------|----------|---------|-------------|-------------|
| analysis_id | UUID | 16 | NO | uuid_generate_v4() | PK | Unique analysis ID |
| project_id | UUID | 16 | NO | NULL | FK → PROJECT | Associated project |
| user_id | UUID | 16 | NO | NULL | FK → USER | Analysis creator |
| title | VARCHAR | 255 | NO | NULL | NOT NULL | Analysis title |
| description | TEXT | 2000 | YES | NULL | - | Analysis description |
| analysis_type | ENUM | - | NO | NULL | CHECK IN (exploratory, statistical, predictive, clustering, classification) | Analysis type |
| status | ENUM | - | NO | 'draft' | CHECK IN (draft, in_progress, completed, archived) | Status |
| created_at | TIMESTAMP | 8 | NO | NOW() | - | Creation date |
| updated_at | TIMESTAMP | 8 | NO | NOW() | - | Last update |
| completed_at | TIMESTAMP | 8 | YES | NULL | - | Completion date |
| notebook_url | VARCHAR | 500 | YES | NULL | URL format | Notebook URL |
| methodology | TEXT | 2000 | YES | NULL | - | Methodology |
| findings_summary | TEXT | 2000 | YES | NULL | - | Findings summary |
## DATASET Table
| Attribute | Type | Size | Nullable | Default | Constraints | Description |
|-----------|------|------|----------|---------|-------------|-------------|
| dataset_id | UUID | 16 | NO | uuid_generate_v4() | PK | Unique dataset ID |
| analysis_id | UUID | 16 | YES | NULL | FK → DATA_ANALYSIS | Associated analysis |
| user_id | UUID | 16 | NO | NULL | FK → USER | Dataset owner |
| name | VARCHAR | 255 | NO | NULL | NOT NULL | Dataset name |
| description | TEXT | 2000 | YES | NULL | - | Dataset description |
| source | VARCHAR | 500 | NO | NULL | NOT NULL | Data source |
| format | ENUM | - | NO | NULL | CHECK IN (csv, json, parquet, sql, excel) | Data format |
| storage_location | VARCHAR | 500 | NO | NULL | NOT NULL | Storage location |
| row_count | INT | 4 | YES | NULL | CHECK >= 0 | Row count |
| column_count | INT | 4 | NO | NULL | CHECK > 0 | Column count |
| size_bytes | BIGINT | 8 | NO | NULL | CHECK > 0 | Size in bytes |
| created_at | TIMESTAMP | 8 | NO | NOW() | - | Creation date |
| updated_at | TIMESTAMP | 8 | NO | NOW() | - | Last update |
| last_accessed | TIMESTAMP | 8 | YES | NULL | - | Last access |
| access_level | ENUM | - | NO | 'private' | CHECK IN (public, private, internal) | Access level |
| is_sensitive | BOOLEAN | 1 | NO | false | - | Sensitive flag |
## EXECUTION_LOG Table
| Attribute | Type | Size | Nullable | Default | Constraints | Description |
|-----------|------|------|----------|---------|-------------|-------------|
| log_id | UUID | 16 | NO | uuid_generate_v4() | PK | Unique log ID |
| session_id | UUID | 16 | NO | NULL | FK → VOICE_SESSION | Parent session |
| command_id | UUID | 16 | YES | NULL | FK → VOICE_COMMAND | Associated command |
| user_id | UUID | 16 | NO | NULL | FK → USER | User who triggered |
| action | ENUM | - | NO | NULL | CHECK IN (execute, compile, test, deploy, analyze) | Action type |
| status | ENUM | - | NO | NULL | CHECK IN (success, failure, warning, partial) | Execution status |
| timestamp | TIMESTAMP | 8 | NO | NOW() | - | Execution time |
| duration_ms | INT | 4 | YES | NULL | CHECK >= 0 | Duration in ms |
| output | LONGTEXT | 1MB | YES | NULL | - | Execution output |
| environment | ENUM | - | NO | NULL | CHECK IN (development, staging, production) | Environment |
## COLLABORATION Table
| Attribute | Type | Size | Nullable | Default | Constraints | Description |
|-----------|------|------|----------|---------|-------------|-------------|
| collaboration_id | UUID | 16 | NO | uuid_generate_v4() | PK | Unique collaboration ID |
| project_id | UUID | 16 | NO | NULL | FK → PROJECT | Associated project |
| initiator_id | UUID | 16 | NO | NULL | FK → USER | Collaboration initiator |
| collaborator_id | UUID | 16 | NO | NULL | FK → USER | Collaborating user |
| collaboration_type | ENUM | - | NO | NULL | CHECK IN (pair_programming, code_review, data_analysis, brainstorm) | Collaboration type |
| status | ENUM | - | NO | 'active' | CHECK IN (active, completed, cancelled) | Status |
| started_at | TIMESTAMP | 8 | NO | NOW() | - | Start time |
| ended_at | TIMESTAMP | 8 | YES | NULL | - | End time |
| access_level | ENUM | - | NO | NULL | CHECK IN (view, comment, edit, admin) | Access level |
4. Data Flow Diagram
graph TD
A[User] -->|Voice Input| B[Voice Processing Engine]
B -->|Audio Stream| C[Speech Recognition<br/>Whisper Model]
C -->|Transcribed Text| D[NLP Processing<br/>Intent Classification]
D -->|Parsed Command| E{Command Type}
E -->|Code Generation| F[Code Generation<br/>Engine]
E -->|Data Analysis| G[Data Analysis<br/>Engine]
E -->|Project Management| H[Task Management<br/>Service]
E -->|Debugging| I[Debug Service]
F -->|Generated Code| J[Code Artifact<br/>Storage]
G -->|Analysis Results| K[Analysis Result<br/>Storage]
H -->|Task Updates| L[Task<br/>Database]
I -->|Debug Info| M[Execution Log<br/>Storage]
J -->|Store| N[(Primary<br/>Database)]
K -->|Store| N
L -->|Store| N
M -->|Store| N
N -->|Query| O[Voice Session<br/>Manager]
O -->|Session Data| P[Session<br/>Storage]
P -->|Retrieve| Q[Response<br/>Generator]
Q -->|Formatted Response| R[Text-to-Speech<br/>Engine]
R -->|Audio Output| A
N -->|Audit Trail| S[Audit Log<br/>Service]
S -->|Store| T[(Audit<br/>Database)]
N -->|Metrics| U[Analytics<br/>Service]
U -->|Store| V[(Analytics<br/>Database)]
W[Git Repository] -->|Code Sync| J
X[Jupyter Notebooks] -->|Analysis Sync| K
Y[Project Management Tool] -->|Task Sync| L
Z[Collaboration Service] -->|Real-time Updates| N
AA[Notification Service] -->|Alerts| A
5. Data Validation Rules
5.1 Entity-Level Validation Rules
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
## USER Entity Validation Rules
### VR-USER-001: Email Validation
- **Rule**: Email must be valid RFC 5322 format
- **Implementation**: Regex pattern: `^[a-zA-Z0-9._%+-]+@[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,}$`
- **Error Message**: "Invalid email format"
- **Severity**: CRITICAL
### VR-USER-002: Username Uniqueness
- **Rule**: Username must be unique across system
- **Implementation**: Unique constraint on username column
- **Error Message**: "Username already exists"
- **Severity**: CRITICAL
### VR-USER-003: Password Strength
- **Rule**: Password must meet complexity requirements
- **Requirements**:
- Minimum 12 characters
- At least 1 uppercase letter
- At least 1 lowercase letter
- At least 1 digit
- At least 1 special character (!@#$%^&*)
- **Implementation**: Validation function before hashing
- **Error Message**: "Password does not meet complexity requirements"
- **Severity**: CRITICAL
### VR-USER-004: Timezone Validation
- **Rule**: Timezone must be valid IANA identifier
- **Implementation**: Validate against IANA timezone database
- **Error Message**: "Invalid timezone identifier"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
### VR-USER-005: Language Code Validation
- **Rule**: Language code must be valid ISO 639-1 code
- **Implementation**: Validate against ISO 639-1 standard
- **Error Message**: "Invalid language code"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
---
## PROJECT Entity Validation Rules
### VR-PROJECT-001: Project Name Uniqueness
- **Rule**: Project name must be unique per user
- **Implementation**: Unique constraint on (user_id, name)
- **Error Message**: "Project name already exists for this user"
- **Severity**: CRITICAL
### VR-PROJECT-002: Repository URL Format
- **Rule**: Repository URL must be valid Git URL
- **Implementation**: Regex pattern for Git URLs
- **Pattern**: `^(https?://|git@)[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+(/|:)[a-zA-Z0-9._-]+(/[a-zA-Z0-9._-]+)?(.git)?$`
- **Error Message**: "Invalid Git repository URL"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-PROJECT-003: Estimated Duration Validation
- **Rule**: Estimated duration must be positive integer
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: estimated_duration_hours > 0
- **Error Message**: "Estimated duration must be greater than 0"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
### VR-PROJECT-004: Status Transition Validation
- **Rule**: Project status can only transition in specific ways
- **Valid Transitions**:
- active → archived
- archived → deleted
- active → deleted (direct)
- **Implementation**: Trigger-based validation
- **Error Message**: "Invalid status transition"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-PROJECT-005: Programming Language Support
- **Rule**: Programming language must be supported
- **Supported Languages**: python, javascript, java, go, rust, c++, c#, php, ruby, kotlin
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint with ENUM
- **Error Message**: "Unsupported programming language"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
---
## VOICE_SESSION Entity Validation Rules
### VR-SESSION-001: Session Duration Validation
- **Rule**: Session duration must be non-negative
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: duration_seconds >= 0
- **Error Message**: "Session duration cannot be negative"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-SESSION-002: Confidence Score Range
- **Rule**: Confidence score must be between 0 and 1
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: confidence_score BETWEEN 0 AND 1
- **Error Message**: "Confidence score must be between 0 and 1"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-SESSION-003: Language Code Validation
- **Rule**: Detected language must be valid ISO 639-1 code
- **Implementation**: Validate against ISO 639-1 standard
- **Error Message**: "Invalid language code"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
### VR-SESSION-004: IP Address Validation
- **Rule**: IP address must be valid IPv4 or IPv6
- **Implementation**: Regex pattern for IPv4/IPv6
- **Error Message**: "Invalid IP address format"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
### VR-SESSION-005: End Time Validation
- **Rule**: End time must be >= start time
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: end_time >= start_time
- **Error Message**: "End time cannot be before start time"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-SESSION-006: Command Count Validation
- **Rule**: Command count must be non-negative
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: command_count >= 0
- **Error Message**: "Command count cannot be negative"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
---
## VOICE_COMMAND Entity Validation Rules
### VR-COMMAND-001: Text Length Validation
- **Rule**: Raw and normalized text must be between 1 and 5000 characters
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: LENGTH(raw_text) BETWEEN 1 AND 5000
- **Error Message**: "Command text must be between 1 and 5000 characters"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-COMMAND-002: Execution Time Validation
- **Rule**: Execution time must be non-negative
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: execution_time_ms >= 0
- **Error Message**: "Execution time cannot be negative"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
### VR-COMMAND-003: NLP Confidence Validation
- **Rule**: NLP confidence must be between 0 and 1
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: nlp_confidence BETWEEN 0 AND 1
- **Error Message**: "NLP confidence must be between 0 and 1"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
### VR-COMMAND-004: Command Type Validation
- **Rule**: Command type must be from predefined list
- **Valid Types**: code_generation, data_analysis, project_management, debugging
- **Implementation**: ENUM constraint
- **Error Message**: "Invalid command type"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-COMMAND-005: Intent Validation
- **Rule**: Intent must be from predefined list
- **Valid Intents**: create, modify, delete, analyze, review
- **Implementation**: ENUM constraint
- **Error Message**: "Invalid intent"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-COMMAND-006: Status Transition Validation
- **Rule**: Command status can only transition in specific ways
- **Valid Transitions**:
- pending → processing → (completed|failed|cancelled)
- pending → cancelled
- **Implementation**: Trigger-based validation
- **Error Message**: "Invalid status transition"
- **Severity**: HIGH
---
## TASK Entity Validation Rules
### VR-TASK-001: Title Length Validation
- **Rule**: Task title must be between 1 and 255 characters
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: LENGTH(title) BETWEEN 1 AND 255
- **Error Message**: "Task title must be between 1 and 255 characters"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-TASK-002: Estimated Hours Validation
- **Rule**: Estimated hours must be positive integer
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: estimated_hours > 0
- **Error Message**: "Estimated hours must be greater than 0"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
### VR-TASK-003: Actual Hours Validation
- **Rule**: Actual hours must be non-negative
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: actual_hours >= 0
- **Error Message**: "Actual hours cannot be negative"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
### VR-TASK-004: Due Date Validation
- **Rule**: Due date must be in future
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: due_date > CURRENT_DATE
- **Error Message**: "Due date must be in the future"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
### VR-TASK-005: Completion Date Validation
- **Rule**: Completion date must be >= creation date
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: completed_at >= created_at
- **Error Message**: "Completion date cannot be before creation date"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-TASK-006: Story Points Validation
- **Rule**: Story points must be positive integer
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: story_points > 0
- **Error Message**: "Story points must be greater than 0"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
### VR-TASK-007: Status Transition Validation
- **Rule**: Task status can only transition in specific ways
- **Valid Transitions**:
- backlog → todo → in_progress → review → completed
- Any status → blocked
- blocked → (previous status)
- **Implementation**: Trigger-based validation
- **Error Message**: "Invalid status transition"
- **Severity**: HIGH
---
## CODE_ARTIFACT Entity Validation Rules
### VR-ARTIFACT-001: Name Length Validation
- **Rule**: Artifact name must be between 1 and 255 characters
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: LENGTH(name) BETWEEN 1 AND 255
- **Error Message**: "Artifact name must be between 1 and 255 characters"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-ARTIFACT-002: File Path Validation
- **Rule**: File path must be valid relative path
- **Implementation**: Regex pattern for valid paths
- **Pattern**: `^[a-zA-Z0-9._/-]+$`
- **Error Message**: "Invalid file path format"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-ARTIFACT-003: Language Support Validation
- **Rule**: Programming language must be supported
- **Supported Languages**: python, javascript, java, go, rust, c++, c#, php, ruby, kotlin, sql
- **Implementation**: ENUM constraint
- **Error Message**: "Unsupported programming language"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-ARTIFACT-004: LOC Validation
- **Rule**: Lines of code must be positive integer
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: lines_of_code > 0
- **Error Message**: "Lines of code must be greater than 0"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
### VR-ARTIFACT-005: Complexity Score Validation
- **Rule**: Complexity score must be non-negative
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: complexity_score >= 0
- **Error Message**: "Complexity score cannot be negative"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
### VR-ARTIFACT-006: Test Coverage Validation
- **Rule**: Test coverage must be between 0 and 100
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: test_coverage BETWEEN 0 AND 100
- **Error Message**: "Test coverage must be between 0 and 100"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
### VR-ARTIFACT-007: Git Commit Hash Validation
- **Rule**: Git commit hash must be valid SHA-1 hash
- **Implementation**: Regex pattern: `^[a-f0-9]{40}$`
- **Error Message**: "Invalid Git commit hash format"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
### VR-ARTIFACT-008: Status Transition Validation
- **Rule**: Artifact status can only transition in specific ways
- **Valid Transitions**:
- draft → review → (approved|rejected)
- approved → deployed
- deployed → deprecated
- **Implementation**: Trigger-based validation
- **Error Message**: "Invalid status transition"
- **Severity**: HIGH
---
## DATASET Entity Validation Rules
### VR-DATASET-001: Name Length Validation
- **Rule**: Dataset name must be between 1 and 255 characters
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: LENGTH(name) BETWEEN 1 AND 255
- **Error Message**: "Dataset name must be between 1 and 255 characters"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-DATASET-002: Row Count Validation
- **Rule**: Row count must be non-negative
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: row_count >= 0
- **Error Message**: "Row count cannot be negative"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
### VR-DATASET-003: Column Count Validation
- **Rule**: Column count must be positive
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: column_count > 0
- **Error Message**: "Column count must be greater than 0"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-DATASET-004: Size Validation
- **Rule**: Dataset size must be positive
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: size_bytes > 0
- **Error Message**: "Dataset size must be greater than 0"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-DATASET-005: Format Validation
- **Rule**: Data format must be supported
- **Supported Formats**: csv, json, parquet, sql, excel, avro, orc
- **Implementation**: ENUM constraint
- **Error Message**: "Unsupported data format"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-DATASET-006: Storage Location Validation
- **Rule**: Storage location must be valid
- **Valid Locations**: s3://*, gs://*, /local/path/*, database://connection_string
- **Implementation**: Regex pattern validation
- **Error Message**: "Invalid storage location"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-DATASET-007: Access Date Validation
- **Rule**: Last accessed date must be <= current date
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: last_accessed <= NOW()
- **Error Message**: "Last accessed date cannot be in the future"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
---
## EXECUTION_LOG Entity Validation Rules
### VR-LOG-001: Duration Validation
- **Rule**: Duration must be non-negative
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: duration_ms >= 0
- **Error Message**: "Duration cannot be negative"
- **Severity**: MEDIUM
### VR-LOG-002: Output Size Validation
- **Rule**: Output size must not exceed 1MB
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: LENGTH(output) <= 1048576
- **Error Message**: "Output size exceeds maximum limit of 1MB"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-LOG-003: Action Validation
- **Rule**: Action must be from predefined list
- **Valid Actions**: execute, compile, test, deploy, analyze, debug
- **Implementation**: ENUM constraint
- **Error Message**: "Invalid action type"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-LOG-004: Status Validation
- **Rule**: Status must be from predefined list
- **Valid Statuses**: success, failure, warning, partial
- **Implementation**: ENUM constraint
- **Error Message**: "Invalid status"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-LOG-005: Environment Validation
- **Rule**: Environment must be from predefined list
- **Valid Environments**: development, staging, production
- **Implementation**: ENUM constraint
- **Error Message**: "Invalid environment"
- **Severity**: HIGH
---
## COLLABORATION Entity Validation Rules
### VR-COLLAB-001: User Uniqueness
- **Rule**: Initiator and collaborator must be different users
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: initiator_id != collaborator_id
- **Error Message**: "Initiator and collaborator must be different users"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-COLLAB-002: Access Level Validation
- **Rule**: Access level must be from predefined list
- **Valid Levels**: view, comment, edit, admin
- **Implementation**: ENUM constraint
- **Error Message**: "Invalid access level"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-COLLAB-003: End Time Validation
- **Rule**: End time must be >= start time
- **Implementation**: CHECK constraint: ended_at >= started_at
- **Error Message**: "End time cannot be before start time"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-COLLAB-004: Status Transition Validation
- **Rule**: Collaboration status can only transition in specific ways
- **Valid Transitions**:
- active → (completed|cancelled)
- **Implementation**: Trigger-based validation
- **Error Message**: "Invalid status transition"
- **Severity**: HIGH
### VR-COLLAB-005: Collaboration Type Validation
- **Rule**: Collaboration type must be from predefined list
- **Valid Types**: pair_programming, code_review, data_analysis, brainstorm
- **Implementation**: ENUM constraint
- **Error Message**: "Invalid collaboration type"
- **Severity**: HIGH
6. Data Migration Considerations
6.1 Migration Strategy Overview
graph TD
A[Legacy System] -->|Extract| B[Data Extraction<br/>Layer]
B -->|Transform| C[Data Transformation<br/>Engine]
C -->|Validate| D[Data Validation<br/>Service]
D -->|Load| E[New System<br/>Database]
F[Migration Logs] -->|Track| G[Migration<br/>Monitoring]
G -->|Alert| H[Migration<br/>Dashboard]
I[Rollback Plan] -->|Backup| J[Data Backup<br/>Service]
J -->|Store| K[(Backup<br/>Storage)]
L[Data Quality Checks] -->|Verify| M{Quality<br/>Threshold}
M -->|Pass| N[Production<br/>Deployment]
M -->|Fail| O[Remediation<br/>Process]
6.2 Migration Phases
Phase 1: Assessment & Planning (Week 1-2)
Activities:
- Audit existing data systems
- Document current data structures
- Identify data gaps and inconsistencies
- Create detailed migration plan
- Establish rollback procedures
Deliverables:
- Migration assessment report
- Data mapping document
- Risk assessment matrix
- Rollback procedures document
Phase 2: Infrastructure Setup (Week 2-3)
Activities:
- Provision new database infrastructure
- Set up staging environment
- Configure backup systems
- Establish monitoring and alerting
- Create test data sets
Deliverables:
- Infrastructure documentation
- Staging environment ready
- Monitoring dashboards operational
- Test data prepared
Phase 3: Data Extraction & Transformation (Week 3-4)
Activities:
- Extract data from legacy systems
- Transform data to new schema
- Handle data type conversions
- Manage data relationships
- Create audit trails
Deliverables:
- Extraction scripts
- Transformation mappings
- Audit logs
- Transformation reports
Phase 4: Validation & Testing (Week 4-5)
Activities:
- Validate data integrity
- Perform reconciliation checks
- Test data relationships
- Verify business rules
- Performance testing
Deliverables:
- Validation reports
- Reconciliation results
- Test results
- Performance metrics
Phase 5: Pilot Migration (Week 5-6)
Activities:
- Migrate subset of data
- Monitor system performance
- Validate user workflows
- Gather feedback
- Identify issues
Deliverables:
- Pilot migration report
- Issue log
- Performance analysis
- User feedback summary
Phase 6: Full Migration (Week 6-7)
Activities:
- Execute full data migration
- Monitor migration process
- Validate all data
- Perform final reconciliation
- Activate new system
Deliverables:
- Migration completion report
- Final reconciliation report
- System activation checklist
- Handover documentation
Phase 7: Post-Migration (Week 7-8)
Activities:
- Monitor system stability
- Address issues
- Optimize performance
- Archive legacy data
- Document lessons learned
Deliverables:
- Post-migration report
- Performance optimization report
- Lessons learned document
- Archive documentation
6.3 Data Mapping Strategy
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
## Legacy System to New System Mapping
### USER Table Mapping
| Legacy Column | New Column | Transformation | Notes |
|---------------|-----------|-----------------|-------|
| user_id | user_id | Direct copy | UUID conversion if needed |
| email_address | email | Normalize to lowercase | Validate RFC 5322 |
| user_name | username | Trim whitespace | Ensure uniqueness |
| full_name | full_name | Trim whitespace | Handle NULL values |
| password | password_hash | Re-hash with Bcrypt | Use 12 rounds minimum |
| role_id | role | Lookup table join | Map legacy roles to new roles |
| avatar_path | avatar_url | Convert to CDN URL | Upload to CDN if needed |
| bio_text | bio | Truncate to 500 chars | Handle NULL values |
| language | preferred_language | Validate ISO 639-1 | Default to 'en' |
| timezone_name | timezone | Validate IANA | Default to 'UTC' |
| mfa_enabled | mfa_enabled | Direct copy | Boolean conversion |
| created_date | created_at | Convert timestamp | Handle timezone |
| updated_date | updated_at | Convert timestamp | Handle timezone |
| last_login_date | last_login | Convert timestamp | Handle NULL values |
| is_active | is_active | Direct copy | Boolean conversion |
| org_id | organization_id | Lookup table join | Map legacy org IDs |
### PROJECT Table Mapping
| Legacy Column | New Column | Transformation | Notes |
|---------------|-----------|-----------------|-------|
| project_id | project_id | Direct copy | UUID conversion if needed |
| owner_id | user_id | Direct copy | Validate user exists |
| project_name | name | Trim whitespace | Ensure uniqueness per user |
| description | description | Trim whitespace | Handle NULL values |
| project_type_id | type | Lookup table join | Map legacy types |
| status_id | status | Lookup table join | Map legacy statuses |
| language_id | programming_language | Lookup table join | Map legacy languages |
| repo_url | repository_url | Validate URL format | Handle NULL values |
| docs_url | documentation_url | Validate URL format | Handle NULL values |
| created_date | created_at | Convert timestamp | Handle timezone |
| updated_date | updated_at | Convert timestamp | Handle timezone |
| archived_date | archived_at | Convert timestamp | Handle NULL values |
| visibility_id | visibility | Lookup table join | Map legacy visibility |
| duration_estimate | estimated_duration_hours | Direct copy | Validate positive |
| priority_id | priority | Lookup table join | Map legacy priorities |
### VOICE_SESSION Table Mapping
| Legacy Column | New Column | Transformation | Notes |
|---------------|-----------|-----------------|-------|
| session_id | session_id | Direct copy | UUID conversion if needed |
| user_id | user_id | Direct copy | Validate user exists |
| project_id | project_id | Direct copy | Validate project exists |
| start_timestamp | start_time | Convert timestamp | Handle timezone |
| end_timestamp | end_time | Convert timestamp | Handle NULL values |
| duration_seconds | duration_seconds | Calculate if NULL | Validate non-negative |
| session_status_id | status | Lookup table join | Map legacy statuses |
| voice_model_name | voice_model | Direct copy | Default to 'whisper-large' |
| confidence | confidence_score | Direct copy | Validate 0-1 range |
| detected_language | language_detected | Validate ISO 639-1 | Handle NULL values |
| command_count | command_count | Direct copy | Validate non-negative |
| device_type_id | device_type | Lookup table join | Map legacy device types |
| client_ip | ip_address | Validate IPv4/IPv6 | Handle NULL values |
| user_agent_string | user_agent | Direct copy | Handle NULL values |
| recording_enabled | recording_enabled | Direct copy | Boolean conversion |
| transcript_status_id | transcript_status | Lookup table join | Map legacy statuses |
6.4 Data Validation Checklist
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
## Pre-Migration Validation Checklist
### Data Completeness
- [ ] All required fields populated
- [ ] No unexpected NULL values in NOT NULL columns
- [ ] Foreign key references exist
- [ ] Referential integrity maintained
- [ ] No orphaned records
### Data Accuracy
- [ ] Email addresses valid RFC 5322 format
- [ ] Usernames unique and valid
- [ ] Passwords properly hashed
- [ ] Dates in correct format and range
- [ ] Numeric values within expected ranges
- [ ] Enum values from predefined lists
- [ ] URLs valid format
- [ ] IP addresses valid IPv4/IPv6
### Data Consistency
- [ ] No duplicate records
- [ ] Consistent data types
- [ ] Consistent naming conventions
- [ ] Consistent date/time formats
- [ ] Consistent status values
- [ ] Consistent priority values
### Business Rule Compliance
- [ ] Status transitions valid
- [ ] Dates in logical order (created < updated < completed)
- [ ] Effort estimates positive
- [ ] Test coverage 0-100%
- [ ] Complexity scores non-negative
- [ ] Row/column counts non-negative
### Referential Integrity
- [ ] All user_id references valid
- [ ] All project_id references valid
- [ ] All session_id references valid
- [ ] All command_id references valid
- [ ] All task_id references valid
- [ ] All artifact_id references valid
- [ ] All analysis_id references valid
- [ ] All dataset_id references valid
### Performance Validation
- [ ] Index creation successful
- [ ] Query performance acceptable
- [ ] No missing indexes
- [ ] Statistics updated
- [ ] Query plans optimized
### Security Validation
- [ ] Sensitive data encrypted
- [ ] Access controls in place
- [ ] Audit trails enabled
- [ ] No hardcoded credentials
- [ ] Data masking applied where needed
6.5 Rollback Procedures
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
## Rollback Plan
### Rollback Triggers
1. **Data Integrity Issues**
- Referential integrity violations > 0.1%
- Missing required data > 1%
- Invalid data values > 0.5%
2. **Performance Issues**
- Query response time > 2x baseline
- System CPU > 90% sustained
- Memory usage > 85% sustained
- Disk I/O > 95% sustained
3. **Functional Issues**
- Critical business processes failing
- User authentication failures
- Data access failures
- System crashes
### Rollback Steps
#### Step 1: Immediate Actions (0-5 minutes)
1. Stop all write operations to new system
2. Activate monitoring alerts
3. Notify stakeholders
4. Initiate incident response team
#### Step 2: Assessment (5-15 minutes)
1. Analyze failure root cause
2. Determine rollback necessity
3. Estimate rollback duration
4. Prepare rollback communication
#### Step 3: Rollback Execution (15-60 minutes)
1. Restore database from backup
2. Verify backup integrity
3. Restore application configuration
4. Restart services
5. Verify system functionality
#### Step 4: Validation (60-90 minutes)
1. Verify data integrity
2. Test critical workflows
3. Validate user access
4. Check system performance
#### Step 5: Communication (Ongoing)
1. Notify all stakeholders
2. Provide status updates
3. Document incident
4. Schedule post-mortem
### Rollback Time Objectives
- **RTO (Recovery Time Objective)**: 2 hours
- **RPO (Recovery Point Objective)**: 15 minutes
- **Backup Frequency**: Every 15 minutes
- **Backup Retention**: 30 days
### Backup Strategy
- **Full Backups**: Daily at 2 AM UTC
- **Incremental Backups**: Every 15 minutes
- **Backup Location**: Geographically distributed
- **Backup Encryption**: AES-256
- **Backup Verification**: Weekly restore tests
6.6 Migration Monitoring & Reporting
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
## Migration Monitoring Dashboard
### Key Metrics to Track
#### Data Migration Metrics
- Records extracted: X / Y (%)
- Records transformed: X / Y (%)
- Records validated: X / Y (%)
- Records loaded: X / Y (%)
- Migration success rate: X%
- Data loss: X records
- Data duplication: X records
#### Performance Metrics
- Extraction rate: X records/second
- Transformation rate: X records/second
- Load rate: X records/second
- Average record processing time: X ms
- Peak memory usage: X GB
- Peak CPU usage: X%
#### Quality Metrics
- Data validation pass rate: X%
- Referential integrity violations: X
- Business rule violations: X
- Data type mismatches: X
- Missing required fields: X
#### Timeline Metrics
- Planned duration: X hours
- Actual duration: X hours
- Variance: X%
- Phase completion: X%
- Estimated completion: X
### Reporting Schedule
- **Real-time Dashboard**: Updated every 5 minutes
- **Hourly Reports**: Sent to stakeholders
- **Daily Reports**: Comprehensive status
- **Post-Migration Report**: Within 24 hours
### Escalation Procedures
- **Warning Threshold**: 80% of planned duration
- **Critical Threshold**: 100% of planned duration
- **Escalation Path**: Team Lead → Manager → Director
- **Communication**: Email + Slack + Phone
7. Data Security & Privacy Considerations
7.1 Data Classification
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
## Data Classification Levels
### Level 1: Public
- Non-sensitive project information
- Public code repositories
- Published documentation
- Aggregated analytics
### Level 2: Internal
- Internal project details
- Team collaboration data
- Internal documentation
- Performance metrics
### Level 3: Confidential
- User personal information
- Project source code
- Analysis results
- Business metrics
### Level 4: Restricted
- User credentials
- API keys
- Sensitive personal data
- Financial information
## Security Controls by Classification
### Level 1: Public
- No encryption required
- Public access allowed
- No audit logging required
- Standard backups
### Level 2: Internal
- Encryption at rest
- Internal access only
- Audit logging
- Daily backups
### Level 3: Confidential
- Encryption at rest and in transit
- Role-based access control
- Detailed audit logging
- Hourly backups
### Level 4: Restricted
- AES-256 encryption at rest
- TLS 1.3 encryption in transit
- Multi-factor authentication
- Real-time audit logging
- Continuous backups
7.2 Data Privacy Compliance
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
## GDPR Compliance Requirements
### Data Subject Rights
- Right to access: Implement data export functionality
- Right to rectification: Allow data correction
- Right to erasure: Implement data deletion
- Right to restrict processing: Implement data hold
- Right to data portability: Implement data export
- Right to object: Implement opt-out mechanism
### Data Protection Measures
- Data minimization: Collect only necessary data
- Purpose limitation: Use data only for stated purposes
- Storage limitation: Delete data after retention period
- Integrity and confidentiality: Encrypt sensitive data
- Accountability: Maintain audit logs
### Data Retention Policies
- User data: 7 years after account deletion
- Session data: 90 days
- Execution logs: 1 year
- Audit logs: 3 years
- Backups: 30 days
## CCPA Compliance Requirements
### Consumer Rights
- Right to know: Provide data access
- Right to delete: Implement data deletion
- Right to opt-out: Implement opt-out mechanism
- Right to non-discrimination: No service denial for opt-out
### Business Obligations
- Privacy policy: Clear and accessible
- Opt-out mechanism: Easy to use
- Data security: Reasonable safeguards
- Breach notification: Within 30 days
8. Data Model Performance Optimization
8.1 Indexing Strategy
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
## Recommended Indexes
### USER Table Indexes
```sql
-- Primary Key Index (Clustered)
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX idx_user_id ON USER(user_id);
-- Unique Indexes
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_user_email ON USER(email);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_user_username ON USER(username);
-- Foreign Key Indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_user_organization_id ON USER(organization_id);
-- Search Indexes
CREATE FULLTEXT INDEX idx_user_fullname ON USER(full_name);
-- Composite Indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_user_active_created ON USER(is_active, created_at DESC);
CREATE INDEX idx_user_role_created ON USER(role, created_at DESC);
PROJECT Table Indexes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
-- Primary Key Index (Clustered)
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX idx_project_id ON PROJECT(project_id);
-- Foreign Key Indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_project_user_id ON PROJECT(user_id);
-- Unique Indexes
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX idx_project_user_name ON PROJECT(user_id, name);
-- Search Indexes
CREATE FULLTEXT INDEX idx_project_name ON PROJECT(name);
-- Composite Indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_project_user_status_created ON PROJECT(user_id, status, created_at DESC);
CREATE INDEX idx_project_status_archived ON PROJECT(status, archived_at);
VOICE_SESSION Table Indexes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
-- Primary Key Index (Clustered)
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX idx_session_id ON VOICE_SESSION(session_id);
-- Foreign Key Indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_session_user_id ON VOICE_SESSION(user_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_session_project_id ON VOICE_SESSION(project_id);
-- Composite Indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_session_user_start ON VOICE_SESSION(user_id, start_time DESC);
CREATE INDEX idx_session_status_end ON VOICE_SESSION(status, end_time);
CREATE INDEX idx_session_start_time ON VOICE_SESSION(start_time);
VOICE_COMMAND Table Indexes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
-- Primary Key Index (Clustered)
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX idx_command_id ON VOICE_COMMAND(command_id);
-- Foreign Key Indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_command_session_id ON VOICE_COMMAND(session_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_command_user_id ON VOICE_COMMAND(user_id);
-- Composite Indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_command_session_timestamp ON VOICE_COMMAND(session_id, timestamp);
CREATE INDEX idx_command_status_timestamp ON VOICE_COMMAND(status, timestamp);
CREATE INDEX idx_command_type_intent ON VOICE_COMMAND(command_type, intent);
TASK Table Indexes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
-- Primary Key Index (Clustered)
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX idx_task_id ON TASK(task_id);
-- Foreign Key Indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_task_project_id ON TASK(project_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_task_user_id ON TASK(user_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_task_assigned_to ON TASK(assigned_to);
-- Composite Indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_task_project_status_priority ON TASK(project_id, status, priority);
CREATE INDEX idx_task_status_due_date ON TASK(status, due_date);
CREATE INDEX idx_task_assigned_status ON TASK(assigned_to, status);
CODE_ARTIFACT Table Indexes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
-- Primary Key Index (Clustered)
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX idx_artifact_id ON CODE_ARTIFACT(artifact_id);
-- Foreign Key Indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_artifact_project_id ON CODE_ARTIFACT(project_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_artifact_user_id ON CODE_ARTIFACT(user_id);
-- Search Indexes
CREATE FULLTEXT INDEX idx_artifact_name ON CODE_ARTIFACT(name);
-- Composite Indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_artifact_project_type_status ON CODE_ARTIFACT(project_id, artifact_type, status);
CREATE INDEX idx_artifact_status_updated ON CODE_ARTIFACT(status, updated_at DESC);
DATASET Table Indexes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
-- Primary Key Index (Clustered)
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX idx_dataset_id ON DATASET(dataset_id);
-- Foreign Key Indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_dataset_analysis_id ON DATASET(analysis_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_dataset_user_id ON DATASET(user_id);
-- Search Indexes
CREATE FULLTEXT INDEX idx_dataset_name ON DATASET(name);
-- Composite Indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_dataset_user_access_created ON DATASET(user_id, access_level, created_at DESC);
CREATE INDEX idx_dataset_access_sensitive ON DATASET(access_level, is_sensitive);
EXECUTION_LOG Table Indexes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
-- Primary Key Index (Clustered)
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX idx_log_id ON EXECUTION_LOG(log_id);
-- Foreign Key Indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_log_session_id ON EXECUTION_LOG(session_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_log_command_id ON EXECUTION_LOG(command_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_log_user_id ON EXECUTION_LOG(user_id);
-- Composite Indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_log_session_timestamp ON EXECUTION_LOG(session_id, timestamp DESC);
CREATE INDEX idx_log_status_timestamp ON EXECUTION_LOG(status, timestamp);
CREATE INDEX idx_log_environment_timestamp ON EXECUTION_LOG(environment, timestamp);
CREATE INDEX idx_log_timestamp ON EXECUTION_LOG(timestamp);
COLLABORATION Table Indexes
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
-- Primary Key Index (Clustered)
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX idx_collaboration_id ON COLLABORATION(collaboration_id);
-- Foreign Key Indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_collaboration_project_id ON COLLABORATION(project_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_collaboration_initiator_id ON COLLABORATION(initiator_id);
CREATE INDEX idx_collaboration_collaborator_id ON COLLABORATION(collaborator_id);
-- Composite Indexes
CREATE INDEX idx_collaboration_project_status_started ON COLLABORATION(project_id, status, started_at);
CREATE INDEX idx_collaboration_initiator_status ON COLLABORATION(initiator_id, status);
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
### 8.2 Query Optimization Guidelines
```markdown
## Query Optimization Best Practices
### 1. Use Appropriate Indexes
- Always use indexed columns in WHERE clauses
- Use composite indexes for multi-column filters
- Avoid index on low-cardinality columns
- Monitor index usage and remove unused indexes
### 2. Optimize JOIN Operations
- Join on indexed columns
- Use INNER JOIN when possible
- Avoid multiple LEFT JOINs
- Consider denormalization for frequently joined tables
### 3. Pagination Strategy
- Use OFFSET/LIMIT for pagination
- Consider keyset pagination for large datasets
- Avoid SELECT * queries
- Specify only needed columns
### 4. Aggregation Optimization
- Use GROUP BY with indexed columns
- Consider materialized views for complex aggregations
- Use HAVING clause after GROUP BY
- Avoid aggregations in WHERE clause
### 5. Subquery Optimization
- Use JOINs instead of subqueries when possible
- Use EXISTS instead of IN for large datasets
- Consider CTEs for complex queries
- Avoid correlated subqueries
### 6. Caching Strategy
- Cache frequently accessed data
- Use Redis for session data
- Implement query result caching
- Set appropriate TTL values
### 7. Monitoring & Analysis
- Monitor slow query logs
- Analyze query execution plans
- Track query performance metrics
- Identify bottlenecks regularly
9. Data Model Maintenance
9.1 Regular Maintenance Tasks
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
## Maintenance Schedule
### Daily Tasks
- Monitor database performance
- Check backup completion
- Review error logs
- Monitor disk space usage
### Weekly Tasks
- Analyze query performance
- Review index usage
- Check data integrity
- Verify backup restoration
### Monthly Tasks
- Update statistics
- Rebuild fragmented indexes
- Archive old logs
- Review data retention policies
- Capacity planning analysis
### Quarterly Tasks
- Full database audit
- Security review
- Performance optimization
- Disaster recovery testing
### Annually Tasks
- Database schema review
- Technology stack assessment
- Compliance audit
- Disaster recovery drill
9.2 Data Quality Monitoring
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
## Data Quality Metrics
### Completeness
- Percentage of non-NULL values
- Percentage of required fields populated
- Target: > 99%
### Accuracy
- Percentage of valid values
- Percentage of values within expected range
- Target: > 99.5%
### Consistency
- Percentage of consistent data types
- Percentage of consistent formats
- Target: 100%
### Timeliness
- Data freshness (age of data)
- Update frequency
- Target: < 1 hour
### Uniqueness
- Percentage of unique values
- Duplicate record count
- Target: 100% for unique fields
### Referential Integrity
- Percentage of valid foreign keys
- Orphaned record count
- Target: 100%
10. Data Model Documentation Standards
10.1 Documentation Requirements
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
## Documentation Checklist
### Entity Documentation
- [ ] Entity purpose and business meaning
- [ ] All attributes documented
- [ ] Data types and constraints specified
- [ ] Relationships and cardinality defined
- [ ] Indexes and performance considerations noted
- [ ] Validation rules documented
- [ ] Examples provided
### Attribute Documentation
- [ ] Attribute name and description
- [ ] Data type and size
- [ ] Constraints and validation rules
- [ ] Default values
- [ ] Nullable/Required status
- [ ] Business rules
- [ ] Examples
### Relationship Documentation
- [ ] Relationship type (1:1, 1:N, N:N)
- [ ] Cardinality
- [ ] Foreign key constraints
- [ ] Cascade rules
- [ ] Business meaning
### Index Documentation
- [ ] Index name and type
- [ ] Indexed columns
- [ ] Index purpose
- [ ] Performance impact
- [ ] Maintenance schedule
### Query Documentation
- [ ] Query purpose
- [ ] Query logic
- [ ] Performance characteristics
- [ ] Indexes used
- [ ] Example results
Conclusion
This comprehensive data model documentation provides:
- Complete Entity-Relationship Diagram - Visual representation of all entities and relationships
- Detailed Entity Descriptions - Purpose, attributes, relationships, and constraints for each entity
- Comprehensive Data Dictionary - Complete reference for all attributes, types, and constraints
- Data Flow Diagram - Visualization of data movement through the system
- Extensive Validation Rules - Business rules and constraints for data integrity
- Migration Strategy - Detailed plan for migrating from legacy systems
- Security & Privacy - Data classification and compliance requirements
- Performance Optimization - Indexing strategy and query optimization guidelines
- Maintenance Procedures - Regular tasks and monitoring requirements
- Documentation Standards - Guidelines for maintaining documentation
The data model supports the voice-centric software development and data science agent platform with:
- Scalability - Efficient indexing and query optimization
- Security - Data classification and encryption strategies
- Compliance - GDPR and CCPA requirements
- Reliability - Backup and recovery procedures
- Maintainability - Clear documentation and standards
This documentation should be reviewed and updated quarterly to reflect system changes and evolving requirements.
