As automation and artificial intelligence approach the potential for material post-scarcity, existing economic theory provides limited guidance for understanding the resulting equilibrium conditions and transition dynamics. This proposal outlines a comprehensive computational modeling framework to analyze post-scarcity economic systems, focusing on persistent constraints, emergent equilibria, and the evolutionary dynamics of institutional arrangements. Through agent-based modeling, game-theoretic analysis, and evolutionary algorithms, we aim to identify stable configurations for post-material-scarcity societies and the conditions under which they emerge.

1. Introduction and Motivation

The prospect of post-scarcity economics—where material goods become so abundant that traditional economic models based on resource limitations break down—is transitioning from science fiction to policy consideration. Current discussions of automation, universal basic income, and technological unemployment reflect growing recognition that fundamental economic assumptions may soon require revision. Recent advances in physics research, particularly in areas like quantum-coherent nuclear fusion ( see superfluid_fusion_proposal.md), suggest that material abundance through novel energy and matter synthesis may arrive sooner than anticipated.

However, existing analyses of post-scarcity scenarios suffer from three critical limitations: (1) insufficient attention to persistent constraints that remain binding even under material abundance, (2) lack of systematic analysis of possible equilibrium configurations and their stability properties, and (3) inadequate consideration of transition dynamics and path-dependent outcomes.

This research addresses these gaps through computational modeling that explicitly incorporates multiple constraint types, allows for complex agent interactions, and simulates evolutionary dynamics across institutional arrangements.

2. Theoretical Framework

2.1 Persistent Constraints in Post-Scarcity Systems

Even under conditions of material abundance, several categories of constraints remain binding:

Thermodynamic Constraints: Energy requirements and entropy increases create ultimate limits on production and consumption, establishing boundary conditions for any post-scarcity equilibrium.

Spatial and Temporal Constraints: Location-specific advantages, proximity effects, and finite human lifespans create inherent scarcities that resist technological solutions.

Cognitive and Attention Constraints: Human information processing limitations, decision-making capacity, and attention spans create bottlenecks in complex systems.

Coordination and Information Constraints: The computational and social overhead of coordinating large-scale systems creates scaling limits independent of material resources.

Social and Preference Constraints: Status competition, cultural heterogeneity, and preference evolution create new forms of scarcity and conflict even under material abundance. Information and Reality Constraints: As explored in [managedmanaged_reality_paper.mdnagement of information environments becomes a critical constraint in post-scarcity societies where traditional economic pressures no longer organize human behavior.

2.2 Potential Equilibrium Configurations

Our framework considers multiple possible equilibrium states:

3.1 Agent-Based Modeling Framework

Core Architecture: Heterogeneous agents with differentiated utility functions, cognitive constraints, and resource endowments operating within multi-layer networks representing economic exchange, social influence, and information flows. Technical Implementation:

Agent Types:

Agent Decision Models:

Environmental Dynamics:

Simulation Parameters:

3.2 Game-Theoretic Submodels

Status Competition Games: Positional goods markets with relative utility functions, tournament models for attention allocation, and costly signaling equilibria in social hierarchies. Mathematical Formulation:

Coordination Games: Public goods provision mechanisms, commons management with monitoring and sanctioning, and coalition formation for infrastructure investment. Implementation Details:

Innovation Races: R&D competition with spillover effects, intellectual property strategy choices, and network effects in platform adoption. Algorithmic Approach:

3.3 Evolutionary Dynamics

Cultural Evolution Module: Group selection on institutional arrangements, individual learning and social transmission of economic strategies, and mutation operators introducing novel organizational forms. Technical Implementation:

Economic System Evolution: Fitness landscapes for different economic arrangements, migration between communities with different systems, and analysis of hybrid system emergence and stability. Computational Methods:

3.4 Multi-Scale Implementation

Micro-level: Individual decision-making with bounded rationality and preference updating Meso-level: Market clearing mechanisms, network formation, and institutional emergence Macro-level: System-wide resource flows, technological progress, and equilibrium dynamics Integration Architecture:

4. Research Questions

  1. Constraint Analysis: Which categories of constraints remain most binding under different levels of material abundance, and how do constraint interactions shape equilibrium possibilities?

  2. Equilibrium Stability: Under what conditions do different post-scarcity equilibria emerge and remain stable? What factors drive transitions between equilibrium states?

  3. Transition Dynamics: How do path-dependent factors and existing institutional arrangements influence trajectories toward post-scarcity conditions?

  4. Fragmentation vs. Convergence: Do competitive pressures force convergence toward single economic systems, or can multiple arrangements coexist stably?

  5. Inequality Evolution: How do different forms of inequality (material, status, attention, spatial) evolve under post-scarcity conditions?

  6. Innovation Incentives: What mechanisms maintain innovation incentives in the absence of material scarcity and traditional profit motives?

5. Expected Outcomes

5.1 Theoretical Contributions

5.2 Policy Implications

5.3 Methodological Advances

6. Validation and Robustness

Historical Benchmarking: Validation against known economic transitions (agricultural to industrial, planned to market economies) Data Sources and Methods:

Experimental Validation: Cross-validation with laboratory experiments on resource allocation behavior and existing UBI pilot program data Experimental Design:

Sensitivity Analysis: Systematic parameter sweeps across automation rates, resource abundance levels, initial inequality distributions, and network topologies Technical Approach:

Robustness Testing: Analysis of model behavior under extreme parameter values and structural assumptions Methodological Details:

7. Timeline and Milestones

Year 1: Framework development, basic agent-based model implementation, initial constraint analysis Year 2: Game-theoretic submodel integration, evolutionary dynamics implementation, preliminary results Year 3: Full model validation, policy scenario analysis, manuscript preparation

8. Broader Impacts

This research addresses fundamental questions about the future of human economic organization as technological capabilities approach post-scarcity conditions. The computational framework will provide policymakers, technologists, and social planners with tools to anticipate and influence transitions toward more equitable and stable economic arrangements.

Beyond immediate policy applications, this work contributes to our understanding of complex adaptive systems, institutional evolution, and the relationship between technological capability and social organization. The methodological innovations may prove applicable to other domains involving large-scale social and economic transitions.

As societies worldwide grapple with automation, inequality, and technological displacement, systematic analysis of post-scarcity possibilities becomes increasingly crucial for informed decision-making about our economic future.