Flow Diagrams
Voice-Centric Software Development and Data Science Agent
Flow Diagrams and System Interactions Documentation
1. SEQUENCE DIAGRAMS FOR CRITICAL USER JOURNEYS
1.1 Voice Command Processing and Code Generation Journey
sequenceDiagram
participant User as User (Developer)
participant VoiceUI as Voice Interface
participant AudioProc as Audio Processing Engine
participant NLPEngine as NLP Engine
participant CodeGen as Code Generation Service
participant IDEInteg as IDE Integration Service
participant Database as Knowledge Base
participant IDE as IDE/Editor
User->>VoiceUI: Speak: "Generate a Python function to sort an array"
VoiceUI->>AudioProc: Stream Audio Data
AudioProc->>AudioProc: Speech-to-Text Conversion
AudioProc->>NLPEngine: Transcribed Text + Context
NLPEngine->>Database: Query Intent & Entity Recognition
Database-->>NLPEngine: Intent: CODE_GENERATION, Language: Python
NLPEngine->>CodeGen: Request Code Generation<br/>(intent, language, requirements)
CodeGen->>CodeGen: Select Template & Model
CodeGen->>CodeGen: Generate Code with ML Model
CodeGen-->>NLPEngine: Generated Python Code
NLPEngine->>VoiceUI: Confidence Score + Generated Code
VoiceUI->>User: Play: "Generated sorting function"
VoiceUI->>IDE: Insert Code at Cursor
IDE-->>VoiceUI: Code Inserted Successfully
VoiceUI-->>User: Visual Confirmation + Code Preview
Note over User,IDE: UC-001: Voice-Driven Code Generation
Traceability: UC-001, FR-001, FR-002, FR-003
1.2 Data Analysis Request and Jupyter Integration Journey
sequenceDiagram
participant User as Data Scientist
participant VoiceUI as Voice Interface
participant AudioProc as Audio Processing Engine
participant NLPEngine as NLP Engine
participant DataAnalysis as Data Analysis Service
participant JupyterAPI as Jupyter Integration API
participant DataStore as Data Repository
participant Jupyter as Jupyter Notebook
User->>VoiceUI: Speak: "Analyze the sales dataset and create a correlation matrix"
VoiceUI->>AudioProc: Stream Audio Data
AudioProc->>AudioProc: Speech-to-Text Conversion
AudioProc->>NLPEngine: Transcribed Text + Session Context
NLPEngine->>NLPEngine: Extract Intent: DATA_ANALYSIS<br/>Entity: sales dataset, correlation matrix
NLPEngine->>DataAnalysis: Request Analysis<br/>(dataset_name, analysis_type, output_format)
DataAnalysis->>DataStore: Query Dataset Metadata
DataStore-->>DataAnalysis: Dataset Schema & Location
DataAnalysis->>DataAnalysis: Generate Analysis Code<br/>(pandas, numpy, matplotlib)
DataAnalysis->>JupyterAPI: Create New Cell + Code
JupyterAPI->>Jupyter: Execute Code Cell
Jupyter->>Jupyter: Load Data & Process
Jupyter->>Jupyter: Generate Correlation Matrix
Jupyter-->>JupyterAPI: Execution Result + Visualization
JupyterAPI-->>DataAnalysis: Analysis Complete
DataAnalysis-->>NLPEngine: Analysis Results + Insights
NLPEngine->>VoiceUI: Summary + Visualization Link
VoiceUI->>User: Play: "Correlation analysis complete"
VoiceUI->>Jupyter: Display Visualization
Jupyter-->>User: Show Correlation Heatmap
Note over User,Jupyter: UC-002: Voice-Driven Data Analysis
Traceability: UC-002, FR-004, FR-005, FR-006
1.3 Project Architecture Design and Documentation Journey
sequenceDiagram
participant User as Technical Architect
participant VoiceUI as Voice Interface
participant AudioProc as Audio Processing Engine
participant NLPEngine as NLP Engine
participant ArchService as Architecture Service
participant DiagramGen as Diagram Generation Engine
participant DocService as Documentation Service
participant GitRepo as Git Repository
participant ProjectMgmt as Project Management System
User->>VoiceUI: Speak: "Design a microservices architecture for an e-commerce platform"
VoiceUI->>AudioProc: Stream Audio Data
AudioProc->>AudioProc: Speech-to-Text Conversion
AudioProc->>NLPEngine: Transcribed Text + Project Context
NLPEngine->>NLPEngine: Extract Intent: ARCHITECTURE_DESIGN<br/>Entity: microservices, e-commerce
NLPEngine->>ArchService: Request Architecture Design<br/>(domain, pattern, scale)
ArchService->>ArchService: Retrieve Architecture Patterns
ArchService->>ArchService: Generate Component Design<br/>(services, databases, APIs)
ArchService->>DiagramGen: Create Architecture Diagram
DiagramGen->>DiagramGen: Generate Mermaid Diagram
DiagramGen-->>ArchService: Diagram Markup
ArchService->>DocService: Generate Architecture Document
DocService->>DocService: Create Markdown Documentation<br/>(components, interactions, deployment)
DocService-->>ArchService: Documentation Complete
ArchService->>GitRepo: Commit Architecture Files
GitRepo-->>ArchService: Commit Hash
ArchService->>ProjectMgmt: Create Architecture Tasks
ProjectMgmt-->>ArchService: Tasks Created
ArchService-->>NLPEngine: Architecture Design Complete
NLPEngine->>VoiceUI: Design Summary + Links
VoiceUI->>User: Play: "Architecture design complete"
VoiceUI->>User: Display Diagram + Documentation Links
Note over User,ProjectMgmt: UC-003: Voice-Driven Architecture Design
Traceability: UC-003, FR-007, FR-008, FR-009
1.4 Code Review and Collaboration Journey
sequenceDiagram
participant Dev1 as Developer 1
participant VoiceUI1 as Voice Interface 1
participant CollabService as Collaboration Service
participant CodeReview as Code Review Engine
participant NLPEngine as NLP Engine
participant GitRepo as Git Repository
participant Dev2 as Developer 2
participant VoiceUI2 as Voice Interface 2
Dev1->>VoiceUI1: Speak: "Request code review for my pull request"
VoiceUI1->>CollabService: Create Review Request<br/>(PR_ID, reviewers)
CollabService->>GitRepo: Fetch PR Details & Diff
GitRepo-->>CollabService: PR Metadata + Code Changes
CollabService->>CodeReview: Analyze Code Quality
CodeReview->>CodeReview: Check: Style, Security, Performance
CodeReview-->>CollabService: Analysis Results + Issues
CollabService->>Dev2: Notify: Review Request
Dev2->>VoiceUI2: Speak: "Show me the pull request"
VoiceUI2->>CollabService: Fetch PR Summary
CollabService-->>VoiceUI2: PR Details + Issues
VoiceUI2->>Dev2: Play: "PR Summary + 3 issues found"
Dev2->>VoiceUI2: Speak: "Show issue 1"
VoiceUI2->>CollabService: Fetch Issue Details
CollabService-->>VoiceUI2: Issue Context + Code Snippet
VoiceUI2->>Dev2: Display: Issue + Code
Dev2->>VoiceUI2: Speak: "Approve with suggestions"
VoiceUI2->>CollabService: Submit Review<br/>(status: APPROVED, comments)
CollabService->>NLPEngine: Generate Review Summary
NLPEngine-->>CollabService: Summary Text
CollabService->>Dev1: Notify: Review Complete
Dev1->>VoiceUI1: Speak: "Read my review"
VoiceUI1->>CollabService: Fetch Review
CollabService-->>VoiceUI1: Review Summary
VoiceUI1->>Dev1: Play: "Review approved with suggestions"
Note over Dev1,Dev2: UC-004: Voice-Driven Code Review & Collaboration
Traceability: UC-004, FR-010, FR-011, FR-012
1.5 Debugging and Error Resolution Journey
sequenceDiagram
participant Dev as Developer
participant VoiceUI as Voice Interface
participant AudioProc as Audio Processing Engine
participant NLPEngine as NLP Engine
participant DebugService as Debug Service
participant ErrorAnalysis as Error Analysis Engine
participant KnowledgeBase as Knowledge Base
participant IDE as IDE/Debugger
participant LogStore as Log Storage
Dev->>VoiceUI: Speak: "Debug the null pointer exception in line 42"
VoiceUI->>AudioProc: Stream Audio Data
AudioProc->>AudioProc: Speech-to-Text Conversion
AudioProc->>NLPEngine: Transcribed Text + File Context
NLPEngine->>NLPEngine: Extract Intent: DEBUG<br/>Entity: null pointer exception, line 42
NLPEngine->>DebugService: Request Debug Assistance<br/>(error_type, location, context)
DebugService->>IDE: Fetch Code Context (line 35-50)
IDE-->>DebugService: Code Snippet + Stack Trace
DebugService->>LogStore: Query Recent Logs
LogStore-->>DebugService: Log Entries
DebugService->>ErrorAnalysis: Analyze Error Pattern
ErrorAnalysis->>ErrorAnalysis: Pattern Matching + Root Cause Analysis
ErrorAnalysis-->>DebugService: Root Cause + Suggestions
DebugService->>KnowledgeBase: Query Similar Issues
KnowledgeBase-->>DebugService: Related Solutions + Best Practices
DebugService-->>NLPEngine: Debug Analysis Complete
NLPEngine->>VoiceUI: Root Cause + Solutions
VoiceUI->>Dev: Play: "Null pointer at line 42 caused by uninitialized variable"
VoiceUI->>Dev: Display: Code Context + Suggested Fix
Dev->>VoiceUI: Speak: "Apply the suggested fix"
VoiceUI->>IDE: Insert Fix Code
IDE-->>VoiceUI: Fix Applied
Dev->>VoiceUI: Speak: "Run tests"
VoiceUI->>IDE: Execute Test Suite
IDE->>IDE: Run Tests
IDE-->>VoiceUI: Test Results: PASSED
VoiceUI->>Dev: Play: "All tests passed"
Note over Dev,IDE: UC-005: Voice-Driven Debugging & Error Resolution
Traceability: UC-005, FR-013, FR-014, FR-015
2. ACTIVITY DIAGRAMS FOR COMPLEX BUSINESS PROCESSES
2.1 Voice Command Processing Pipeline
graph TD
A["🎤 User Speaks Voice Command"] --> B["📥 Audio Stream Received"]
B --> C["🔊 Audio Quality Check"]
C --> D{Audio Quality<br/>Acceptable?}
D -->|No| E["⚠️ Request Repeat"]
E --> A
D -->|Yes| F["🎯 Speech-to-Text Conversion"]
F --> G["📝 Transcription Generated"]
G --> H["🔍 Intent Recognition"]
H --> I["🏷️ Extract Entities"]
I --> J["📊 Confidence Score Check"]
J --> K{Confidence ><br/>Threshold?}
K -->|No| L["❓ Ask for Clarification"]
L --> M["🎤 User Provides Clarification"]
M --> H
K -->|Yes| N["✅ Intent Confirmed"]
N --> O["🔗 Route to Service"]
O --> P{Service Type}
P -->|Code Generation| Q["💻 Code Generation Service"]
P -->|Data Analysis| R["📊 Data Analysis Service"]
P -->|Architecture| S["🏗️ Architecture Service"]
P -->|Other| T["🔄 Other Services"]
Q --> U["⚙️ Process Request"]
R --> U
S --> U
T --> U
U --> V["📤 Generate Response"]
V --> W["🎵 Text-to-Speech Conversion"]
W --> X["🔊 Play Audio Response"]
X --> Y["📺 Display Visual Output"]
Y --> Z["✨ End - User Receives Result"]
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style Z fill:#c8e6c9
style E fill:#ffccbc
style L fill:#ffccbc
style K fill:#fff9c4
style D fill:#fff9c4
Traceability: FR-001, FR-002, FR-003, FR-016
2.2 Code Generation and Integration Workflow
graph TD
A["📋 Code Generation Request"] --> B["🔍 Analyze Requirements"]
B --> C["📚 Retrieve Code Templates"]
C --> D["🤖 Select ML Model"]
D --> E["⚙️ Generate Code Skeleton"]
E --> F["🔧 Apply Customizations"]
F --> G["✅ Code Quality Check"]
G --> H{Quality<br/>Acceptable?}
H -->|No| I["🔄 Regenerate Code"]
I --> E
H -->|Yes| J["🛡️ Security Scan"]
J --> K{Security<br/>Issues?}
K -->|Yes| L["⚠️ Flag Issues"]
L --> M["📝 Add Comments"]
M --> N["👤 Request Review"]
K -->|No| O["✨ Code Ready"]
N --> O
O --> P["💾 Format Code"]
P --> Q["🔗 Prepare IDE Integration"]
Q --> R{IDE Type}
R -->|VS Code| S["📌 Insert at Cursor Position"]
R -->|JetBrains| S
R -->|Vim| S
R -->|Other| S
S --> T["📊 Log Generation Event"]
T --> U["🎵 Notify User via Voice"]
U --> V["📺 Display Code Preview"]
V --> W["✨ End - Code Integrated"]
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style W fill:#c8e6c9
style H fill:#fff9c4
style K fill:#fff9c4
style L fill:#ffccbc
style N fill:#ffccbc
Traceability: UC-001, FR-001, FR-003, FR-017
2.3 Data Analysis and Visualization Pipeline
graph TD
A["📊 Data Analysis Request"] --> B["🔍 Identify Dataset"]
B --> C{Dataset<br/>Exists?}
C -->|No| D["❌ Dataset Not Found"]
D --> E["🔄 Suggest Alternatives"]
E --> F["👤 User Selects Dataset"]
F --> B
C -->|Yes| G["📥 Load Dataset"]
G --> H["🔍 Analyze Schema"]
H --> I["📊 Generate Statistics"]
I --> J["🎯 Determine Analysis Type"]
J --> K{Analysis Type}
K -->|Correlation| L["📈 Calculate Correlation Matrix"]
K -->|Distribution| M["📊 Generate Distribution Analysis"]
K -->|Trend| N["📉 Perform Trend Analysis"]
K -->|Custom| O["⚙️ Execute Custom Analysis"]
L --> P["🎨 Generate Visualization"]
M --> P
N --> P
O --> P
P --> Q["✅ Visualization Quality Check"]
Q --> R{Quality<br/>Acceptable?}
R -->|No| S["🔄 Adjust Parameters"]
S --> P
R -->|Yes| T["💾 Save Results"]
T --> U["📝 Generate Insights"]
U --> V["🔗 Create Jupyter Cell"]
V --> W["📤 Export Results"]
W --> X["🎵 Notify User"]
X --> Y["📺 Display Visualization"]
Y --> Z["✨ End - Analysis Complete"]
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style Z fill:#c8e6c9
style C fill:#fff9c4
style K fill:#fff9c4
style D fill:#ffccbc
style R fill:#fff9c4
style S fill:#ffccbc
Traceability: UC-002, FR-004, FR-005, FR-006
2.4 Architecture Design and Documentation Process
graph TD
A["🏗️ Architecture Design Request"] --> B["📋 Gather Requirements"]
B --> C["🎯 Define Scope & Constraints"]
C --> D["📚 Retrieve Architecture Patterns"]
D --> E["🔍 Analyze Domain"]
E --> F["⚙️ Select Appropriate Pattern"]
F --> G{Pattern<br/>Suitable?}
G -->|No| H["🔄 Try Alternative Pattern"]
H --> F
G -->|Yes| I["🏗️ Design Components"]
I --> J["🔗 Define Interactions"]
J --> K["💾 Design Data Models"]
K --> L["🛡️ Plan Security"]
L --> M["📊 Create Architecture Diagram"]
M --> N["📝 Generate Documentation"]
N --> O["✅ Review Design"]
O --> P{Design<br/>Approved?}
P -->|No| Q["📝 Collect Feedback"]
Q --> R["🔄 Revise Design"]
R --> I
P -->|Yes| S["🔗 Create Git Repository"]
S --> T["📤 Commit Architecture Files"]
T --> U["📋 Create Project Tasks"]
U --> V["👥 Assign Tasks"]
V --> W["🎵 Notify Stakeholders"]
W --> X["📺 Display Architecture"]
X --> Y["✨ End - Architecture Ready"]
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style Y fill:#c8e6c9
style G fill:#fff9c4
style P fill:#fff9c4
style H fill:#ffccbc
style Q fill:#ffccbc
style R fill:#ffccbc
Traceability: UC-003, FR-007, FR-008, FR-009
2.5 Error Handling and Recovery Process
graph TD
A["⚠️ Error Detected"] --> B["🔍 Capture Error Context"]
B --> C["📝 Log Error Details"]
C --> D["🏷️ Classify Error Type"]
D --> E{Error<br/>Severity}
E -->|Critical| F["🚨 Immediate Alert"]
E -->|High| G["⚠️ High Priority Alert"]
E -->|Medium| H["ℹ️ Standard Alert"]
E -->|Low| I["📝 Log Only"]
F --> J["👤 Notify User"]
G --> J
H --> J
I --> J
J --> K["🔍 Analyze Root Cause"]
K --> L["📚 Query Knowledge Base"]
L --> M["🤖 Generate Solutions"]
M --> N{Solution<br/>Found?}
N -->|Yes| O["💡 Suggest Fix"]
N -->|No| P["👥 Escalate to Support"]
O --> Q["👤 Present to User"]
P --> Q
Q --> R{User<br/>Action}
R -->|Apply Fix| S["⚙️ Execute Fix"]
R -->|Ignore| T["📝 Log Decision"]
R -->|Request Help| P
S --> U["✅ Verify Fix"]
U --> V{Fix<br/>Successful?}
V -->|Yes| W["✨ Error Resolved"]
V -->|No| X["🔄 Try Alternative Solution"]
X --> M
T --> Y["📊 Update Error Statistics"]
Y --> Z["✨ End - Error Handled"]
W --> Z
style A fill:#ffccbc
style Z fill:#c8e6c9
style E fill:#fff9c4
style N fill:#fff9c4
style R fill:#fff9c4
style V fill:#fff9c4
style F fill:#ffccbc
style P fill:#ffccbc
Traceability: FR-013, FR-014, FR-015, FR-018
3. STATE DIAGRAMS FOR ENTITIES WITH COMPLEX STATE TRANSITIONS
3.1 Voice Command State Machine
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> Idle: System Ready
Idle --> Listening: User Activates Voice
Idle --> Sleeping: Inactivity Timeout
Sleeping --> Idle: Wake Word Detected
Listening --> Processing: Audio Stream Complete
Listening --> Idle: Timeout / Cancel
Processing --> Transcribing: Audio Received
Processing --> Idle: Error
Transcribing --> IntentRecognition: Transcription Complete
Transcribing --> Processing: Retry
IntentRecognition --> ConfidenceCheck: Intent Extracted
IntentRecognition --> Clarification: Low Confidence
Clarification --> Listening: User Clarifies
Clarification --> Idle: User Cancels
ConfidenceCheck --> Executing: High Confidence
ConfidenceCheck --> Clarification: Low Confidence
Executing --> Processing: Service Processing
Executing --> ResponseGeneration: Service Complete
Executing --> ErrorHandling: Service Error
ResponseGeneration --> TextToSpeech: Response Ready
ResponseGeneration --> Idle: No Response Needed
TextToSpeech --> Speaking: Audio Generated
TextToSpeech --> Idle: Error
Speaking --> Idle: Audio Complete
ErrorHandling --> Idle: Error Resolved
ErrorHandling --> Escalation: Unrecoverable Error
Escalation --> Idle: User Intervention
note right of Idle
Ready for next command
Low power state
end note
note right of Listening
Capturing audio stream
Real-time processing
end note
note right of Processing
Audio analysis
Quality checks
end note
note right of Executing
Service execution
Result generation
end note
Traceability: FR-001, FR-002, FR-016
3.2 Code Generation Task State Machine
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> Queued: Task Created
Queued --> Analyzing: Task Assigned
Queued --> Cancelled: User Cancels
Analyzing --> TemplateSelection: Requirements Analyzed
Analyzing --> Failed: Analysis Error
TemplateSelection --> ModelSelection: Template Chosen
TemplateSelection --> Analyzing: No Suitable Template
ModelSelection --> CodeGeneration: Model Selected
ModelSelection --> TemplateSelection: Model Unavailable
CodeGeneration --> QualityCheck: Code Generated
CodeGeneration --> Failed: Generation Error
QualityCheck --> SecurityScan: Quality Passed
QualityCheck --> CodeGeneration: Quality Failed - Retry
SecurityScan --> Formatting: Security Passed
SecurityScan --> SecurityReview: Security Issues Found
SecurityReview --> Formatting: Issues Acknowledged
SecurityReview --> Failed: Critical Issues
Formatting --> IDEIntegration: Code Formatted
Formatting --> Failed: Formatting Error
IDEIntegration --> Complete: Code Integrated
IDEIntegration --> Failed: Integration Error
Complete --> [*]: Task Complete
Failed --> [*]: Task Failed
Cancelled --> [*]: Task Cancelled
note right of Queued
Waiting for processing
Priority assigned
end note
note right of CodeGeneration
ML model execution
Template application
end note
note right of SecurityScan
Vulnerability check
Best practices validation
end note
note right of Complete
Code ready for use
Logged and tracked
end note
Traceability: UC-001, FR-001, FR-003, FR-017
3.3 Data Analysis Task State Machine
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> Requested: Analysis Request
Requested --> DatasetValidation: Request Queued
Requested --> Cancelled: User Cancels
DatasetValidation --> DataLoading: Dataset Valid
DatasetValidation --> Failed: Dataset Invalid
DataLoading --> SchemaAnalysis: Data Loaded
DataLoading --> Failed: Load Error
SchemaAnalysis --> PreProcessing: Schema Analyzed
SchemaAnalysis --> Failed: Schema Error
PreProcessing --> AnalysisExecution: Data Preprocessed
PreProcessing --> Failed: Preprocessing Error
AnalysisExecution --> Visualization: Analysis Complete
AnalysisExecution --> Failed: Analysis Error
Visualization --> InsightGeneration: Visualization Created
Visualization --> Failed: Visualization Error
InsightGeneration --> JupyterIntegration: Insights Generated
InsightGeneration --> Failed: Insight Error
JupyterIntegration --> ResultsExport: Cell Created
JupyterIntegration --> Failed: Integration Error
ResultsExport --> Complete: Results Exported
ResultsExport --> Failed: Export Error
Complete --> [*]: Analysis Complete
Failed --> [*]: Analysis Failed
Cancelled --> [*]: Analysis Cancelled
note right of DataLoading
Fetch from repository
Memory management
end note
note right of AnalysisExecution
Pandas/NumPy operations
Statistical calculations
end note
note right of Visualization
Matplotlib/Seaborn
Interactive charts
end note
note right of JupyterIntegration
Cell creation
Notebook update
end note
Traceability: UC-002, FR-004, FR-005, FR-006
3.4 Code Review Workflow State Machine
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> Draft: PR Created
Draft --> ReviewRequested: Request Review
Draft --> Abandoned: Author Abandons
ReviewRequested --> UnderReview: Reviewer Assigned
ReviewRequested --> ReviewRequested: Waiting for Reviewer
UnderReview --> Reviewing: Reviewer Starts Review
UnderReview --> ReviewRequested: Reviewer Unavailable
Reviewing --> ChangesRequested: Issues Found
Reviewing --> Approved: No Issues
Reviewing --> Rejected: Critical Issues
ChangesRequested --> Revising: Author Revises
ChangesRequested --> Abandoned: Author Abandons
Revising --> ReviewRequested: Changes Pushed
Approved --> Merging: Approval Granted
Approved --> Abandoned: Author Abandons
Merging --> Merged: Merge Successful
Merging --> ConflictResolution: Merge Conflict
ConflictResolution --> Revising: Conflicts Resolved
ConflictResolution --> Abandoned: Author Abandons
Rejected --> Abandoned: Author Abandons
Rejected --> Revising: Author Revises
Merged --> [*]: PR Complete
Abandoned --> [*]: PR Abandoned
note right of ReviewRequested
Waiting for reviewer
Notification sent
end note
note right of Reviewing
Code inspection
Quality checks
end note
note right of ChangesRequested
Issues documented
Author notified
end note
note right of Merging
Conflict detection
Merge strategy
end note
Traceability: UC-004, FR-010, FR-011, FR-012
3.5 Architecture Design State Machine
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> Initiated: Design Request
Initiated --> RequirementsGathering: Project Created
Initiated --> Cancelled: Request Cancelled
RequirementsGathering --> ScopeDefinition: Requirements Collected
RequirementsGathering --> RequirementsGathering: More Info Needed
ScopeDefinition --> PatternSelection: Scope Defined
ScopeDefinition --> RequirementsGathering: Scope Unclear
PatternSelection --> ComponentDesign: Pattern Selected
PatternSelection --> PatternSelection: Evaluate Alternatives
ComponentDesign --> InteractionDesign: Components Designed
ComponentDesign --> PatternSelection: Pattern Unsuitable
InteractionDesign --> DataModelDesign: Interactions Defined
InteractionDesign --> ComponentDesign: Redesign Needed
DataModelDesign --> SecurityPlanning: Data Models Designed
DataModelDesign --> InteractionDesign: Redesign Needed
SecurityPlanning --> DiagramGeneration: Security Planned
SecurityPlanning --> DataModelDesign: Redesign Needed
DiagramGeneration --> DocumentationGeneration: Diagrams Created
DiagramGeneration --> SecurityPlanning: Redesign Needed
DocumentationGeneration --> DesignReview: Documentation Created
DocumentationGeneration --> DiagramGeneration: Regenerate Diagrams
DesignReview --> Approved: Design Approved
DesignReview --> Revisions: Changes Requested
Revisions --> ComponentDesign: Revise Design
Approved --> RepositorySetup: Design Finalized
Approved --> Cancelled: Approval Withdrawn
RepositorySetup --> TaskCreation: Repository Created
RepositorySetup --> Approved: Setup Failed
TaskCreation --> Complete: Tasks Created
TaskCreation --> RepositorySetup: Retry
Complete --> [*]: Architecture Ready
Cancelled --> [*]: Design Cancelled
note right of RequirementsGathering
Stakeholder interviews
Constraint collection
end note
note right of PatternSelection
Microservices
Monolithic
Serverless
end note
note right of DesignReview
Stakeholder review
Technical validation
end note
note right of Complete
Ready for implementation
Tasks assigned
end note
Traceability: UC-003, FR-007, FR-008, FR-009
4. INTEGRATION FLOW DIAGRAMS
4.1 System Architecture and Data Flow
graph LR
subgraph "User Interface Layer"
VoiceUI["🎤 Voice Interface"]
WebUI["🌐 Web Interface"]
MobileUI["📱 Mobile Interface"]
end
subgraph "Audio Processing"
AudioProc["🔊 Audio Processing Engine"]
STT["🎯 Speech-to-Text"]
TTS["🎵 Text-to-Speech"]
end
subgraph "NLP & Intelligence"
NLPEngine["🧠 NLP Engine"]
IntentRecog["🏷️ Intent Recognition"]
EntityExt["📊 Entity Extraction"]
ContextMgmt["📝 Context Management"]
end
subgraph "Service Layer"
CodeGenSvc["💻 Code Generation"]
DataAnalysisSvc["📊 Data Analysis"]
ArchSvc["🏗️ Architecture Service"]
DebugSvc["🐛 Debug Service"]
CollabSvc["👥 Collaboration Service"]
end
subgraph "Integration Layer"
IDEInteg["📌 IDE Integration"]
JupyterInteg["📓 Jupyter Integration"]
GitInteg["🔗 Git Integration"]
PMInteg["📋 Project Mgmt Integration"]
end
subgraph "Data Layer"
KnowledgeBase["📚 Knowledge Base"]
UserDB["👤 User Database"]
ProjectDB["📦 Project Database"]
LogStore["📝 Log Storage"]
end
subgraph "External Systems"
IDE["💻 IDE/Editor"]
Jupyter["📓 Jupyter Notebook"]
GitRepo["🔗 Git Repository"]
ProjectMgmt["📋 Project Management"]
end
VoiceUI --> AudioProc
WebUI --> NLPEngine
MobileUI --> AudioProc
AudioProc --> STT
STT --> NLPEngine
NLPEngine --> IntentRecog
IntentRecog --> EntityExt
EntityExt --> ContextMgmt
ContextMgmt --> CodeGenSvc
ContextMgmt --> DataAnalysisSvc
ContextMgmt --> ArchSvc
ContextMgmt --> DebugSvc
ContextMgmt --> CollabSvc
CodeGenSvc --> IDEInteg
DataAnalysisSvc --> JupyterInteg
ArchSvc --> GitInteg
DebugSvc --> IDEInteg
CollabSvc --> GitInteg
IDEInteg --> IDE
JupyterInteg --> Jupyter
GitInteg --> GitRepo
PMInteg --> ProjectMgmt
CodeGenSvc --> KnowledgeBase
DataAnalysisSvc --> KnowledgeBase
ArchSvc --> KnowledgeBase
NLPEngine --> UserDB
CollabSvc --> UserDB
ArchSvc --> ProjectDB
PMInteg --> ProjectDB
CodeGenSvc --> LogStore
DataAnalysisSvc --> LogStore
DebugSvc --> LogStore
TTS --> VoiceUI
CodeGenSvc --> TTS
DataAnalysisSvc --> TTS
style VoiceUI fill:#e1f5ff
style AudioProc fill:#fff3e0
style NLPEngine fill:#f3e5f5
style CodeGenSvc fill:#e8f5e9
style DataAnalysisSvc fill:#e8f5e9
style KnowledgeBase fill:#fce4ec
Traceability: FR-001 through FR-018
4.2 Voice Command Processing Data Flow
graph TD
A["🎤 Audio Input"] -->|Raw Audio Stream| B["🔊 Audio Processing"]
B -->|Noise Reduction| C["📊 Signal Processing"]
C -->|Normalized Audio| D["🎯 Speech-to-Text"]
D -->|Transcribed Text| E["🧠 NLP Engine"]
E -->|Intent + Entities| F["📝 Context Manager"]
F -->|Enriched Request| G{Service Router}
G -->|CODE_GENERATION| H["💻 Code Gen Service"]
G -->|DATA_ANALYSIS| I["📊 Data Analysis Service"]
G -->|ARCHITECTURE| J["🏗️ Architecture Service"]
G -->|DEBUG| K["🐛 Debug Service"]
G -->|COLLABORATION| L["👥 Collaboration Service"]
H -->|Generated Code| M["✅ Response Generator"]
I -->|Analysis Results| M
J -->|Architecture Design| M
K -->|Debug Info| M
L -->|Collaboration Data| M
M -->|Response Text| N["🎵 Text-to-Speech"]
N -->|Audio Response| O["🔊 Audio Output"]
H -->|Code| P["📌 IDE Integration"]
I -->|Visualization| Q["📓 Jupyter Integration"]
J -->|Diagram| R["🔗 Git Integration"]
P -->|Insert Code| S["💻 IDE/Editor"]
Q -->|Display Chart| T["📓 Jupyter Notebook"]
R -->|Commit Files| U["🔗 Git Repository"]
E -->|Logs| V["📝 Log Storage"]
M -->|Logs| V
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style O fill:#c8e6c9
style G fill:#fff9c4
style H fill:#e8f5e9
style I fill:#e8f5e9
style J fill:#e8f5e9
style K fill:#e8f5e9
style L fill:#e8f5e9
Traceability: FR-001, FR-002, FR-003, FR-016
4.3 Code Generation to IDE Integration Flow
graph TD
A["💻 Code Generation Request"] -->|Requirements| B["🤖 ML Model Selection"]
B -->|Model ID| C["📚 Template Retrieval"]
C -->|Template + Model| D["⚙️ Code Generation"]
D -->|Generated Code| E["✅ Quality Validation"]
E -->|Quality Score| F{Quality Check}
F -->|Pass| G["🛡️ Security Scan"]
F -->|Fail| H["🔄 Regenerate"]
H --> D
G -->|Security Report| I{Security Check}
I -->|Pass| J["📝 Format Code"]
I -->|Issues| K["⚠️ Flag Issues"]
K --> J
J -->|Formatted Code| L["🔗 IDE Integration"]
L -->|IDE Type Detection| M{IDE Type}
M -->|VS Code| N["📌 VS Code Adapter"]
M -->|JetBrains| O["📌 JetBrains Adapter"]
M -->|Vim| P["📌 Vim Adapter"]
M -->|Other| Q["📌 Generic Adapter"]
N -->|Insert Command| R["💻 VS Code API"]
O -->|Insert Command| S["💻 JetBrains API"]
P -->|Insert Command| T["💻 Vim Command"]
Q -->|Insert Command| U["💻 Generic API"]
R -->|Code Inserted| V["✨ IDE Updated"]
S -->|Code Inserted| V
T -->|Code Inserted| V
U -->|Code Inserted| V
V -->|Event| W["📊 Analytics"]
W -->|Metrics| X["📝 Log Storage"]
V -->|Notification| Y["🎵 Text-to-Speech"]
Y -->|Audio| Z["🔊 User Notification"]
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style Z fill:#c8e6c9
style F fill:#fff9c4
style I fill:#fff9c4
style M fill:#fff9c4
style D fill:#e8f5e9
style G fill:#e8f5e9
Traceability: UC-001, FR-001, FR-003, FR-017
4.4 Data Analysis to Jupyter Integration Flow
graph TD
A["📊 Data Analysis Request"] -->|Dataset Name| B["🔍 Dataset Lookup"]
B -->|Dataset Path| C["📥 Load Dataset"]
C -->|Data Frame| D["📊 Schema Analysis"]
D -->|Schema Info| E["🎯 Analysis Type Selection"]
E -->|Analysis Type| F{Analysis Type}
F -->|Correlation| G["📈 Correlation Analysis"]
F -->|Distribution| H["📊 Distribution Analysis"]
F -->|Trend| I["📉 Trend Analysis"]
F -->|Custom| J["⚙️ Custom Analysis"]
G -->|Results| K["🎨 Visualization Generation"]
H -->|Results| K
I -->|Results| K
J -->|Results| K
K -->|Chart Config| L["📊 Matplotlib/Seaborn"]
L -->|Image Data| M["💾 Save Visualization"]
M -->|Image Path| N["📝 Generate Insights"]
N -->|Insights Text| O["🔗 Jupyter Integration"]
O -->|Cell Content| P["📓 Create Notebook Cell"]
P -->|Cell ID| Q["📓 Jupyter Kernel"]
Q -->|Execute| R["⚙️ Run Analysis Code"]
R -->|Results| S["📊 Display Output"]
S -->|Visualization| T["📺 Jupyter Display"]
T -->|Event| U["📊 Analytics"]
U -->|Metrics| V["📝 Log Storage"]
T -->|Notification| W["🎵 Text-to-Speech"]
W -->|Audio| X["🔊 User Notification"]
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style X fill:#c8e6c9
style F fill:#fff9c4
style K fill:#e8f5e9
style R fill:#e8f5e9
Traceability: UC-002, FR-004, FR-005, FR-006
5. ERROR HANDLING AND RECOVERY FLOWS
5.1 Comprehensive Error Handling Architecture
graph TD
A["⚠️ Error Occurs"] --> B["🔍 Error Detection"]
B --> C["📝 Capture Error Context"]
C --> D["🏷️ Classify Error"]
D --> E{Error Type}
E -->|Audio Error| F["🔊 Audio Processing Error"]
E -->|NLP Error| G["🧠 NLP Processing Error"]
E -->|Service Error| H["⚙️ Service Execution Error"]
E -->|Integration Error| I["🔗 Integration Error"]
E -->|Database Error| J["💾 Database Error"]
E -->|Authentication Error| K["🔐 Authentication Error"]
F --> L["🔄 Retry Audio Processing"]
G --> M["🔄 Retry NLP Processing"]
H --> N["🔄 Retry Service"]
I --> O["🔄 Retry Integration"]
J --> P["🔄 Retry Database"]
K --> Q["🔄 Re-authenticate"]
L --> R{Retry<br/>Successful?}
M --> R
N --> R
O --> R
P --> R
Q --> R
R -->|Yes| S["✅ Error Recovered"]
R -->|No| T["📊 Analyze Root Cause"]
T --> U["📚 Query Knowledge Base"]
U --> V{Solution<br/>Found?}
V -->|Yes| W["💡 Generate Solution"]
V -->|No| X["👥 Escalate to Support"]
W --> Y["👤 Present to User"]
X --> Y
Y --> Z{User<br/>Action}
Z -->|Apply Fix| AA["⚙️ Execute Fix"]
Z -->|Ignore| AB["📝 Log Decision"]
Z -->|Request Help| X
AA --> AC["✅ Verify Fix"]
AC --> AD{Fix<br/>Successful?}
AD -->|Yes| S
AD -->|No| AE["🔄 Try Alternative"]
AE --> T
AB --> AF["📊 Update Statistics"]
S --> AF
AF --> AG["🎵 Notify User"]
AG --> AH["✨ End - Error Handled"]
style A fill:#ffccbc
style AH fill:#c8e6c9
style E fill:#fff9c4
style V fill:#fff9c4
style R fill:#fff9c4
style Z fill:#fff9c4
style AD fill:#fff9c4
Traceability: FR-013, FR-014, FR-015, FR-018
5.2 Audio Processing Error Recovery Flow
graph TD
A["🎤 Audio Input"] --> B["🔊 Audio Quality Check"]
B --> C{Quality<br/>Acceptable?}
C -->|Yes| D["✅ Process Audio"]
C -->|No| E["⚠️ Audio Quality Error"]
E --> F{Error Type}
F -->|Too Quiet| G["🔊 Increase Gain"]
F -->|Too Loud| H["🔊 Reduce Gain"]
F -->|Noise| I["🔊 Apply Noise Filter"]
F -->|Timeout| J["⏱️ Extend Timeout"]
G --> K["🎤 Request Repeat"]
H --> K
I --> K
J --> K
K --> L["🎤 User Repeats"]
L --> B
D --> M["🎯 Speech-to-Text"]
M --> N{STT<br/>Successful?}
N -->|Yes| O["✅ Transcription Complete"]
N -->|No| P["⚠️ STT Error"]
P --> Q{Error Type}
Q -->|No Speech Detected| R["🎤 Request Repeat"]
Q -->|Unclear Speech| S["❓ Ask for Clarification"]
Q -->|Language Mismatch| T["🌐 Detect Language"]
Q -->|Service Error| U["🔄 Retry STT"]
R --> L
S --> L
T --> M
U --> M
O --> V["✨ Continue Processing"]
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style V fill:#c8e6c9
style E fill:#ffccbc
style P fill:#ffccbc
style C fill:#fff9c4
style N fill:#fff9c4
style Q fill:#fff9c4
style F fill:#fff9c4
Traceability: FR-001, FR-002, FR-016
5.3 Service Execution Error Recovery Flow
graph TD
A["⚙️ Service Execution"] --> B["🔄 Execute Service"]
B --> C{Execution<br/>Successful?}
C -->|Yes| D["✅ Service Complete"]
C -->|No| E["⚠️ Service Error"]
E --> F{Error Type}
F -->|Timeout| G["⏱️ Timeout Error"]
F -->|Resource| H["💾 Resource Error"]
F -->|Dependency| I["🔗 Dependency Error"]
F -->|Logic| J["🧠 Logic Error"]
F -->|Unknown| K["❓ Unknown Error"]
G --> L["🔄 Retry with Extended Timeout"]
H --> M["🔄 Retry with Resource Cleanup"]
I --> N["🔄 Retry Dependency"]
J --> O["📝 Log Error Details"]
K --> O
L --> P{Retry<br/>Successful?}
M --> P
N --> P
P -->|Yes| D
P -->|No| Q["📊 Analyze Error"]
O --> Q
Q --> R["📚 Query Knowledge Base"]
R --> S{Solution<br/>Found?}
S -->|Yes| T["💡 Apply Solution"]
S -->|No| U["👥 Escalate"]
T --> V["🔄 Retry Service"]
V --> C
U --> W["📝 Create Support Ticket"]
W --> X["👤 Notify User"]
X --> Y["✨ End - Error Escalated"]
D --> Z["✨ End - Service Complete"]
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style D fill:#c8e6c9
style Z fill:#c8e6c9
style E fill:#ffccbc
style F fill:#fff9c4
style P fill:#fff9c4
style S fill:#fff9c4
Traceability: FR-013, FR-014, FR-015
5.4 Integration Error Recovery Flow
graph TD
A["🔗 Integration Request"] --> B["🔗 Connect to External System"]
B --> C{Connection<br/>Successful?}
C -->|Yes| D["✅ Connected"]
C -->|No| E["⚠️ Connection Error"]
E --> F{Error Type}
F -->|Network| G["🌐 Network Error"]
F -->|Authentication| H["🔐 Auth Error"]
F -->|API| I["📡 API Error"]
F -->|Timeout| J["⏱️ Timeout Error"]
G --> K["🔄 Retry Connection"]
H --> L["🔐 Re-authenticate"]
I --> M["📡 Check API Status"]
J --> N["⏱️ Increase Timeout"]
K --> O{Retry<br/>Successful?}
L --> O
M --> O
N --> O
O -->|Yes| D
O -->|No| P["📊 Fallback Strategy"]
P --> Q{Fallback<br/>Available?}
Q -->|Yes| R["🔄 Use Fallback"]
Q -->|No| S["❌ Integration Failed"]
R --> T["✅ Fallback Active"]
T --> U["⚠️ Notify User"]
D --> V["📤 Send Request"]
V --> W{Request<br/>Successful?}
W -->|Yes| X["✅ Response Received"]
W -->|No| Y["⚠️ Request Error"]
Y --> Z["🔄 Retry Request"]
Z --> V
X --> AA["✨ End - Integration Complete"]
S --> AB["✨ End - Integration Failed"]
U --> AC["✨ End - Fallback Active"]
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style AA fill:#c8e6c9
style AC fill:#fff9c4
style AB fill:#ffccbc
style E fill:#ffccbc
style F fill:#fff9c4
style Q fill:#fff9c4
style W fill:#fff9c4
Traceability: FR-013, FR-014, FR-015, FR-018
5.5 Database Error Recovery Flow
graph TD
A["💾 Database Operation"] --> B["🔍 Execute Query"]
B --> C{Query<br/>Successful?}
C -->|Yes| D["✅ Query Complete"]
C -->|No| E["⚠️ Database Error"]
E --> F{Error Type}
F -->|Connection| G["🔗 Connection Error"]
F -->|Timeout| H["⏱️ Query Timeout"]
F -->|Constraint| I["🔐 Constraint Violation"]
F -->|Deadlock| J["🔄 Deadlock Detected"]
F -->|Resource| K["💾 Resource Error"]
G --> L["🔄 Reconnect to DB"]
H --> M["⏱️ Increase Timeout"]
I --> N["📝 Validate Data"]
J --> O["🔄 Retry Query"]
K --> P["🔄 Cleanup Resources"]
L --> Q{Retry<br/>Successful?}
M --> Q
N --> Q
O --> Q
P --> Q
Q -->|Yes| D
Q -->|No| R["📊 Analyze Error"]
R --> S["📚 Query Knowledge Base"]
S --> T{Solution<br/>Found?}
T -->|Yes| U["💡 Apply Solution"]
T -->|No| V["👥 Escalate to DBA"]
U --> W["🔄 Retry Operation"]
W --> B
V --> X["📝 Create Incident"]
X --> Y["👤 Notify User"]
Y --> Z["✨ End - Escalated"]
D --> AA["✨ End - Operation Complete"]
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style AA fill:#c8e6c9
style Z fill:#ffccbc
style E fill:#ffccbc
style F fill:#fff9c4
style Q fill:#fff9c4
style T fill:#fff9c4
Traceability: FR-013, FR-014, FR-015
6. CROSS-FUNCTIONAL FLOW DIAGRAMS
6.1 End-to-End Voice Command to Result Delivery
graph TD
subgraph "User Interaction"
A["🎤 User Speaks Command"]
B["👂 System Listens"]
end
subgraph "Audio Processing"
C["🔊 Capture Audio Stream"]
D["📊 Signal Processing"]
E["🎯 Speech-to-Text"]
end
subgraph "NLP Processing"
F["🧠 Intent Recognition"]
G["📊 Entity Extraction"]
H["📝 Context Enrichment"]
end
subgraph "Service Routing"
I{Service Type}
J["💻 Code Generation"]
K["📊 Data Analysis"]
L["🏗️ Architecture"]
M["🐛 Debugging"]
end
subgraph "Processing"
N["⚙️ Execute Service"]
O["✅ Validate Results"]
P["📊 Generate Insights"]
end
subgraph "Integration"
Q["🔗 IDE Integration"]
R["📓 Jupyter Integration"]
S["🔗 Git Integration"]
end
subgraph "Response Generation"
T["📝 Format Response"]
U["🎵 Text-to-Speech"]
V["📺 Visual Output"]
end
subgraph "User Delivery"
W["🔊 Play Audio"]
X["📺 Display Results"]
Y["✨ Complete"]
end
A --> B
B --> C
C --> D
D --> E
E --> F
F --> G
G --> H
H --> I
I -->|Code| J
I -->|Analysis| K
I -->|Architecture| L
I -->|Debug| M
J --> N
K --> N
L --> N
M --> N
N --> O
O --> P
P --> T
J --> Q
K --> R
L --> S
T --> U
U --> W
P --> V
V --> X
W --> Y
X --> Y
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style Y fill:#c8e6c9
style I fill:#fff9c4
Traceability: All UC and FR items
6.2 Multi-User Collaboration Flow
graph TD
subgraph "Developer 1"
A["👨💻 Dev 1 Creates Code"]
B["🎤 Dev 1: Request Review"]
end
subgraph "Collaboration Service"
C["👥 Create Review Request"]
D["📊 Analyze Code Quality"]
E["🔍 Identify Issues"]
end
subgraph "Developer 2"
F["👨💻 Dev 2 Receives Notification"]
G["🎤 Dev 2: Show PR"]
H["👀 Dev 2 Reviews Code"]
end
subgraph "Review Processing"
I["📝 Process Review Comments"]
J["🏷️ Categorize Issues"]
K["📊 Generate Summary"]
end
subgraph "Developer 1 Response"
L["👨💻 Dev 1 Receives Review"]
M["🎤 Dev 1: Show Issues"]
N["✏️ Dev 1 Fixes Code"]
end
subgraph "Finalization"
O["✅ Verify Fixes"]
P["🔗 Merge Code"]
Q["📊 Update Project"]
end
A --> B
B --> C
C --> D
D --> E
E --> F
F --> G
G --> H
H --> I
I --> J
J --> K
K --> L
L --> M
M --> N
N --> O
O --> P
P --> Q
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style Q fill:#c8e6c9
style C fill:#f3e5f5
style I fill:#f3e5f5
Traceability: UC-004, FR-010, FR-011, FR-012
7. DETAILED FLOW DOCUMENTATION SUMMARY
7.1 Critical Path Analysis
| Flow ID | Flow Name | Duration | Critical Steps | Dependencies |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLOW-001 | Voice Command Processing | 500ms | Audio capture → STT → NLP → Service routing | Audio hardware, NLP model |
| FLOW-002 | Code Generation | 2-5s | Intent recognition → Template selection → Code generation → IDE integration | ML model, IDE API |
| FLOW-003 | Data Analysis | 5-30s | Dataset loading → Analysis execution → Visualization → Jupyter integration | Data repository, Jupyter API |
| FLOW-004 | Architecture Design | 10-60s | Requirements gathering → Pattern selection → Diagram generation → Documentation | Architecture patterns, Git |
| FLOW-005 | Code Review | 5-15min | PR analysis → Issue identification → Review submission → Notification | Git API, Code analysis engine |
| FLOW-006 | Error Recovery | 1-10s | Error detection → Root cause analysis → Solution generation → User notification | Knowledge base, Support system |
7.2 Performance Requirements by Flow
| Flow | Latency Target | Throughput | Availability | Scalability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voice Command Processing | <500ms | 1000 req/s | 99.99% | Horizontal |
| Code Generation | <5s | 100 req/s | 99.9% | Horizontal |
| Data Analysis | <30s | 50 req/s | 99.9% | Vertical |
| Architecture Design | <60s | 20 req/s | 99.9% | Vertical |
| Code Review | <15min | 100 req/s | 99.9% | Horizontal |
| Error Recovery | <10s | 500 req/s | 99.99% | Horizontal |
7.3 Error Handling Strategy by Flow
| Flow | Error Types | Recovery Strategy | Max Retries | Fallback |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voice Command | Audio, STT, NLP | Retry with parameters adjustment | 3 | Manual input |
| Code Generation | Model, Template, IDE | Regenerate with alternative model | 2 | Manual code entry |
| Data Analysis | Dataset, Analysis, Jupyter | Retry with data validation | 2 | Export results |
| Architecture | Pattern, Git, PM | Retry with alternative pattern | 2 | Manual documentation |
| Code Review | Git, Analysis | Retry with fallback analysis | 3 | Manual review |
| Error Recovery | All types | Escalate to support | 1 | Support ticket |
7.4 Integration Points and Protocols
| Integration | Protocol | Format | Latency | Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IDE Integration | REST/WebSocket | JSON | <100ms | 99.9% |
| Jupyter Integration | HTTP/WebSocket | JSON | <200ms | 99.9% |
| Git Integration | REST/SSH | JSON/Git | <500ms | 99.9% |
| Project Management | REST | JSON | <500ms | 99.9% |
| Audio Processing | gRPC | Binary | <50ms | 99.99% |
| NLP Engine | gRPC | Protocol Buffers | <100ms | 99.99% |
8. FLOW VALIDATION AND TESTING CRITERIA
8.1 Sequence Diagram Validation
graph TD
A["Sequence Diagram"] --> B["Validate Message Order"]
B --> C["Check Participant Roles"]
C --> D["Verify Response Paths"]
D --> E["Validate Error Handling"]
E --> F["Check Timing Constraints"]
F --> G["Verify Data Consistency"]
G --> H{All Checks<br/>Pass?}
H -->|Yes| I["✅ Diagram Valid"]
H -->|No| J["❌ Issues Found"]
J --> K["📝 Document Issues"]
K --> L["🔄 Revise Diagram"]
L --> A
I --> M["✨ Ready for Implementation"]
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style M fill:#c8e6c9
style H fill:#fff9c4
8.2 Test Cases for Critical Flows
TC-001: Voice Command Processing
- Precondition: System initialized, user authenticated
- Steps:
- User speaks clear command
- System captures audio
- Audio processed and transcribed
- Intent recognized
- Service executed
- Expected Result: Command executed successfully, user receives response
- Acceptance Criteria: Response time <500ms, accuracy >95%
TC-002: Code Generation
- Precondition: IDE open, user authenticated
- Steps:
- User requests code generation
- System analyzes requirements
- Code generated
- Quality checks passed
- Code inserted into IDE
- Expected Result: Code inserted at cursor position
- Acceptance Criteria: Code compiles, follows style guide, <5s latency
TC-003: Error Recovery
- Precondition: Error condition triggered
- Steps:
- Error detected
- Root cause analyzed
- Solution generated
- User notified
- Fix applied
- Expected Result: Error resolved or escalated
- Acceptance Criteria: Recovery success rate >90%, <10s recovery time
9. FLOW DOCUMENTATION ARTIFACTS
9.1 Traceability Matrix
| Requirement | Sequence Diagram | Activity Diagram | State Diagram | Integration Flow | Error Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR-001 | FLOW-SEQ-001 | FLOW-ACT-001 | FLOW-STATE-001 | FLOW-INT-001 | FLOW-ERR-001 |
| FR-002 | FLOW-SEQ-001 | FLOW-ACT-001 | FLOW-STATE-001 | FLOW-INT-001 | FLOW-ERR-001 |
| FR-003 | FLOW-SEQ-001 | FLOW-ACT-002 | FLOW-STATE-002 | FLOW-INT-002 | FLOW-ERR-002 |
| FR-004 | FLOW-SEQ-002 | FLOW-ACT-003 | FLOW-STATE-003 | FLOW-INT-003 | FLOW-ERR-003 |
| FR-005 | FLOW-SEQ-002 | FLOW-ACT-003 | FLOW-STATE-003 | FLOW-INT-003 | FLOW-ERR-003 |
| FR-006 | FLOW-SEQ-002 | FLOW-ACT-003 | FLOW-STATE-003 | FLOW-INT-003 | FLOW-ERR-003 |
| FR-007 | FLOW-SEQ-003 | FLOW-ACT-004 | FLOW-STATE-004 | FLOW-INT-004 | FLOW-ERR-004 |
| FR-008 | FLOW-SEQ-003 | FLOW-ACT-004 | FLOW-STATE-004 | FLOW-INT-004 | FLOW-ERR-004 |
| FR-009 | FLOW-SEQ-003 | FLOW-ACT-004 | FLOW-STATE-004 | FLOW-INT-004 | FLOW-ERR-004 |
| FR-010 | FLOW-SEQ-004 | FLOW-ACT-005 | FLOW-STATE-005 | FLOW-INT-005 | FLOW-ERR-005 |
| FR-011 | FLOW-SEQ-004 | FLOW-ACT-005 | FLOW-STATE-005 | FLOW-INT-005 | FLOW-ERR-005 |
| FR-012 | FLOW-SEQ-004 | FLOW-ACT-005 | FLOW-STATE-005 | FLOW-INT-005 | FLOW-ERR-005 |
| FR-013 | FLOW-SEQ-005 | FLOW-ACT-006 | FLOW-STATE-006 | FLOW-INT-006 | FLOW-ERR-006 |
| FR-014 | FLOW-SEQ-005 | FLOW-ACT-006 | FLOW-STATE-006 | FLOW-INT-006 | FLOW-ERR-006 |
| FR-015 | FLOW-SEQ-005 | FLOW-ACT-006 | FLOW-STATE-006 | FLOW-INT-006 | FLOW-ERR-006 |
| FR-016 | FLOW-SEQ-001 | FLOW-ACT-001 | FLOW-STATE-001 | FLOW-INT-001 | FLOW-ERR-001 |
| FR-017 | FLOW-SEQ-001 | FLOW-ACT-002 | FLOW-STATE-002 | FLOW-INT-002 | FLOW-ERR-002 |
| FR-018 | FLOW-SEQ-005 | FLOW-ACT-006 | FLOW-STATE-006 | FLOW-INT-006 | FLOW-ERR-006 |
9.2 Flow Documentation Checklist
- All critical user journeys documented with sequence diagrams
- Complex business processes documented with activity diagrams
- Entity state transitions documented with state diagrams
- System integration points documented with integration flows
- Error handling and recovery documented with error flows
- Performance requirements specified for each flow
- Latency targets defined (<500ms for voice, <5s for code gen, etc.)
- Throughput requirements specified (1000 req/s for voice, etc.)
- Availability targets defined (99.9% - 99.99%)
- Scalability strategies documented
- Test cases defined for critical flows
- Traceability established between requirements and flows
- Error recovery strategies documented
- Integration protocols specified
- Data formats documented (JSON, Protocol Buffers, etc.)
10. IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP
Phase 1: Foundation (Weeks 1-4)
- Implement voice command processing pipeline
- Deploy audio processing engine
- Integrate NLP engine
- Establish error handling framework
Phase 2: Core Services (Weeks 5-8)
- Implement code generation service
- Implement data analysis service
- Implement architecture design service
- Establish IDE integration
Phase 3: Advanced Features (Weeks 9-12)
- Implement debugging service
- Implement collaboration features
- Implement Jupyter integration
- Implement Git integration
Phase 4: Optimization (Weeks 13-16)
- Performance optimization
- Scalability improvements
- Security hardening
- Production deployment
CONCLUSION
This comprehensive flow documentation provides:
- 5 Critical Sequence Diagrams covering voice command processing, data analysis, architecture design, code review, and debugging
- 5 Activity Diagrams for complex business processes including command processing, code generation, data analysis, architecture design, and error handling
- 5 State Diagrams for entities with complex transitions including voice commands, code generation tasks, data analysis tasks, code reviews, and architecture designs
- 4 Integration Flow Diagrams showing system architecture, voice processing, code generation integration, and data analysis integration
- 5 Error Handling Flows covering comprehensive error handling, audio processing errors, service execution errors, integration errors, and database errors
- 2 Cross-Functional Flows for end-to-end delivery and multi-user collaboration
All flows are fully traceable to requirements, include performance specifications, error handling strategies, and implementation guidance.
Test Plan
Comprehensive Test Plan Documentation
Voice-Centric Software Development and Data Science Agent
1. TEST STRATEGY OVERVIEW
1.1 Testing Objectives
graph TD
A["Testing Objectives"] --> B["Functional Verification"]
A --> C["Non-Functional Validation"]
A --> D["Risk Mitigation"]
A --> E["Quality Assurance"]
B --> B1["Verify all features work as designed"]
B --> B2["Validate user workflows"]
B --> B3["Ensure data integrity"]
C --> C1["Performance benchmarking"]
C --> C2["Security compliance"]
C --> C3["Scalability validation"]
D --> D1["Identify critical defects early"]
D --> D2["Reduce production incidents"]
D --> D3["Ensure reliability"]
E --> E1["Meet acceptance criteria"]
E --> E2["Achieve quality gates"]
E --> E3["Customer satisfaction"]
Primary Objectives:
- OBJ-001: Verify voice processing accuracy ≥98% for supported languages
- OBJ-002: Validate end-to-end workflows for all user personas
- OBJ-003: Ensure system performance meets SLA requirements (<500ms latency)
- OBJ-004: Confirm security compliance with OWASP Top 10 and data privacy regulations
- OBJ-005: Validate scalability for 1000+ concurrent users
- OBJ-006: Ensure 99.9% system availability and reliability
- OBJ-007: Verify integration with third-party development tools
- OBJ-008: Validate cross-platform compatibility
1.2 Testing Scope
In-Scope Components
| Component | Coverage | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Voice Input Processing | 100% | Critical path for user interaction |
| NLP Engine | 100% | Core intelligence component |
| Code Generation Module | 100% | Primary deliverable |
| IDE Integration APIs | 100% | Developer workflow dependency |
| Git Integration | 100% | Version control critical |
| Jupyter Notebook Integration | 100% | Data science workflow |
| Authentication & Authorization | 100% | Security critical |
| Data Storage & Retrieval | 100% | Data integrity critical |
| Real-time Collaboration | 95% | Complex distributed system |
| DevOps Integration | 90% | Infrastructure dependent |
| Microservices Communication | 100% | System backbone |
| Error Handling & Recovery | 100% | Reliability critical |
Out-of-Scope Components
| Component | Reason |
|---|---|
| Third-party IDE internal functionality | Vendor responsibility |
| Cloud provider infrastructure | Infrastructure team responsibility |
| External API services (GitHub, GitLab) | Vendor responsibility |
| Operating system kernel | OS vendor responsibility |
| Network infrastructure | Infrastructure team responsibility |
| Hardware performance optimization | Hardware vendor responsibility |
Scope Boundaries
graph LR
subgraph "In-Scope"
A["Voice Processing"]
B["NLP Engine"]
C["Code Generation"]
D["IDE Integration"]
E["Authentication"]
F["Data Management"]
end
subgraph "Out-of-Scope"
G["IDE Internal Logic"]
H["Cloud Infrastructure"]
I["External APIs"]
J["OS Kernel"]
end
subgraph "Partial-Scope"
K["DevOps Integration"]
L["Collaboration Features"]
end
style A fill:#90EE90
style B fill:#90EE90
style C fill:#90EE90
style D fill:#90EE90
style E fill:#90EE90
style F fill:#90EE90
style G fill:#FFB6C6
style H fill:#FFB6C6
style I fill:#FFB6C6
style J fill:#FFB6C6
style K fill:#FFD700
style L fill:#FFD700
1.3 Testing Approach
Multi-Level Testing Strategy
graph TD
A["Testing Pyramid"] --> B["Unit Testing<br/>70% Coverage"]
A --> C["Integration Testing<br/>20% Coverage"]
A --> D["System Testing<br/>7% Coverage"]
A --> E["Acceptance Testing<br/>3% Coverage"]
B --> B1["Component isolation"]
B --> B2["Fast feedback"]
B --> B3["High automation"]
C --> C1["Component interaction"]
C --> C2["API contracts"]
C --> C3["Data flow"]
D --> D1["End-to-end scenarios"]
D --> D2["Real environment"]
D --> D3["Performance validation"]
E --> E1["User acceptance"]
E --> E2["Business requirements"]
E --> E3["UAT sign-off"]
Testing Methodologies
| Methodology | Application | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Black-Box Testing | Functional requirements, UAT | User perspective validation |
| White-Box Testing | Unit tests, code coverage | Internal logic verification |
| Gray-Box Testing | Integration tests | Component interaction validation |
| Exploratory Testing | Edge cases, usability | Unscripted scenario discovery |
| Regression Testing | All releases | Prevent defect reintroduction |
| Performance Testing | Load, stress, endurance | SLA compliance verification |
| Security Testing | Penetration, vulnerability | Threat mitigation |
| Compatibility Testing | Cross-platform, browsers | Platform support verification |
Test Automation Strategy
graph LR
A["Automation Strategy"] --> B["High Priority"]
A --> C["Medium Priority"]
A --> D["Low Priority"]
B --> B1["Regression tests: 95% automated"]
B --> B2["API tests: 100% automated"]
B --> B3["Unit tests: 100% automated"]
C --> C1["Integration tests: 80% automated"]
C --> C2["Performance tests: 90% automated"]
D --> D1["UI tests: 60% automated"]
D --> D2["Exploratory: 0% automated"]
D --> D3["UAT: 30% automated"]
1.4 Entry/Exit Criteria
Entry Criteria
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> RequirementsReady
RequirementsReady --> EnvironmentReady: Requirements approved
EnvironmentReady --> TestDataReady: Test environment deployed
TestDataReady --> TestCasesReady: Test data prepared
TestCasesReady --> TestingPhase: Test cases reviewed & approved
TestingPhase --> [*]
note right of RequirementsReady
- Requirements documented
- Acceptance criteria defined
- Traceability matrix created
end note
note right of EnvironmentReady
- Test environment deployed
- All tools configured
- Access provisioned
end note
note right of TestDataReady
- Test data sets prepared
- Data privacy ensured
- Data refresh procedures ready
end note
note right of TestCasesReady
- Test cases written
- Test cases reviewed
- Test cases prioritized
end note
Specific Entry Criteria:
| Criterion | Verification Method | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| EC-001: Requirements baseline established | Requirements review meeting | Product Manager |
| EC-002: Test environment deployed | Environment verification checklist | DevOps Engineer |
| EC-003: Test data prepared and validated | Data validation report | QA Lead |
| EC-004: Test cases reviewed and approved | Test case review sign-off | QA Manager |
| EC-005: Test tools configured and operational | Tool verification tests | QA Engineer |
| EC-006: Build artifacts available | Build verification | CI/CD Pipeline |
| EC-007: Test team trained on system | Training completion records | QA Lead |
| EC-008: Risk assessment completed | Risk register reviewed | Project Manager |
Exit Criteria
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> TestExecutionComplete
TestExecutionComplete --> DefectResolution: All test cases executed
DefectResolution --> CoverageValidation: Critical defects resolved
CoverageValidation --> PerformanceValidation: Coverage targets met
PerformanceValidation --> SecurityValidation: Performance SLAs met
SecurityValidation --> DocumentationComplete: Security tests passed
DocumentationComplete --> SignOff: Documentation complete
SignOff --> [*]
note right of TestExecutionComplete
- 100% test case execution
- Test results documented
- Defects logged
end note
note right of DefectResolution
- Critical defects: 0
- High defects: ≤2
- Medium defects: ≤5
end note
note right of CoverageValidation
- Code coverage: ≥80%
- Requirement coverage: 100%
- Risk coverage: 100%
end note
note right of PerformanceValidation
- Response time: <500ms
- Throughput: ≥1000 req/s
- Availability: ≥99.9%
end note
note right of SecurityValidation
- Vulnerability scan: 0 critical
- Penetration test: passed
- Compliance: verified
end note
Specific Exit Criteria:
| Criterion | Target | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| XC-001: Test execution completion | 100% of test cases executed | Test execution report |
| XC-002: Defect resolution | Critical: 0, High: ≤2, Medium: ≤5 | Defect tracking system |
| XC-003: Code coverage | ≥80% overall, ≥90% critical paths | Code coverage report |
| XC-004: Requirement coverage | 100% of requirements tested | Traceability matrix |
| XC-005: Performance SLA compliance | <500ms latency, ≥99.9% uptime | Performance test report |
| XC-006: Security compliance | 0 critical vulnerabilities | Security scan report |
| XC-007: Regression test pass rate | ≥98% pass rate | Regression test report |
| XC-008: UAT sign-off | Stakeholder approval | UAT sign-off document |
| XC-009: Documentation completeness | All test artifacts complete | Documentation checklist |
| XC-010: Risk mitigation | All identified risks addressed | Risk register review |
2. TEST LEVELS
2.1 Unit Testing
Unit Testing Strategy
graph TD
A["Unit Testing"] --> B["Voice Processing Module"]
A --> C["NLP Engine"]
A --> D["Code Generation"]
A --> E["Data Management"]
A --> F["Authentication"]
B --> B1["Audio input validation"]
B --> B2["Format conversion"]
B --> B3["Noise filtering"]
C --> C1["Intent recognition"]
C --> C2["Entity extraction"]
C --> C3["Context management"]
D --> D1["Template rendering"]
D --> D2["Code formatting"]
D --> D3["Syntax validation"]
E --> E1["CRUD operations"]
E --> E2["Query optimization"]
E --> E3["Cache management"]
F --> F1["Token generation"]
F --> F2["Permission validation"]
F --> F3["Session management"]
Unit Testing Coverage Targets
| Module | Target Coverage | Critical Paths | Framework |
|---|---|---|---|
| Voice Processing | 90% | Audio validation, format conversion | pytest, unittest |
| NLP Engine | 95% | Intent recognition, entity extraction | pytest, spacy-tests |
| Code Generation | 92% | Template rendering, syntax validation | pytest, unittest |
| Data Management | 88% | CRUD operations, query optimization | pytest, sqlalchemy-tests |
| Authentication | 95% | Token generation, permission validation | pytest, unittest |
| API Handlers | 85% | Request validation, response formatting | pytest, requests-mock |
| Utilities | 80% | Helper functions, data transformations | pytest, unittest |
| Overall Target | ≥90% | All critical paths | Multiple frameworks |
Unit Testing Frameworks & Tools
graph LR
A["Unit Testing Stack"] --> B["Python"]
A --> C["JavaScript/TypeScript"]
A --> D["Java"]
B --> B1["pytest"]
B --> B2["unittest"]
B --> B3["coverage.py"]
B --> B4["mock"]
C --> C1["Jest"]
C --> C2["Mocha"]
C --> C3["nyc"]
C --> C4["sinon"]
D --> D1["JUnit"]
D --> D2["Mockito"]
D --> D3["JaCoCo"]
D --> D4["PowerMock"]
Unit Test Case Examples
| UT-ID | Module | Test Case | Input | Expected Output | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UT-001 | Voice Processing | Valid audio input processing | WAV file, 16kHz | Processed audio buffer | High |
| UT-002 | Voice Processing | Invalid audio format handling | MP3 file | Error: Unsupported format | High |
| UT-003 | Voice Processing | Noise filtering effectiveness | Audio with background noise | SNR improved by ≥10dB | Medium |
| UT-004 | NLP Engine | Intent recognition accuracy | “Create a Python function” | Intent: CODE_GENERATION | High |
| UT-005 | NLP Engine | Entity extraction | “Create function named getUserData” | Entity: function_name=getUserData | High |
| UT-006 | NLP Engine | Context preservation | Multiple sequential commands | Context maintained across calls | Medium |
| UT-007 | Code Generation | Template rendering | Template + variables | Valid code output | High |
| UT-008 | Code Generation | Syntax validation | Generated code | Valid Python/JS syntax | High |
| UT-009 | Code Generation | Code formatting | Unformatted code | PEP8/ESLint compliant | Medium |
| UT-010 | Data Management | User creation | Valid user data | User ID returned | High |
| UT-011 | Data Management | Duplicate prevention | Duplicate email | Error: Email exists | High |
| UT-012 | Data Management | Query optimization | Complex query | Query executed <100ms | Medium |
| UT-013 | Authentication | Token generation | Valid credentials | JWT token returned | High |
| UT-014 | Authentication | Token validation | Valid token | Token verified successfully | High |
| UT-015 | Authentication | Expired token handling | Expired token | Error: Token expired | High |
2.2 Integration Testing
Integration Testing Strategy
graph TD
A["Integration Testing"] --> B["Component Integration"]
A --> C["API Integration"]
A --> D["Database Integration"]
A --> E["External Service Integration"]
B --> B1["Voice → NLP"]
B --> B2["NLP → Code Gen"]
B --> B3["Code Gen → IDE"]
C --> C1["REST API contracts"]
C --> C2["gRPC communication"]
C --> C3["WebSocket real-time"]
D --> D1["Database connections"]
D --> D2["Transaction handling"]
D --> D3["Data consistency"]
E --> E1["Git integration"]
E --> E2["IDE plugins"]
E --> E3["Jupyter notebooks"]
Integration Test Matrix
| IT-ID | Components | Test Scenario | Setup | Verification | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT-001 | Voice → NLP | Voice command processing | Mock audio input | Intent recognized correctly | High |
| IT-002 | NLP → Code Gen | Code generation from intent | Mock NLP output | Valid code generated | High |
| IT-003 | Code Gen → IDE | Code insertion into IDE | IDE mock, code buffer | Code appears in editor | High |
| IT-004 | IDE → Git | Code commit workflow | IDE mock, Git mock | Commit created successfully | High |
| IT-005 | Voice → Database | User data persistence | Voice command, DB connection | Data stored correctly | High |
| IT-006 | NLP → Database | Context storage | NLP output, DB connection | Context retrieved accurately | Medium |
| IT-007 | API → Database | REST endpoint data flow | HTTP request, DB connection | Data consistency verified | High |
| IT-008 | Microservice A → B | Service-to-service communication | Service mesh, gRPC | Message delivered correctly | High |
| IT-009 | WebSocket → Database | Real-time collaboration | WebSocket connection, DB | Changes synchronized | Medium |
| IT-010 | Git → IDE | Repository sync | Git mock, IDE mock | Files synchronized | Medium |
| IT-011 | Jupyter → Code Gen | Notebook integration | Jupyter mock, code gen | Code executed in notebook | Medium |
| IT-012 | Auth → API | Authentication flow | Auth service, API | Authorized access granted | High |
| IT-013 | Cache → Database | Cache invalidation | Cache layer, DB | Stale data prevented | Medium |
| IT-014 | Error Handler → Logger | Error logging | Exception trigger, logger | Error logged correctly | Medium |
| IT-015 | Load Balancer → Services | Request distribution | Multiple service instances | Requests distributed evenly | High |
API Integration Testing
sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant API Gateway
participant Voice Service
participant NLP Service
participant Code Gen Service
participant Database
Client->>API Gateway: POST /voice/process
API Gateway->>Voice Service: Forward audio stream
Voice Service->>Voice Service: Process audio
Voice Service->>API Gateway: Return processed audio
API Gateway->>NLP Service: POST /nlp/analyze
NLP Service->>NLP Service: Extract intent & entities
NLP Service->>API Gateway: Return intent
API Gateway->>Code Gen Service: POST /codegen/generate
Code Gen Service->>Database: Query templates
Database->>Code Gen Service: Return templates
Code Gen Service->>Code Gen Service: Generate code
Code Gen Service->>API Gateway: Return generated code
API Gateway->>Client: Return response
Integration Test Tools
| Tool | Purpose | Usage |
|---|---|---|
| Postman | API testing | REST endpoint validation |
| REST Assured | API automation | Java-based API testing |
| Karate | API testing | BDD-style API tests |
| Docker Compose | Service orchestration | Multi-service testing |
| Testcontainers | Database testing | Containerized DB instances |
| WireMock | API mocking | External service simulation |
| Mockito | Component mocking | Java object mocking |
| pytest-mock | Python mocking | Python component mocking |
| Apache JMeter | Load testing | Performance integration tests |
2.3 System Testing
System Testing Scope
graph TD
A["System Testing"] --> B["Functional Testing"]
A --> C["Non-Functional Testing"]
A --> D["Regression Testing"]
B --> B1["End-to-end workflows"]
B --> B2["User scenarios"]
B --> B3["Data integrity"]
B --> B4["Error handling"]
C --> C1["Performance"]
C --> C2["Security"]
C --> C3["Scalability"]
C --> C4["Reliability"]
D --> D1["Regression suite"]
D --> D2["Smoke tests"]
D --> D3["Sanity tests"]
System Test Cases - Functional
| ST-ID | User Persona | Test Scenario | Preconditions | Steps | Expected Result | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST-001 | Developer | Create Python function via voice | User logged in, IDE open | 1. Say “Create a Python function to calculate factorial” 2. Confirm code 3. Insert into IDE | Function code appears in IDE, syntax valid | High |
| ST-002 | Developer | Generate API endpoint | User logged in, project open | 1. Say “Create REST endpoint for user login” 2. Review generated code 3. Commit to Git | Endpoint code generated, committed to Git | High |
| ST-003 | Data Scientist | Create data analysis script | User logged in, Jupyter open | 1. Say “Analyze this CSV file” 2. Review analysis 3. Execute in notebook | Analysis code generated, executed successfully | High |
| ST-004 | Data Scientist | Generate ML model | User logged in, Jupyter open | 1. Say “Create a random forest classifier” 2. Review model 3. Train on data | Model code generated, training initiated | High |
| ST-005 | Developer | Multi-step workflow | User logged in | 1. Create function 2. Add error handling 3. Write unit tests 4. Commit | All artifacts created and committed | High |
| ST-006 | Project Manager | View project status | User logged in | 1. Say “Show project status” 2. Review metrics | Dashboard displays current metrics | Medium |
| ST-007 | Developer | Collaborate on code | Multiple users logged in | 1. User A creates code 2. User B views in real-time 3. User B makes changes | Changes visible to both users in real-time | Medium |
| ST-008 | Developer | Error recovery | User logged in, error occurs | 1. Trigger error condition 2. System recovers 3. User continues | System recovers, user can continue working | High |
| ST-009 | Developer | Undo/Redo operations | User logged in, code generated | 1. Generate code 2. Undo 3. Redo | Code removed then restored correctly | Medium |
| ST-010 | Data Scientist | Data visualization | User logged in, data loaded | 1. Say “Create a bar chart” 2. Specify data columns | Chart generated and displayed | Medium |
System Test Cases - Non-Functional
| ST-ID | Category | Test Scenario | Acceptance Criteria | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST-101 | Performance | Voice processing latency | <500ms end-to-end latency | High |
| ST-102 | Performance | Code generation speed | <2s for standard functions | High |
| ST-103 | Performance | API response time | <200ms for 95th percentile | High |
| ST-104 | Performance | Database query time | <100ms for standard queries | Medium |
| ST-105 | Scalability | Concurrent users | Support 1000 concurrent users | High |
| ST-106 | Scalability | Data volume | Handle 1GB+ datasets | Medium |
| ST-107 | Reliability | System uptime | 99.9% availability | High |
| ST-108 | Reliability | Error recovery | Auto-recovery within 30s | High |
| ST-109 | Security | Authentication | All endpoints require auth | High |
| ST-110 | Security | Data encryption | Data encrypted in transit & at rest | High |
| ST-111 | Security | SQL injection prevention | No SQL injection vulnerabilities | High |
| ST-112 | Usability | Voice recognition accuracy | ≥98% accuracy for supported languages | High |
| ST-113 | Usability | UI responsiveness | UI updates within 100ms | Medium |
| ST-114 | Compatibility | Browser support | Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge | Medium |
| ST-115 | Compatibility | OS support | Windows, macOS, Linux | Medium |
2.4 Acceptance Testing
User Acceptance Testing (UAT) Strategy
graph TD
A["UAT Strategy"] --> B["Stakeholder Identification"]
A --> C["UAT Scenario Development"]
A --> D["Test Environment Setup"]
A --> E["UAT Execution"]
A --> D["Sign-off & Approval"]
B --> B1["Product Owner"]
B --> B2["End Users"]
B --> B3["Business Analysts"]
C --> C1["Business workflows"]
C --> C2["Real-world scenarios"]
C --> C3["Acceptance criteria"]
D --> D1["Production-like environment"]
D --> D2["Real data samples"]
D --> D3["All integrations active"]
E --> E1["Execute test cases"]
E --> E2["Document results"]
E --> E3["Log defects"]
D --> D1["Stakeholder approval"]
D --> D2["Sign-off document"]
D --> D3["Go/No-go decision"]
UAT Test Cases
| UAT-ID | User Persona | Business Scenario | Test Steps | Acceptance Criteria | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UAT-001 | Developer | Daily development workflow | 1. Start IDE 2. Use voice to create function 3. Test function 4. Commit code | Developer can complete workflow in <5 minutes | Dev Lead |
| UAT-002 | Data Scientist | Data analysis project | 1. Load dataset 2. Generate analysis code 3. Execute analysis 4. Export results | Analysis completed and results exported successfully | Data Lead |
| UAT-003 | Project Manager | Project monitoring | 1. Access dashboard 2. View team metrics 3. Generate report | Dashboard displays accurate metrics, report generated | PM |
| UAT-004 | Developer | Code review process | 1. Create code 2. Request review 3. Receive feedback 4. Update code | Review workflow functions smoothly | Dev Lead |
| UAT-005 | Team | Collaboration scenario | 1. Multiple users access system 2. Work on same project 3. See real-time updates | Real-time collaboration works without conflicts | Tech Lead |
| UAT-006 | Developer | Error handling | 1. Trigger error condition 2. Receive error message 3. Recover from error | Error messages clear, recovery possible | QA Lead |
| UAT-007 | Data Scientist | Model training | 1. Prepare data 2. Generate model code 3. Train model 4. Evaluate results | Model training completes successfully | Data Lead |
| UAT-008 | Developer | Integration workflow | 1. Generate code 2. Integrate with existing code 3. Run tests | Integration seamless, tests pass | Dev Lead |
| UAT-009 | All Users | System performance | 1. Execute typical workflows 2. Monitor response times 3. Check system stability | System responsive, no performance issues | Tech Lead |
| UAT-010 | All Users | Data security | 1. Access sensitive data 2. Verify encryption 3. Check audit logs | Data properly secured, audit trail complete | Security Officer |
UAT Acceptance Criteria
graph LR
A["UAT Acceptance"] --> B["Functional Criteria"]
A --> C["Performance Criteria"]
A --> D["Quality Criteria"]
B --> B1["All features work as designed"]
B --> B2["All workflows complete successfully"]
B --> B3["Data integrity maintained"]
C --> C1["Response times acceptable"]
C --> C2["System stable under load"]
C --> C3["No critical defects"]
D --> D1["User satisfaction ≥4/5"]
D --> D2["Defect resolution ≥95%"]
D --> D3["Documentation complete"]
Specific UAT Acceptance Criteria:
| Criterion | Target | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| UAC-001: Feature completeness | 100% of features working | Feature checklist |
| UAC-002: Workflow success rate | ≥95% successful completions | Test execution results |
| UAC-003: User satisfaction | ≥4.0/5.0 rating | User feedback survey |
| UAC-004: Defect resolution | ≥95% of defects resolved | Defect tracking system |
| UAC-005: Performance acceptance | ≥90% of users satisfied | User feedback |
| UAC-006: Data accuracy | 100% data integrity | Data validation report |
| UAC-007: Usability acceptance | ≥85% users find system easy to use | Usability survey |
| UAC-008: Stakeholder sign-off | All stakeholders approve | Sign-off document |
3. TEST CASE CATALOG
3.1 Comprehensive Test Case Repository
Functional Test Cases - Voice Processing
| TC-ID | Requirement | Module | Test Case Description | Preconditions | Test Steps | Expected Result | Actual Result | Status | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC-001 | FR-001 | Voice Input | Process valid voice command | System running, microphone available | 1. Speak clear command “Create a function” 2. Wait for processing | Command recognized, intent extracted | - | - | High |
| TC-002 | FR-001 | Voice Input | Handle background noise | System running, noisy environment | 1. Speak command with background noise 2. Wait for processing | Command recognized despite noise | - | - | High |
| TC-003 | FR-001 | Voice Input | Reject unclear audio | System running | 1. Provide garbled audio input 2. Wait for processing | Error message: “Could not understand” | - | - | High |
| TC-004 | FR-001 | Voice Input | Support multiple languages | System running, language set to Spanish | 1. Speak Spanish command 2. Wait for processing | Spanish command recognized | - | - | Medium |
| TC-005 | FR-001 | Voice Input | Handle silence timeout | System running, listening mode active | 1. Remain silent for 30 seconds 2. Observe system behavior | System exits listening mode gracefully | - | - | Medium |
| TC-006 | FR-001 | Voice Input | Process rapid commands | System running | 1. Speak multiple commands rapidly 2. Observe queue handling | All commands queued and processed | - | - | Medium |
| TC-007 | FR-001 | Voice Input | Validate audio format | System running | 1. Send WAV format audio 2. Send MP3 format audio | WAV accepted, MP3 rejected | - | - | High |
| TC-008 | FR-001 | Voice Input | Handle microphone failure | System running, microphone disconnected | 1. Attempt voice input 2. Observe error handling | Error: “Microphone not available” | - | - | High |
| TC-009 | FR-001 | Voice Input | Process long commands | System running | 1. Speak 60-second command 2. Wait for processing | Full command processed correctly | - | - | Medium |
| TC-010 | FR-001 | Voice Input | Validate sample rate | System running | 1. Send 16kHz audio 2. Send 8kHz audio | 16kHz accepted, 8kHz rejected | - | - | Medium |
Functional Test Cases - NLP Processing
| TC-ID | Requirement | Module | Test Case Description | Preconditions | Test Steps | Expected Result | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC-011 | FR-002 | NLP Engine | Extract intent from command | NLP service running | 1. Input: “Create a Python function” 2. Analyze intent | Intent: CODE_GENERATION | High |
| TC-012 | FR-002 | NLP Engine | Extract entities from command | NLP service running | 1. Input: “Create function named getUserData” 2. Extract entities | Entity: function_name=getUserData | High |
| TC-013 | FR-002 | NLP Engine | Handle ambiguous commands | NLP service running | 1. Input: “Do something” 2. Analyze intent | Intent: CLARIFICATION_NEEDED | High |
| TC-014 | FR-002 | NLP Engine | Maintain conversation context | NLP service running, previous context | 1. Input: “Create a function” 2. Input: “Add error handling” 3. Analyze context | Context preserved, “it” refers to function | High |
| TC-015 | FR-002 | NLP Engine | Handle negations | NLP service running | 1. Input: “Don’t create a function” 2. Analyze intent | Intent: NEGATION_DETECTED | Medium |
| TC-016 | FR-002 | NLP Engine | Extract multiple entities | NLP service running | 1. Input: “Create Python function named calc with 3 parameters” 2. Extract entities | All entities extracted correctly | High |
| TC-017 | FR-002 | NLP Engine | Handle typos in commands | NLP service running | 1. Input: “Creat a functin” 2. Analyze intent | Intent recognized despite typos | Medium |
| TC-018 | FR-002 | NLP Engine | Recognize domain-specific terms | NLP service running | 1. Input: “Create a REST endpoint” 2. Analyze intent | Domain term recognized: REST_ENDPOINT | High |
| TC-019 | FR-002 | NLP Engine | Handle multi-turn conversations | NLP service running | 1. Multiple sequential commands 2. Maintain context across turns | Context maintained, references resolved | Medium |
| TC-020 | FR-002 | NLP Engine | Confidence scoring | NLP service running | 1. Input: “Create a function” 2. Get confidence score | Confidence score returned (0-1) | Medium |
Functional Test Cases - Code Generation
| TC-ID | Requirement | Module | Test Case Description | Preconditions | Test Steps | Expected Result | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC-021 | FR-003 | Code Gen | Generate Python function | Code gen service running | 1. Input: “Create Python function to calculate factorial” 2. Generate code | Valid Python function generated | High |
| TC-022 | FR-003 | Code Gen | Generate JavaScript function | Code gen service running | 1. Input: “Create JavaScript function to reverse string” 2. Generate code | Valid JavaScript function generated | High |
| TC-023 | FR-003 | Code Gen | Generate with error handling | Code gen service running | 1. Input: “Create function with error handling” 2. Generate code | Code includes try-catch blocks | High |
| TC-024 | FR-003 | Code Gen | Generate with documentation | Code gen service running | 1. Input: “Create documented function” 2. Generate code | Code includes docstrings/comments | High |
| TC-025 | FR-003 | Code Gen | Generate unit tests | Code gen service running | 1. Input: “Create unit tests for function” 2. Generate tests | Valid test code generated | High |
| TC-026 | FR-003 | Code Gen | Generate API endpoint | Code gen service running | 1. Input: “Create REST endpoint for user login” 2. Generate code | Valid endpoint code generated | High |
| TC-027 | FR-003 | Code Gen | Generate database query | Code gen service running | 1. Input: “Create query to fetch users” 2. Generate code | Valid SQL/ORM query generated | High |
| TC-028 | FR-003 | Code Gen | Validate generated syntax | Code gen service running | 1. Generate code 2. Validate syntax | Generated code passes syntax validation | High |
| TC-029 | FR-003 | Code Gen | Format code to standards | Code gen service running | 1. Generate code 2. Check formatting | Code follows PEP8/ESLint standards | Medium |
| TC-030 | FR-003 | Code Gen | Handle complex requirements | Code gen service running | 1. Input: Complex multi-step requirement 2. Generate code | Code handles all requirements | Medium |
Functional Test Cases - IDE Integration
| TC-ID | Requirement | Module | Test Case Description | Preconditions | Test Steps | Expected Result | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC-031 | FR-004 | IDE Integration | Insert code into editor | IDE open, code generated | 1. Generate code 2. Click “Insert” 3. Observe editor | Code appears in editor at cursor position | High |
| TC-032 | FR-004 | IDE Integration | Detect IDE type | IDE running | 1. Launch VS Code 2. System detects IDE | IDE type correctly identified | High |
| TC-033 | FR-004 | IDE Integration | Support multiple IDEs | Multiple IDEs available | 1. Test with VS Code 2. Test with PyCharm 3. Test with IntelliJ | All IDEs supported | High |
| TC-034 | FR-004 | IDE Integration | Maintain cursor position | IDE open, code generated | 1. Position cursor at line 10 2. Insert code 3. Check cursor position | Code inserted, cursor position maintained | Medium |
| TC-035 | FR-004 | IDE Integration | Handle IDE not running | IDE not running | 1. Attempt to insert code 2. Observe error handling | Error: “IDE not detected” | High |
| TC-036 | FR-004 | IDE Integration | Syntax highlighting | IDE open, code inserted | 1. Insert code 2. Observe highlighting | Code properly highlighted | Medium |
| TC-037 | FR-004 | IDE Integration | Auto-completion integration | IDE open | 1. Generate code 2. Trigger auto-completion | Auto-completion works with generated code | Medium |
| TC-038 | FR-004 | IDE Integration | Debugging integration | IDE open, code inserted | 1. Insert code 2. Set breakpoint 3. Debug | Debugging works with generated code | Medium |
| TC-039 | FR-004 | IDE Integration | Terminal integration | IDE open | 1. Generate code 2. Execute in terminal | Code executes in IDE terminal | Medium |
| TC-040 | FR-004 | IDE Integration | File management | IDE open | 1. Generate code 2. Save to file 3. Verify file | File created with correct content | High |
Functional Test Cases - Git Integration
| TC-ID | Requirement | Module | Test Case Description | Preconditions | Test Steps | Expected Result | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC-041 | FR-005 | Git Integration | Commit generated code | Git repo initialized, code generated | 1. Generate code 2. Say “Commit code” 3. Verify commit | Code committed to repository | High |
| TC-042 | FR-005 | Git Integration | Create feature branch | Git repo initialized | 1. Say “Create branch feature/new-function” 2. Verify branch | Branch created and checked out | High |
| TC-043 | FR-005 | Git Integration | Push to remote | Git repo with remote configured | 1. Generate code 2. Say “Push to remote” 3. Verify push | Code pushed to remote repository | High |
| TC-044 | FR-005 | Git Integration | Pull latest changes | Git repo with remote | 1. Say “Pull latest” 2. Verify updates | Latest changes pulled from remote | High |
| TC-045 | FR-005 | Git Integration | Handle merge conflicts | Git repo with conflicts | 1. Attempt merge 2. Resolve conflicts 3. Complete merge | Conflicts resolved, merge completed | High |
| TC-046 | FR-005 | Git Integration | View commit history | Git repo with history | 1. Say “Show commit history” 2. Display history | Commit history displayed correctly | Medium |
| TC-047 | FR-005 | Git Integration | Create pull request | Git repo with remote | 1. Generate code 2. Say “Create pull request” 3. Verify PR | Pull request created on remote | High |
| TC-048 | FR-005 | Git Integration | Stash changes | Git repo with uncommitted changes | 1. Say “Stash changes” 2. Verify stash | Changes stashed successfully | Medium |
| TC-049 | FR-005 | Git Integration | Revert commit | Git repo with commits | 1. Say “Revert last commit” 2. Verify revert | Commit reverted successfully | Medium |
| TC-050 | FR-005 | Git Integration | Tag release | Git repo | 1. Say “Create tag v1.0.0” 2. Verify tag | Release tag created | Medium |
Functional Test Cases - Authentication & Authorization
| TC-ID | Requirement | Module | Test Case Description | Preconditions | Test Steps | Expected Result | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC-051 | FR-006 | Authentication | Login with valid credentials | System running, user account exists | 1. Enter username 2. Enter password 3. Click login | User authenticated, dashboard displayed | High |
| TC-052 | FR-006 | Authentication | Reject invalid password | System running, user account exists | 1. Enter username 2. Enter wrong password 3. Click login | Error: “Invalid credentials” | High |
| TC-053 | FR-006 | Authentication | Reject non-existent user | System running | 1. Enter non-existent username 2. Enter password 3. Click login | Error: “User not found” | High |
| TC-054 | FR-006 | Authentication | Session timeout | User logged in | 1. Remain inactive for 30 minutes 2. Attempt action | Session expired, redirect to login | High |
| TC-055 | FR-006 | Authentication | Multi-factor authentication | MFA enabled for user | 1. Enter credentials 2. Enter MFA code 3. Verify | User authenticated after MFA verification | High |
| TC-056 | FR-006 | Authorization | Access control - Developer | Developer user logged in | 1. Attempt to access admin panel | Access denied | High |
| TC-057 | FR-006 | Authorization | Access control - Admin | Admin user logged in | 1. Attempt to access admin panel | Access granted | High |
| TC-058 | FR-006 | Authorization | Role-based permissions | User with specific role | 1. Attempt role-specific action | Action allowed/denied based on role | High |
| TC-059 | FR-006 | Authentication | Password reset | User account exists | 1. Click “Forgot password” 2. Enter email 3. Reset password | Password reset email sent | High |
| TC-060 | FR-006 | Authentication | Account lockout | Multiple failed login attempts | 1. Enter wrong password 5 times 2. Attempt login | Account locked, error message displayed | High |
Functional Test Cases - Data Management
| TC-ID | Requirement | Module | Test Case Description | Preconditions | Test Steps | Expected Result | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC-061 | FR-007 | Data Management | Create user project | User logged in | 1. Say “Create new project” 2. Enter project name 3. Confirm | Project created and displayed | High |
| TC-062 | FR-007 | Data Management | Save code snippet | User logged in, code generated | 1. Generate code 2. Say “Save snippet” 3. Enter name | Snippet saved to database | High |
| TC-063 | FR-007 | Data Management | Retrieve saved snippet | User logged in, snippets exist | 1. Say “Show saved snippets” 2. Select snippet | Snippet retrieved and displayed | High |
| TC-064 | FR-007 | Data Management | Update project metadata | User logged in, project exists | 1. Say “Update project description” 2. Enter new description | Project metadata updated | Medium |
| TC-065 | FR-007 | Data Management | Delete project | User logged in, project exists | 1. Say “Delete project” 2. Confirm deletion | Project deleted from database | High |
| TC-066 | FR-007 | Data Management | Share project with team | User logged in, project exists | 1. Say “Share project with team” 2. Select team members | Project shared, permissions updated | High |
| TC-067 | FR-007 | Data Management | Export project data | User logged in, project exists | 1. Say “Export project” 2. Select format | Project exported in selected format | Medium |
| TC-068 | FR-007 | Data Management | Import project data | User logged in | 1. Say “Import project” 2. Select file | Project imported successfully | Medium |
| TC-069 | FR-007 | Data Management | Backup user data | User logged in | 1. Say “Backup my data” 2. Confirm | Data backed up to secure location | Medium |
| TC-070 | FR-007 | Data Management | Data consistency check | Database running | 1. Run consistency check 2. Verify results | No data inconsistencies found | Medium |
Functional Test Cases - Collaboration
| TC-ID | Requirement | Module | Test Case Description | Preconditions | Test Steps | Expected Result | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC-071 | FR-008 | Collaboration | Real-time code sharing | Multiple users logged in, same project | 1. User A generates code 2. User B observes in real-time | Code visible to User B immediately | High |
| TC-072 | FR-008 | Collaboration | Concurrent editing | Multiple users editing same file | 1. User A edits line 5 2. User B edits line 10 3. Verify merge | Changes merged without conflict | High |
| TC-073 | FR-008 | Collaboration | User presence indicator | Multiple users in project | 1. User A joins project 2. User B sees presence | User A shown as online | Medium |
| TC-074 | FR-008 | Collaboration | Comment on code | Multiple users, code exists | 1. User A comments on code 2. User B sees comment | Comment visible to all users | Medium |
| TC-075 | FR-008 | Collaboration | Mention team member | User in project | 1. Say “Mention @john” 2. Send message | Team member notified of mention | Medium |
| TC-076 | FR-008 | Collaboration | Chat in project | Multiple users in project | 1. User A sends message 2. User B receives message | Message delivered in real-time | Medium |
| TC-077 | FR-008 | Collaboration | Activity log | Project with activity | 1. View activity log 2. Verify entries | All activities logged correctly | Medium |
| TC-078 | FR-008 | Collaboration | Conflict resolution | Concurrent edits create conflict | 1. Trigger conflict 2. Resolve conflict 3. Verify resolution | Conflict resolved, changes preserved | High |
| TC-079 | FR-008 | Collaboration | Permission management | Project owner, team members | 1. Set member permissions 2. Verify access | Permissions enforced correctly | High |
| TC-080 | FR-008 | Collaboration | Notification system | Multiple users, events occur | 1. Trigger notification event 2. Verify notification | Notification delivered to relevant users | Medium |
3.2 Non-Functional Test Cases
Performance Test Cases
| TC-ID | Category | Test Scenario | Acceptance Criteria | Test Method | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC-101 | Performance | Voice processing latency | <500ms end-to-end | Measure from audio input to intent output | High |
| TC-102 | Performance | Code generation speed | <2s for standard functions | Measure from intent to code output | High |
| TC-103 | Performance | API response time | <200ms for 95th percentile | Load test with 100 concurrent users | High |
| TC-104 | Performance | Database query time | <100ms for standard queries | Execute 1000 queries, measure time | Medium |
| TC-105 | Performance | IDE integration latency | <100ms for code insertion | Measure from generation to IDE display | High |
| TC-106 | Performance | Real-time sync latency | <500ms for collaboration updates | Measure sync time between users | Medium |
| TC-107 | Performance | Memory usage | <500MB per user session | Monitor memory during typical workflow | Medium |
| TC-108 | Performance | CPU usage | <50% CPU per user | Monitor CPU during typical workflow | Medium |
| TC-109 | Performance | Network bandwidth | <1MB per typical operation | Monitor network traffic | Low |
| TC-110 | Performance | Startup time | <5s from launch to ready | Measure application startup time | Medium |
Scalability Test Cases
| TC-ID | Category | Test Scenario | Acceptance Criteria | Test Method | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC-111 | Scalability | Concurrent users | Support 1000 concurrent users | Load test with 1000 users | High |
| TC-112 | Scalability | Data volume | Handle 1GB+ datasets | Load test with large dataset | Medium |
| TC-113 | Scalability | Request throughput | ≥1000 requests/second | Load test with sustained traffic | High |
| TC-114 | Scalability | Database scaling | Linear performance up to 10M records | Test with increasing data volume | Medium |
| TC-115 | Scalability | Horizontal scaling | Add servers without downtime | Test adding servers during load | High |
| TC-116 | Scalability | Cache effectiveness | Cache hit rate ≥80% | Monitor cache performance | Medium |
| TC-117 | Scalability | Queue handling | Process 10K+ queued items | Test with large queue | Medium |
| TC-118 | Scalability | File handling | Process 100MB+ files | Test with large file uploads | Medium |
| TC-119 | Scalability | Concurrent projects | Support 10K+ concurrent projects | Load test with many projects | Low |
| TC-120 | Scalability | Real-time connections | Support 10K+ WebSocket connections | Load test with many connections | Medium |
Reliability Test Cases
| TC-ID | Category | Test Scenario | Acceptance Criteria | Test Method | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC-121 | Reliability | System uptime | 99.9% availability | Monitor uptime over 30 days | High |
| TC-122 | Reliability | Error recovery | Auto-recovery within 30s | Trigger errors, measure recovery | High |
| TC-123 | Reliability | Data persistence | No data loss on failure | Simulate failures, verify data | High |
| TC-124 | Reliability | Failover | Automatic failover to backup | Simulate primary failure | High |
| TC-125 | Reliability | Backup restoration | Restore from backup in <5 minutes | Test backup/restore process | High |
| TC-126 | Reliability | Graceful degradation | System continues with reduced features | Simulate component failure | Medium |
| TC-127 | Reliability | Connection resilience | Reconnect after network interruption | Simulate network failure | High |
| TC-128 | Reliability | Transaction consistency | ACID properties maintained | Test concurrent transactions | High |
| TC-129 | Reliability | Deadlock prevention | No deadlocks under load | Load test with concurrent access | Medium |
| TC-130 | Reliability | Resource cleanup | No resource leaks | Monitor resources over time | Medium |
Security Test Cases
| TC-ID | Category | Test Scenario | Acceptance Criteria | Test Method | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC-131 | Security | SQL injection prevention | No SQL injection vulnerabilities | Penetration testing | High |
| TC-132 | Security | XSS prevention | No XSS vulnerabilities | Penetration testing | High |
| TC-133 | Security | CSRF protection | CSRF tokens validated | Penetration testing | High |
| TC-134 | Security | Authentication bypass | No authentication bypass possible | Penetration testing | High |
| TC-135 | Security | Authorization bypass | No authorization bypass possible | Penetration testing | High |
| TC-136 | Security | Data encryption | Data encrypted in transit (TLS 1.2+) | Verify SSL/TLS configuration | High |
| TC-137 | Security | Data encryption at rest | Data encrypted at rest (AES-256) | Verify encryption configuration | High |
| TC-138 | Security | Password security | Passwords hashed with bcrypt/argon2 | Verify password storage | High |
| TC-139 | Security | API security | API endpoints require authentication | Test unauthenticated access | High |
| TC-140 | Security | Rate limiting | Rate limiting prevents abuse | Test with excessive requests | High |
| TC-141 | Security | Input validation | All inputs validated | Fuzzing test | High |
| TC-142 | Security | Output encoding | All outputs properly encoded | Verify output encoding | High |
| TC-143 | Security | Dependency vulnerabilities | No known vulnerabilities in dependencies | Dependency scanning | High |
| TC-144 | Security | Secrets management | No secrets in code/logs | Scan for hardcoded secrets | High |
| TC-145 | Security | Audit logging | All security events logged | Verify audit logs | Medium |
Usability Test Cases
| TC-ID | Category | Test Scenario | Acceptance Criteria | Test Method | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC-146 | Usability | Voice recognition accuracy | ≥98% accuracy for supported languages | Test with native speakers | High |
| TC-147 | Usability | Command clarity | Users understand available commands | User testing | Medium |
| TC-148 | Usability | Error messages | Error messages clear and actionable | User testing | Medium |
| TC-149 | Usability | UI responsiveness | UI updates within 100ms | Measure UI response time | Medium |
| TC-150 | Usability | Navigation intuitiveness | Users can navigate without training | User testing | Medium |
| TC-151 | Usability | Accessibility | WCAG 2.1 AA compliance | Accessibility audit | High |
| TC-152 | Usability | Help documentation | Help available and understandable | User testing | Medium |
| TC-153 | Usability | Keyboard shortcuts | Common shortcuts available | Verify shortcuts | Low |
| TC-154 | Usability | Undo/Redo | Undo/Redo works intuitively | User testing | Medium |
| TC-155 | Usability | Search functionality | Search finds relevant results | User testing | Medium |
Compatibility Test Cases
| TC-ID | Category | Test Scenario | Acceptance Criteria | Test Method | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC-156 | Compatibility | Browser support | Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge | Test on all browsers | Medium |
| TC-157 | Compatibility | OS support | Windows, macOS, Linux | Test on all OS | Medium |
| TC-158 | Compatibility | IDE support | VS Code, PyCharm, IntelliJ, Sublime | Test with all IDEs | High |
| TC-159 | Compatibility | Language support | Python, JavaScript, Java, Go, Rust | Test code generation for all languages | High |
| TC-160 | Compatibility | Mobile support | iOS, Android | Test on mobile devices | Medium |
| TC-161 | Compatibility | API compatibility | Backward compatible with v1.0 | Test with old API clients | Medium |
| TC-162 | Compatibility | Database compatibility | PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB | Test with all databases | Medium |
| TC-163 | Compatibility | Git platform support | GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket | Test with all platforms | High |
| TC-164 | Compatibility | Jupyter version support | Jupyter 6.0+ | Test with multiple versions | Medium |
| TC-165 | Compatibility | Python version support | Python 3.8+ | Test with multiple versions | High |
4. TEST COVERAGE MATRIX
4.1 Requirements to Test Cases Traceability
graph LR
subgraph Requirements
FR1["FR-001: Voice Input"]
FR2["FR-002: NLP Processing"]
FR3["FR-003: Code Generation"]
FR4["FR-004: IDE Integration"]
FR5["FR-005: Git Integration"]
FR6["FR-006: Authentication"]
FR7["FR-007: Data Management"]
FR8["FR-008: Collaboration"]
end
subgraph Test_Cases
TC1["TC-001 to TC-010"]
TC2["TC-011 to TC-020"]
TC3["TC-021 to TC-030"]
TC4["TC-031 to TC-040"]
TC5["TC-041 to TC-050"]
TC6["TC-051 to TC-060"]
TC7["TC-061 to TC-070"]
TC8["TC-071 to TC-080"]
end
FR1 --> TC1
FR2 --> TC2
FR3 --> TC3
FR4 --> TC4
FR5 --> TC5
FR6 --> TC6
FR7 --> TC7
FR8 --> TC8
style FR1 fill:#90EE90
style FR2 fill:#90EE90
style FR3 fill:#90EE90
style FR4 fill:#90EE90
style FR5 fill:#90EE90
style FR6 fill:#90EE90
style FR7 fill:#90EE90
style FR8 fill:#90EE90
4.2 Coverage Summary Table
| Requirement | Test Cases | Coverage % | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR-001: Voice Input | TC-001 to TC-010 | 100% | Complete | 10 test cases covering all scenarios |
| FR-002: NLP Processing | TC-011 to TC-020 | 100% | Complete | 10 test cases covering intent & entities |
| FR-003: Code Generation | TC-021 to TC-030 | 100% | Complete | 10 test cases covering all languages |
| FR-004: IDE Integration | TC-031 to TC-040 | 100% | Complete | 10 test cases covering all IDEs |
| FR-005: Git Integration | TC-041 to TC-050 | 100% | Complete | 10 test cases covering all operations |
| FR-006: Authentication | TC-051 to TC-060 | 100% | Complete | 10 test cases covering auth & authz |
| FR-007: Data Management | TC-061 to TC-070 | 100% | Complete | 10 test cases covering CRUD ops |
| FR-008: Collaboration | TC-071 to TC-080 | 100% | Complete | 10 test cases covering real-time features |
| Performance | TC-101 to TC-110 | 100% | Complete | 10 test cases covering performance |
| Scalability | TC-111 to TC-120 | 100% | Complete | 10 test cases covering scalability |
| Reliability | TC-121 to TC-130 | 100% | Complete | 10 test cases covering reliability |
| Security | TC-131 to TC-145 | 100% | Complete | 15 test cases covering security |
| Usability | TC-146 to TC-155 | 100% | Complete | 10 test cases covering usability |
| Compatibility | TC-156 to TC-165 | 100% | Complete | 10 test cases covering compatibility |
| TOTAL | 165 test cases | 100% | Complete | Comprehensive coverage |
4.3 Risk-Based Coverage Matrix
graph TD
A["Risk-Based Coverage"] --> B["Critical Risks"]
A --> C["High Risks"]
A --> D["Medium Risks"]
B --> B1["Voice processing failure<br/>Coverage: 100%<br/>Test Cases: TC-001-010"]
B --> B2["Authentication bypass<br/>Coverage: 100%<br/>Test Cases: TC-051-060, TC-131-135"]
B --> B3["Data loss<br/>Coverage: 100%<br/>Test Cases: TC-061-070, TC-121-130"]
C --> C1["Performance degradation<br/>Coverage: 100%<br/>Test Cases: TC-101-110"]
C --> C2["Integration failures<br/>Coverage: 100%<br/>Test Cases: TC-031-050"]
C --> C3["Collaboration conflicts<br/>Coverage: 100%<br/>Test Cases: TC-071-080"]
D --> D1["Usability issues<br/>Coverage: 100%<br/>Test Cases: TC-146-155"]
D --> D2["Compatibility issues<br/>Coverage: 100%<br/>Test Cases: TC-156-165"]
5. TEST ENVIRONMENT REQUIREMENTS
5.1 Hardware Requirements
graph TD
A["Test Environment Hardware"] --> B["Development Machines"]
A --> C["Test Servers"]
A --> D["Database Servers"]
A --> E["Load Testing Infrastructure"]
B --> B1["CPU: 8+ cores"]
B --> B2["RAM: 16GB+"]
B --> B3["Storage: 500GB SSD"]
B --> B4["Network: 1Gbps"]
C --> C1["CPU: 16+ cores"]
C --> C2["RAM: 32GB+"]
C --> C3["Storage: 1TB SSD"]
C --> C4["Network: 10Gbps"]
D --> D1["CPU: 32+ cores"]
D --> D2["RAM: 64GB+"]
D --> D3["Storage: 10TB SSD"]
D --> D4["Network: 10Gbps"]
E --> E1["CPU: 64+ cores"]
E --> E2["RAM: 128GB+"]
E --> E3["Storage: 5TB SSD"]
E --> E4["Network: 10Gbps"]
Detailed Hardware Specifications
| Component | Development | Testing | Production-Like | Load Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPU | 8 cores @ 2.5GHz | 16 cores @ 2.5GHz | 32 cores @ 3.0GHz | 64 cores @ 3.0GHz |
| RAM | 16GB DDR4 | 32GB DDR4 | 64GB DDR4 | 128GB DDR4 |
| Storage | 500GB SSD | 1TB SSD | 10TB SSD | 5TB SSD |
| Network | 1Gbps | 10Gbps | 10Gbps | 10Gbps |
| GPU | Optional | Optional | Optional | Optional |
| Microphone | USB microphone | Professional audio interface | Professional audio interface | N/A |
| Speakers | Standard | Professional monitors | Professional monitors | N/A |
5.2 Software Requirements
graph LR
A["Test Environment Software"] --> B["Operating Systems"]
A --> C["Development Tools"]
A --> D["Testing Tools"]
A --> E["Infrastructure"]
B --> B1["Windows Server 2019+"]
B --> B2["Ubuntu 20.04 LTS+"]
B --> B3["macOS 11+"]
C --> C1["Python 3.8+"]
C --> C2["Node.js 14+"]
C --> C3["Java 11+"]
C --> C4["Git 2.30+"]
D --> D1["pytest"]
D --> D2["Jest"]
D --> D3["JUnit"]
D --> D4["Postman"]
D --> D5["JMeter"]
E --> E1["Docker"]
E --> E2["Kubernetes"]
E --> E3["PostgreSQL"]
E --> E4["Redis"]
Software Stack Details
| Category | Component | Version | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| OS | Ubuntu | 20.04 LTS | Primary test OS |
| OS | Windows Server | 2019+ | Windows compatibility testing |
| OS | macOS | 11+ | macOS compatibility testing |
| Runtime | Python | 3.8+ | Backend services |
| Runtime | Node.js | 14+ | Frontend/API services |
| Runtime | Java | 11+ | Enterprise services |
| VCS | Git | 2.30+ | Version control |
| Container | Docker | 20.10+ | Containerization |
| Orchestration | Kubernetes | 1.20+ | Container orchestration |
| Database | PostgreSQL | 12+ | Primary database |
| Database | MongoDB | 4.4+ | NoSQL database |
| Cache | Redis | 6.0+ | Caching layer |
| Message Queue | RabbitMQ | 3.8+ | Message broker |
| Testing | pytest | 6.0+ | Python testing |
| Testing | Jest | 27.0+ | JavaScript testing |
| Testing | JUnit | 4.13+ | Java testing |
| API Testing | Postman | 9.0+ | API testing |
| Load Testing | Apache JMeter | 5.4+ | Performance testing |
| Security | OWASP ZAP | 2.11+ | Security testing |
| CI/CD | Jenkins | 2.300+ | Continuous integration |
| Monitoring | Prometheus | 2.25+ | Metrics collection |
| Logging | ELK Stack | 7.10+ | Log aggregation |
5.3 Test Data Requirements
graph TD
A["Test Data Strategy"] --> B["User Data"]
A --> C["Project Data"]
A --> D["Code Samples"]
A --> E["Performance Data"]
B --> B1["100 test users"]
B --> B2["Various roles"]
B --> B3["Different permissions"]
C --> C1["50 test projects"]
C --> C2["Various sizes"]
C --> C3["Different languages"]
D --> D1["1000 code snippets"]
D --> D2["Multiple languages"]
D --> D3["Various complexity levels"]
E --> E1["Large datasets"]
E --> E2["Realistic data volume"]
E --> E3["Performance benchmarks"]
Test Data Specifications
| Data Type | Volume | Format | Source | Refresh Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Users | 100 test users | JSON | Generated | Per test cycle |
| Projects | 50 test projects | JSON | Generated | Per test cycle |
| Code Snippets | 1000 snippets | Code files | Repository | Per test cycle |
| Voice Samples | 500 audio files | WAV/MP3 | Recorded | Per test cycle |
| Git Repos | 20 test repos | Git | Created | Per test cycle |
| Large Datasets | 1GB+ data | CSV/JSON | Generated | Per performance test |
| Historical Data | 1 year data | Database dump | Production-like | Per test cycle |
Test Data Privacy & Security
graph LR
A["Test Data Security"] --> B["Anonymization"]
A --> C["Encryption"]
A --> D["Access Control"]
A --> E["Audit Logging"]
B --> B1["Remove PII"]
B --> B2["Mask sensitive data"]
B --> B3["Use synthetic data"]
C --> C1["Encrypt at rest"]
C --> C2["Encrypt in transit"]
C --> C3["Key management"]
D --> D1["Role-based access"]
D --> D2["Need-to-know basis"]
D --> D3["Access logging"]
E --> E1["Track data access"]
E --> E2["Monitor changes"]
E --> E3["Compliance audit"]
5.4 Tool Requirements
Testing Tools Stack
graph TD
A["Testing Tools"] --> B["Unit Testing"]
A --> C["Integration Testing"]
A --> D["Performance Testing"]
A --> E["Security Testing"]
A --> F["Test Management"]
B --> B1["pytest"]
B --> B2["Jest"]
B --> B3["JUnit"]
B --> B4["Coverage.py"]
C --> C1["Postman"]
C --> C2["REST Assured"]
C --> C3["Karate"]
C --> C4["Docker Compose"]
D --> D1["Apache JMeter"]
D --> D2["Gatling"]
D --> D3["LoadRunner"]
D --> D4["k6"]
E --> E1["OWASP ZAP"]
E --> E2["Burp Suite"]
E --> E3["Snyk"]
E --> E4["SonarQube"]
F --> F1["TestRail"]
F --> F2["Jira"]
F --> F3["Azure DevOps"]
F --> F4["Xray"]
Tool Configuration Details
| Tool | Purpose | Configuration | License |
|---|---|---|---|
| pytest | Python unit testing | pytest.ini, conftest.py | Open Source |
| Jest | JavaScript testing | jest.config.js | Open Source |
| JUnit | Java testing | pom.xml configuration | Open Source |
| Postman | API testing | Collections, environments | Free/Paid |
| Apache JMeter | Load testing | Test plans, scenarios | Open Source |
| OWASP ZAP | Security scanning | Automated scans | Open Source |
| SonarQube | Code quality | Quality gates | Open Source/Paid |
| TestRail | Test management | Test cases, runs | Paid |
| Jira | Issue tracking | Defect management | Paid |
| Jenkins | CI/CD | Pipeline configuration | Open Source |
| Docker | Containerization | Docker Compose | Open Source |
| Kubernetes | Orchestration | Helm charts | Open Source |
5.5 Test Environment Architecture
graph TB
subgraph "Development Environment"
DEV1["Developer Machine"]
DEV2["Local Database"]
DEV3["Local Services"]
end
subgraph "Testing Environment"
TEST1["Test Server"]
TEST2["Test Database"]
TEST3["Test Services"]
TEST4["Message Queue"]
end
subgraph "Staging Environment"
STAGE1["Staging Server"]
STAGE2["Staging Database"]
STAGE3["Staging Services"]
STAGE4["Load Balancer"]
end
subgraph "Load Testing Environment"
LOAD1["Load Generator"]
LOAD2["Monitoring"]
LOAD3["Metrics Collection"]
end
DEV1 --> DEV2
DEV1 --> DEV3
TEST1 --> TEST2
TEST1 --> TEST3
TEST1 --> TEST4
STAGE1 --> STAGE2
STAGE1 --> STAGE3
STAGE4 --> STAGE1
LOAD1 --> STAGE1
LOAD1 --> LOAD2
LOAD2 --> LOAD3
6. TEST SCHEDULE
6.1 Test Phase Timeline
gantt
title Test Execution Timeline
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
section Planning
Test Planning :plan1, 2024-01-01, 14d
Test Strategy Review :plan2, after plan1, 7d
section Preparation
Environment Setup :prep1, after plan2, 21d
Test Data Preparation :prep2, after plan2, 21d
Test Case Development :prep3, after plan2, 28d
section Unit Testing
Unit Test Execution :unit1, after prep3, 21d
Unit Test Review :unit2, after unit1, 7d
section Integration Testing
Integration Test Execution :int1, after unit2, 28d
Integration Test Review :int2, after int1, 7d
section System Testing
System Test Execution :sys1, after int2, 35d
System Test Review :sys2, after sys1, 7d
section Performance Testing
Performance Test Execution :perf1, after sys2, 21d
Performance Test Review :perf2, after perf1, 7d
section Security Testing
Security Test Execution :sec1, after perf2, 21d
Security Test Review :sec2, after sec1, 7d
section UAT
UAT Execution :uat1, after sec2, 28d
UAT Review :uat2, after uat1, 7d
section Closure
Defect Resolution :close1, after uat2, 14d
Final Sign-off :close2, after close1, 7d
6.2 Detailed Phase Schedule
Phase 1: Test Planning & Preparation (Weeks 1-4)
| Week | Activity | Deliverable | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Test strategy development | Test strategy document | QA Manager | - |
| 1 | Risk assessment | Risk register | QA Manager | - |
| 2 | Test environment design | Environment architecture | DevOps Engineer | - |
| 2 | Test data strategy | Data preparation plan | QA Lead | - |
| 3 | Test case development | Test case catalog | QA Engineers | - |
| 3 | Tool setup & configuration | Tool configuration docs | QA Engineer | - |
| 4 | Environment deployment | Deployed test environment | DevOps Engineer | - |
| 4 | Test data preparation | Test data sets | QA Lead | - |
Phase 2: Unit Testing (Weeks 5-7)
| Week | Activity | Coverage Target | Deliverable | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | Voice processing unit tests | 90% | Test results | Dev Team | - |
| 5 | NLP engine unit tests | 95% | Test results | Dev Team | - |
| 6 | Code generation unit tests | 92% | Test results | Dev Team | - |
| 6 | Data management unit tests | 88% | Test results | Dev Team | - |
| 7 | Authentication unit tests | 95% | Test results | Dev Team | - |
| 7 | Code coverage analysis | ≥90% overall | Coverage report | QA Lead | - |
Phase 3: Integration Testing (Weeks 8-11)
| Week | Activity | Test Cases | Deliverable | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Voice → NLP integration | IT-001 to IT-003 | Test results | QA Engineers | - |
| 9 | Code Gen → IDE integration | IT-004 to IT-006 | Test results | QA Engineers | - |
| 10 | Git integration testing | IT-007 to IT-009 | Test results | QA Engineers | - |
| 11 | API integration testing | IT-010 to IT-015 | Test results | QA Engineers | - |
Phase 4: System Testing (Weeks 12-18)
| Week | Activity | Test Cases | Deliverable | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | Functional testing - Voice | ST-001 to ST-005 | Test results | QA Engineers | - |
| 13 | Functional testing - NLP | ST-006 to ST-010 | Test results | QA Engineers | - |
| 14 | Functional testing - Code Gen | ST-011 to ST-015 | Test results | QA Engineers | - |
| 15 | Functional testing - Collaboration | ST-016 to ST-020 | Test results | QA Engineers | - |
| 16 | Regression testing | All previous tests | Regression report | QA Engineers | - |
| 17 | Exploratory testing | Ad-hoc scenarios | Exploratory report | QA Engineers | - |
| 18 | System test review | All results | System test report | QA Lead | - |
Phase 5: Performance & Security Testing (Weeks 19-24)
| Week | Activity | Test Cases | Deliverable | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | Performance baseline | TC-101 to TC-110 | Performance report | QA Engineers | - |
| 20 | Load testing | TC-111 to TC-120 | Load test report | QA Engineers | - |
| 21 | Stress testing | Stress scenarios | Stress test report | QA Engineers | - |
| 22 | Security scanning | TC-131 to TC-145 | Security report | Security Team | - |
| 23 | Penetration testing | Penetration scenarios | Penetration report | Security Team | - |
| 24 | Performance review | All results | Performance summary | QA Lead | - |
Phase 6: UAT (Weeks 25-28)
| Week | Activity | Test Cases | Deliverable | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | UAT environment setup | - | UAT environment ready | DevOps Engineer | - |
| 25 | UAT training | - | Training materials | QA Lead | - |
| 26 | UAT execution - Day 1 | UAT-001 to UAT-005 | UAT results | Stakeholders | - |
| 27 | UAT execution - Day 2 | UAT-006 to UAT-010 | UAT results | Stakeholders | - |
| 28 | UAT review & sign-off | All UAT results | UAT sign-off | Product Owner | - |
Phase 7: Closure (Weeks 29-30)
| Week | Activity | Deliverable | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 | Defect resolution | Resolved defects | Dev Team | - |
| 29 | Final regression testing | Regression results | QA Engineers | - |
| 30 | Test summary report | Final test report | QA Manager | - |
| 30 | Go/No-go decision | Release decision | Project Manager | - |
6.3 Milestone Schedule
graph LR
A["Start<br/>Week 1"] --> B["Test Plan<br/>Approved<br/>Week 2"]
B --> C["Environment<br/>Ready<br/>Week 4"]
C --> D["Unit Testing<br/>Complete<br/>Week 7"]
D --> E["Integration<br/>Complete<br/>Week 11"]
E --> F["System Testing<br/>Complete<br/>Week 18"]
F --> G["Performance<br/>Complete<br/>Week 24"]
G --> H["UAT<br/>Complete<br/>Week 28"]
H --> I["Release<br/>Ready<br/>Week 30"]
style A fill:#FFB6C6
style B fill:#FFD700
style C fill:#FFD700
style D fill:#90EE90
style E fill:#90EE90
style F fill:#90EE90
style G fill:#87CEEB
style H fill:#DDA0DD
style I fill:#90EE90
7. RISK ASSESSMENT & MITIGATION
7.1 Testing Risks
graph TD
A["Testing Risks"] --> B["Schedule Risks"]
A --> C["Resource Risks"]
A --> D["Technical Risks"]
A --> E["Quality Risks"]
B --> B1["Delays in test execution"]
B --> B2["Scope creep"]
B --> B3["Dependency delays"]
C --> C1["Insufficient test resources"]
C --> C2["Skill gaps"]
C --> C3["Tool unavailability"]
D --> D1["Environment instability"]
D --> D2["Integration complexity"]
D --> D3["Performance issues"]
E --> E1["Inadequate test coverage"]
E --> E2["Defect escape"]
E --> E3["Quality gate failures"]
7.2 Risk Register
| Risk ID | Risk Description | Probability | Impact | Severity | Mitigation Strategy | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R-001 | Test environment deployment delays | Medium | High | High | Pre-deploy environment components, maintain backup environment | DevOps Lead |
| R-002 | Insufficient test data | Medium | High | High | Prepare test data early, maintain data refresh procedures | QA Lead |
| R-003 | Test tool failures | Low | High | Medium | Maintain backup tools, test tool stability early | QA Engineer |
| R-004 | Resource unavailability | Medium | Medium | Medium | Cross-train team members, maintain resource buffer | QA Manager |
| R-005 | Scope creep in testing | High | Medium | High | Strict scope management, change control process | Project Manager |
| R-006 | Performance issues discovered late | Medium | High | High | Early performance testing, continuous monitoring | QA Lead |
| R-007 | Security vulnerabilities | Low | Critical | Critical | Early security testing, penetration testing | Security Officer |
| R-008 | Integration complexity | Medium | High | High | Early integration testing, API contract testing | Tech Lead |
| R-009 | Voice recognition accuracy issues | Medium | High | High | Extensive voice testing, multiple language testing | QA Lead |
| R-010 | Defect escape to production | Low | Critical | Critical | Comprehensive test coverage, UAT validation | QA Manager |
| R-011 | Test execution delays | Medium | Medium | Medium | Parallel test execution, automation focus | QA Lead |
| R-012 | Inadequate test coverage | Medium | High | High | Coverage analysis, risk-based testing | QA Manager |
| R-013 | Collaboration feature complexity | Medium | High | High | Early integration testing, real-time testing | Tech Lead |
| R-014 | Database scalability issues | Low | High | Medium | Early load testing, database optimization | DevOps Lead |
| R-015 | Third-party integration failures | Medium | Medium | Medium | Early integration testing, vendor communication | Tech Lead |
7.3 Risk Mitigation Strategies
Schedule Risk Mitigation
graph LR
A["Schedule Risks"] --> B["Mitigation Strategies"]
B --> B1["Parallel Testing<br/>Execute tests in parallel<br/>Reduce timeline by 30%"]
B --> B2["Test Automation<br/>Automate repetitive tests<br/>Reduce manual effort by 50%"]
B --> B3["Early Testing<br/>Start testing early<br/>Catch issues sooner"]
B --> B4["Resource Planning<br/>Allocate resources early<br/>Prevent bottlenecks"]
B --> B5["Buffer Time<br/>Add 20% buffer<br/>Handle unexpected delays"]
Resource Risk Mitigation
graph LR
A["Resource Risks"] --> B["Mitigation Strategies"]
B --> B1["Cross-Training<br/>Train multiple team members<br/>Reduce dependency"]
B --> B2["Contractor Support<br/>Hire contractors if needed<br/>Scale resources"]
B --> B3["Tool Automation<br/>Use automated tools<br/>Reduce manual effort"]
B --> B4["Knowledge Transfer<br/>Document procedures<br/>Enable knowledge sharing"]
B --> B5["Resource Buffer<br/>Maintain 20% buffer<br/>Handle absences"]
Technical Risk Mitigation
graph LR
A["Technical Risks"] --> B["Mitigation Strategies"]
B --> B1["Early Integration<br/>Test integrations early<br/>Identify issues sooner"]
B --> B2["Performance Testing<br/>Test performance early<br/>Optimize before release"]
B --> B3["Environment Stability<br/>Maintain stable environment<br/>Reduce test failures"]
B --> B4["Backup Systems<br/>Maintain backup systems<br/>Ensure continuity"]
B --> B5["Vendor Communication<br/>Communicate with vendors<br/>Resolve issues quickly"]
Quality Risk Mitigation
graph LR
A["Quality Risks"] --> B["Mitigation Strategies"]
B --> B1["Coverage Analysis<br/>Analyze test coverage<br/>Ensure comprehensive testing"]
B --> B2["Risk-Based Testing<br/>Focus on high-risk areas<br/>Prioritize testing"]
B --> B3["Defect Analysis<br/>Analyze defect patterns<br/>Improve test cases"]
B --> B4["UAT Validation<br/>Comprehensive UAT<br/>Catch issues before release"]
B --> B5["Regression Testing<br/>Extensive regression tests<br/>Prevent defect escape"]
7.4 Risk Monitoring & Control
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> IdentifyRisks
IdentifyRisks --> AssessRisks: Risk identified
AssessRisks --> PrioritizeRisks: Risk assessed
PrioritizeRisks --> MitigateRisks: Risk prioritized
MitigateRisks --> MonitorRisks: Mitigation plan created
MonitorRisks --> ReviewRisks: Risk monitored
ReviewRisks --> UpdateRisks: Risk status reviewed
UpdateRisks --> MonitorRisks: Risk status updated
UpdateRisks --> [*]: Risk resolved
note right of IdentifyRisks
- Brainstorm sessions
- Historical data analysis
- Expert interviews
end note
note right of AssessRisks
- Probability assessment
- Impact assessment
- Severity calculation
end note
note right of MitigateRisks
- Mitigation strategy
- Action plan
- Owner assignment
end note
note right of MonitorRisks
- Weekly reviews
- Status tracking
- Trigger monitoring
end note
Risk Monitoring Metrics
| Metric | Target | Frequency | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk count | ≤15 active risks | Weekly | QA Manager |
| Risk resolution rate | ≥80% resolved | Weekly | QA Manager |
| Risk escalation | ≤2 escalations/week | Weekly | Project Manager |
| Mitigation effectiveness | ≥90% effective | Monthly | QA Manager |
| Risk trend | Decreasing | Weekly | QA Manager |
8. TEST EXECUTION & REPORTING
8.1 Test Execution Process
graph TD
A["Test Execution Process"] --> B["Test Case Selection"]
A --> C["Test Environment Verification"]
A --> D["Test Execution"]
A --> E["Result Documentation"]
A --> F["Defect Logging"]
A --> G["Test Reporting"]
B --> B1["Select test cases"]
B --> B2["Prioritize by risk"]
B --> B3["Assign to testers"]
C --> C1["Verify environment"]
C --> C2["Verify test data"]
C --> C3["Verify tools"]
D --> D1["Execute test steps"]
D --> D2["Observe results"]
D --> D3["Compare with expected"]
E --> E1["Document results"]
E --> E2["Capture screenshots"]
E --> E3["Record logs"]
F --> F1["Log defects"]
F --> F2["Assign severity"]
F --> F3["Assign to developer"]
G --> G1["Generate reports"]
G --> G2["Analyze trends"]
G --> G3["Communicate status"]
8.2 Test Execution Status Tracking
graph LR
A["Test Status"] --> B["Not Started"]
A --> C["In Progress"]
A --> D["Blocked"]
A --> E["Passed"]
A --> F["Failed"]
A --> G["Skipped"]
B --> C: Start execution
C --> E: Test passes
C --> F: Test fails
C --> D: Dependency issue
D --> C: Dependency resolved
F --> B: Defect fixed
style B fill:#FFB6C6
style C fill:#FFD700
style D fill:#FF6347
style E fill:#90EE90
style F fill:#FF6347
style G fill:#D3D3D3
8.3 Defect Management
Defect Severity Levels
| Severity | Definition | Example | Resolution Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | System crash, data loss, security breach | Voice processing completely fails | 24 hours |
| High | Major feature not working, significant impact | Code generation produces invalid syntax | 48 hours |
| Medium | Feature partially working, workaround available | IDE integration slow but functional | 1 week |
| Low | Minor issue, cosmetic, no workaround needed | UI text alignment issue | 2 weeks |
Defect Lifecycle
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> New
New --> Assigned: Assign to developer
Assigned --> InProgress: Developer starts work
InProgress --> Fixed: Developer fixes issue
Fixed --> Testing: QA tests fix
Testing --> Verified: Fix verified
Testing --> Reopened: Fix not working
Reopened --> InProgress: Developer continues
Verified --> Closed: Defect closed
Closed --> [*]
note right of New
- Defect logged
- Initial assessment
- Severity assigned
end note
note right of Assigned
- Assigned to developer
- Developer reviews
- Work begins
end note
note right of Fixed
- Code changes made
- Unit tests pass
- Ready for QA
end note
note right of Testing
- QA tests fix
- Verify resolution
- Check for regressions
end note
Defect Tracking Template
| Field | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Defect ID | Unique identifier | DEF-001 |
| Title | Brief description | Voice processing fails with background noise |
| Description | Detailed description | When background noise >60dB, voice recognition fails |
| Severity | Critical/High/Medium/Low | High |
| Priority | 1-5 (1=highest) | 1 |
| Status | New/Assigned/In Progress/Fixed/Testing/Verified/Closed | In Progress |
| Assigned To | Developer name | John Smith |
| Reporter | QA engineer name | Jane Doe |
| Date Reported | Date of discovery | 2024-01-15 |
| Date Fixed | Date of fix | 2024-01-17 |
| Root Cause | Why it happened | Noise filter threshold too high |
| Fix Description | How it was fixed | Adjusted noise filter threshold to 50dB |
| Test Case | Related test case | TC-002 |
| Attachment | Screenshots, logs | screenshot.png, error.log |
8.4 Test Reporting
Daily Test Report
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
TEST EXECUTION REPORT - Daily
Date: 2024-01-15
Reporting Period: 2024-01-15 09:00 - 17:00
SUMMARY
-------
Total Test Cases: 165
Executed: 45
Passed: 42
Failed: 3
Blocked: 0
Skipped: 0
Pass Rate: 93.3%
EXECUTION DETAILS
-----------------
Unit Testing: 15/15 passed (100%)
Integration Testing: 12/15 passed (80%)
System Testing: 15/15 passed (100%)
Performance Testing: 0/15 (not started)
DEFECTS LOGGED
--------------
Critical: 0
High: 2
Medium: 1
Low: 0
Total: 3
DEFECTS RESOLVED
----------------
Critical: 0
High: 1
Medium: 0
Low: 0
Total: 1
BLOCKERS
--------
None
NEXT STEPS
----------
1. Continue integration testing
2. Start performance testing
3. Resolve 2 remaining high-severity defects
4. Review test coverage
RISKS
-----
- Performance testing delayed due to environment setup
- 2 high-severity defects may impact schedule
SIGN-OFF
--------
QA Lead: Jane Doe
Date: 2024-01-15
Weekly Test Report
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
TEST EXECUTION REPORT - Weekly
Week: Week 2 (2024-01-08 to 2024-01-12)
SUMMARY
-------
Total Test Cases: 165
Executed: 80
Passed: 75
Failed: 5
Blocked: 0
Skipped: 0
Pass Rate: 93.75%
PHASE PROGRESS
--------------
Unit Testing: 100% complete (15/15 passed)
Integration Testing: 60% complete (12/20 passed)
System Testing: 0% complete (0/50)
Performance Testing: 0% complete (0/50)
Security Testing: 0% complete (0/30)
DEFECTS SUMMARY
---------------
Total Logged: 8
Total Resolved: 3
Total Open: 5
Critical: 0
High: 2
Medium: 3
Low: 0
METRICS
-------
Test Execution Rate: 48% (80/165)
Defect Resolution Rate: 37.5% (3/8)
Pass Rate: 93.75%
Code Coverage: 85%
SCHEDULE STATUS
---------------
On Track: Yes
Planned: 80 test cases
Actual: 80 test cases
Variance: 0%
RISKS & ISSUES
--------------
1. Integration testing slower than expected (60% vs 80% planned)
- Mitigation: Allocate additional resources
2. 2 high-severity defects pending resolution
- Mitigation: Prioritize resolution
NEXT WEEK PLAN
--------------
- Complete integration testing (100%)
- Start system testing (50%)
- Resolve all high-severity defects
- Begin performance testing
SIGN-OFF
--------
QA Manager: John Smith
Date: 2024-01-12
Test Summary Report
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
TEST SUMMARY REPORT - Final
Project: Voice-Centric Software Development Agent
Test Period: 2024-01-01 to 2024-02-28
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
-----------------
Total Test Cases: 165
Total Executed: 165 (100%)
Total Passed: 160 (96.97%)
Total Failed: 5 (3.03%)
Overall Pass Rate: 96.97%
TEST LEVEL SUMMARY
------------------
Unit Testing:
- Total: 15
- Passed: 15 (100%)
- Failed: 0 (0%)
- Coverage: 92%
Integration Testing:
- Total: 15
- Passed: 14 (93.3%)
- Failed: 1 (6.7%)
- Coverage: 95%
System Testing:
- Total: 50
- Passed: 48 (96%)
- Failed: 2 (4%)
- Coverage: 98%
Performance Testing:
- Total: 10
- Passed: 10 (100%)
- Failed: 0 (0%)
- Coverage: 100%
Security Testing:
- Total: 15
- Passed: 15 (100%)
- Failed: 0 (0%)
- Coverage: 100%
UAT:
- Total: 10
- Passed: 10 (100%)
- Failed: 0 (0%)
- Coverage: 100%
Compatibility Testing:
- Total: 10
- Passed: 10 (100%)
- Failed: 0 (0%)
- Coverage: 100%
DEFECT SUMMARY
--------------
Total Defects: 12
Critical: 0 (0%)
High: 2 (16.7%)
Medium: 5 (41.7%)
Low: 5 (41.7%)
Defects Resolved: 12 (100%)
Defects Pending: 0 (0%)
Defect Escape Rate: 0%
QUALITY METRICS
---------------
Code Coverage: 92%
Test Coverage: 100%
Requirement Coverage: 100%
Risk Coverage: 100%
Defect Density: 0.07 defects/1000 LOC
PERFORMANCE METRICS
-------------------
Voice Processing Latency: 450ms (Target: <500ms) ✓
Code Generation Speed: 1.8s (Target: <2s) ✓
API Response Time: 180ms (Target: <200ms) ✓
System Uptime: 99.95% (Target: 99.9%) ✓
SECURITY METRICS
----------------
Vulnerabilities Found: 0
Security Test Pass Rate: 100%
Compliance Status: Compliant
RECOMMENDATIONS
---------------
1. Maintain current test automation level
2. Continue regression testing for future releases
3. Monitor performance metrics in production
4. Conduct security testing for each release
5. Implement continuous testing in CI/CD pipeline
SIGN-OFF
--------
QA Manager: John Smith
Project Manager: Jane Doe
Product Owner: Bob Johnson
Date: 2024-02-28
Status: APPROVED FOR RELEASE
9. TEST AUTOMATION STRATEGY
9.1 Automation Framework Architecture
graph TD
A["Test Automation Framework"] --> B["Unit Test Layer"]
A --> C["Integration Test Layer"]
A --> D["API Test Layer"]
A --> E["UI Test Layer"]
A --> F["Performance Test Layer"]
B --> B1["pytest"]
B --> B2["Jest"]
B --> B3["JUnit"]
C --> C1["Docker Compose"]
C --> C2["Testcontainers"]
C --> C3["Test fixtures"]
D --> D1["Postman"]
D --> D2["REST Assured"]
D --> D3["Karate"]
E --> E1["Selenium"]
E --> E2["Cypress"]
E --> E3["Playwright"]
F --> F1["JMeter"]
F --> F2["Gatling"]
F --> F3["k6"]
9.2 Automation Coverage Plan
| Test Level | Automation % | Tools | Maintenance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unit Testing | 100% | pytest, Jest, JUnit | High |
| Integration Testing | 80% | Docker, Testcontainers | High |
| API Testing | 95% | Postman, REST Assured | High |
| UI Testing | 60% | Selenium, Cypress | Medium |
| Performance Testing | 90% | JMeter, Gatling | Medium |
| Security Testing | 70% | OWASP ZAP, Snyk | Medium |
| Overall | 85% | Multiple tools | High |
9.3 CI/CD Integration
graph LR
A["Code Commit"] --> B["Trigger Pipeline"]
B --> C["Unit Tests"]
C --> D["Code Quality"]
D --> E["Integration Tests"]
E --> F["API Tests"]
F --> G["Performance Tests"]
G --> H["Security Tests"]
H --> I["Build Artifact"]
I --> J["Deploy to Staging"]
J --> K["Smoke Tests"]
K --> L["Ready for Release"]
style A fill:#FFB6C6
style C fill:#90EE90
style D fill:#87CEEB
style E fill:#90EE90
style F fill:#90EE90
style G fill:#FFD700
style H fill:#FF6347
style I fill:#DDA0DD
style J fill:#FFD700
style K fill:#90EE90
style L fill:#90EE90
10. CONCLUSION & SIGN-OFF
10.1 Test Plan Approval
This comprehensive test plan has been developed to ensure thorough validation of the Voice-Centric Software Development and Data Science Agent system. The plan covers:
✓ 165 comprehensive test cases across all functional and non-functional requirements ✓ 100% requirement coverage with traceability matrix ✓ Multi-level testing approach from unit to acceptance testing ✓ Risk-based testing strategy focusing on critical components ✓ Detailed test schedule spanning 30 weeks ✓ Robust risk management with mitigation strategies ✓ Automated testing framework for continuous quality assurance
10.2 Sign-Off
| Role | Name | Signature | Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| QA Manager | _________ | _________ | _____ |
| Project Manager | _________ | _________ | _____ |
| Product Owner | _________ | _________ | _____ |
| Technical Lead | _________ | _________ | _____ |
| Security Officer | _________ | _________ | _____ |
10.3 Document Control
| Version | Date | Author | Changes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | 2024-01-01 | QA Team | Initial version |
| 1.1 | 2024-01-15 | QA Manager | Added risk assessment |
| 1.2 | 2024-02-01 | QA Lead | Updated test cases |
| 2.0 | 2024-02-15 | QA Manager | Final approved version |
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Test Case Template
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
TEST CASE TEMPLATE
TC-ID: [Unique identifier]
Requirement: [Linked requirement ID]
Module: [Module name]
Title: [Test case title]
Priority: [High/Medium/Low]
Type: [Functional/Non-Functional]
PRECONDITIONS:
- [List preconditions]
TEST STEPS:
1. [Step 1]
2. [Step 2]
3. [Step 3]
EXPECTED RESULT:
- [Expected outcome]
ACTUAL RESULT:
- [To be filled during execution]
STATUS: [Pass/Fail/Blocked/Skipped]
NOTES:
- [Any additional notes]
ATTACHMENTS:
- [Screenshots, logs, etc.]
Appendix B: Defect Report Template
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
DEFECT REPORT TEMPLATE
DEF-ID: [Unique identifier]
Title: [Brief description]
Severity: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
Priority: [1-5]
Status: [New/Assigned/In Progress/Fixed/Testing/Verified/Closed]
DESCRIPTION:
[Detailed description of the defect]
STEPS TO REPRODUCE:
1. [Step 1]
2. [Step 2]
3. [Step 3]
EXPECTED BEHAVIOR:
[What should happen]
ACTUAL BEHAVIOR:
[What actually happens]
ENVIRONMENT:
- OS: [Operating system]
- Browser: [Browser version]
- Build: [Build number]
ATTACHMENTS:
- [Screenshots, logs, etc.]
ASSIGNED TO: [Developer name]
REPORTED BY: [QA engineer name]
DATE REPORTED: [Date]
DATE FIXED: [Date]
Appendix C: Test Metrics & KPIs
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
1. Test Execution Rate
Formula: (Test Cases Executed / Total Test Cases) × 100
Target: ≥95%
Frequency: Daily
2. Pass Rate
Formula: (Test Cases Passed / Test Cases Executed) × 100
Target: ≥95%
Frequency: Daily
3. Defect Density
Formula: Total Defects / Lines of Code × 1000
Target: <0.1 defects/1000 LOC
Frequency: Weekly
4. Defect Resolution Rate
Formula: (Defects Resolved / Total Defects) × 100
Target: ≥90%
Frequency: Weekly
5. Code Coverage
Formula: (Lines Covered / Total Lines) × 100
Target: ≥90%
Frequency: Weekly
6. Test Coverage
Formula: (Requirements Tested / Total Requirements) × 100
Target: 100%
Frequency: Weekly
7. Automation Coverage
Formula: (Automated Tests / Total Tests) × 100
Target: ≥85%
Frequency: Monthly
8. Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR)
Formula: Total Resolution Time / Number of Defects
Target: <48 hours
Frequency: Weekly
END OF TEST PLAN DOCUMENTATION
This comprehensive test plan provides a complete roadmap for testing the Voice-Centric Software Development and Data Science Agent system. It ensures thorough validation, risk mitigation, and quality assurance throughout the development lifecycle.
Phase Plan
Voice-Centric Software Development and Data Science Agent
Development Phase Planning Documentation
1. Project Timeline Overview
gantt
title Voice-Centric Agent Development Timeline
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
axisFormat %b %d
section Phase 1: Foundation
Requirements & Design :a1, 2024-01-08, 14d
Infrastructure Setup :a2, 2024-01-22, 14d
DevOps & CI/CD Pipeline :a3, 2024-02-05, 10d
section Phase 2: Core Voice Engine
Voice Processing Engine :b1, 2024-02-15, 21d
NLP Integration :b2, 2024-03-07, 21d
Voice Command Parser :b3, 2024-03-28, 14d
section Phase 3: Development Features
Code Generation Module :c1, 2024-04-11, 21d
IDE Integration :c2, 2024-05-02, 21d
Git Integration :c3, 2024-05-23, 14d
section Phase 4: Data Science Features
Data Analysis Engine :d1, 2024-06-06, 21d
ML Model Integration :d2, 2024-06-27, 21d
Jupyter Integration :d3, 2024-07-18, 14d
section Phase 5: Collaboration & Management
Real-time Collaboration :e1, 2024-08-01, 21d
Project Management Tools :e2, 2024-08-22, 21d
Team Communication :e3, 2024-09-12, 14d
section Phase 6: Quality & Launch
Performance Optimization :f1, 2024-09-26, 14d
Security Hardening :f2, 2024-10-10, 14d
UAT & Bug Fixes :f3, 2024-10-24, 21d
Production Deployment :f4, 2024-11-14, 7d
milestone M1: Architecture Complete, 2024-02-05, 0d
milestone M2: Voice Engine Ready, 2024-03-28, 0d
milestone M3: Dev Features Complete, 2024-05-23, 0d
milestone M4: Data Science Ready, 2024-07-18, 0d
milestone M5: Collaboration Ready, 2024-09-12, 0d
milestone M6: Production Ready, 2024-11-14, 0d
2. Detailed Phase Descriptions
PHASE 1: FOUNDATION (Weeks 1-6)
Phase Overview
- Duration: 6 weeks (January 8 - February 19, 2024)
- Team Size: 8 people (2 Architects, 2 Backend Engineers, 2 DevOps, 2 QA)
- Budget Allocation: 15% of total project budget
Objectives & Deliverables
| Objective | Deliverable | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Define system architecture | Architecture Design Document (ADD) | Technical Architect |
| Establish infrastructure | Cloud infrastructure provisioned | DevOps Lead |
| Setup development environment | Dev environment ready for all teams | DevOps Engineer |
| Create CI/CD pipeline | Automated build/test/deploy pipeline | DevOps Engineer |
| Define security framework | Security policies & compliance docs | Security Officer |
| Establish coding standards | Code style guide & best practices | Tech Lead |
Key Activities
graph TD
A["Phase 1: Foundation"] --> B["Week 1-2: Requirements & Design"]
A --> C["Week 3-4: Infrastructure Setup"]
A --> D["Week 5-6: DevOps & CI/CD"]
B --> B1["Stakeholder interviews"]
B --> B2["Architecture workshops"]
B --> B3["Technology selection"]
B --> B4["Design documentation"]
C --> C1["Cloud account setup"]
C --> C2["Network configuration"]
C --> C3["Database provisioning"]
C --> C4["Monitoring setup"]
D --> D1["Git repository setup"]
D --> D2["CI/CD pipeline creation"]
D --> D3["Automated testing framework"]
D --> D4["Deployment automation"]
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style B fill:#b3e5fc
style C fill:#b3e5fc
style D fill:#b3e5fc
Dependencies
- Executive approval on architecture decisions
- Cloud provider account access
- Security compliance framework finalization
- Team onboarding completion
Success Criteria
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture Approval | Stakeholder sign-off | 100% approval |
| Infrastructure Readiness | All services deployed | 0 critical issues |
| CI/CD Pipeline | Build success rate | >95% |
| Documentation Completeness | Pages completed | ≥50 pages |
| Team Onboarding | Team readiness | 100% trained |
| Security Baseline | Compliance checks | 100% passed |
Risks & Mitigations
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope creep in architecture | Medium | High | Weekly scope review meetings |
| Cloud provider delays | Low | High | Pre-arrange account setup; backup provider |
| Team skill gaps | Medium | Medium | Conduct training sessions; hire contractors |
| Security compliance delays | Medium | High | Engage security early; use compliance templates |
| Infrastructure cost overruns | Medium | Medium | Set budget alerts; use cost optimization tools |
PHASE 2: CORE VOICE ENGINE (Weeks 7-13)
Phase Overview
- Duration: 7 weeks (February 20 - April 9, 2024)
- Team Size: 12 people (3 ML Engineers, 3 Backend Engineers, 2 NLP Specialists, 2 QA, 2 DevOps)
- Budget Allocation: 25% of total project budget
Objectives & Deliverables
| Objective | Deliverable | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Build voice processing engine | Voice Engine API (v1.0) | ML Lead |
| Integrate NLP models | NLP Pipeline with 5+ models | NLP Lead |
| Create command parser | Command Parser Module | Backend Lead |
| Implement audio handling | Audio Processing Library | ML Engineer |
| Setup voice training | Voice model training pipeline | ML Engineer |
| Create voice API | RESTful Voice API | Backend Engineer |
Key Activities
graph LR
A["Voice Engine Development"] --> B["Audio Capture & Processing"]
A --> C["Speech-to-Text Engine"]
A --> D["NLP Processing"]
A --> E["Intent Recognition"]
A --> F["Response Generation"]
B --> B1["Audio codec support"]
B --> B2["Noise reduction"]
B --> B3["Audio normalization"]
C --> C1["Multi-language support"]
C --> C2["Real-time transcription"]
C --> C3["Confidence scoring"]
D --> D1["Entity extraction"]
D --> D2["Sentiment analysis"]
D --> D3["Context understanding"]
E --> E1["Intent classification"]
E --> E2["Confidence thresholds"]
E --> E3["Fallback handling"]
F --> F1["Response templating"]
F --> F2["Text-to-Speech"]
F --> F3["Audio delivery"]
style A fill:#fff3e0
style B fill:#ffe0b2
style C fill:#ffe0b2
style D fill:#ffe0b2
style E fill:#ffe0b2
style F fill:#ffe0b2
Technical Architecture
graph TD
A["Voice Input"] --> B["Audio Processing Layer"]
B --> C["Speech Recognition Engine"]
C --> D["NLP Processing Pipeline"]
D --> E["Intent Classification"]
E --> F["Action Router"]
F --> G["Response Generator"]
G --> H["Text-to-Speech Engine"]
H --> I["Voice Output"]
D --> J["ML Model Cache"]
E --> K["Intent Database"]
F --> L["Action Handlers"]
style A fill:#c8e6c9
style I fill:#c8e6c9
style B fill:#bbdefb
style C fill:#bbdefb
style D fill:#bbdefb
style E fill:#bbdefb
style F fill:#bbdefb
style G fill:#bbdefb
style H fill:#bbdefb
Dependencies
- Phase 1 infrastructure completion
- ML model training data availability
- Third-party voice API access (Google Cloud Speech, Azure Speech)
- NLP library licenses
Success Criteria
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Voice Recognition Accuracy | Word Error Rate (WER) | <5% |
| Processing Latency | End-to-end time | <500ms |
| Intent Recognition | F1 Score | >0.92 |
| Language Support | Languages supported | ≥5 languages |
| API Availability | Uptime | >99.5% |
| Concurrent Users | Simultaneous connections | ≥1000 users |
Risks & Mitigations
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| NLP model accuracy issues | Medium | High | Use ensemble models; continuous training |
| Voice API rate limits | Medium | High | Implement caching; use multiple providers |
| Latency requirements not met | Medium | High | Optimize inference; use edge computing |
| Language support delays | Low | Medium | Use pre-trained models; prioritize top 3 languages |
| Model training data quality | High | High | Data validation pipeline; manual review |
PHASE 3: DEVELOPMENT FEATURES (Weeks 14-21)
Phase Overview
- Duration: 8 weeks (April 10 - June 4, 2024)
- Team Size: 14 people (4 Backend Engineers, 3 Frontend Engineers, 2 ML Engineers, 2 QA, 2 DevOps, 1 Tech Writer)
- Budget Allocation: 22% of total project budget
Objectives & Deliverables
| Objective | Deliverable | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Build code generation module | Code Generator API (v1.0) | Backend Lead |
| Integrate with IDEs | IDE Plugin Suite | Frontend Lead |
| Git integration | Git Integration Module | Backend Engineer |
| Code analysis engine | Static Analysis Engine | Backend Engineer |
| Documentation generation | Doc Generator Module | Backend Engineer |
| Testing framework integration | Test Generation Module | QA Lead |
Key Activities
graph TD
A["Development Features"] --> B["Code Generation"]
A --> C["IDE Integration"]
A --> D["Git Integration"]
A --> E["Code Analysis"]
B --> B1["Template engine"]
B --> B2["Multi-language support"]
B --> B3["Design pattern library"]
B --> B4["Code quality checks"]
C --> C1["VS Code extension"]
C --> C2["JetBrains plugin"]
C --> C3["Vim integration"]
C --> C4["Real-time sync"]
D --> D1["Commit automation"]
D --> D2["Branch management"]
D --> D3["PR generation"]
D --> D4["Conflict resolution"]
E --> E1["Linting integration"]
E --> E2["Security scanning"]
E --> E3["Performance analysis"]
E --> E4["Complexity metrics"]
style A fill:#f3e5f5
style B fill:#e1bee7
style C fill:#e1bee7
style D fill:#e1bee7
style E fill:#e1bee7
Supported Languages & Frameworks
graph LR
A["Language Support"] --> B["Python"]
A --> C["JavaScript/TypeScript"]
A --> D["Java"]
A --> E["C++"]
A --> F["Go"]
A --> G["Rust"]
B --> B1["Django, FastAPI, Flask"]
C --> C1["React, Vue, Node.js"]
D --> D1["Spring, Quarkus"]
E --> E1["Qt, Boost"]
F --> F1["Gin, Actix"]
G --> R1["Rocket, Actix-web"]
style A fill:#fff9c4
style B fill:#fff59d
style C fill:#fff59d
style D fill:#fff59d
style E fill:#fff59d
style F fill:#fff59d
style G fill:#fff59d
Dependencies
- Phase 2 voice engine completion
- IDE vendor APIs access
- Git provider API access (GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket)
- Code analysis tool integrations
Success Criteria
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Code Generation Accuracy | Generated code quality score | >85% |
| IDE Integration Coverage | IDEs supported | ≥3 major IDEs |
| Git Integration Reliability | Operation success rate | >99% |
| Code Analysis Coverage | Code patterns detected | ≥50 patterns |
| Documentation Quality | Auto-generated doc accuracy | >90% |
| Test Coverage | Generated tests coverage | >80% |
Risks & Mitigations
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDE API changes | Medium | Medium | Monitor vendor updates; version compatibility |
| Code generation bugs | High | High | Extensive testing; code review process |
| Git provider rate limits | Low | Medium | Implement queuing; batch operations |
| Language support complexity | Medium | High | Prioritize top 3 languages; use AST libraries |
| Security vulnerabilities in generated code | Medium | High | Security scanning; OWASP compliance |
PHASE 4: DATA SCIENCE FEATURES (Weeks 22-28)
Phase Overview
- Duration: 7 weeks (June 5 - July 23, 2024)
- Team Size: 12 people (3 Data Scientists, 3 ML Engineers, 2 Backend Engineers, 2 QA, 2 DevOps)
- Budget Allocation: 20% of total project budget
Objectives & Deliverables
| Objective | Deliverable | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Build data analysis engine | Data Analysis API (v1.0) | Data Science Lead |
| ML model integration | Model Registry & Serving | ML Lead |
| Jupyter integration | Jupyter Integration Module | Backend Engineer |
| Data visualization | Visualization Engine | Frontend Engineer |
| Statistical analysis | Stats Analysis Module | Data Scientist |
| Data pipeline orchestration | Pipeline Orchestrator | Data Engineer |
Key Activities
graph TD
A["Data Science Features"] --> B["Data Analysis Engine"]
A --> C["ML Model Integration"]
A --> D["Jupyter Integration"]
A --> E["Visualization Engine"]
B --> B1["Data profiling"]
B --> B2["Statistical analysis"]
B --> B3["Data quality checks"]
B --> B4["Anomaly detection"]
C --> C1["Model registry"]
C --> C2["Model serving"]
C --> C3["Model versioning"]
C --> C4["A/B testing framework"]
D --> D1["Notebook execution"]
D --> D2["Cell-by-cell analysis"]
D --> D3["Variable inspection"]
D --> D4["Output capture"]
E --> E1["Interactive charts"]
E --> E2["Real-time dashboards"]
E --> E3["Export capabilities"]
E --> E4["Custom visualizations"]
style A fill:#e0f2f1
style B fill:#b2dfdb
style C fill:#b2dfdb
style D fill:#b2dfdb
style E fill:#b2dfdb
Data Science Workflow
sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant VoiceAgent
participant DataEngine
participant MLRegistry
participant Jupyter
participant Visualization
User->>VoiceAgent: "Analyze sales data for trends"
VoiceAgent->>DataEngine: Parse analysis request
DataEngine->>DataEngine: Load dataset
DataEngine->>DataEngine: Perform statistical analysis
DataEngine->>MLRegistry: Get relevant models
MLRegistry->>DataEngine: Return model list
DataEngine->>Jupyter: Execute analysis notebook
Jupyter->>DataEngine: Return results
DataEngine->>Visualization: Generate charts
Visualization->>User: Display results
User->>VoiceAgent: "Create prediction model"
VoiceAgent->>MLRegistry: Train new model
MLRegistry->>MLRegistry: Store model version
MLRegistry->>User: Model ready for deployment
Dependencies
- Phase 2 voice engine completion
- Phase 3 development features (for code generation)
- Jupyter Notebook API access
- ML framework libraries (TensorFlow, PyTorch, scikit-learn)
- Data storage infrastructure
Success Criteria
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Data Analysis Speed | Query response time | <2 seconds |
| ML Model Accuracy | Average model F1 score | >0.85 |
| Jupyter Integration | Notebook execution success | >98% |
| Visualization Quality | Chart rendering time | <1 second |
| Statistical Analysis Coverage | Analysis types supported | ≥20 types |
| Model Registry Reliability | Uptime | >99.9% |
Risks & Mitigations
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Large dataset processing | High | High | Implement streaming; use Spark/Dask |
| Model training time | Medium | High | Use pre-trained models; distributed training |
| Jupyter kernel crashes | Medium | Medium | Implement restart logic; resource limits |
| Data privacy concerns | High | High | Implement data masking; encryption |
| Model drift over time | Medium | High | Implement monitoring; retraining pipeline |
PHASE 5: COLLABORATION & MANAGEMENT (Weeks 29-35)
Phase Overview
- Duration: 7 weeks (July 24 - September 10, 2024)
- Team Size: 10 people (2 Backend Engineers, 2 Frontend Engineers, 2 QA, 2 DevOps, 1 Tech Writer, 1 Product Manager)
- Budget Allocation: 12% of total project budget
Objectives & Deliverables
| Objective | Deliverable | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time collaboration | Collaboration Engine (v1.0) | Backend Lead |
| Project management integration | PM Integration Module | Backend Engineer |
| Team communication | Communication Hub | Frontend Lead |
| Notification system | Notification Service | Backend Engineer |
| Activity tracking | Activity Logger & Analytics | Backend Engineer |
| Audit logging | Audit Trail System | Security Officer |
Key Activities
graph TD
A["Collaboration & Management"] --> B["Real-time Collaboration"]
A --> C["Project Management"]
A --> D["Team Communication"]
A --> E["Notifications & Tracking"]
B --> B1["Shared workspaces"]
B --> B2["Live code editing"]
B --> B3["Presence awareness"]
B --> B4["Conflict resolution"]
C --> C1["Jira integration"]
C --> C2["Asana integration"]
C --> C3["Monday.com integration"]
C --> C4["Task automation"]
D --> D1["Chat integration"]
D --> D2["Slack integration"]
D --> D3["Teams integration"]
D --> D4["Email notifications"]
E --> E1["Real-time notifications"]
E --> E2["Activity dashboard"]
E --> E3["Performance metrics"]
E --> E4["Audit logging"]
style A fill:#fce4ec
style B fill:#f8bbd0
style C fill:#f8bbd0
style D fill:#f8bbd0
style E fill:#f8bbd0
Collaboration Architecture
graph LR
A["User A"] -->|WebSocket| B["Collaboration Server"]
C["User B"] -->|WebSocket| B
D["User C"] -->|WebSocket| B
B --> E["Operational Transform Engine"]
B --> F["Presence Manager"]
B --> G["Conflict Resolver"]
E --> H["Document Store"]
F --> I["User State Cache"]
G --> J["Merge Strategy Engine"]
H --> K["Project Management API"]
I --> K
J --> K
K --> L["Jira"]
K --> M["Slack"]
K --> N["GitHub"]
style B fill:#ffccbc
style E fill:#ffab91
style F fill:#ffab91
style G fill:#ffab91
Dependencies
- Phase 2 voice engine completion
- Phase 3 development features
- Phase 4 data science features
- Third-party PM tool APIs (Jira, Asana, Monday.com)
- Communication platform APIs (Slack, Teams, Discord)
Success Criteria
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Real-time Sync Latency | Update propagation time | <100ms |
| Collaboration Reliability | Session uptime | >99.9% |
| PM Integration Coverage | Tools integrated | ≥3 tools |
| Notification Delivery | Message delivery rate | >99.5% |
| Conflict Resolution | Auto-resolution rate | >95% |
| Audit Trail Completeness | Events logged | 100% |
Risks & Mitigations
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Real-time sync conflicts | Medium | High | Implement OT/CRDT; extensive testing |
| API rate limits from PM tools | Medium | Medium | Implement caching; batch operations |
| Notification spam | Medium | Low | Implement filtering; user preferences |
| Data consistency issues | Low | High | Implement distributed transactions |
| Security in shared workspaces | Medium | High | Implement access controls; encryption |
PHASE 6: QUALITY & LAUNCH (Weeks 36-42)
Phase Overview
- Duration: 7 weeks (September 11 - October 29, 2024)
- Team Size: 16 people (2 Backend Engineers, 2 Frontend Engineers, 4 QA Engineers, 2 DevOps, 2 Security Engineers, 2 Tech Writers, 1 Product Manager, 1 Release Manager)
- Budget Allocation: 6% of total project budget
Objectives & Deliverables
| Objective | Deliverable | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Performance optimization | Performance Report & Tuning | DevOps Lead |
| Security hardening | Security Assessment Report | Security Officer |
| UAT execution | UAT Test Results & Sign-off | QA Lead |
| Bug fixes & stabilization | Release Candidate (RC) | Tech Lead |
| Documentation finalization | Complete User & Admin Docs | Tech Writer |
| Production deployment | Production Environment Ready | DevOps Lead |
Key Activities
graph TD
A["Quality & Launch Phase"] --> B["Performance Optimization"]
A --> C["Security Hardening"]
A --> D["UAT & Testing"]
A --> E["Documentation"]
A --> F["Deployment Preparation"]
B --> B1["Load testing"]
B --> B2["Profiling & optimization"]
B --> B3["Database tuning"]
B --> B4["Caching strategy"]
C --> C1["Penetration testing"]
C --> C2["Vulnerability scanning"]
C --> C3["Security audit"]
C --> C4["Compliance verification"]
D --> D1["Functional testing"]
D --> D2["Integration testing"]
D --> D3["User acceptance testing"]
D --> D4["Regression testing"]
E --> E1["User guide"]
E --> E2["Admin guide"]
E --> E3["API documentation"]
E --> E4["Troubleshooting guide"]
F --> F1["Production setup"]
F --> F2["Backup strategy"]
F --> F3["Disaster recovery"]
F --> F4["Rollback plan"]
style A fill:#c8e6c9
style B fill:#a5d6a7
style C fill:#a5d6a7
style D fill:#a5d6a7
style E fill:#a5d6a7
style F fill:#a5d6a7
Testing Strategy
graph LR
A["Test Pyramid"] --> B["Unit Tests"]
A --> C["Integration Tests"]
A --> D["System Tests"]
A --> E["UAT"]
B --> B1["70% coverage"]
B --> B2["<100ms per test"]
C --> C1["50% coverage"]
C --> C2["<1s per test"]
D --> D1["30% coverage"]
D --> D2["<10s per test"]
E --> E1["End-to-end scenarios"]
E --> E2["User workflows"]
style A fill:#fff9c4
style B fill:#fff59d
style C fill:#fff59d
style D fill:#fff59d
style E fill:#fff59d
Dependencies
- All previous phases completion
- Stakeholder availability for UAT
- Production infrastructure provisioning
- Security compliance approval
Success Criteria
| Criterion | Measurement | Target |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | P95 latency | <200ms |
| Security | Vulnerabilities found | 0 critical |
| Test Coverage | Code coverage | >85% |
| UAT Pass Rate | Tests passed | >98% |
| Documentation | Pages completed | ≥100 pages |
| Production Readiness | Deployment checklist | 100% complete |
Risks & Mitigations
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Critical bugs found in UAT | Medium | High | Extended testing; staged rollout |
| Performance issues | Medium | High | Load testing; optimization sprints |
| Security vulnerabilities | Low | Critical | Penetration testing; security audit |
| Deployment issues | Low | High | Dry runs; rollback plan |
| Stakeholder unavailability | Low | Medium | Schedule UAT early; backup approvers |
3. Milestone Schedule
gantt
title Milestone Schedule
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
milestone M1: Architecture & Infrastructure Complete, 2024-02-19, 0d
milestone M2: Voice Engine MVP Ready, 2024-03-28, 0d
milestone M3: Development Features Complete, 2024-05-23, 0d
milestone M4: Data Science Features Complete, 2024-07-18, 0d
milestone M5: Collaboration Features Complete, 2024-09-10, 0d
milestone M6: UAT Complete, 2024-10-24, 0d
milestone M7: Production Ready, 2024-11-14, 0d
section Milestones
M1 :crit, m1, 2024-02-19, 1d
M2 :crit, m2, 2024-03-28, 1d
M3 :crit, m3, 2024-05-23, 1d
M4 :crit, m4, 2024-07-18, 1d
M5 :crit, m5, 2024-09-10, 1d
M6 :crit, m6, 2024-10-24, 1d
M7 :crit, m7, 2024-11-14, 1d
| Milestone | Target Date | Deliverables | Success Criteria | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1: Architecture & Infrastructure Complete | Feb 19, 2024 | Architecture docs, Infrastructure setup, CI/CD pipeline | All design docs approved, Infrastructure 99.5% uptime, CI/CD success rate >95% | Technical Architect |
| M2: Voice Engine MVP Ready | Mar 28, 2024 | Voice processing engine, NLP integration, Command parser | WER <5%, Latency <500ms, Intent F1 >0.92 | ML Lead |
| M3: Development Features Complete | May 23, 2024 | Code generator, IDE plugins, Git integration | Code quality >85%, IDE coverage ≥3, Git reliability >99% | Backend Lead |
| M4: Data Science Features Complete | Jul 18, 2024 | Data analysis engine, ML model registry, Jupyter integration | Analysis speed <2s, Model F1 >0.85, Jupyter success >98% | Data Science Lead |
| M5: Collaboration Features Complete | Sep 10, 2024 | Collaboration engine, PM integration, Communication hub | Sync latency <100ms, Uptime >99.9%, PM coverage ≥3 tools | Backend Lead |
| M6: UAT Complete | Oct 24, 2024 | UAT test results, Bug fixes, Release candidate | UAT pass rate >98%, 0 critical bugs, All docs complete | QA Lead |
| M7: Production Ready | Nov 14, 2024 | Production deployment, Monitoring setup, Support docs | Deployment successful, Monitoring active, Support team trained | DevOps Lead |
4. Resource Allocation
4.1 Team Structure by Phase
graph TD
A["Project Team Structure"] --> B["Phase 1: Foundation"]
A --> C["Phase 2: Voice Engine"]
A --> D["Phase 3: Dev Features"]
A --> E["Phase 4: Data Science"]
A --> F["Phase 5: Collaboration"]
A --> G["Phase 6: Quality & Launch"]
B --> B1["2x Architects"]
B --> B2["2x Backend Engineers"]
B --> B3["2x DevOps Engineers"]
B --> B4["2x QA Engineers"]
B --> B5["Total: 8 people"]
C --> C1["3x ML Engineers"]
C --> C2["3x Backend Engineers"]
C --> C3["2x NLP Specialists"]
C --> C4["2x QA Engineers"]
C --> C5["2x DevOps Engineers"]
C --> C6["Total: 12 people"]
D --> D1["4x Backend Engineers"]
D --> D2["3x Frontend Engineers"]
D --> D3["2x ML Engineers"]
D --> D4["2x QA Engineers"]
D --> D5["2x DevOps Engineers"]
D --> D6["1x Tech Writer"]
D --> D7["Total: 14 people"]
E --> E1["3x Data Scientists"]
E --> E2["3x ML Engineers"]
E --> E3["2x Backend Engineers"]
E --> E4["2x QA Engineers"]
E --> E5["2x DevOps Engineers"]
E --> E6["Total: 12 people"]
F --> F1["2x Backend Engineers"]
F --> F2["2x Frontend Engineers"]
F --> F3["2x QA Engineers"]
F --> F4["2x DevOps Engineers"]
F --> F5["1x Tech Writer"]
F --> F6["1x Product Manager"]
F --> F7["Total: 10 people"]
G --> G1["2x Backend Engineers"]
G --> G2["2x Frontend Engineers"]
G --> G3["4x QA Engineers"]
G --> G4["2x DevOps Engineers"]
G --> G5["2x Security Engineers"]
G --> G6["2x Tech Writers"]
G --> G7["1x Product Manager"]
G --> G8["1x Release Manager"]
G --> G9["Total: 16 people"]
style A fill:#e3f2fd
style B fill:#bbdefb
style C fill:#bbdefb
style D fill:#bbdefb
style E fill:#bbdefb
style F fill:#bbdefb
style G fill:#bbdefb
4.2 Core Team Roles & Responsibilities
| Role | Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 | Phase 4 | Phase 5 | Phase 6 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technical Architect | 100% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 1 FTE |
| ML Lead | - | 100% | 20% | 50% | 10% | 10% | 1 FTE |
| Backend Lead | 50% | 50% | 100% | 50% | 50% | 30% | 2 FTE |
| Frontend Lead | - | - | 50% | 20% | 100% | 50% | 1 FTE |
| DevOps Lead | 100% | 50% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 100% | 1 FTE |
| QA Lead | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 100% | 1 FTE |
| Data Science Lead | - | - | - | 100% | 20% | 10% | 1 FTE |
| Security Officer | 50% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 100% | 1 FTE |
| Product Manager | 20% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 50% | 50% | 1 FTE |
| Tech Writer | 10% | 10% | 30% | 20% | 30% | 50% | 1 FTE |
4.3 Resource Utilization Chart
graph LR
A["Resource Utilization"] --> B["Phase 1"]
A --> C["Phase 2"]
A --> D["Phase 3"]
A --> E["Phase 4"]
A --> F["Phase 5"]
A --> G["Phase 6"]
B --> B1["8 people<br/>100% utilized"]
C --> C1["12 people<br/>95% utilized"]
D --> D1["14 people<br/>92% utilized"]
E --> E1["12 people<br/>90% utilized"]
F --> F1["10 people<br/>88% utilized"]
G --> G1["16 people<br/>85% utilized"]
style B1 fill:#c8e6c9
style C1 fill:#c8e6c9
style D1 fill:#c8e6c9
style E1 fill:#c8e6c9
style F1 fill:#c8e6c9
style G1 fill:#c8e6c9
4.4 Skill Matrix
| Skill | Required Level | Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 | Phase 4 | Phase 5 | Phase 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| System Architecture | Expert | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Backend Development | Senior | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Frontend Development | Senior | - | - | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Machine Learning | Expert | - | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| NLP/Voice Processing | Expert | - | 2 | - | 1 | - | - |
| Data Science | Senior | - | - | - | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| DevOps/Infrastructure | Senior | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| QA/Testing | Senior | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Security | Expert | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Technical Writing | Senior | - | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
5. Sprint Planning Overview
5.1 Sprint Schedule (6 Sprints × 2 weeks)
gantt
title Sprint Schedule
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
section Sprint 1
Sprint 1: s1, 2024-01-08, 14d
section Sprint 2
Sprint 2: s2, 2024-01-22, 14d
section Sprint 3
Sprint 3: s3, 2024-02-05, 14d
section Sprint 4
Sprint 4: s4, 2024-02-19, 14d
section Sprint 5
Sprint 5: s5, 2024-03-04, 14d
section Sprint 6
Sprint 6: s6, 2024-03-18, 14d
milestone Sprint 1 Review, 2024-01-22, 0d
milestone Sprint 2 Review, 2024-02-05, 0d
milestone Sprint 3 Review, 2024-02-19, 0d
milestone Sprint 4 Review, 2024-03-04, 0d
milestone Sprint 5 Review, 2024-03-18, 0d
milestone Sprint 6 Review, 2024-04-01, 0d
5.2 Sprint Details
Sprint 1: Foundation Setup (Jan 8-22, 2024)
Sprint Goal: Establish project foundation and infrastructure
| Item | Story Points | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture design workshop | 8 | Tech Architect | Planned |
| Cloud infrastructure setup | 13 | DevOps Lead | Planned |
| Development environment setup | 8 | DevOps Engineer | Planned |
| Git repository initialization | 5 | Backend Lead | Planned |
| Team onboarding & training | 5 | Project Manager | Planned |
| Security framework definition | 8 | Security Officer | Planned |
| Capacity: 47 story points | Team: 8 people | Velocity Target: 45 points |
Key Deliverables:
- Architecture Design Document (ADD)
- Infrastructure provisioned in cloud
- Development environment ready
- Team trained and onboarded
Risks:
- Cloud provider account delays → Mitigation: Pre-arrange setup
- Team availability → Mitigation: Confirm schedules upfront
Sprint 2: Infrastructure & CI/CD (Jan 22 - Feb 5, 2024)
Sprint Goal: Complete infrastructure and establish CI/CD pipeline
| Item | Story Points | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Database setup & optimization | 13 | DevOps Engineer | Planned |
| Monitoring & logging setup | 10 | DevOps Engineer | Planned |
| CI/CD pipeline creation | 13 | DevOps Lead | Planned |
| Automated testing framework | 8 | QA Lead | Planned |
| Security scanning integration | 8 | Security Officer | Planned |
| Documentation finalization | 5 | Tech Writer | Planned |
| Capacity: 57 story points | Team: 8 people | Velocity Target: 50 points |
Key Deliverables:
- CI/CD pipeline operational
- Monitoring & logging active
- Automated tests running
- Security scanning enabled
Risks:
- Tool integration complexity → Mitigation: Use managed services
- Performance issues → Mitigation: Load testing early
Sprint 3: Voice Engine Foundation (Feb 5-19, 2024)
Sprint Goal: Build core voice processing engine
| Item | Story Points | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audio processing library | 13 | ML Engineer | Planned |
| Speech-to-text integration | 13 | ML Engineer | Planned |
| Voice API development | 10 | Backend Engineer | Planned |
| NLP model selection | 8 | NLP Specialist | Planned |
| Voice testing framework | 8 | QA Engineer | Planned |
| Documentation | 5 | Tech Writer | Planned |
| Capacity: 57 story points | Team: 12 people | Velocity Target: 55 points |
Key Deliverables:
- Audio processing working
- Speech-to-text API functional
- Voice API endpoints ready
- NLP models selected
Risks:
- Model accuracy issues → Mitigation: Use ensemble models
- API rate limits → Mitigation: Implement caching
Sprint 4: NLP & Intent Recognition (Feb 19 - Mar 4, 2024)
Sprint Goal: Implement NLP processing and intent recognition
| Item | Story Points | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| NLP pipeline implementation | 13 | NLP Specialist | Planned |
| Intent classification model | 13 | ML Engineer | Planned |
| Entity extraction | 10 | NLP Specialist | Planned |
| Command parser | 8 | Backend Engineer | Planned |
| Voice testing & optimization | 8 | QA Engineer | Planned |
| Performance tuning | 8 | ML Engineer | Planned |
| Capacity: 60 story points | Team: 12 people | Velocity Target: 55 points |
Key Deliverables:
- NLP pipeline operational
- Intent recognition working
- Command parser functional
- Performance optimized
Risks:
- Accuracy below targets → Mitigation: Retrain models
- Latency issues → Mitigation: Optimize inference
Sprint 5: Code Generation (Mar 4-18, 2024)
Sprint Goal: Build code generation module
| Item | Story Points | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Code template engine | 13 | Backend Engineer | Planned |
| Multi-language support | 13 | Backend Engineer | Planned |
| Design pattern library | 10 | Backend Engineer | Planned |
| Code quality checks | 8 | Backend Engineer | Planned |
| Code generation testing | 8 | QA Engineer | Planned |
| Documentation | 5 | Tech Writer | Planned |
| Capacity: 57 story points | Team: 14 people | Velocity Target: 55 points |
Key Deliverables:
- Code generator API functional
- Multi-language support working
- Design patterns available
- Quality checks integrated
Risks:
- Language support complexity → Mitigation: Prioritize top 3 languages
- Generated code quality → Mitigation: Extensive testing
Sprint 6: IDE Integration (Mar 18 - Apr 1, 2024)
Sprint Goal: Integrate with major IDEs
| Item | Story Points | Owner | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| VS Code extension | 13 | Frontend Engineer | Planned |
| JetBrains plugin | 13 | Frontend Engineer | Planned |
| Real-time sync | 10 | Backend Engineer | Planned |
| IDE testing | 8 | QA Engineer | Planned |
| Git integration | 8 | Backend Engineer | Planned |
| Documentation | 5 | Tech Writer | Planned |
| Capacity: 57 story points | Team: 14 people | Velocity Target: 55 points |
Key Deliverables:
- VS Code extension published
- JetBrains plugin ready
- Real-time sync working
- Git integration functional
Risks:
- IDE API changes → Mitigation: Monitor vendor updates
- Plugin approval delays → Mitigation: Submit early
5.3 Capacity Planning
graph LR
A["Capacity Planning"] --> B["Sprint 1"]
A --> C["Sprint 2"]
A --> D["Sprint 3"]
A --> E["Sprint 4"]
A --> F["Sprint 5"]
A --> G["Sprint 6"]
B --> B1["47 points<br/>8 people<br/>5.9 pts/person"]
C --> C1["57 points<br/>8 people<br/>7.1 pts/person"]
D --> D1["57 points<br/>12 people<br/>4.8 pts/person"]
E --> E1["60 points<br/>12 people<br/>5.0 pts/person"]
F --> F1["57 points<br/>14 people<br/>4.1 pts/person"]
G --> G1["57 points<br/>14 people<br/>4.1 pts/person"]
style B1 fill:#fff9c4
style C1 fill:#fff9c4
style D1 fill:#fff9c4
style E1 fill:#fff9c4
style F1 fill:#fff9c4
style G1 fill:#fff9c4
5.4 Sprint Metrics & KPIs
| Metric | Target | Sprint 1 | Sprint 2 | Sprint 3 | Sprint 4 | Sprint 5 | Sprint 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Velocity | 50 pts | 45 | 52 | 54 | 56 | 55 | 54 |
| Burndown | 100% | 98% | 100% | 99% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| Bug Escape Rate | <2% | 1.5% | 1.8% | 2.0% | 1.9% | 1.7% | 1.5% |
| Code Review Time | <24h | 20h | 18h | 16h | 15h | 14h | 12h |
| Test Coverage | >80% | 75% | 78% | 82% | 85% | 87% | 90% |
| Deployment Success | >95% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 99% | 99% | 100% |
6. Release Plan
6.1 Release Timeline
gantt
title Release Plan Timeline
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
section Alpha Release
Alpha Development :a1, 2024-02-20, 30d
Alpha Testing :a2, 2024-03-21, 14d
Alpha Release :crit, a3, 2024-04-04, 1d
section Beta Release
Beta Development :b1, 2024-04-05, 45d
Beta Testing :b2, 2024-05-20, 21d
Beta Release :crit, b3, 2024-06-10, 1d
section Release Candidate
RC Development :c1, 2024-06-11, 45d
RC Testing :c2, 2024-07-26, 21d
RC Release :crit, c3, 2024-08-16, 1d
section Production Release
Final Testing :d1, 2024-08-17, 30d
Production Release :crit, d2, 2024-09-16, 1d
milestone Alpha, 2024-04-04, 0d
milestone Beta, 2024-06-10, 0d
milestone RC, 2024-08-16, 0d
milestone Production, 2024-09-16, 0d
6.2 Release Versions & Features
Release 1.0-Alpha (April 4, 2024)
Target Audience: Internal stakeholders, early adopters
Features:
- Voice input/output processing
- Basic command recognition
- Simple code generation (Python only)
- Single IDE integration (VS Code)
- Basic project management
Acceptance Criteria:
- Voice recognition WER <8%
- Latency <800ms
- Code generation accuracy >75%
- 50 concurrent users supported
- 99% uptime in test environment
Known Limitations:
- Limited language support (English only)
- No data science features
- No collaboration features
- Limited IDE support
Release 1.0-Beta (June 10, 2024)
Target Audience: Extended beta testers, select customers
Features:
- Multi-language voice support (5 languages)
- Advanced NLP with entity extraction
- Multi-language code generation (Python, JavaScript, Java)
- Multiple IDE integrations (VS Code, JetBrains)
- Basic data analysis features
- Git integration
- Project management integration (Jira)
Acceptance Criteria:
- Voice recognition WER <5%
- Latency <500ms
- Code generation accuracy >85%
- 500 concurrent users supported
- 99.5% uptime in staging environment
- Data analysis response time <3 seconds
New Features:
- Multi-language support
- Data analysis engine
- Git integration
- PM tool integration
Release 1.0-RC (August 16, 2024)
Target Audience: Pre-production testing, customer pilots
Features:
- All Beta features
- Real-time collaboration
- Advanced data science features (ML model registry, Jupyter integration)
- Comprehensive IDE support (6+ IDEs)
- Advanced project management
- Team communication integration
- Audit logging & compliance
Acceptance Criteria:
- Voice recognition WER <4%
- Latency <400ms
- Code generation accuracy >90%
- 1000 concurrent users supported
- 99.8% uptime in staging environment
- Data analysis response time <2 seconds
- Collaboration sync latency <100ms
- 0 critical security vulnerabilities
New Features:
- Real-time collaboration
- ML model registry
- Jupyter integration
- Team communication
- Audit logging
Release 1.0-Production (September 16, 2024)
Target Audience: General availability, all customers
Features:
- All RC features
- Performance optimizations
- Enhanced security
- Comprehensive documentation
- Production support infrastructure
- Advanced monitoring & analytics
Acceptance Criteria:
- Voice recognition WER <3%
- Latency <300ms
- Code generation accuracy >92%
- 5000 concurrent users supported
- 99.9% uptime in production
- Data analysis response time <1.5 seconds
- Collaboration sync latency <50ms
- 0 critical security vulnerabilities
- 100% documentation coverage
New Features:
- Performance optimizations
- Enhanced security features
- Advanced analytics
- Production monitoring
6.3 Release Criteria
graph TD
A["Release Criteria"] --> B["Functional Criteria"]
A --> C["Quality Criteria"]
A --> D["Performance Criteria"]
A --> E["Security Criteria"]
A --> F["Documentation Criteria"]
B --> B1["All features implemented"]
B --> B2["All acceptance tests pass"]
B --> B3["Integration tests pass"]
B --> B4["UAT sign-off"]
C --> C1["Code coverage >85%"]
C --> C2["Bug escape rate <1%"]
C --> C3["No critical bugs"]
C --> C4["Regression tests pass"]
D --> D1["Latency targets met"]
D --> D2["Throughput targets met"]
D --> D3["Load testing passed"]
D --> D4["Stress testing passed"]
E --> E1["Security audit passed"]
E --> E2["Penetration testing passed"]
E --> E3["Vulnerability scan clean"]
E --> E4["Compliance verified"]
F --> F1["User guide complete"]
F --> F2["Admin guide complete"]
F --> F3["API docs complete"]
F --> F4["Troubleshooting guide complete"]
style A fill:#e8f5e9
style B fill:#c8e6c9
style C fill:#c8e6c9
style D fill:#c8e6c9
style E fill:#c8e6c9
style F fill:#c8e6c9
6.4 Release Checklist
| Item | Alpha | Beta | RC | Production |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Functional Testing | 80% | 95% | 100% | 100% |
| Performance Testing | Partial | Full | Full | Full |
| Security Testing | Basic | Intermediate | Advanced | Advanced |
| Load Testing | 100 users | 500 users | 1000 users | 5000 users |
| UAT | Internal | Extended | Full | Full |
| Documentation | 50% | 80% | 95% | 100% |
| Deployment Readiness | Partial | 80% | 95% | 100% |
| Support Readiness | No | Partial | 80% | 100% |
| Monitoring Setup | Basic | Intermediate | Advanced | Advanced |
| Rollback Plan | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
7. Risk Timeline
7.1 Risk Heat Map by Phase
graph TD
A["Risk Timeline Analysis"] --> B["Phase 1: Foundation"]
A --> C["Phase 2: Voice Engine"]
A --> D["Phase 3: Dev Features"]
A --> E["Phase 4: Data Science"]
A --> F["Phase 5: Collaboration"]
A --> G["Phase 6: Quality & Launch"]
B --> B1["Risk Level: MEDIUM<br/>Critical Risks: 2<br/>High Risks: 3"]
C --> C1["Risk Level: HIGH<br/>Critical Risks: 1<br/>High Risks: 4"]
D --> D1["Risk Level: MEDIUM<br/>Critical Risks: 1<br/>High Risks: 3"]
E --> E1["Risk Level: MEDIUM<br/>Critical Risks: 1<br/>High Risks: 3"]
F --> F1["Risk Level: LOW<br/>Critical Risks: 0<br/>High Risks: 2"]
G --> G1["Risk Level: HIGH<br/>Critical Risks: 2<br/>High Risks: 3"]
style B1 fill:#fff9c4
style C1 fill:#ffccbc
style D1 fill:#fff9c4
style E1 fill:#fff9c4
style F1 fill:#c8e6c9
style G1 fill:#ffccbc
7.2 Comprehensive Risk Register
Phase 1: Foundation (Weeks 1-6)
| Risk ID | Risk Description | Probability | Impact | Severity | Mitigation | Owner | Monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1-001 | Scope creep in architecture | Medium (60%) | High | HIGH | Weekly scope review; change control board | Tech Architect | Weekly reviews |
| R1-002 | Cloud provider account delays | Low (20%) | High | MEDIUM | Pre-arrange setup; backup provider | DevOps Lead | Daily check-ins |
| R1-003 | Team skill gaps | Medium (50%) | Medium | MEDIUM | Training sessions; hire contractors | Project Manager | Skill assessments |
| R1-004 | Security compliance delays | Medium (55%) | High | HIGH | Engage security early; use templates | Security Officer | Compliance audits |
| R1-005 | Infrastructure cost overruns | Medium (45%) | Medium | MEDIUM | Budget alerts; cost optimization | DevOps Lead | Monthly reviews |
Mitigation Window: Weeks 1-3 (highest risk period)
Phase 2: Voice Engine (Weeks 7-13)
| Risk ID | Risk Description | Probability | Impact | Severity | Mitigation | Owner | Monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2-001 | NLP model accuracy issues | Medium (65%) | High | HIGH | Ensemble models; continuous training | ML Lead | Weekly accuracy metrics |
| R2-002 | Voice API rate limits | Medium (50%) | High | HIGH | Caching; multiple providers | ML Engineer | API usage tracking |
| R2-003 | Latency requirements not met | Medium (55%) | High | HIGH | Optimize inference; edge computing | ML Engineer | Latency monitoring |
| R2-004 | Language support delays | Low (30%) | Medium | MEDIUM | Pre-trained models; prioritize top 3 | NLP Specialist | Language coverage tracking |
| R2-005 | Model training data quality | High (75%) | High | CRITICAL | Data validation pipeline; manual review | Data Scientist | Data quality metrics |
Mitigation Window: Weeks 8-10 (model training phase)
Phase 3: Development Features (Weeks 14-21)
| Risk ID | Risk Description | Probability | Impact | Severity | Mitigation | Owner | Monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3-001 | IDE API changes | Medium (50%) | Medium | MEDIUM | Monitor vendor updates; version compatibility | Frontend Lead | API change tracking |
| R3-002 | Code generation bugs | High (70%) | High | HIGH | Extensive testing; code review | Backend Lead | Bug tracking metrics |
| R3-003 | Git provider rate limits | Low (25%) | Medium | MEDIUM | Queuing; batch operations | Backend Engineer | API usage tracking |
| R3-004 | Language support complexity | Medium (55%) | High | HIGH | Prioritize top 3; use AST libraries | Backend Lead | Language coverage tracking |
| R3-005 | Security vulnerabilities in generated code | Medium (50%) | High | HIGH | Security scanning; OWASP compliance | Security Officer | Security scan results |
Mitigation Window: Weeks 15-17 (code generation phase)
Phase 4: Data Science Features (Weeks 22-28)
| Risk ID | Risk Description | Probability | Impact | Severity | Mitigation | Owner | Monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4-001 | Large dataset processing | High (70%) | High | HIGH | Streaming; Spark/Dask | Data Scientist | Performance metrics |
| R4-002 | Model training time | Medium (55%) | High | HIGH | Pre-trained models; distributed training | ML Lead | Training time tracking |
| R4-003 | Jupyter kernel crashes | Medium (50%) | Medium | MEDIUM | Restart logic; resource limits | Backend Engineer | Crash rate tracking |
| R4-004 | Data privacy concerns | High (75%) | High | CRITICAL | Data masking; encryption | Security Officer | Compliance audits |
| R4-005 | Model drift over time | Medium (60%) | High | HIGH | Monitoring; retraining pipeline | Data Scientist | Model performance tracking |
Mitigation Window: Weeks 23-25 (data processing phase)
Phase 5: Collaboration & Management (Weeks 29-35)
| Risk ID | Risk Description | Probability | Impact | Severity | Mitigation | Owner | Monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R5-001 | Real-time sync conflicts | Medium (50%) | High | HIGH | OT/CRDT; extensive testing | Backend Lead | Conflict rate tracking |
| R5-002 | API rate limits from PM tools | Medium (45%) | Medium | MEDIUM | Caching; batch operations | Backend Engineer | API usage tracking |
| R5-003 | Notification spam | Medium (40%) | Low | LOW | Filtering; user preferences | Frontend Engineer | User feedback |
| R5-004 | Data consistency issues | Low (25%) | High | MEDIUM | Distributed transactions | Backend Lead | Consistency checks |
| R5-005 | Security in shared workspaces | Medium (50%) | High | HIGH | Access controls; encryption | Security Officer | Security audits |
Mitigation Window: Weeks 30-32 (collaboration engine phase)
Phase 6: Quality & Launch (Weeks 36-42)
| Risk ID | Risk Description | Probability | Impact | Severity | Mitigation | Owner | Monitoring |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R6-001 | Critical bugs found in UAT | Medium (55%) | High | HIGH | Extended testing; staged rollout | QA Lead | Bug tracking |
| R6-002 | Performance issues | Medium (50%) | High | HIGH | Load testing; optimization sprints | DevOps Lead | Performance metrics |
| R6-003 | Security vulnerabilities | Low (20%) | Critical | CRITICAL | Penetration testing; security audit | Security Officer | Vulnerability tracking |
| R6-004 | Deployment issues | Low (25%) | High | HIGH | Dry runs; rollback plan | DevOps Lead | Deployment logs |
| R6-005 | Stakeholder unavailability | Low (20%) | Medium | MEDIUM | Schedule early; backup approvers | Project Manager | Stakeholder tracking |
Mitigation Window: Weeks 37-39 (UAT phase)
7.3 Risk Mitigation Timeline
gantt
title Risk Mitigation Timeline
dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
section Critical Risks
R2-005: Data Quality :crit, 2024-02-20, 21d
R4-004: Data Privacy :crit, 2024-06-06, 21d
R6-003: Security Vulns :crit, 2024-09-26, 21d
section High Risks
R1-001: Scope Creep :high, 2024-01-08, 42d
R1-004: Compliance :high, 2024-01-08, 42d
R2-001: NLP Accuracy :high, 2024-02-20, 21d
R2-002: API Rate Limits :high, 2024-02-20, 21d
R2-003: Latency :high, 2024-02-20, 21d
R3-002: Code Gen Bugs :high, 2024-04-11, 21d
R3-004: Language Support:high, 2024-04-11, 21d
R3-005: Security in Code:high, 2024-04-11, 21d
R4-001: Large Datasets :high, 2024-06-06, 21d
R4-002: Training Time :high, 2024-06-06, 21d
R4-005: Model Drift :high, 2024-06-06, 21d
R5-001: Sync Conflicts :high, 2024-08-01, 21d
R5-005: Workspace Sec :high, 2024-08-01, 21d
R6-001: UAT Bugs :high, 2024-09-26, 21d
R6-002: Performance :high, 2024-09-26, 21d
R6-004: Deployment :high, 2024-09-26, 21d
7.4 Risk Response Strategies
graph TD
A["Risk Response Strategies"] --> B["Avoid"]
A --> C["Mitigate"]
A --> D["Transfer"]
A --> E["Accept"]
B --> B1["R1-001: Scope Creep<br/>Strategy: Strict change control"]
B --> B2["R1-002: Provider Delays<br/>Strategy: Pre-arrange setup"]
C --> C1["R2-001: NLP Accuracy<br/>Strategy: Ensemble models"]
C --> C2["R2-005: Data Quality<br/>Strategy: Validation pipeline"]
C --> C3["R3-002: Code Gen Bugs<br/>Strategy: Extensive testing"]
C --> C4["R4-001: Large Datasets<br/>Strategy: Streaming/Spark"]
C --> C5["R4-004: Data Privacy<br/>Strategy: Encryption/Masking"]
C --> C6["R6-001: UAT Bugs<br/>Strategy: Extended testing"]
D --> D1["R6-003: Security Vulns<br/>Strategy: Insurance/SLA"]
E --> E1["R5-003: Notification Spam<br/>Strategy: User preferences"]
E --> E2["R1-005: Cost Overruns<br/>Strategy: Budget buffer"]
style A fill:#e3f2fd
style B fill:#bbdefb
style C fill:#bbdefb
style D fill:#bbdefb
style E fill:#bbdefb
7.5 Risk Escalation Matrix
| Risk Level | Probability | Impact | Escalation | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRITICAL | >60% | Critical | Executive | Immediate action; daily reviews |
| HIGH | >50% | High | Project Manager | Weekly reviews; mitigation plan |
| MEDIUM | 30-50% | Medium | Team Lead | Bi-weekly reviews; monitoring |
| LOW | <30% | Low | Team | Monthly reviews; contingency plan |
8. Budget & Resource Summary
8.1 Budget Allocation by Phase
graph LR
A["Total Budget"] --> B["Phase 1: 15%"]
A --> C["Phase 2: 25%"]
A --> D["Phase 3: 22%"]
A --> E["Phase 4: 20%"]
A --> F["Phase 5: 12%"]
A --> G["Phase 6: 6%"]
B --> B1["$150K"]
C --> C1["$250K"]
D --> D1["$220K"]
E --> E1["$200K"]
F --> F1["$120K"]
G --> G1["$60K"]
style A fill:#fff3e0
style B fill:#ffe0b2
style C fill:#ffe0b2
style D fill:#ffe0b2
style E fill:#ffe0b2
style F fill:#ffe0b2
style G fill:#ffe0b2
Total Project Budget: $1,000,000
8.2 Resource Summary
| Phase | Duration | Team Size | FTE | Budget | Key Deliverables |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | 6 weeks | 8 | 8 | $150K | Architecture, Infrastructure, CI/CD |
| Phase 2 | 7 weeks | 12 | 12 | $250K | Voice Engine, NLP, Command Parser |
| Phase 3 | 8 weeks | 14 | 14 | $220K | Code Generator, IDE Integration, Git |
| Phase 4 | 7 weeks | 12 | 12 | $200K | Data Analysis, ML Registry, Jupyter |
| Phase 5 | 7 weeks | 10 | 10 | $120K | Collaboration, PM Integration, Comms |
| Phase 6 | 7 weeks | 16 | 16 | $60K | QA, Security, Deployment |
| TOTAL | 42 weeks | Peak: 16 | Avg: 12 | $1,000K | Production-ready system |
9. Success Metrics & KPIs
9.1 Project Success Metrics
graph TD
A["Project Success Metrics"] --> B["Schedule"]
A --> C["Budget"]
A --> D["Quality"]
A --> E["Performance"]
A --> F["User Satisfaction"]
B --> B1["On-time delivery: 100%"]
B --> B2["Milestone completion: 100%"]
C --> C1["Budget variance: <5%"]
C --> C2["Cost per feature: <$10K"]
D --> D1["Code coverage: >85%"]
D --> D2["Bug escape rate: <1%"]
D --> D3["Security vulnerabilities: 0 critical"]
E --> E1["Voice latency: <300ms"]
E --> E2["System uptime: >99.9%"]
E --> E3["Concurrent users: 5000+"]
F --> F1["User satisfaction: >4.5/5"]
F --> F2["Feature adoption: >80%"]
F --> F3["Support ticket resolution: <24h"]
style A fill:#e8f5e9
style B fill:#c8e6c9
style C fill:#c8e6c9
style D fill:#c8e6c9
style E fill:#c8e6c9
style F fill:#c8e6c9
9.2 Key Performance Indicators
| KPI | Target | Phase 1 | Phase 2 | Phase 3 | Phase 4 | Phase 5 | Phase 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schedule Adherence | 100% | 100% | 98% | 99% | 99% | 100% | 100% |
| Budget Variance | <5% | 2% | 3% | 4% | 3% | 2% | 1% |
| Code Coverage | >85% | 80% | 82% | 85% | 87% | 88% | 90% |
| Test Pass Rate | >98% | 95% | 97% | 98% | 99% | 99% | 100% |
| Defect Density | <5/KLOC | 8 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
| System Uptime | >99.5% | 99% | 99.2% | 99.5% | 99.6% | 99.7% | 99.9% |
| Performance | <500ms | 800ms | 600ms | 500ms | 400ms | 300ms | 250ms |
| Team Velocity | 50 pts | 45 | 52 | 54 | 56 | 55 | 54 |
| User Satisfaction | >4.5/5 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 4.2 | 4.6 |
10. Governance & Communication
10.1 Governance Structure
graph TD
A["Project Governance"] --> B["Executive Steering Committee"]
A --> C["Project Management Office"]
A --> D["Technical Steering Committee"]
B --> B1["Monthly reviews"]
B --> B2["Budget approval"]
B --> B3["Risk escalation"]
C --> C1["Weekly status"]
C --> C2["Sprint planning"]
C --> C3["Issue tracking"]
D --> D1["Technical decisions"]
D --> D2["Architecture reviews"]
D --> D3["Quality standards"]
style A fill:#e1f5fe
style B fill:#b3e5fc
style C fill:#b3e5fc
style D fill:#b3e5fc
10.2 Communication Plan
| Audience | Frequency | Format | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Executive Sponsors | Monthly | Status report, presentation | Project Manager |
| Project Team | Daily | Stand-up meeting (15 min) | Scrum Master |
| Stakeholders | Weekly | Status email, dashboard | Project Manager |
| Technical Team | Bi-weekly | Technical review | Tech Lead |
| Quality Team | Weekly | QA metrics review | QA Lead |
| DevOps Team | Daily | Infrastructure status | DevOps Lead |
Conclusion
This comprehensive development phase planning provides:
✅ Clear Timeline: 42-week project with 6 distinct phases
✅ Detailed Milestones: 7 major milestones with specific deliverables
✅ Resource Planning: Team structure, capacity planning, and skill matrix
✅ Sprint Planning: 6 sprints with detailed story breakdowns
✅ Release Strategy: 4 release versions (Alpha, Beta, RC, Production)
✅ Risk Management: Comprehensive risk register with mitigation strategies
✅ Success Metrics: Clear KPIs and success criteria for each phase
The plan balances aggressive timelines with realistic resource allocation, comprehensive risk mitigation, and quality assurance throughout the development lifecycle.
Project Data
Generated JSON file: voice-centric_software_development_and_data_science_agent_project_data.json
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1460
1461
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1513
1514
1515
1516
1517
1518
1519
1520
1521
1522
1523
1524
1525
1526
1527
1528
1529
1530
1531
1532
1533
1534
1535
1536
1537
1538
1539
1540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1560
1561
1562
1563
1564
1565
1566
1567
1568
1569
1570
1571
1572
1573
1574
1575
1576
1577
1578
1579
1580
1581
1582
1583
1584
1585
1586
1587
1588
1589
1590
1591
1592
1593
1594
1595
1596
1597
1598
1599
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1660
1661
1662
1663
1664
1665
1666
1667
1668
1669
1670
1671
1672
1673
1674
1675
1676
1677
1678
1679
1680
1681
1682
1683
1684
1685
1686
1687
1688
1689
1690
1691
1692
1693
1694
1695
1696
1697
1698
1699
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722
1723
1724
1725
1726
1727
1728
1729
1730
1731
1732
1733
1734
1735
1736
1737
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
1744
1745
1746
1747
1748
1749
1750
1751
1752
1753
1754
1755
1756
1757
1758
1759
1760
1761
1762
1763
1764
1765
1766
1767
1768
1769
1770
1771
1772
1773
1774
1775
1776
1777
1778
1779
1780
1781
1782
1783
1784
1785
1786
1787
1788
1789
1790
1791
1792
1793
1794
1795
1796
1797
1798
1799
1800
1801
1802
1803
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
1813
1814
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1860
1861
1862
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
1877
1878
1879
1880
1881
1882
1883
1884
1885
1886
1887
1888
1889
1890
1891
1892
1893
1894
1895
1896
1897
1898
1899
1900
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
1919
1920
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
2052
2053
2054
2055
2056
2057
2058
2059
2060
2061
2062
2063
2064
2065
2066
2067
2068
2069
2070
2071
2072
2073
2074
2075
2076
2077
2078
2079
2080
2081
2082
2083
2084
2085
2086
2087
2088
2089
2090
2091
2092
2093
2094
2095
2096
2097
2098
2099
2100
2101
2102
2103
2104
2105
2106
2107
2108
2109
2110
2111
2112
2113
2114
2115
2116
2117
2118
2119
2120
2121
2122
2123
2124
2125
2126
2127
2128
2129
2130
2131
2132
2133
2134
2135
2136
2137
2138
2139
2140
2141
2142
2143
2144
2145
2146
2147
2148
2149
2150
2151
2152
2153
2154
2155
2156
2157
2158
2159
2160
2161
2162
2163
2164
2165
2166
2167
2168
2169
2170
2171
2172
2173
2174
2175
2176
2177
2178
2179
2180
2181
2182
2183
2184
2185
2186
2187
2188
2189
2190
2191
2192
2193
2194
2195
2196
2197
2198
2199
2200
2201
2202
2203
2204
2205
2206
2207
2208
2209
2210
2211
2212
2213
2214
2215
2216
2217
2218
2219
2220
2221
2222
2223
2224
2225
2226
2227
2228
2229
2230
2231
2232
2233
2234
2235
2236
2237
2238
2239
2240
2241
2242
2243
2244
2245
2246
2247
2248
2249
2250
2251
2252
2253
2254
2255
2256
2257
2258
2259
2260
2261
2262
2263
2264
2265
2266
2267
2268
2269
2270
2271
2272
2273
2274
2275
2276
2277
2278
2279
2280
2281
2282
2283
2284
2285
2286
2287
2288
2289
2290
2291
2292
2293
2294
2295
2296
2297
2298
2299
2300
2301
2302
2303
2304
2305
2306
2307
2308
2309
2310
2311
2312
2313
2314
2315
2316
2317
2318
2319
2320
2321
2322
2323
2324
2325
2326
2327
2328
2329
2330
2331
2332
2333
2334
2335
2336
2337
2338
2339
2340
2341
2342
2343
2344
2345
2346
2347
2348
2349
2350
2351
2352
2353
2354
2355
2356
2357
2358
2359
2360
2361
2362
2363
2364
2365
2366
2367
2368
2369
2370
2371
2372
2373
2374
2375
2376
2377
2378
2379
2380
2381
2382
2383
2384
2385
2386
2387
2388
2389
2390
2391
2392
2393
2394
2395
2396
2397
2398
2399
2400
2401
2402
2403
2404
2405
2406
2407
2408
2409
2410
2411
2412
2413
2414
2415
2416
2417
2418
2419
2420
2421
2422
2423
2424
2425
2426
2427
2428
2429
2430
2431
2432
2433
2434
2435
2436
2437
2438
2439
2440
2441
2442
2443
2444
2445
2446
2447
2448
2449
2450
2451
2452
2453
2454
2455
2456
2457
2458
2459
2460
2461
2462
2463
2464
2465
2466
2467
2468
2469
2470
2471
2472
2473
2474
2475
2476
2477
2478
2479
2480
2481
2482
2483
2484
2485
2486
2487
2488
2489
2490
2491
2492
2493
2494
2495
2496
2497
2498
2499
2500
2501
2502
2503
2504
2505
2506
2507
2508
2509
2510
2511
2512
2513
2514
2515
2516
2517
2518
2519
2520
2521
2522
2523
2524
2525
2526
2527
2528
2529
2530
2531
2532
2533
2534
2535
2536
2537
2538
2539
2540
2541
2542
2543
2544
2545
2546
2547
2548
2549
2550
2551
2552
2553
2554
2555
2556
2557
2558
2559
2560
2561
2562
2563
2564
2565
2566
2567
2568
2569
2570
2571
2572
2573
2574
2575
2576
2577
2578
2579
2580
2581
2582
2583
2584
2585
2586
2587
2588
2589
2590
2591
2592
2593
2594
2595
2596
2597
2598
2599
2600
2601
2602
2603
2604
2605
2606
2607
2608
2609
2610
2611
2612
2613
2614
2615
2616
2617
2618
2619
2620
2621
2622
2623
2624
2625
2626
2627
2628
2629
2630
2631
2632
2633
2634
2635
2636
2637
2638
2639
2640
2641
2642
2643
2644
2645
2646
2647
2648
2649
2650
2651
2652
2653
2654
2655
2656
2657
2658
2659
2660
2661
2662
2663
2664
2665
2666
2667
2668
2669
2670
2671
2672
2673
2674
2675
2676
2677
2678
2679
2680
2681
2682
2683
2684
2685
2686
2687
2688
2689
2690
2691
2692
2693
2694
2695
2696
2697
2698
2699
2700
2701
2702
2703
2704
2705
2706
2707
2708
2709
2710
2711
2712
2713
2714
2715
2716
2717
2718
2719
2720
2721
2722
2723
2724
2725
2726
2727
2728
2729
2730
2731
2732
2733
2734
2735
2736
2737
2738
2739
2740
2741
2742
2743
2744
2745
2746
2747
2748
2749
2750
2751
2752
2753
2754
2755
2756
2757
2758
2759
2760
2761
2762
2763
2764
2765
2766
2767
2768
2769
2770
2771
2772
2773
2774
2775
2776
2777
2778
2779
2780
2781
2782
2783
2784
2785
2786
2787
2788
2789
2790
2791
2792
2793
2794
2795
2796
2797
2798
2799
2800
2801
2802
2803
2804
2805
2806
2807
2808
2809
2810
2811
2812
2813
2814
2815
2816
2817
2818
2819
2820
2821
2822
2823
2824
2825
2826
2827
2828
2829
2830
2831
2832
2833
2834
2835
2836
2837
2838
2839
2840
2841
2842
2843
2844
2845
2846
2847
2848
2849
2850
2851
2852
2853
2854
2855
2856
2857
2858
2859
2860
2861
2862
2863
2864
2865
2866
2867
2868
2869
2870
2871
2872
2873
2874
2875
2876
2877
2878
2879
2880
2881
2882
2883
2884
2885
2886
2887
2888
2889
2890
2891
2892
2893
2894
2895
2896
2897
2898
2899
2900
2901
2902
2903
2904
2905
2906
2907
2908
2909
2910
2911
2912
2913
2914
2915
2916
2917
2918
2919
2920
2921
2922
2923
2924
2925
2926
2927
2928
2929
2930
2931
2932
2933
2934
2935
2936
2937
2938
2939
2940
2941
2942
2943
2944
2945
2946
2947
2948
2949
2950
2951
2952
2953
2954
2955
2956
2957
2958
2959
2960
2961
2962
2963
2964
2965
2966
2967
2968
2969
2970
2971
2972
2973
2974
2975
2976
2977
2978
2979
2980
2981
2982
2983
2984
2985
2986
2987
2988
2989
2990
2991
2992
2993
2994
2995
2996
2997
2998
2999
3000
3001
3002
3003
3004
3005
3006
3007
3008
3009
3010
3011
3012
3013
3014
3015
3016
3017
3018
3019
3020
3021
3022
3023
3024
3025
3026
3027
3028
3029
3030
3031
3032
3033
3034
3035
3036
3037
3038
3039
3040
3041
3042
3043
3044
3045
3046
3047
3048
3049
3050
3051
3052
3053
3054
3055
3056
3057
3058
3059
3060
3061
3062
3063
3064
3065
3066
3067
3068
3069
3070
3071
3072
3073
3074
3075
3076
3077
3078
3079
3080
3081
3082
3083
3084
3085
3086
3087
3088
3089
3090
3091
3092
3093
3094
3095
3096
3097
3098
3099
3100
3101
3102
3103
3104
3105
3106
3107
3108
3109
3110
3111
3112
3113
3114
3115
3116
3117
3118
3119
3120
3121
3122
3123
3124
3125
3126
3127
3128
3129
3130
3131
3132
3133
3134
3135
3136
3137
3138
3139
3140
3141
3142
3143
3144
3145
3146
3147
3148
3149
3150
3151
3152
3153
3154
3155
3156
3157
3158
3159
3160
3161
3162
3163
3164
3165
3166
3167
3168
3169
3170
3171
3172
3173
3174
3175
3176
3177
3178
3179
3180
3181
3182
3183
3184
3185
3186
3187
3188
3189
3190
3191
3192
3193
3194
3195
3196
3197
3198
3199
3200
3201
3202
3203
3204
3205
3206
3207
3208
3209
3210
3211
3212
3213
3214
3215
3216
3217
3218
3219
3220
3221
3222
3223
3224
3225
3226
3227
3228
3229
3230
3231
3232
3233
3234
3235
3236
3237
3238
3239
3240
3241
3242
3243
3244
3245
3246
3247
3248
3249
3250
3251
3252
3253
3254
3255
3256
3257
3258
3259
3260
3261
3262
3263
3264
3265
3266
3267
3268
3269
3270
3271
3272
3273
3274
3275
3276
3277
3278
3279
3280
3281
3282
3283
3284
3285
3286
3287
3288
3289
3290
3291
3292
3293
3294
3295
3296
3297
3298
3299
3300
3301
3302
3303
3304
3305
3306
3307
3308
3309
3310
3311
3312
3313
3314
3315
3316
3317
3318
3319
3320
3321
3322
3323
3324
3325
3326
3327
3328
3329
3330
3331
3332
3333
3334
3335
3336
3337
3338
3339
3340
3341
3342
3343
3344
3345
3346
3347
3348
3349
3350
3351
3352
3353
3354
3355
3356
3357
3358
3359
3360
3361
3362
3363
3364
3365
{
"project_name" : "Voice-Centric Software Development and Data Science Agent",
"description" : "A sophisticated AI agent system that leverages voice interfaces to facilitate software development and data science workflows. The system enables developers and data scientists to interact through natural language voice commands to design architectures, write code, analyze data, manage projects, and collaborate on technical tasks. The agent integrates with development tools, data science platforms, and project management systems to provide a seamless voice-driven development experience.",
"created_date" : "2025-11-26T13:57:19.619589155",
"epics" : [ {
"id" : "EPIC-UC",
"name" : "User Features",
"description" : "Core user-facing functionality based on use cases",
"priority" : "High",
"status" : "Planned",
"story_points" : 1050
}, {
"id" : "EPIC-ARCH",
"name" : "Architecture & Infrastructure",
"description" : "Set up system architecture and infrastructure",
"priority" : "High",
"status" : "Planned",
"story_points" : 21
}, {
"id" : "EPIC-TEST",
"name" : "Quality Assurance",
"description" : "Testing and quality assurance activities",
"priority" : "High",
"status" : "Planned",
"story_points" : 13
}, {
"id" : "EPIC-001",
"name" : "Epic EPIC-001",
"description" : "Auto-extracted epic from analysis",
"priority" : "Medium",
"status" : "Planned",
"story_points" : 13
}, {
"id" : "EPIC-002",
"name" : "Epic EPIC-002",
"description" : "Auto-extracted epic from analysis",
"priority" : "Medium",
"status" : "Planned",
"story_points" : 13
}, {
"id" : "EPIC-003",
"name" : "Epic EPIC-003",
"description" : "Auto-extracted epic from analysis",
"priority" : "Medium",
"status" : "Planned",
"story_points" : 13
}, {
"id" : "EPIC-004",
"name" : "Epic EPIC-004",
"description" : "Auto-extracted epic from analysis",
"priority" : "Medium",
"status" : "Planned",
"story_points" : 13
}, {
"id" : "EPIC-005",
"name" : "Epic EPIC-005",
"description" : "Auto-extracted epic from analysis",
"priority" : "Medium",
"status" : "Planned",
"story_points" : 13
}, {
"id" : "EPIC-006",
"name" : "Epic EPIC-006",
"description" : "Auto-extracted epic from analysis",
"priority" : "Medium",
"status" : "Planned",
"story_points" : 13
}, {
"id" : "EPIC-007",
"name" : "Epic EPIC-007",
"description" : "Auto-extracted epic from analysis",
"priority" : "Medium",
"status" : "Planned",
"story_points" : 13
}, {
"id" : "EPIC-008",
"name" : "Epic EPIC-008",
"description" : "Auto-extracted epic from analysis",
"priority" : "Medium",
"status" : "Planned",
"story_points" : 13
}, {
"id" : "EPIC-009",
"name" : "Epic EPIC-009",
"description" : "Auto-extracted epic from analysis",
"priority" : "Medium",
"status" : "Planned",
"story_points" : 13
}, {
"id" : "EPIC-010",
"name" : "Epic EPIC-010",
"description" : "Auto-extracted epic from analysis",
"priority" : "Medium",
"status" : "Planned",
"story_points" : 13
}, {
"id" : "EPIC-011",
"name" : "Epic EPIC-011",
"description" : "Auto-extracted epic from analysis",
"priority" : "Medium",
"status" : "Planned",
"story_points" : 13
}, {
"id" : "EPIC-012",
"name" : "Epic EPIC-012",
"description" : "Auto-extracted epic from analysis",
"priority" : "Medium",
"status" : "Planned",
"story_points" : 13
} ],
"releases" : [ {
"id" : "REL-1",
"name" : "MVP Release",
"version" : "1.0.0",
"target_date" : "2026-01-07",
"description" : "Minimum Viable Product release with core functionality",
"epic_ids" : [ "EPIC-UC", "EPIC-ARCH", "EPIC-TEST", "EPIC-001", "EPIC-002", "EPIC-003", "EPIC-004" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "REL-2",
"name" : "Feature Complete Release",
"version" : "1.1.0",
"target_date" : "2026-02-18",
"description" : "Full feature release with all planned functionality",
"epic_ids" : [ "EPIC-UC", "EPIC-ARCH", "EPIC-TEST", "EPIC-001", "EPIC-002", "EPIC-003", "EPIC-004", "EPIC-005", "EPIC-006", "EPIC-007", "EPIC-008", "EPIC-009", "EPIC-010", "EPIC-011", "EPIC-012" ],
"status" : "Planned"
} ],
"sprints" : [ {
"id" : "SPRINT-1",
"name" : "Sprint 1",
"number" : 1,
"start_date" : "2025-11-26",
"end_date" : "2025-12-10",
"goals" : [ "Complete sprint 1 deliverables" ],
"capacity_points" : 40,
"task_ids" : [ "TASK-100", "TASK-101", "TASK-102", "TASK-103", "TASK-104", "TASK-105", "TASK-106", "TASK-107", "TASK-108", "TASK-109" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "SPRINT-2",
"name" : "Sprint 2",
"number" : 2,
"start_date" : "2025-12-10",
"end_date" : "2025-12-24",
"goals" : [ "Complete sprint 2 deliverables" ],
"capacity_points" : 40,
"task_ids" : [ "TASK-110", "TASK-111", "TASK-112", "TASK-113", "TASK-114", "TASK-115", "TASK-116", "TASK-117", "TASK-118", "TASK-119", "TASK-120" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "SPRINT-3",
"name" : "Sprint 3",
"number" : 3,
"start_date" : "2025-12-24",
"end_date" : "2026-01-07",
"goals" : [ "Complete sprint 3 deliverables" ],
"capacity_points" : 40,
"task_ids" : [ "TASK-121", "TASK-122", "TASK-123", "TASK-124", "TASK-125", "TASK-126", "TASK-127", "TASK-128", "TASK-129" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "SPRINT-4",
"name" : "Sprint 4",
"number" : 4,
"start_date" : "2026-01-07",
"end_date" : "2026-01-21",
"goals" : [ "Complete sprint 4 deliverables" ],
"capacity_points" : 40,
"task_ids" : [ "TASK-130", "TASK-131", "TASK-132", "TASK-133", "TASK-134", "TASK-135", "TASK-136", "TASK-137", "TASK-138", "TASK-139" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "SPRINT-5",
"name" : "Sprint 5",
"number" : 5,
"start_date" : "2026-01-21",
"end_date" : "2026-02-04",
"goals" : [ "Complete sprint 5 deliverables" ],
"capacity_points" : 40,
"task_ids" : [ "TASK-140", "TASK-141", "TASK-142", "TASK-143", "TASK-144", "TASK-145", "TASK-146", "TASK-147", "TASK-148", "TASK-149", "TASK-150", "TASK-151" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "SPRINT-6",
"name" : "Sprint 6",
"number" : 6,
"start_date" : "2026-02-04",
"end_date" : "2026-02-18",
"goals" : [ "Complete sprint 6 deliverables" ],
"capacity_points" : 40,
"task_ids" : [ "TASK-152", "TASK-153", "TASK-154", "TASK-155", "TASK-156", "TASK-157", "TASK-158", "TASK-159", "TASK-160" ],
"status" : "Planned"
} ],
"tasks" : [ {
"id" : "TASK-100",
"title" : "Implement FR-001",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-001",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-1",
"priority" : "High",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-001 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-001" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-101",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-1",
"priority" : "High",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-102",
"title" : "Implement FR-003",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-003",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-1",
"priority" : "High",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-003 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-003" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-103",
"title" : "Implement FR-004",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-004",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-1",
"priority" : "High",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-004 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-004" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-104",
"title" : "Implement FR-005",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-005",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-1",
"priority" : "High",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-005 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-005" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-105",
"title" : "Implement FR-006",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-006",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-1",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-006 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-006" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-106",
"title" : "Implement FR-007",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-007",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-1",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-007 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-007" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-107",
"title" : "Implement FR-008",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-008",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-1",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-008 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-008" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-108",
"title" : "Implement FR-009",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-009",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-1",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-009 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-009" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-109",
"title" : "Implement FR-010",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-010",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-1",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-010 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-010" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-110",
"title" : "Implement FR-011",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-011",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-2",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-011 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-011" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-111",
"title" : "Implement FR-012",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-012",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-2",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-012 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-012" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-112",
"title" : "Implement FR-013",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-013",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-2",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-013 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-013" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-113",
"title" : "Implement FR-014",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-014",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-2",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-014 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-014" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-114",
"title" : "Implement FR-015",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-015",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-2",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-015 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-015" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-115",
"title" : "Implement FR-016",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-016",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-2",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-016 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-016" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-116",
"title" : "Implement FR-017",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-017",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-2",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-017 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-017" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-117",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-2",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-118",
"title" : "Implement FR-019",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-019",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-2",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-019 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-019" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-119",
"title" : "Implement FR-020",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-020",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-2",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-020 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-020" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-120",
"title" : "Implement FR-001",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-001",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-2",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-001 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-001" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-121",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-3",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-122",
"title" : "Implement FR-003",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-003",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-3",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-003 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-003" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-123",
"title" : "Implement FR-003",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-003",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-3",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-003 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-003" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-124",
"title" : "Implement FR-010",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-010",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-3",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-010 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-010" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-125",
"title" : "Implement FR-011",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-011",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-3",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-011 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-011" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-126",
"title" : "Implement FR-005",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-005",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-3",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-005 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-005" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-127",
"title" : "Implement FR-012",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-012",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-3",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-012 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-012" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-128",
"title" : "Implement FR-016",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-016",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-3",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-016 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-016" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-129",
"title" : "Implement FR-017",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-017",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-3",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-017 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-017" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-130",
"title" : "Implement FR-016",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-016",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-4",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-016 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-016" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-131",
"title" : "Implement FR-015",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-015",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-4",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-015 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-015" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-132",
"title" : "Implement FR-015",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-015",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-4",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-015 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-015" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-133",
"title" : "Implement FR-016",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-016",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-4",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-016 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-016" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-134",
"title" : "Implement FR-016",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-016",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-4",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-016 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-016" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-135",
"title" : "Implement FR-015",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-015",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-4",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-015 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-015" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-136",
"title" : "Implement FR-016",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-016",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-4",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-016 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-016" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-137",
"title" : "Implement FR-015",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-015",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-4",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-015 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-015" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-138",
"title" : "Implement FR-016",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-016",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-4",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-016 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-016" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-139",
"title" : "Implement FR-015",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-015",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-4",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-015 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-015" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-140",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-5",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-141",
"title" : "Implement FR-001",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-001",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-5",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-001 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-001" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-142",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-5",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-143",
"title" : "Implement FR-011",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-011",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-5",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-011 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-011" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-144",
"title" : "Implement FR-007",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-007",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-5",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-007 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-007" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-145",
"title" : "Implement FR-010",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-010",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-5",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-010 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-010" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-146",
"title" : "Implement FR-006",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-006",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-5",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-006 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-006" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-147",
"title" : "Implement FR-007",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-007",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-5",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-007 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-007" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-148",
"title" : "Implement FR-008",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-008",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-5",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-008 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-008" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-149",
"title" : "Implement FR-003",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-003",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-5",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-003 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-003" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-150",
"title" : "Implement FR-010",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-010",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-5",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-010 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-010" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-151",
"title" : "Implement FR-014",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-014",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-5",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-014 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-014" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-152",
"title" : "Implement FR-001",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-001",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-6",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-001 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-001" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-153",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-6",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-154",
"title" : "Implement FR-003",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-003",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-6",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-003 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-003" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-155",
"title" : "Implement FR-004",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-004",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-6",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-004 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-004" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-156",
"title" : "Implement FR-005",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-005",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-6",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-005 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-005" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-157",
"title" : "Implement FR-006",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-006",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-6",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-006 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-006" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-158",
"title" : "Implement FR-007",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-007",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-6",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-007 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-007" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-159",
"title" : "Implement FR-008",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-008",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-6",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-008 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-008" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-160",
"title" : "Implement FR-009",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-009",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"sprint_id" : "SPRINT-6",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-009 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-009" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-161",
"title" : "Implement FR-010",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-010",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-010 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-010" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-162",
"title" : "Implement FR-011",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-011",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-011 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-011" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-163",
"title" : "Implement FR-012",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-012",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-012 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-012" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-164",
"title" : "Implement FR-013",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-013",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-013 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-013" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-165",
"title" : "Implement FR-014",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-014",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-014 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-014" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-166",
"title" : "Implement FR-015",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-015",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-015 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-015" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-167",
"title" : "Implement FR-016",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-016",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-016 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-016" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-168",
"title" : "Implement FR-017",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-017",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-017 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-017" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-169",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-170",
"title" : "Implement FR-019",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-019",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-019 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-019" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-171",
"title" : "Implement FR-020",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-020",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-020 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-020" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-172",
"title" : "Implement FR-001",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-001",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-001 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-001" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-173",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-174",
"title" : "Implement FR-003",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-003",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-003 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-003" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-175",
"title" : "Implement FR-004",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-004",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-004 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-004" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-176",
"title" : "Implement FR-005",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-005",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-005 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-005" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-177",
"title" : "Implement FR-006",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-006",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-006 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-006" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-178",
"title" : "Implement FR-007",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-007",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-007 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-007" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-179",
"title" : "Implement FR-008",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-008",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-008 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-008" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-180",
"title" : "Implement FR-009",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-009",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-009 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-009" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-181",
"title" : "Implement FR-010",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-010",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-010 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-010" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-182",
"title" : "Implement FR-011",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-011",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-011 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-011" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-183",
"title" : "Implement FR-012",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-012",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-012 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-012" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-184",
"title" : "Implement FR-013",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-013",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-013 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-013" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-185",
"title" : "Implement FR-014",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-014",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-014 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-014" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-186",
"title" : "Implement FR-015",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-015",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-015 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-015" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-187",
"title" : "Implement FR-016",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-016",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-016 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-016" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-188",
"title" : "Implement FR-017",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-017",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-017 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-017" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-189",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-190",
"title" : "Implement FR-019",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-019",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-019 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-019" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-191",
"title" : "Implement FR-020",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-020",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-020 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-020" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-192",
"title" : "Implement FR-001",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-001",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-001 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-001" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-193",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-194",
"title" : "Implement FR-017",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-017",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-017 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-017" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-195",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-196",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-197",
"title" : "Implement FR-003",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-003",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-003 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-003" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-198",
"title" : "Implement FR-006",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-006",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-006 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-006" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-199",
"title" : "Implement FR-010",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-010",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-010 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-010" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-200",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-201",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-202",
"title" : "Implement FR-004",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-004",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-004 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-004" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-203",
"title" : "Implement FR-011",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-011",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-011 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-011" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-204",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-205",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-206",
"title" : "Implement FR-005",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-005",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-005 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-005" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-207",
"title" : "Implement FR-013",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-013",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-013 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-013" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-208",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-209",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-210",
"title" : "Implement FR-010",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-010",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-010 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-010" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-211",
"title" : "Implement FR-003",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-003",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-003 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-003" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-212",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-213",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-214",
"title" : "Implement FR-011",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-011",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-011 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-011" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-215",
"title" : "Implement FR-004",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-004",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-004 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-004" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-216",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-217",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-218",
"title" : "Implement FR-012",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-012",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-012 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-012" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-219",
"title" : "Implement FR-005",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-005",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-005 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-005" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-220",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-221",
"title" : "Implement FR-003",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-003",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-003 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-003" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-222",
"title" : "Implement FR-006",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-006",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-006 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-006" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-223",
"title" : "Implement FR-007",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-007",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-007 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-007" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-224",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-225",
"title" : "Implement FR-009",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-009",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-009 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-009" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-226",
"title" : "Implement FR-008",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-008",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-008 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-008" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-227",
"title" : "Implement FR-006",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-006",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-006 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-006" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-228",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-229",
"title" : "Implement FR-008",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-008",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-008 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-008" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-230",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-231",
"title" : "Implement FR-009",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-009",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-009 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-009" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-232",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-233",
"title" : "Implement FR-009",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-009",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-009 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-009" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-234",
"title" : "Implement FR-006",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-006",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-006 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-006" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-235",
"title" : "Implement FR-003",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-003",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-003 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-003" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-236",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-237",
"title" : "Implement FR-010",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-010",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-010 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-010" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-238",
"title" : "Implement FR-015",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-015",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-015 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-015" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-239",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-240",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-241",
"title" : "Implement FR-012",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-012",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-012 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-012" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-242",
"title" : "Implement FR-005",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-005",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-005 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-005" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-243",
"title" : "Implement FR-013",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-013",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-013 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-013" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-244",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-245",
"title" : "Implement FR-013",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-013",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-013 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-013" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-246",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-247",
"title" : "Implement FR-004",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-004",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-004 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-004" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-248",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-249",
"title" : "Implement FR-014",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-014",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-014 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-014" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-250",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-251",
"title" : "Implement FR-007",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-007",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-007 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-007" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-252",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-253",
"title" : "Implement FR-014",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-014",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-014 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-014" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-254",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-255",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-256",
"title" : "Implement FR-015",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-015",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-015 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-015" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-257",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-258",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-259",
"title" : "Implement FR-015",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-015",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-015 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-015" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-260",
"title" : "Implement FR-016",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-016",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-016 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-016" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-261",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-262",
"title" : "Implement FR-016",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-016",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-016 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-016" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-263",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-264",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-265",
"title" : "Implement FR-016",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-016",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-016 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-016" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-266",
"title" : "Implement FR-015",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-015",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-015 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-015" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-267",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-268",
"title" : "Implement FR-017",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-017",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-017 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-017" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-269",
"title" : "Implement FR-016",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-016",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-016 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-016" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-270",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-271",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-272",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-273",
"title" : "Implement FR-019",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-019",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-019 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-019" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-274",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-275",
"title" : "Implement FR-019",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-019",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-019 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-019" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-276",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-277",
"title" : "Implement FR-020",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-020",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-020 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-020" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-278",
"title" : "Implement FR-001",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-001",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-001 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-001" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-279",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-280",
"title" : "Implement FR-020",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-020",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-020 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-020" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-281",
"title" : "Implement FR-001",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-001",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-001 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-001" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-282",
"title" : "Implement FR-001",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-001",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-001 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-001" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-283",
"title" : "Implement FR-002",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-002",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-002 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-002" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-284",
"title" : "Implement FR-003",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-003",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-003 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-003" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-285",
"title" : "Implement FR-006",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-006",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-006 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-006" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-286",
"title" : "Implement FR-010",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-010",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-010 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-010" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-287",
"title" : "Implement FR-004",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-004",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-004 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-004" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-288",
"title" : "Implement FR-011",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-011",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-011 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-011" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-289",
"title" : "Implement FR-005",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-005",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-005 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-005" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-290",
"title" : "Implement FR-012",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-012",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-012 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-012" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-291",
"title" : "Implement FR-013",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-013",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-013 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-013" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-292",
"title" : "Implement FR-006",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-006",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-006 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-006" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-293",
"title" : "Implement FR-003",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-003",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-003 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-003" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-294",
"title" : "Implement FR-007",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-007",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-007 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-007" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-295",
"title" : "Implement FR-009",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-009",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-009 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-009" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-296",
"title" : "Implement FR-007",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-007",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-007 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-007" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-297",
"title" : "Implement FR-006",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-006",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-006 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-006" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-298",
"title" : "Implement FR-008",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-008",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-008 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-008" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-299",
"title" : "Implement FR-009",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-009",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-009 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-009" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-300",
"title" : "Implement FR-008",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-008",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-008 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-008" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-301",
"title" : "Implement FR-009",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-009",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-009 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-009" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-302",
"title" : "Implement FR-009",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-009",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-009 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-009" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-303",
"title" : "Implement FR-006",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-006",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-006 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-006" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-304",
"title" : "Implement FR-007",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-007",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-007 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-007" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-305",
"title" : "Implement FR-008",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-008",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-008 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-008" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-306",
"title" : "Implement FR-010",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-010",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-010 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-010" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-307",
"title" : "Implement FR-003",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-003",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-003 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-003" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-308",
"title" : "Implement FR-011",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-011",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-011 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-011" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-309",
"title" : "Implement FR-004",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-004",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-004 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-004" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-310",
"title" : "Implement FR-012",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-012",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-012 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-012" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-311",
"title" : "Implement FR-005",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-005",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-005 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-005" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-312",
"title" : "Implement FR-013",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-013",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-013 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-013" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-313",
"title" : "Implement FR-005",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-005",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-005 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-005" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-314",
"title" : "Implement FR-014",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-014",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-014 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-014" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-315",
"title" : "Implement FR-007",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-007",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-007 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-007" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-316",
"title" : "Implement FR-015",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-015",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-015 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-015" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-317",
"title" : "Implement FR-016",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-016",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-016 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-016" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-318",
"title" : "Implement FR-016",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-016",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-016 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-016" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-319",
"title" : "Implement FR-017",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-017",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-017 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-017" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-320",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-321",
"title" : "Implement FR-017",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-017",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-017 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-017" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-322",
"title" : "Implement FR-016",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-016",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-016 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-016" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-323",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-324",
"title" : "Implement FR-018",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-018",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 8,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-018 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-018" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-325",
"title" : "Implement FR-019",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-019",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 2,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-019 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-019" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-326",
"title" : "Implement FR-020",
"description" : "Implementation task for requirement FR-020",
"type" : "story",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 5,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "FR-020 is fully implemented", "All test cases pass" ],
"labels" : [ "requirement", "FR-020" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-001",
"title" : "Task TASK-001",
"description" : "Auto-extracted task from analysis",
"type" : "task",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "Task completed successfully" ],
"labels" : [ "auto-generated" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-002",
"title" : "Task TASK-002",
"description" : "Auto-extracted task from analysis",
"type" : "task",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "Task completed successfully" ],
"labels" : [ "auto-generated" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-003",
"title" : "Task TASK-003",
"description" : "Auto-extracted task from analysis",
"type" : "task",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "Task completed successfully" ],
"labels" : [ "auto-generated" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-004",
"title" : "Task TASK-004",
"description" : "Auto-extracted task from analysis",
"type" : "task",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "Task completed successfully" ],
"labels" : [ "auto-generated" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-005",
"title" : "Task TASK-005",
"description" : "Auto-extracted task from analysis",
"type" : "task",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "Task completed successfully" ],
"labels" : [ "auto-generated" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-006",
"title" : "Task TASK-006",
"description" : "Auto-extracted task from analysis",
"type" : "task",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "Task completed successfully" ],
"labels" : [ "auto-generated" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-007",
"title" : "Task TASK-007",
"description" : "Auto-extracted task from analysis",
"type" : "task",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "Task completed successfully" ],
"labels" : [ "auto-generated" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-008",
"title" : "Task TASK-008",
"description" : "Auto-extracted task from analysis",
"type" : "task",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "Task completed successfully" ],
"labels" : [ "auto-generated" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-009",
"title" : "Task TASK-009",
"description" : "Auto-extracted task from analysis",
"type" : "task",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "Task completed successfully" ],
"labels" : [ "auto-generated" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-010",
"title" : "Task TASK-010",
"description" : "Auto-extracted task from analysis",
"type" : "task",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "Task completed successfully" ],
"labels" : [ "auto-generated" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-011",
"title" : "Task TASK-011",
"description" : "Auto-extracted task from analysis",
"type" : "task",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "Task completed successfully" ],
"labels" : [ "auto-generated" ]
}, {
"id" : "TASK-012",
"title" : "Task TASK-012",
"description" : "Auto-extracted task from analysis",
"type" : "task",
"epic_id" : "EPIC-UC",
"priority" : "Medium",
"story_points" : 3,
"status" : "Backlog",
"acceptance_criteria" : [ "Task completed successfully" ],
"labels" : [ "auto-generated" ]
} ],
"milestones" : [ {
"id" : "MS-1",
"name" : "Architecture Complete, 2024-02-05, 0d",
"target_date" : "2025-12-24",
"description" : "Project milestone 1",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 1 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-2",
"name" : "Voice Engine Ready, 2024-03-28, 0d",
"target_date" : "2026-01-21",
"description" : "Project milestone 2",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 2 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-3",
"name" : "Dev Features Complete, 2024-05-23, 0d",
"target_date" : "2026-02-18",
"description" : "Project milestone 3",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 3 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-4",
"name" : "Data Science Ready, 2024-07-18, 0d",
"target_date" : "2026-03-18",
"description" : "Project milestone 4",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 4 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-5",
"name" : "Collaboration Ready, 2024-09-12, 0d",
"target_date" : "2026-04-15",
"description" : "Project milestone 5",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 5 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-6",
"name" : "Production Ready, 2024-11-14, 0d",
"target_date" : "2026-05-13",
"description" : "Project milestone 6",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 6 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-7",
"name" : "Architecture & Infrastructure Complete, 2024-02-19",
"target_date" : "2026-06-10",
"description" : "Project milestone 7",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 7 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-8",
"name" : "Voice Engine MVP Ready, 2024-03-28, 0d",
"target_date" : "2026-07-08",
"description" : "Project milestone 8",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 8 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-9",
"name" : "Development Features Complete, 2024-05-23, 0d",
"target_date" : "2026-08-05",
"description" : "Project milestone 9",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 9 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-10",
"name" : "Data Science Features Complete, 2024-07-18, 0d",
"target_date" : "2026-09-02",
"description" : "Project milestone 10",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 10 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-11",
"name" : "Collaboration Features Complete, 2024-09-10, 0d",
"target_date" : "2026-09-30",
"description" : "Project milestone 11",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 11 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-12",
"name" : "UAT Complete, 2024-10-24, 0d",
"target_date" : "2026-10-28",
"description" : "Project milestone 12",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 12 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-13",
"name" : "Production Ready, 2024-11-14, 0d",
"target_date" : "2026-11-25",
"description" : "Project milestone 13",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 13 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-14",
"name" : ":crit, m1, 2024-02-19, 1d",
"target_date" : "2026-12-23",
"description" : "Project milestone 14",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 14 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-15",
"name" : ":crit, m2, 2024-03-28, 1d",
"target_date" : "2027-01-20",
"description" : "Project milestone 15",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 15 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-16",
"name" : ":crit, m3, 2024-05-23, 1d",
"target_date" : "2027-02-17",
"description" : "Project milestone 16",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 16 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-17",
"name" : ":crit, m4, 2024-07-18, 1d",
"target_date" : "2027-03-17",
"description" : "Project milestone 17",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 17 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-18",
"name" : ":crit, m5, 2024-09-10, 1d",
"target_date" : "2027-04-14",
"description" : "Project milestone 18",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 18 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-19",
"name" : ":crit, m6, 2024-10-24, 1d",
"target_date" : "2027-05-12",
"description" : "Project milestone 19",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 19 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-20",
"name" : ":crit, m7, 2024-11-14, 1d",
"target_date" : "2027-06-09",
"description" : "Project milestone 20",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 20 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-21",
"name" : "Architecture & Infrastructure Complete**",
"target_date" : "2027-07-07",
"description" : "Project milestone 21",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 21 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-22",
"name" : "Voice Engine MVP Ready**",
"target_date" : "2027-08-04",
"description" : "Project milestone 22",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 22 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-23",
"name" : "Development Features Complete**",
"target_date" : "2027-09-01",
"description" : "Project milestone 23",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 23 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-24",
"name" : "Data Science Features Complete**",
"target_date" : "2027-09-29",
"description" : "Project milestone 24",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 24 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-25",
"name" : "Collaboration Features Complete**",
"target_date" : "2027-10-27",
"description" : "Project milestone 25",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 25 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-26",
"name" : "UAT Complete**",
"target_date" : "2027-11-24",
"description" : "Project milestone 26",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 26 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
}, {
"id" : "MS-27",
"name" : "Production Ready**",
"target_date" : "2027-12-22",
"description" : "Project milestone 27",
"deliverables" : [ "Phase 27 deliverables complete" ],
"status" : "Planned"
} ],
"dependencies" : [ {
"id" : "DEP-1",
"source_id" : "EPIC-001",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-007",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "depends_on"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-2",
"source_id" : "EPIC-001",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-002",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "blocks"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-3",
"source_id" : "EPIC-001",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-003",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "blocks"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-4",
"source_id" : "EPIC-001",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-004",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "blocks"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-5",
"source_id" : "EPIC-001",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-005",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "blocks"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-6",
"source_id" : "EPIC-001",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-006",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "blocks"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-7",
"source_id" : "EPIC-001",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-012",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "blocks"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-8",
"source_id" : "EPIC-002",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-001",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "depends_on"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-9",
"source_id" : "EPIC-002",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-003",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "blocks"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-10",
"source_id" : "EPIC-002",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-004",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "blocks"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-11",
"source_id" : "EPIC-002",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-005",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "blocks"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-12",
"source_id" : "EPIC-002",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-006",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "blocks"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-13",
"source_id" : "EPIC-002",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-011",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "relates_to"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-14",
"source_id" : "EPIC-003",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-002",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "depends_on"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-15",
"source_id" : "EPIC-003",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-005",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "blocks"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-16",
"source_id" : "EPIC-003",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-006",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "blocks"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-17",
"source_id" : "EPIC-003",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-012",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "blocks"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-18",
"source_id" : "EPIC-003",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-009",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "relates_to"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-19",
"source_id" : "EPIC-003",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-010",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "relates_to"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-20",
"source_id" : "EPIC-004",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-002",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "depends_on"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-21",
"source_id" : "EPIC-004",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-008",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "relates_to"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-22",
"source_id" : "EPIC-004",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-009",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "relates_to"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-23",
"source_id" : "EPIC-004",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-010",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "relates_to"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-24",
"source_id" : "EPIC-004",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-011",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "relates_to"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-25",
"source_id" : "EPIC-005",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-003",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "depends_on"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-26",
"source_id" : "EPIC-005",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-006",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "blocks"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-27",
"source_id" : "EPIC-005",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-008",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "relates_to"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-28",
"source_id" : "EPIC-005",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-009",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "relates_to"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-29",
"source_id" : "EPIC-006",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-003",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "depends_on"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-30",
"source_id" : "EPIC-006",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-005",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "depends_on"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-31",
"source_id" : "EPIC-006",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-007",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "depends_on"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-32",
"source_id" : "EPIC-006",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-008",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "relates_to"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-33",
"source_id" : "EPIC-006",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-009",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "relates_to"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-34",
"source_id" : "EPIC-007",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-008",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "relates_to"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-35",
"source_id" : "EPIC-008",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-009",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "relates_to"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-36",
"source_id" : "EPIC-011",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-008",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "relates_to"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-37",
"source_id" : "EPIC-012",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-009",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "depends_on"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-38",
"source_id" : "EPIC-012",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-010",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "relates_to"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-39",
"source_id" : "EPIC-001",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-002",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "blocks"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-40",
"source_id" : "EPIC-002",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-003",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "blocks"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-41",
"source_id" : "EPIC-003",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-005",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "blocks"
}, {
"id" : "DEP-42",
"source_id" : "EPIC-005",
"source_type" : "epic",
"target_id" : "EPIC-006",
"target_type" : "epic",
"dependency_type" : "blocks"
} ]
}
Document Generation Complete
Total Time: 1224.318s
Completed: 2025-11-26 13:57:19
